| Revision as of 14:54, 14 May 2009 editUntwirl (talk | contribs)1,493 edits →Consolation barnstar: new section← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 03:43, 20 November 2018 edit undoLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,308,451 editsm Archiving 2 discussion(s) to User talk:N-HH/Archive 7) (bot | ||
| (758 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | |archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}} | ||
| |maxarchivesize = 75K | |maxarchivesize = 75K | ||
| |counter = |
|counter = 7 | ||
| |algo = old( |
|algo = old(14d) | ||
| |archive = User talk: |
|archive = User talk:N-HH/Archive %(counter)d | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{archives|auto=yes}} | {{archives|auto=yes}} | ||
| ==Notification== | |||
| == Arbitrator questions on ] == | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. | |||
| == Another Daily Mail RfC == | |||
| Kirill has asked some questions ]. You are invited to respond. --] (]) 22:23, 16 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| There is an RfC at ]. Your input would be most helpful. --] (]) 12:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| == Soapbox Sam and HenryGarden1000 == | |||
| A ] has been filed with the ] that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at ], and indicate whether you agree or disagree to mediation. If you are unfamiliar with mediation on Misplaced Pages, please refer to ]. Please note there is a seven-day time limit on all parties responding to the request with their agreement or disagreement to mediation. Thanks, ]<sub><font size="-2">]</font></sub> 01:45, 27 April 2009 (UTC) | |||
| Because you posted on the talk pages of both of these editors, and queried whether they were the same person, I'm sending you to an SPI I just opened about them. ] (]) 05:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination of ] for deletion == | |||
| <div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ''']''' is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to ] or whether it should be ]. | |||
| The article will be discussed at ] until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. | |||
| == Request for mediation not accepted == | |||
| Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd notice --> ] (]) 08:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC) | |||
| {| class="messagebox" style="width:90%" | |||
| :This is literally everything that's wrong with Misplaced Pages in one example from one editor: opening a deletion page for one of the oldest and best-known wineries in Spain, with a 150-year history, while to argue *against* deleting a pointless, partisan gossip page about an ephemeral political "controversy" based ultimately on one Daily Mail report misrepresenting a one-off event five years after everyone else had long since forgotten about it. Absolute fuckwittery and pathetic and transparent political point-scoring at the same time. <small>'''] ]/]'''</small> 22:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC) | |||
| |- | |||
| |] | |||
| |A ] to which you were are a party was ] and has been delisted.<br>You can find more information on the case subpage, ].</center><br> | |||
| ::''For the Mediation Committee,'' ''']''' 18:10, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| <small><center>This message delivered by ], an automated bot account ] by the ] to perform case management.<br>If you have questions about this bot, please ].</small></center> | |||
| == ArbCom 2018 election voter message == | |||
| == arb case == | |||
| {{Ivmbox|Hello, N-HH. Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| Based on the evidence I saw, I think you are right. However, have been involved in a previous case, I think the some of the heads are to get to the real problem makers, the partisan edit warriors. In a previous case, I have been 'reminded' or something like that, suddenly inserted at the last minute after most arbs had already voted without a single ref presented for what I supposedly had done wrong. I have asked multiple times for those refs, and never received them. As for the why, I have my suspicion, but won't voice that. -- ] <sup>]</sup> 20:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| == Celebration cancelled == | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. ] (]) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) | |||
| OK, no round of wiki-beer for us. I thought a majority was needed for the proposals to pass, but apparently you got thrown in the same ditch as the rest of us. Sorry for dragging you into this. Unless the guidelines amnesty is granted (and I don't have extremely high hopes), I will probably not volunteer much more of my precious time to this ungrateful project. Are you going to apply? ] (]) 23:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| |Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}} | |||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2018/Coordination/MMS/08&oldid=866998273 --> | |||
| == ] == | |||
| This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. {{User|Canadian Monkey}}, {{User|G-Dett}}, {{User|MeteorMaker}}, {{User|Nickhh}}, {{User|Nishidani}}, {{User|NoCal100}}, and {{User|Pedrito}} are prohibited from editing any Arab-Israeli conflict-related article/talk page or discussing on the dispute anywhere else on the project. {{admin|Jayjg}} is also prohibited from editing in the area of conflict, and he is stripped of his status as a ] and any and all associated privileged access, including the ] and ] tools and the '']'', '']'', and '']'' mailing lists. Jayjg is also thanked for his years of service. | |||
| After six months, these editors may individually ask the ] to lift their editing restrictions after demonstrating commitment to the goals of Misplaced Pages and ability to work constructively with other editors. However, restrictions may be temporarily suspended for the exclusive purpose of participating in the ] for this area. | |||
| In the meantime, the community is strongly urged to pursue current discussions to come to a definitive consensus on the preferred current and historical names of the region that is the source of conflict in this case. Note that this must be consistent with current Misplaced Pages guidelines on ], a ], and ]. This decision will be appended onto this case within two months from the close of the case. | |||
| For the Arbitration Committee, '''<font face="times new roman">]]</font>''' 17:33, 12 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ''']''' | |||
| == The Independent == | |||
| I believe your participation in that article's Talk page violates the conditions of your topic ban, and have asked for clarification ]. ] (]) 14:19, 13 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| *Please note the arbitration ruling states "For the purposes of editing restrictions in this case, the "area of conflict" shall be defined as it was defined in the Palestine-Israel articles case, encompassing the entire set of Arab-Israeli conflict-related articles, broadly interpreted, '''as well as any edits on the subject of the Palestine/Israel dispute on any other article or talk page''', or any other page throughout the project." Basically, all the sanctioned editors need to stay well away from I-P issues and find something else to do. If you want to discuss the circulation figures for ], be my guest, but once you start in on their coverage of I-P issues, you've violated your topic ban. Blocking is the next step. Thanks. ] 16:15, 13 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ==Notice, warning on your arbcom ban== | |||
| Per that discussion, please consider this an official administrative warning--you are barred from any discussion or edits broadly construed of anything to do with the I/P conflicts. Should you edit these areas in any way again, you can and will be blocked 24 hours for your next edit after this notification. Apologies. <font color="0D670D" face="Georgia, Helvetica">]</font> (<font color="#156917">]</font>)(<font color="#156917">]</font>) 16:13, 13 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I have noted this at ]. Thank you. <font color="0D670D" face="Georgia, Helvetica">]</font> (<font color="#156917">]</font>)(<font color="#156917">]</font>) 16:17, 13 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Consolation barnstar == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | To: "The Gang of Five" | |||
| For hours of fruitless effort trying to protect Misplaced Pages from nationalist bias. Although you have been sanctioned unfairly, your thoughtful arguments and dogged research have given the community a strong background of information to draw on when denouncing future attempts to portray ideology as fact. ](]) 14:54, 14 May 2009 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
Latest revision as of 03:43, 20 November 2018
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Notification
There is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Another Daily Mail RfC
There is an RfC at Talk:Daily Mail#Request for comment: Other criticisms section. Your input would be most helpful. --Guy Macon (talk) 12:24, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Soapbox Sam and HenryGarden1000
Because you posted on the talk pages of both of these editors, and queried whether they were the same person, I'm sending you this link to an SPI I just opened about them. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:33, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Bodegas Marqués de Murrieta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Icewhiz (talk) 08:06, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
- This is literally everything that's wrong with Misplaced Pages in one example from one editor: opening a deletion page for one of the oldest and best-known wineries in Spain, with a 150-year history, while diving in to argue *against* deleting a pointless, partisan gossip page about an ephemeral political "controversy" based ultimately on one Daily Mail report misrepresenting a one-off event five years after everyone else had long since forgotten about it. Absolute fuckwittery and pathetic and transparent political point-scoring at the same time. N-HH talk/edits 22:23, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
Hello, N-HH. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)