| Revision as of 22:08, 4 June 2009 editVirtualSteve (talk | contribs)24,139 edits →June 2009: wrong template← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 23:37, 5 June 2009 edit undoVirtualSteve (talk | contribs)24,139 editsm Reverted edits by VirtualSteve (talk) to last version by Kingevil | ||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| go ruin someone else's article.] (]) 20:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | go ruin someone else's article.] (]) 20:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == ] and ] issues - you have been blocked. == | |||
| I have blocked you for your continued personal attacks against Jprw. I have also noted your ownership problems at Alice Cooper - and you should read up on the link I provide in the subject heading. You need to learn that no-one owns any article on wikipedia. Please be aware that if you return to attack other editors or pursue "ownership" of any article in the manner shown at Alice Cooper you will be reblocked.--] <sup>]</sup> 22:07, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == June 2009 == | |||
Latest revision as of 23:37, 5 June 2009
Please see my comments in the reinstated (perfectly good) edits on the Alice Cooper page. I don't know what your reasoning is for removing perfectly good references. In addition, when you post your own reference (re: the so called "demented clown" eyes) it is completely irrelevant. Please also try to not resort to launching ad hominem attacks as this is usually a sure sign that you are losing an argument. Your whole approach to the Alice Cooper page seems to be excessively subjective and not up to Misplaced Pages's overall standards for editing, although I do agree that with some of your edits the Alice Cooper page has been improved Jprw (talk) 10:26, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
go ruin someone else's article.Kingevil (talk) 20:32, 3 June 2009 (UTC)