Misplaced Pages

User talk:AnnaFrance: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:54, 23 August 2008 editAnnaFrance (talk | contribs)6,815 edits Removed top box← Previous edit Latest revision as of 10:32, 3 October 2021 edit undoMalnadachBot (talk | contribs)11,637,095 editsm Fixed Lint errors in signatures. (Task 2)Tag: AWB 
(45 intermediate revisions by 23 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Wikibreak|]|in October if things go well.}}

{{message|User:AnnaFrance}} {{message|User:AnnaFrance}}


{{Archives|collapsed=yes|image=none|search=no}}
== Welcome ==

<!-- Template from Template:Welcomeg -->
== Best wishes ==
{| style="background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;" cellpadding="0"

|style="border:1px solid #084080; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top; color:#000000;"|
I just saw that you were taking a wikibreak and your comment on the Toy Story page. I hope everything turns out all right, and no need to worry about PLC... it'll always be here. Best wishes, --] (]) 16:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA; padding:0;"

| <div style="margin:0; background-color:#CEF2E0; font-family:sans-serif; border:1px solid #084080; text-align:left; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top:0.2em; padding-bottom:0.2em;">Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}! ] to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for ] to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out ''Getting Help'' below, ask me on {{#if: JamieS93|]|my talk page}}, or place '''{{tl|helpme}}''' on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to ] on talk pages by clicking ] or using four tildes (<nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the ] field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! ]] 17:04, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
== ] ==
|}

{| width="100%" style="background-color:#F5FFFA;"
|style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | ]
{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"
|rowspan="2" |
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting started</div>
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Reviewers Award'''
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ] • ] • ]
* How to: ] • ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Getting help</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
* ] • ]
* ]
* ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Policies and guidelines</div>
|-
| style="color:#000"|
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ]
<hr />
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
|- |-
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thank you for all your hard work on ]. The article would not have made featured status without you! ] (]) 01:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)
|} |}

|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

{| width="100%" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="5" style="vertical-align:top; background-color:#F5FFFA"

! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">The community</div>
I saw you're on a WikiBreak and may not see this for a while, but I wanted to express my gratitude for the assistance you provided in copy editing ]. The article is now a featured article, in large part due to your assistance. I am thankful for your help! Cheers! ] (]) 01:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

== Hey there ==

Hi, I just noticed you at ] and thought your copyediting standards must by high. Anyways, I was wondering if you could please have a go at ]. The prose isn't the best, but I've referenced most of it and I could be getting it in at GAC shortly. Thank you. :) ] (]) 15:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

== Concerning the ] ==

(the RfDs have already run their course)

===RfD nomination of ]===
I have nominated {{la|Navy of Sudan}} for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. ] (]) 00:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

===RfD nomination of ]===
I have nominated {{la|Navy of Belarus}} for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at ]. Thank you. ] and his otters • <sup>(] • ] • ])</sup> 16:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

=== Navy redirects ===

We've been "bluelinking" the ] links in the basic topic country lists, by creating redirects for them, even for the countries that have no navy.

There's been a little controversy over the navy redirects for the landlocked countries (many of which have no navy), as you can see above. But it's all been worked out. Each country with no navy gets a redirect to wherever it is reported that it has no navy, or failing that, to its "military of" article.

The country lists are coming along slowing but surely. It shouldn't take too much longer before they will be complete enough to move into article space (!), but I can still use all the help I can get. (hint hint).

] 20:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


We could sure use your help in bluelinking the links in these lists (each link appears in one of the various country basic topic lists):
* ]<br>
* ]<br>
* ]

To bluelink them, create a redirect to wherever the information is covered. If there is no entity, redirect to where that is (or should be) covered.

If you have any questions, please contact me.
] 20:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

== The Scott Mills Show Copyedit ==

Hi.

When you return from your break, could you please take a look at ] as it needs a copyedit.

Thanks, ] ] 13:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)
== ] ==
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};"
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''Rajaraja Chola Award'''
|- |-
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Hi Anna. Just to say you've done a wonderful job with your edits to the article over the past few months - it flows much more smoothly now, and is a much better article for the work you've done. ] smiles in delight.] (]) 02:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
|style="color:#000"|
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ]
<hr />
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Writing articles</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ] • ]
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
* ] • ]
|-
! <div style="margin: 0; background-color:#084080; font-family: sans-serif; font-size:120%; font-weight:bold; border:1px solid #CEF2E0; text-align:left; color:#FFC000; padding-left:0.4em; padding-top: 0.2em; padding-bottom: 0.2em;">Miscellaneous</div>
|-
|style="color:#000"|
* ] • ] • ]
* Clean up: ] - ] - ]
* ] • ]
* ] • ] • ]
|-
|}
|} |}
|}<!--Template:Welcomeg-->


== Adoption == == Copyedit help ==


Hi there. I'm wondering if you might have time to help copyediting ]. It's currently and some concerns about prose have been brought up. I've gone over ] but I feel I am too close to the text (being the primary contributor) to be able to take an objective eye and work out the kinks. ] recommended you as an experienced copyeditor, so I'm hoping you might have time to lend an eye to the article if you're back from your Wikibreak. Thanks very much for your consideration. --] (]) 23:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
{{Adoptoffer|Save the humans}} <font color="8B4513" face="comic sans ms" size="2">]]</font> 18:27, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
<br><br>
==Hello==


== humble request for copyediting help ==
Okay, to answer you questions and give you a little bit of a head start. (Excuse me if I ramble a bit, I have been going all day and am just about to get some sleep.) As far as working with the LoC goes, just jump right in. Find an article that you want to copyedit and start working on it. If you are having trouble with it or want a second opinion on it then ask another one of the active LoCE members or let me know and I will take a look at it. When you are done with it and satisfied that it is completely edited, then removed the copyedit template at the top of the page and move on to the next one.


{{User|Wandalstouring}} sent me to you for advice on copyediting, after I mangled the 'Late Roman Army' page. Would you be so kind as to drop me a line when you return from Wikibreak? ] (]) 13:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
Don't think that this is the only work open to you though. Be sure to look around and try out many different part of the project. There's no reason to limit yourself to mainspace either, there are a great many tasks available in projectspace, such as ]. I am definitely going to point something out early on, and that is to choose tasks based on where you want to go in the future with Misplaced Pages. Right or wrong, and I happen to think its wrong, there are a number of areas where participation is either damaging or necessary if you have your eyes set on becoming an administrator in the future. I know that it is a little early to give that a lot of consideration, but the unfortunate thing is that to get to that point you need to be at least a little bit politically-minded.


== Help needed: ] ==
I have no interest in going any further than I am right now. I'm an administrator and quite simply I don't have time for anything more than what I'm currently doing. This gives me a rather liberating freedom to cut through the crap and say things like they are, you might want to step a little more lightly :). That is not something you want to worry too much about right now, just something you want to keep in mind.


]
For now, try out copyediting a little bit and maybe check out the "things to do" section of the ] I will talk to you some more tomorrow. Let me know if you need help with anything. ] 05:57, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
I found you at the now defunct ], and I am really hoping that you can help the article. The article failed ] mostly because of irregularities in citation format. But, it also needs a brush up on the copy and a proof reading job. Sorry for dropping in uninvited, but would you consider helping it, please? ]<sup>(] • ])</sup> 00:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)


== Outline of Knowledge / Geography WikiProject Collaboration: Country outlines ==
:I've been looking at the article on ], and I can't find anything really wrong with it. It has been marked for a lack of in-text citations, yet it uses the Harvard, author-date referencing system well and consistently. While not ideal, I thought the author's choice was to be respected unless used improperly or inconsistently. Several sections are marked for copy-edit, yet I find nothing wrong there either. The only complaint I can see with the article is its technical style, but it's difficult to remove technicalities from what is fundamentally a technical article.


As you probably remember, last spring we started work on the "Geography and places" branch of ]. (WikiProject Lists of basic topics has been renamed to ]). The geography branch is in the form of a set of outline pages including one for every present-day nation or state in the world. That's 247 pages! This has been a huge undertaking, involving dozens of editors using advanced wiki-tools.
:OK, back to me talking. Normally the above paragraph would go on the article's talk page, right? Would I be overstepping myself in making these comments? Even worse--would I be overly bold to remove the various templates that I had issue with? (Is that how they're referred to? Templates?) Is it better to go ahead and follow my instincts and let someone revert me if appropriate, or would it be better to simply suggest this on the talk page? --] (]) 18:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


These pages have come a long way, and it won't be long before the whole set is complete enough to be moved to article space into the encyclopedia for the benefit of all. But there's still a lot of work left, and we could use all the help we can get!
::I would certainly make your opinion known on the article. If you feel that there is nothing that needs to be done to copyedit the article, then ] and remove the tags on the article. The worst thing that can happen is that the person who placed the tag there will put it back again. The citation thing is a different story altogether. First of all, someone shouldn't be putting a copyedit tag on an article because it doesn't have sources, any that you find that have been tagged for this purpose you should remove immediately. But there is (what I consider) to be a half-assed de facto consensus when it comes to inline citations. While it is technically proper to use Harvard citations, the inline method is preferred and you will definitely not see an article passing GA or FA without inline citations. (something I learned when nominating ]. ] 21:23, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


While some editors prefer to work on one country at a time, most of our team members take on a particular entry and complete it across all the pages. This has come to be our standard type of task. To facilitate this process, we apply tools such as ], ], and ], all of which can be used to process a large number of pages in various (direct or indirect) ways.
== Peer review request ==


In case you are interested in what we've been up to, here's a progress report:
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I noticed you recently joined the League of Copyeditors. Do you have an interest in peer reviewing some articles? If so, please visit ]. I actually have some articles up for Peer review (some of which I have been working on quite a bit). Please provide feedback for ] if you are interested. Let me know if you need any help. Thanks! — ] (]) 13:48, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


Lately, development has been slow but continuous:
== Red links ==


On our recruiting initiative, ] has done a fantastic job on the images for the awards we'll be using for our project's collaborations and contests. We now have 3 awards: a medal, a trophy, and a race ribbon. They all look ''tight''. The trophy needs a small adjustment, but other than that, all 3 award images are complete and ready to use to create awards with.
When I come across red links, assuming I have no plans to create such an article, should I leave them as is? --] (]) 19:37, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
:Use your own judgment. If it seems as though an article is likely or even possible, go ahead and leave them. If it is something that is obviously never going to have an article like ], then go ahead and remove the Wikilink. ] 20:02, 5 May 2008 (UTC)


Spartaz has warned us of (threatened to take) G4 (speedy delete) action if we run a competition that resembles the previously deleted Awards Center page. So whatever we do, any contests we run must differ substantially from the methods used there.
== My first revert ==


One type of competition I've been exploring is "edit racing". I'm in the process of working the bugs out of this concept - the first race didn't work as expected - you see, because we only had an award for first place, so the opponent didn't think it worthwhile to continue once it was clear who the winner would be. And since editors are in different time zones and usually need to start the race at different times, we need to base winning on personal start times - he who completes his assigned edits in the least time (rather than first), wins. And last but not least is quality control. What good is racing if the participants' edits are ripe with errors? So I'll be exploring possibilities such as using a referee (assigned to oversee a particular race), having participants watching each other for errors to knock them back, etc. I'm not sure yet.
I found my way to ], which is very interesting, and stumbled on a brand-new edit that obviously needed to be removed. I reverted the article and left a warning on the user's talk page. Could you please take a look at the ] article and see if I handled this appropriately? I would greatly appreciate any comments you might have. --] (]) 19:41, 6 May 2008 (UTC)


] has been applying his bot expertise to filling in blanks in the country outlines (the population and area entries). I'm amazed at the number of edits he pumps out each day on a myriad of projects - ours makes up but a small time slice of his activity, and yet he has saved us many hours of manual work. Perhaps we should look into how he gets so much done. :)
:Absolutely. I also like that you left the warning on that user's talk page. That is the best way we have of tracking vandalism and knowing what step to take next. You used a templated message so I assume that you have already figured out how that works. Remember that after receiving a vandalism4, or final warning, you can report them to ] where an administrator will take whatever action is appropriate to deal with the chronic vandal. If vandalism patrolling turns out to be something that you enjoy, you might want to look into using some type of utility to make the work a little bit easier on you. I personally prefer ], which has gotten to be a little bit old school, but it is what I am used to and what I prefer. Most of the new vandalism patrollers seem to be using ] ] 21:04, 6 May 2008 (UTC)


] has chosen to work on specific outlines, and has taken on ], ], ], and ]. He also has been keen on noticing and reporting design issues pertaining to the whole set of country outlines. Keep up the good work!
::I really have no special interest yet. I love to learn new things, and Misplaced Pages is a banquet. While I was checking out the newbie contributions I also found someone who had made 2 very nice edits already, so I read the material at the Welcome Committee pages and gave the new person the same nice welcome I received. I've loaded Lupin's anti-vandal tool script to see what that does, and I'm looking forward to participating in some AfD discussions as well. There is such a <i>lot</i> to do here! --] (])


] is in charge of capitals, adding them to all the outlines. He is also our first race winner. Check out the award on his user pages.
:::If you are looking for something that you might find interesting. (I find it downright boring, but it's what my daughter is doing right now and she seems to be having a good itme with it.) Disambiguation pages are in need of cleanup and there's probably enough work for a half dozen people to go nonstop for a month to clean it all up. Those pages are often very inconsistent and more often then not they don't conform to ]. Just something to think about. ] 08:55, 7 May 2008 (UTC)


In case you didn't know, this project has expanded to include work on any and all sets of pages represented on the country outlines. Once the set of country outlines go live (in article space), traffic will likely increase for all the links included on them. The quality and usefulness of those pages will reflect heavily on the country outlines. The outlines, which are essentially lists of links, are only as good as the links they present, and therefore we've branched out to solve the biggest problems with those as well. So far, we've taken on:
==Vacation==
* The creation of disambiguation pages for country adjectivals ("]", "]", "]", etc.) We're about half done with these.
* Wikifying the ] statistics on the "demographics of" country pages. We've been renaming those sections to provide a key string that AWB can use for targetting (for skipping and filtering). Once that's done, we'll be able to break the clean-up down into simple AWB search/replace tasks, because we'll be able to target just those pages that include the CIA stuff.
* We've also been renaming the "Cuisine of" articles to their adjectival forms ("Chinese cuisine", "Italian cuisine", etc.), for consistency and because the adjective-based terms are generally the most commonly-used names for those cuisine types.


] and ] have been helping out with the "demographics of" pages mentioned above.
After tomorrow I will be on vacation for two weeks. If you have any questions while I'm gone, I've got a list of a few really good admins that are almost perpetually online.


And we have a couple speed addicts (addicted to wiki-velocity, not drugs)...
]
]
]


Both ] and ] prefer (and excel at) simple AWB search/replaces. Robert hasn't actually joined our team yet, but he has been helping out quite a bit from the sidelines (via the ] page. Unfortunately, there has recently been a non-AWB chore that has been holding things up on the AWB front - an edit to all the headings which had to be reverted before too many new edits were made, because any new edits would make the reversion more difficult. The headings have been restored, so now the way is clear for AWB operations, and there are many search/replace tasks in the queue. AWB assignments have started again!
Any of them would be receptive to helping you with any questions that might come up.] 15:35, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


There's a similar bottleneck on the "Demographics of" pages (the "keying" mentioned above), but that's almost cleared too. :)
:That's very nice of you to give me the names of some admins I can bother. I appreciate it. I hope you have a really nice time on your vacation! --] (]) 20:21, 8 May 2008 (UTC)


With my internet access somewhat crippled as of late, I've been finding it difficult to keep up with you guys. However, I expect to be accessing a Linky-capable workstation on a faster server (I'm on it right now, as you can probably tell from my contributions list for the past couple of days), and so I should really pick up speed. Feels goooooood. :)
== ] ==


Recruiting has been a bit slow (but steady), due in part to my crippled access, and because we've been waiting for the images for the awards to be completed. I expect the team to grow more rapidly as the bottlenecks are removed.
Hi! I saw your !vote agreeing with my stance on Bimini Bay. However, I now realise my position was flawed, and have changed my !vote accordingly. As it could look like you are agreeing with my new vote, I thought I had best let you know and give you the opportunity to modify your stance. ] (]) 11:54, 15 May 2008 (UTC)


Well that's what's been happenin', and here's what's in the pipeline...
==Blue message box==


We've got a long list of entries that need to be completed across all the outlines and related page sets. If you would like to dive in with advanced wiki-tools to process this whole set of pages on one or more tasks, drop me a note!
Hi! I could have dscribed it, but it is easier just to do it for you! (grin) If you are interested in the source code, just click the "edit this page" tab at the top of the page, and look at the very top line. ] (]) 14:47, 17 May 2008 (UTC)


As for me, I'm about to begin work on a set of lists that corresponds to all the standard links on the country outlines, and these will be presented on the ] which will be organized exactly like the country outlines. Aside from being an extremely useful navigation aid, it will allow editors to easily see the state of country coverage on Misplaced Pages - each list will be one link-set, and each list can be used with our wiki-tools to process the pages listed. I'll provide you with a link once I get up to speed on this.
== CSS file on ] ==


In the meantime, keep in touch!
Hi. I'm not sure what you intended at ] (it doesn't look much like a ] file) but it is currently showing up at ]. —] (]) 03:16, 18 May 2008 (UTC)


Cheers,
:I've just worked through this issue with MZMcBride, who has edited the file. huggle.css is the configuration file for the ] anti-vandal tool. The options in the file are used to specify which templates are to be included but Anna added them with the brackets round them, thus transcluding the templates and making the page show up in CSD stuff.


] 00:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
:Anna: You don't need to use the CSD templates in the list as there is already a built in CSS function in huggle. If you want to add any other templates, make sure you don't use the brackets round them as this transcludes them and breaks stuff. See ] for an example of how to do it properly.


== Removal from PR Volunteer List ==
:Cheers, ] (]) 05:49, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
Due to your notice that you are on an extended wikibreak, and lack of activity within the past six months, you have been removed from the list of available editors at ]. This is done to ensure those seeking volunteers are only directed to active editors who can respond relatively quickly to requests. If you decide to return to editing Misplaced Pages, feel free to readd your name to this list. -- ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 03:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)


== ''Do not read this one'' - The Hunt - Outline of knowledge WikiProject - 04/17/2009 ==
::Oh! Thanks for clearing that up, Astral. The Huggle docs just said to put the name of the CSD template, so I just assumed they meant ''with'' the brackets. Ah, now I know. (Sorry to answer you here, but I assumed from your talk page that you don't want anyone editing it. --] (]) 05:57, 18 May 2008 (UTC)


While surveying libraries, their outline-related resources, and our coverage of them, I came across something funny...
== American Graffiti copy edit ==


]
AnnaFrance,
Please go ahead and make edits. I think there are numerous areas where the article can be strengthened (sentence and paragraph structure, grammar (e.g. parallelism (major issues), present participle usage, passive voice, split infinitives, incorrect or misplaced punctuation, etc.). I've made some, but have been unable to work more on it during the week. There's some room for improvement in the writing (I think the GA listing may have been premature), plus the addition of music and themes sections would be good.


Do you think they'd like this one at ]?
I'd say the Peer Review process is complete, and editors should use it as a to-do list. I'll jump on it some more this weekend. I look forward to working with you.<br /><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px; color:#000000;"><b>]</b> | ]</span> 17:56, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
(Nope. They didn't.) &nbsp; &nbsp; :)


=== Libraries ===
:AnnaFrance, your edits to AG look good. Thanks for jumping into it. I'll try to find time this weekend to work on it as well.<br /><span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva; font-size:15px; color:#000000;"><b>]</b> | ]</span> 19:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)


For months, I've been sitting at a terminal in one of the largest libraries in the country, and I haven't even looked around at the available resources.
== Knights Inn ==


Until a few days ago.
Thank you.
...njbob <small>—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 02:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


I'm overwhelmed.
== Copy-edit Request ==


When compared to libraries, Misplaced Pages is small. (See , and turn to page 617).
Hi there. Seems like you've been learning a lot (and much faster than I did, too). When you have the time, could you please copy-edit both ] and ]?... And please feel free to ask me any questions you might have about Wiki stuff. Thanks. — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 17:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
:I think by spit shine, Laser brain means "polish". He thinks a copyedit would be good, so go ahead and make some edits if you feel the need. If I think they are not beneficial, I can always revert your edits. ;-) — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 20:57, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
:Your edits are great, so far. Please keep it up! I always make so many tiny grammatical mistakes... — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 08:27, 24 May 2008 (UTC)


But is that a fair comparison?
==Macintosh Classic/PowerBook 100==
Hi Anna. Not to worry. I'm all done with my tiny tweaks to the article, and I won't be cross-editing. Thanks for letting me know and for saving my edits. Good luck with the re-writes. ] (]) 22:47, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
:Looks much better now, thanks again. When you have the time, please copyedit ] also (similar article to the Classic one in style). Thanks! — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 07:35, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
::Thanks for starting on ] so soon. I have a lot of other article rewrites in the works, so I'll keep you posted on what I am doing. — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 20:02, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
:::Do you have any opinion on what the first sentence of the lead should say, should it be ...is a PowerBook or ...was? I always use was because this stuff was manufactured/sold in the past (even though it still exists). — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 07:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
::::Accuracy kept, so far. Your edits were fine. Please keep up the great work. Thanks again. — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 18:32, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
:::::Good point, though ] is over 10 years old. — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 07:39, 27 May 2008 (UTC)


Yes.
== ] book title ==


Why?
There's a note to AWB users ''right next to'' the word "Compleat" that explains that this is the correct spelling of the word in the title of the book. Please try to be more careful with the drive-by copyediting. -] (]) 16:30, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
:Whether you ignored the note because you were banging through edits on autopilot, or you ignored the note because you thought you knew better than the cited source, you still ignored the note. - ] (]) 17:18, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
::The person who didn't even bother to read the text she was editing is lecturing others to "read more carefully"? I did read your comments carefully, which is how I noticed that you didn't even acknowledge what your real mistake was: You didn't bother to read the note that was trying to prevent you from introducing an error into the article. That note is there for a reason; if you can't be bothered to read it, you are disrespecting the work others have done to keep the article correct. Yes, I'm investing a little time into explaining this, because some things are ''worth'' spending time on. And if it helps you slow down from your race through the alphabet with your new toy, and ''read'' before you edit, maybe others won't have to spend as much time correcting your "corrections". - ] (]) 19:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)


Because we have growth potential. :)
== Grater -> greater in ] article ==


And we cover everything, including libraries!
Your edit summary for this ] is "(Typo fixing, typos fixed: grater → greater using AWB)", which would not be correct. However, the only change shown by comparing versions is ] -> ]d, which is fine, but not as advertised. -] (]) 14:59, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
:Sorry, but I'm not familiar with the tool. In an only slightly related issue, I'd love for someone that bills themselves as a copy editor to take a hard look at ]. We've managed to get it to GA status, but it appears to be too far out of the way to get real criticism. -] (]) 16:22, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


Guess what else I found?
== Wow ==


=== Hunting for outlines ===
You have certainly been busy while I've been away. Just got done looking at all that you have done in the last three weeks. Keep up the good work. ] 16:02, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


I began to study libraries and librarians, since they are experts in organizing knowledge. And of course I turned to Misplaced Pages to see what we had on the things I came across...
:Welcome back! Hope you and your family had a great vacation. I've been (mostly) staying out of trouble here at WP, still figuring things out. I've done "ride-alongs" with New Page Patrol, where I watch pages being tagged to learn how experienced patrollers do it, and reading the RfA questions-answers-comments page, which is fascinating. Anyway, here are two questions I have:


And while doing so I kept running into outlines on Misplaced Pages that are not (yet) part of the Outline of knowledge.
* I was recently asked to copy-edit the ] article, which I did (along with a handful of other editors). It appears to have been marked as an FA last night. Does that mean I get to count it as an "FA I have worked on"?


When I come across non-OOK outlines, generally I rename them, and reformat them to our standard outline format. But there is the occasional exception.
* There are many, many tags. Too many. How do you keep them straight, know which one is appropriate for each circumstance and how to apply it? Article tags and Talk page tags. Is it just an experience and memory thing?


Here are some outlines I just added:
: --] (]) 17:36, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


# ] --> ] (it converted great)
::As far as FA's go, there are really no rules for that. There are no set rules for putting up a userbox saying that you helped get an article to FA status. Personally, I feel like I haven't contributed to the article if I haven't made actual content additions. I spent two months copyediting the hell out of ] to get it through FA, but I don't note my contribtions anywhere. I prefer to give the praise to the two gentlemen who wrote the article and asked me to help copyedit it for them. That's just my personal view.
# ] --> ] (no conversion)
# ] --> ??? (no rename, no conversion)


The last 2 are outlines by their very nature, and so our standard outline subheadings didn't seem to fit. So I left them as is.
::As far as templates go, don't worry too much about it. Nobody can keep all of the templates straight. I figure that off-hand I could think of maybe 20% of them without having to look up the Wikicode for them. I try to keep in mind the ones that I use most often, the rest I look up as needed at ]. ] 22:04, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


I renamed the first 2, but the last one is the name of the outline, that is, the topic itself is an outline, and that outline is presented as the article's content, so I left the name as is. For now. This needs more thought.
== Barnstar for your hard work ==


Of course, that's not all. Concerning those last 2 outlines above...
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you, AnnaFrance, this barnstar for all your hard work copyediting articles, in particular ] and ] for me. Thanks! — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 17:55, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
|}
:I am rewriting some articles (listed on my user page), so when I am done, I'll let you know if I need any assistance. Thanks! — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 18:51, 30 May 2008 (UTC)


=== Alternate outlines of knowledge ===
== Stephen Donaldson (activist) ==


...not only are they outlines, but they are outlines of knowledge! Well, the top few levels, at least.
Thank you for cleaning up ], an article on which I've done a lot of work. Could you tell me why you removed the paragraph markup in multi-paragraph blockquotes?


Uh, so?
Thanks. ] (]) 17:47, 31 May 2008 (UTC)


What happens if we linkify them? :)
Thanks for your reversions and notes. ] (]) 01:11, 1 June 2008 (UTC)


That is, what happens if we linkify their classifications to Misplaced Pages's outlines? &nbsp;:)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;:)&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;:)
== To Trusilver: Cleanup ==


=== They become alternate top ends to the OOK ===
I'm hoping you monitor my talk page, otherwise I'm talking to myself. :)


Yep.
When you see an article with a Cleanup tag ("This article may require cleanup to meet Misplaced Pages's quality standards."), what do you start looking for? --] (]) 18:05, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
:Although I'm not Trusilver, your user/talk page is on my watchlist. I used to do a lot of cleanup work on articles. I looked for words which need wikifying, ] issues, grammar/prose issues, layout and other style things. Usually with the messier articles, it is easy to spot what needs fixing (especially once you become familiar with the standards of FA class articles). — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 18:29, 2 June 2008 (UTC)


=== What can you find? ===
::That's a great idea, Wackymacs, about the standards for FA articles. I haven't explored the review process at all yet, and I should. I can see where it would have application even if FA status isn't an issue yet. Thanks for taking the time to give me some tips. Much appreciated. --] (]) 21:54, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
:::Yes, I do monitor your talk page, but a little too late this time :). ] 02:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
::::Sorry, Trusilver. AnnaFrance you should check out ] sometime - it soon becomes clear which articles do not meet the criteria and which do. This kind of off-hand knowledge becomes useful later on if you do cleanup work on articles. — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 08:55, 3 June 2008 (UTC)


I challenge you to find some "hidden" outlines.
== Lone Star Elementary School ==


I dare you to take a look around Misplaced Pages for hidden outlines (that is, outlines not yet hooked into the OOK), and add your kills to ].
I'd like some advice about what to do about ]. Briefly:


My trophies are already there.
* It's not about the school. It's one paragraph of a piece of movie trivia that tangentially involved a person at the school (the librarian).
* It cites a zoetrope.com website, from which it was taken, mostly verbatim.
* The article for the movie in question already contains the information.


=== May the hunt begin! ===
I hesitated about a speedy deletion because it's not entirely a word-for-word copy, but definitely most of it is. I'm not sure how strict WP is about that kind of thing. --] (]) 04:53, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
:I would nominate that for CSD. The article makes very little assertion of notability and what little it does could be merged into the article for the movie that it is referring to. Past practice states that high schools are inherently notable (something many disagree with, myself included) but elementary schools don't have that same blanket protection. The most I would do for this article would be to redirect it to the movie, and were it to come across my desk (so to speak) if I was monitoring CSD, I would almost definitely delete it. That failing, you could add a PROD tag to it and see if anyone else objects to its deletion. Either way, it is very poorly written and would need a complete rewrite to make it salvageable. But just to note, I tend to be a lot more exclusionist than the norm, so I'm also going to ask someone who is extremely inclusionist to chime in on this so you can get both angles on this issue.] 16:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
::Because the article is only about , one could argue ], ], ], and ]. The article clearly needs improvement and if there's a copywright issue, the article could be deleted without prejudice of being restored sans copy vio. The connection with a notable movie does make this particular elementary school a bit more notable than a run of the mill regilar elementary school. Before deleting or nominating as well, I would encouage a . Doing that, we find that beyond the movie connection, the school is also a recognized elementary school as it was selected a 2006 California Distinguished School. One problem with the Google search is that schools with the same name appear in other states, too, so one has to be careful not to confuse them. In any event, I was able to do with the article in less than a half hours worth of work. Best, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 17:42, 4 June 2008 (UTC)
:::All but the first sentence of the "Influence on ''Outsiders'' film" section is taken from the referenced website. So, is that a copyright violation, or a section-sized blockquote that hasn't been properly formatted? (I'm not trying to be a smartass here&mdash;I'm asking a serious question.)


] 21:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
:::As a side note, this is an alarming difference of admin opinions. I'm not sure what to say about the inclusionist position. What couldn't be fixed with enough work? How much poor-quality material on WP is too much? It makes an editor's decisions much easier, though. If you don't have the time to fix it, just ignore it. --] (]) 18:34, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


== Still active? ==
::::I consider it to be a copyright violation as it stands, however I think that it probably could be reworded easily to not be a copyvio. I'm more concerned with the content in general and whether or not it is suitable for an article. I would say no, Le Grand would say yes. I asked him to come here specifically to show you how very different opinions are concerning what belongs on Misplaced Pages, even within the parameters of notability policy. I feel that ] isn't strict enough and there should be a great deal more rigidity on notability. Le Grand would probably tell you that anything that isn't a hoax or a copyvio should be notable. This isn't to say that I consider his opinion any less valid than my own, we all have different opinions on what is notable. (In fact, I'm harassing him to let me nominate him for adminship) The rest of your questions are difficult to answer; I'm of the opinion that if an article is so badly written that it's unsalvagable, then it just needs to be CSD'd until a time that someone comes back and writes it over and then we can determine if it is truly notable. ] 18:54, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


You are listed on the ] of theOutline of knowledge WikiProject, which I'm updating.
:::::Not just hoaxes and copy vios, as I am also concerned with ], ], and ] (please note, though, that my "arguments" in the last two cases I now consider weak per ]; I still would argue to delete, but should have offered a more original rationale). Best, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 19:16, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


Is this something you are still interested in participating in?
Thank you both for taking the time to deal with my questions. You've given me a lot to think about. --] (]) 19:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


I look forward to your reply on my talk page.
:You're welcome! Have a pleasant day! Sincerely, --<font face="Times New Roman">]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 19:41, 4 June 2008 (UTC)


] 20:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
==]==


== A couple questions for you... ==
{{SA-novice}}
=== What are the benefits of a ]? ===


The article doesn't say.
Oh yes, and by the way. Congratulations on your first month anniversary with us. It has been fantastic working with you so far and I'm looking forward to much the same in the future. Good work on everything that you have done up to this point. ] 23:21, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


I'm interested, because I need to explain the benefits in the guideline on outlines I'm writing. (Outlines are a type of tree structure).
Whoa! Thank you so much. Both for the award and for your help (so far&mdash;don't leave town). I'm still having a great time learning, and I've gotten my husband into WP also. He's interested in numismatics, and is already helping out there. Thanks for making this past month a lot less scary than it might have been. --] (]) 23:52, 5 June 2008 (UTC)


I've also asked the question at various reference desks, and these threads may help to jump start your brain on this question. :)
== Bolding scientific terms ==


* ]
In an article I'm working on, ], a number of the more important or unusual terms have been bolded. I haven't found a specific WP policy on whether this is encouraged or discouraged. Is there such a policy? --] (]) 17:50, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]


=== What are the benefits of outlines, over and above regular articles? ===
:No so that I'm aware of, though general practice is that nothing should be bolded within the body of the article itself. When there isn't a specific policy forbidding something, I tend to fall back on standardization and format the article as is typical. ] 18:51, 6 June 2008 (UTC)


What benefits have you noticed?
== Request for Copyedit ==


How are Misplaced Pages's outlines useful to you?
Hi, Anna. I have been the primary contributor to the article ] and am attempting to get it up to FA. I saw your name on the list of copyedit volunteers and was wondering if you would be interested in taking a look through the article to see if you can spot anything for us to edit. Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated. Cheers! ] (]) 19:19, 9 June 2008 (UTC)


I look forward to your answers on my talk page.
== Copyedit request ==


] 04:49, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
Hi.


== Has the shit hit the fan? - ] update, 05/25/2009 ==
Please could you check '']'' for copyeditting. This is article is also currently awaiting a peer review ]. I would really appriciate your input.


Maybe...
Thank you, ] (]) 00:24, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


=== We've started the next phase ===
Thanks for your help on the ] article. I will definitely consider contacting you again in the future about copy edit requests. --]] 19:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


I was experiencing mental block on the ] and on the ]. And this was holding the whole project back. Without these (which are intended to explain the type of lists known as outlines in detail), the danger is higher that a controversy could go the wrong way.
== B & M D images ==


I requested help on them, but there was none forthcoming.
Sorry if I rubbed your husband the wrong way. Not my best message.


So I went ahead and started us on the next phase of operations without those 2 pages...
IE7 "unusual"? The Misplaced Pages article claims it has 45% of the market in 2007.


Our AWB'ers and I have placed about '''1600 notices all over Misplaced Pages. And the plan is to place several thousand more'''.
Anyway, Misplaced Pages itself suggests not using tables to format images.


This generated only one complaint, but it was a very vocal one, and attracted a few other detractors who seemed unfamiliar with the concept of hierarchical outlines and their benefits. However, just as many or more editors came to the defense of the OOK, and there was no consensus formed. But, dab is still trying to rally opposition to outlines at the Village Pump. See below...
I'll see what I can do. -] (]) 03:25, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


=== Administrator noticeboard incident and Village Pump policy discussion ===
== Copy edit request==
Hi Anna. Can you please take a look at the ] article. None of the editors of the article are native English speakers and we would love to have someone of your skills to do a copy edit of the article. This article is currently being and a comment has suggested that the article is in need of copy edit. Your help would be much appreciated. Thanks ] (]) 14:00, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


It appears that the banner placed on the ] caught the attention of an editor named ] who posted a rather forceful message on my talk page, another on ], another at ], and still another at ]!
: Thank you very much for your offer. I must admit that I am an idiot! Originally I had checked your contribution list and saw that you were active in wikipedia. After making a request on your page, however, I re-checked the contribution list and thought that you had not edited for a month because I forgot that were still in june (I must have been eager for July) . It was because of this mistake I decided to ask another copy-editor after my initial request. I would like to apologize for this little mishap. ] (]) 00:22, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


He went well out of his way to use negative hype to cause a stir.
::: Hi again. Wackymacs has not replied to my request and might be busy in real life (seeing his contribution) to spend time to copy edit the article. Are you still willing to do the copy edit? ] (]) 12:50, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


It appears that Mr. Bachmann doesn't understand the nature of hierarchical outlines and their applications. And though he implied that he has never seen an OOK outline before, he was involved with a discussion on these when they were called "lists of basic topics".
== Hello ==


His primary argument is that outlines are content forks of articles, and violate ].
Just to let you know I've been moving back to the United States from Britain this weekend so I haven't had much of a chance to read over your comments. I will over the next day or so, though, and leave comments. Thanks for your continued help! ] (]) 17:05, 17 June 2008 (UTC)


But "topic lists", of which outlines are a type, have been around for almost as long as Misplaced Pages, and fall under the ] and ] guidelines. They aren't intended as forks, as they are lists, bringing the benefits of lists to the corresponding subjects, such as grouping and navigation.
== ] ==


Someone suggested an MfD, but lists are articles, and are within the jurisdiction of AfD. Only the portal page, which merely lists the outline articles, falls within the scope of the MfD department.
Hi. If you have the time, would you please copyedit '']''? It's not for a peer review, but I'm trying to help improve the article. Thank you.


The administrator's noticeboard was considered the wrong venue for the discussion, and the discussion was closed.
] (]) 22:03, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


But ''']''' is still active. Hopefully level heads will prevail there too.
== Four technical questions ==


=== Now what? ===
Three issues that have come up lately:
* Do you put a non-breaking space between AD, BC, CE, BCE, and the rest of the date (either a specific number or something like "10th century")? I didn't see anything about doing that in the ], but I just had a date split between lines and didn't much like the look. What do you do?
* Say you have a paragraph that ends: Highly contentious statement. Everyday statement of fact. .
**Would you repeat the footnote at the end of the contentious statement, just to make it very clear that it is sourced?
* I am going to try tackling ], which has a truckload of maintenance tags. This is going to require more than just a copyedit; there is some major restructuring needed. Is there some kind of tag I should put to indicate that the article is currently in great flux, under major construction, and nobody should worry or try to "fix" the intermediate stages of the job?
* I do a lot of work in WikiProject Disambiguation, and I know that in-text wikilinks shouldn't point to dab pages. But what about wikilinks that point to redirects? Is it a good idea to pipe them to the actual article instead?


Am I disheartened or deterred? Hell no. I say "full steam ahead!"
As always, thanks for your help. --] ] 17:48, 21 June 2008 (UTC)


But we really need to finish the ] and the ]. Otherwise there will continue to be confusion.
== Yellow Claw ==


Over the next week or two, we'll be posting another 1600 or so notices. It's a good thing we didn't send out 10,000 of them all at once. :)
It may be an overactive bot, but either way it's important to let you know that the "khan" being referred to in ] is the lowercase word for a medieval Asian sovereign. It is not a reference to a character named Khan. Several editors have had to keep reverting this over the past few days. Lowercase "khan" is correct. Thanks, -- ] (]) 22:01, 21 June 2008 (UTC)


] 23:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
:No, you've been very gracious, actually, and I thank you for that. As you did, I also looked more closely, and saw we had a "perfect storm" of confusion. Though Merriam-Webster and other standard dictionaries give "khan" as a lowercase word, Misplaced Pages gave only an uppercase version. To help end confusion, I noted at ] that Merriam-Webster spells "khan" lowercase, and added that as alternate spelling, with a footnote link to the "khan" page at Merriam-Webster Online. All's well that ends well. Sorry for my part in the misunderstanding &mdash; or what is, in retrospect, a jolly mix-up! With thanks, -- ] (]) 02:10, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


P.S.: Another related thread has popped up at ]. ''--TT'' &nbsp; 04:44, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
== I Should Coco ==


== Why do we have outlines in addition to...? ==
Copyedit all you want. If I drop in to fix something, it's probably something you overlooked. Also, make sure none of the references link to reproductions of articles on fansites; these are unauthorized reproductions that violate copyright. So if you are citing a ''Melody Maker'' article reprinted on a fansite, just reference the original article and don't include a link to the fansite. ] (]) 00:46, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
{{main|Misplaced Pages:Why do we have outlines in addition to...?}}
:Oh, that was because certain items were more logically placed next to others. See '']'' for one example of what a high-quality album article should look like. ] (]) 01:00, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
::I'm not a primary editor at the page; I only came in because of ]'s Collaboration of the Week project, and I've just been doing some follow-up editing. Do what you will. ] (]) 01:20, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
:::Of course a copyedit is still wanted. --] ] 02:15, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


] was growing so large that I split this section off as a separate page.
== Massacre ==


I look forward to your feedback and improvements.
Hi, you just piped a lot of links for the word ] to the article ]. I assume that's not what you meant to do. Perhaps you intended the result ]; that's done as <nowiki>], or ]</nowiki> for short. Please would you go back and correct them all? - ] ] 21:42, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
:No problem - thanks. Have you tried ]? I enjoy using it for disambiguating; not as quick, but it makes you check your work! - ] ] 21:56, 22 June 2008 (UTC)


] 22:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)
== Lead of ] ==


== Outline update - ''Good news and bad news'' - 06/08/2009 ==
Hello. I've been watching you do some darn good copyedit work on ], which I had worked on a little myself during its FAC. In the past few weeks, I have been working on my own soon-to-be FAC, but, as always, I struggle with making the lead not read too choppy (it's got too many important and unrelated facts to mention and not much space). If you are not otherwise engaged in the next week, would you give the lead of ] a pass? Or maybe you will find that I am too harsh and that it is not bad as an introduction to an FA, who knows? As I believe the rest of the article to be on par with the FA criteria, I don't want to unnecessarily spoil any FA chances by giving a poor first impression with the lead. I would value a second opinion by you. &ndash; ] <sup>]•]</sup> 16:52, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
:Thank you very much. As for the 1100-word plot (in case you weren't aware of it), this refers to the article about the 2005 film (2-hour movie), not the TV serial (five hours, currently 800 words). I just bought the film on DVD, so I will be able to perform a trim if the ownership issues on the other side of the fence are not too strong. :-) &ndash; ] <sup>]•]</sup> 17:50, 24 June 2008 (UTC)


The big push continues.
== Can you help? ==


And it seems to be working!


'''''The good news is''''' that there's growing support for outlines, and there are more editors than ever editing them!
I see you were listed as a participant in the ] so it seems likely you can ... The thing is the ] urgently needs prose pros to help with our best articles. Milhist covers a broad range of interesting and varied subjects from film to biography, battles to weaponry, and Roman emperors to twentieth-century dictators. In Milhist, ] has become the last port of call before ] and we are looking for people to help identify prose and ] issues at A-Class ] and help fix them prior to ]. We also have a ] in our ] and that can always use experienced copy-editors. For most of our articles, you don't need to be a specialist in the subject matter, just good with words.


'''''The bad news is''''' that the complainers are disproportionately represented on the project's various talk pages. While many editors work diligently on the front end, a handful of complainers are trying to tear down the project behind the scenes. Fortunately, barely enough supporters have been watching those pages that no consensus for moving or merging the outlines has succeeded. So far...
If you think you can help, please do! Thanks for your time, --]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 04:21, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


=== Big problem: ignorance of what outlines are for and their benefits ===
:It looks like a fascinating WikiProject, and very well run. I'd be delighted to help. I should be able to start on a new project this weekend, and I'll add my name to your copyeditor list right now. --] ] 13:19, 3 July 2008 (UTC)


Most of the opposition seems to be unaware of the complete range of what outlines are used for. They just don't ''get it''.
==Happy Independence Day!==
As you are a ], I just wanted to wish you a happy ]! And if you are not an American, then have a happy day and a wonderful weekend anyway! :) Your friend and colleague, --<font face="Times New Roman">Happy Independence Day! ]</font><sup>'']''</sup> 21:20, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


This is why it is important to complete ]. An article with a comprehensive treatment of outlines would be the perfect place to refer anybody unfamiliar with outlines to.
:Thank you so much for the kind thought; I am glad to call you my friend and step-mentor. (I hope you don't mind about the "mentor" part&mdash;I've learned so much from talking to you and reading your contributions around WP.) May you and yours have a lovely July 4th too. --] ] 23:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


Opposers also don't seem to understand how outlines differ from some other page type that they prefer. Some think articles are good enough as an overview, others think portals are more in-depth, still others think categories or navigation boxes are the most efficient and useful way to organize and present topical information. Some have simply never seen an "Outline of" page before and think they are a new type of page (they've been around under other names since 2001).
==]==
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Barnstar of Diligence'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award this barn star for the extra ordinary attention to detail that you displayed in selflessly copy editing the ] article ] (]) 21:57, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
|}


If you run across anyone who doesn't understand the role of outlines on Misplaced Pages, ] might help reduce their misconceptions or uncertainties about outlines.
:Well deserved barnstar. I would also like to express my gratitude for your amazing copy edit on the above article. Thank you very much! ] (]) 01:43, 5 July 2008 (UTC)


== Request to copyedit '']'' == === On the bright side, ''you've got to see this...'' ===


To add the outlines and related support pages to your watchlist (takes less than 30 seconds), cut and paste them from ] into your raw watchlist. For a way to improve the display of your watchlist - by namespace (very useful) - see ], or use the "super fast upgrade" at ].
Hi, do you have a week or so to spare to help copyedit ]? I have gotten it to GA, and I believe it is the prose and flow of the sentences that require the most attention before I submit it for FAC. I believe your experience and skills can do much to help improve the article in those areas. Please let me know of your answer. Thank you. ] (]) 08:05, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
: Next week will be fine. Thank you. ] (]) 13:47, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


Or go to ] (currently without the talk pages) and click on "Related changes" in the toolbox menu on the sidebar on the left side of your screen.
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
|rowspan="2" |
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Another well-deserved copyeditor's barnstar for improving the grammatical flow of the video game article ''Conan'' and other articles. Your work is of great benefit to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 21:43, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
|}


=== Conan's FAC === === The big push ===
Hi, AnnaFrance, sorry to bother you again, but could you take a look at ''Conan''{{'}}s ]? ] raised a few criticisms on the grammar, and I am uncertain if they are truly an issue and how to resolve them if they are (namely, his first two points in Crit 1). Many thanks in advance. ] (]) 21:15, 25 July 2008 (UTC)
: Again, thank you very much for taking the time to help! ] (]) 15:06, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
:: Thank you for the kind words, although I am still a bit disappointed that very few participated in its FAC. I would have thought that the name Conan would attract some from those who were attracted to the literature. Hopefully, Laser brain and David Fuchs would continue giving their concerns at ], allowing their issues to be resolved and bringing the article up to better standards. ] (]) 01:04, 7 August 2008 (UTC)
::: Hey, AnnaFrance. David has raised two concerns about language. Could you take a look at his concerns (in the link mentioned above) and weigh in on whether they are indeed actionable? ] (]) 22:16, 11 August 2008 (UTC)
(out dent) AnnaFrance, I have brought ''Conan'' to FAC again. I tried dealing with ]'s concerns but would appreciate your help in checking over my edits and on the use of commas (which was pointed out as sparsely used). Sincerely, ] (]) 01:31, 15 August 2008 (UTC)


The big push started with about a thousand banners and notices being placed on article talk pages all over Misplaced Pages.
=== Conan is now an FA! ===
Conan has been promoted as a Featured Article!! This would not have been possible without your help. Your selflessness in improving the language of the article was instrumental in helping it fulfill a key criteria of Featured Articles. Although you were not the nominator, I think you deserve the following userbox. Thank you very much!!! ] (]) 05:31, 22 August 2008 (UTC)
{{User Featured Article|Conan (2007 video game)}}
{{-}}


But it didn't stop there...
== Auxiliaries (Roman military) ==


=== Welcome our new members... ===
] is currently passing an A-class review. It has enough support because of excellent content, but MOS issues are a problem. Could you take a look? Thanks a lot. ] (]) 09:37, 8 July 2008 (UTC)


The following Wikipedians have joined the OOK team.
] and ] are a discussion about your impending copyedit. It's the first time that EraNavigator really gets one of his articles copyedited and he is a bit nervous. Perhaps you can do something about it. He claims to have been at Oxford and believes that his style can't be that bad. The current problem is MoS, but it seems that many readers don't like his style of small sentences which tend to repeat their structure. ] (]) 07:28, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


Be sure to stop by their talk pages and introduce yourselves.
== ] ==


* ] - going after the Main Page.
Hello, hope you're doing well. Can you help me clear the 2007 backlog starting with January? I am slowly tackling February 2007 to get it to 0. Just as a caution, it seems a lot of the articles are good candidates for deletion, so some are suitable for AFD instead of being copyedited. Any help would be appreciated. — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 15:17, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
* ] / ] - here to help.
:That's great to hear. Looking forward to your help! :-) — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 15:40, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
* ] - made a splash at MfD with ] (see the talk page for the MfD link - lots of support there).


== Thanks very much ... == === Enter the mentors! ===


I asked a bunch of mentors at ] for advice. Several of them answered on my talk page. Most of those who replied were happy to help, and posted some very good ideas. A couple even joined the project.


Here are their ideas, and what is being done about them. A few of the tasks still need volunteers:
for offering your copy-editing help at Milhist. It's very much appreciated :) --]&nbsp;<sup>]</sup> 05:44, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


* ]: Create and place project banners - already {{done}}
== Auxilia ==
* ] & ]: put an animated ad for the project in ] - Our graphics specialist ] is looking into it.
* ]: Create a userbox for the project - assigned to ].
* ]: Ask to have outlines added to next year's ] competition - {{done}} (proposal posted)
* ]: Add a link to ] to the ] - ] is taking on the creation of the proposal
* ]: Create an ] to WPOOK - {{done}} (invitation coming soon, see below)
* ]: (Create a ]) - {{done}}
* ]: Add a feed to ] to gather links to new outlines and post them on a page. Then personally invite new creators to the project. - '''''who wants to tackle the feed?'''''
* ]: Assign someone to monitor the outlines via watchlist, and invite new outline editors to the project - '''''any volunteers?'''''
* Related: Create an invitation - ] is working on it.
* ]: Create ] similar to ], which adds each outline it is posted on to ], where editors (who are browsing the categories) can find them and work on them - '''''to be assigned'''''
* ]: Add the above template to incomplete outlines - upcoming AWB task
* ]: "Tell your wikifriends about it" - I've told mine, have ''you'' told ''yours''?
* ]: "Collaborate with other WikiProjects" - we've been doing this from the start (each outline is associated with at least one other WikiProject).
* : move the projected outline to a subpage of ] - {{done}}


=== Linking to outlines has begun ===
That's fine by me. My comments to Wandalstouring on copyeditors are of course general and not a reflection on you personally. It's just that in the past some "improvements" have actually reduced the clarity of the text. Also, I don't know who Wandalstouring is referring to above, when he says many readers don't like my prose style (unless, of course, he means himself). If you look at the comments on the two reviews on this article (yes, there's been a peer review as well!) not a single one makes any complaint about the prose style. All the points made concern minor quibbles about how footnotes or dates should be presented. Overall, I think Wandalstouring (who in general has been very helpful to me) has been a real old woman about processing this article. I think it's because he's still sore that I dumped his favourite graph of Roman army numbers in favour of my own much clearer (and more accurate) table! (Just joking). I look forward to hearing your views. Regards ] (]) 16:14, 9 July 2008 (UTC)


To the tops of about 30 subject articles, I placed a test batch of hatnotes leading to the corresponding outlines. The hatnotes look like this:
:: Thanks for the comprehensive MoS survey. The only points I would raise are:
# I use the word "ruled" rather than "reigned" advisedly because Roman emperors were not monarchs in the medieval sense. Technically, they were simply Republican officials that were granted dictatorial powers indefinitely by the Senate. Nor were they hereditary (although sons/relatives did occasionally succeed). In practice they were often just military strongmen who had crushed rivals to seize supreme power (and very few died in their beds).
# Do we really have to add "p." to all the page numbers in the refs? This seems unnecessary (what else could the number be?) and absurdly repetitive. It is standard practice in academic publications to put just a number alone for the page ref.
# I think we should ignore all norms which are preferred rather than mandatory. Some preferred norms are just silly, such as spelling out "percent" rather than using "%", which everyone understands.
# I hear your point about the length of the contents. But it is necessarily long, as auxilia is a big subject, and the article aims to be comprehensive. Many of the sections are already summaries e.g. the Batavi revolt, much of which was transferred to the dedicated article. I have struggled hard to keep the article to not more than 100k. I do not believe we can do any more trimming without losing essential points.


: ''For a topical guide to this subject, see ].''(Hidden: <!- PLEASE LEAVE THIS LINE IN PLACE because it leads to the page that serves as the table of contents for Misplaced Pages's overall coverage of this subject. Thank you.-->
Apart from the above, you are welcome to carry out the changes you suggest if you have the time and energy. Unfortunately, I do not, as I'm heavily engaged in tidying up ] (which I started as a spin-off from ]) and which Wandalstouring plans to submit for an A-review shortly (besides, I frankly do not want to devote any more time to auxilia). Best wishes ] (]) 09:46, 13 July 2008 (UTC)


The rationale for the hatnotes is that each outline is a topical guide for its subject, and since tables of contents go at the front of a book, a link to each outline should be placed at the front of its subject.
:: Fine. You are very generous with your time, which I appreciate. If you discover any more technical points, do go ahead and deal with them without sending another message. But if there are points about the text itself (prose style or content), I would prefer to be consulted. PS: Who wants an FA review anyway? Not me. Regards ] (]) 07:40, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
:::How do you get along? I know, EraNavigator is an idiosyncratic fellow. The occupation he has for earning his money is a joke, making him a full-time wikipedian (if he is not watching telenovellas) with an impresssive output. At least he seems to accept that you can comment on his style and he may improve it in return. If you don't mind I'd like you to take a look at some of his other works after they passed A-class review. I also cordially invite you to comment on style in the ].


Unfortunately, not all editors agree. Some of the hatnotes have already disappeared. :(
:::PS: It took some time to convince him of A-class reviews, but now he is quite fond of them (and I don't have to push him any more). FA is the ultimate goal, but for now it is A-class and that has enough surprises.


=== Some past discussions pertaining to the existence or location of outlines ===
:::Greetings ] (]) 18:58, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Note that the "Lists of topics" are of two types, including outlines and indexes, so discussions to remove, move, or merge those are usually relevant to the OOK. Also, outlines are a type of list, so discussions that affect lists in general also pertain to outlines. We've got to be on our toes!


* ]
== Copyedit request for Presbyterian Ladies' College, Sydney ==
* ]
Sorry for piling on extra work, but I was wondering if you'd consider including ] on your future worklist. On its first ], the need for good copy-editing was the primary problem. There's no rush; I also asked ], who recommended looking around ] or ] for help. Many thanks, --] (]) 19:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)
* ]
:That would be great. Thanks! --] (]) 18:49, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
* ]
*
* ]
* ]
* ]


I've excluded links to live discussions, out of respect for ].
== Wikiproject Articles Needing Copy Edit ==


=== Table of contents to OOK-related stuff ===
Hope you're doing well. Great to see you've joined! I really hope this project is successful in clearing at ''least'' the 2007 backlog in the near future. — <font size="3" face="times" color="#f42c39"><strong>]</strong> (] ~ ])</font> 15:15, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
Here's a directory of outline support pages:


* ]
===Project creation===
* ]
Thanks for the support! The project page is now up at ]. It's now a bit bland 'cos there are no pretty pictures yet heh... Feel free to sign up there, and discuss details and direction and what not at its ].
** ]
** ]
*** ]
**** ]
**** ]
* ]
** ]


=== Keep up the great work! ===
I'll be sending out invitations to the members of WP:Grammar, and later WP:LOCE and maybe WP:PR. Cheers! -'''] ]''' 03:12, 22 July 2008 (UTC)


] 04:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)
== Late Roman army ==


== WPOOK advert banner under development, here's the beta... ==
EraNavigator, who wrote ], has been critized for his prose in the A-class review. I have been able to convince him to give copy-editing a try and would like you to do the copy-editing. However, he is not totally convinced and suggest to limit it the ] section. I suggest, you also edit the intro. Afterwards we will discuss matters and see if the whole article gets a copy-edit. Another editor suggested a copy-edit during the A-class review and got started on his own. He combined his copy-editing with inserting OR and distorting sourced facts(mostly infantry, is not completely infantry and the like), leading to EraNavigator totally reverting his edits. I want to avoid such issues, so take your time. Thanks a lot ] (]) 09:53, 26 July 2008 (UTC)


Thank you to those who suggested ] have an animated advert banner. Penubag got working on it right away. Here's what he's come up with so far:
== Request for copyediting ==


<center>]</center>
Hi. I currently have the article ] up as a ], and it needs some copyediting work. Could you help out? (] (]) 02:20, 27 July 2008 (UTC))
{{clear}}
*Any work you can do would be fine. (] (]) 23:15, 27 July 2008 (UTC))
Penubag needs feedback.


I've posted a few changes for him to make to it.
== Late Roman army ==


Please post additional comments and suggestions for him at ].
Hi, I'm sorry you got put off by my tiff with Wandalstouring. It's just that I'm exasperated by the way he's been harping on about the prose issue for so long. He did the same for ], asking for second and third opinions on the prose from virtually every copyeditor he knows. I don't claim that the prose cannot be improved. But the way Wandalstouring has carried on, you would think it was written by an illiterate street kid who left school at age 12. I can understand the need for editing for someone is not a native English speaker or whose writing skills are rudimentary. But I am simply not in that bracket: I hold two degrees from the best British universities. My prose is at least as good as that in any of the other A articles I've seen in the Roman military history section. I don't really get what Wandalstouring is playing at here (in other respects he has been very helpful to me). I've started wondering whether he's just envious that he can't write nearly as good English as I can: his own work really does need heavy editing (see ], already extensively corrected by me). Anyway, whatever the reason, he has really p*****d me off!


Thank you.
Anyway, I shouldn't drag you into my disputes. I know that you are a helpful and sensitive person, and so I would be happy if you would spare the time to copyedit the first section of the article as agreed. I am sure you can suggest some useful improvements. Best wishes ] (]) 21:14, 27 July 2008 (UTC)


] 02:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
== ] ==


== Request to participate in University of Washington survey on tool to quickly understand Wikipedians’ reputations ==
Hi. Here's an update of what we've been up to in this WikiProject...


Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington. In April, we met with some local Wikipedians to learn what they would like to know about other editors’ history and activities (within Misplaced Pages) when interacting with them on talk pages. The goal of those sessions was to gather feedback to help design an embedded application that could quickly communicate useful information about other Wikipedians. We have now created a few images that we feel represent some of what our participants thought was important. We would appreciate it if you took a few minutes of your time to complete an online survey that investigates whether or not these images would be useful to you. Your quick contribution would be very valuable to our research group and ultimately to Misplaced Pages. (When finished, the code for this application will be given over to the Misplaced Pages community to use and/or adjust as they see fit.)
We've created a page for every country of the world! They're not complete, and most of them aren't even in the main namespace yet, but...


Willing to spend a few minutes taking our survey?
A team of editors has been working on them, and they've come a long way.


Please feel free to share the link with other Wikipedians. The more feedback, the better!
We're about to run a competition, called "Around the World", in which participants will compete in the completion of specific data items across all of these country lists. For example, one task would be adding the population figure on each page.
The survey is completely anonymous and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. All data is used for university research purposes only.


Thank you for your time! If you have any questions about our research or research group, please visit our user page. ] (]) 21:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
The awards images are almost done, and the pages themselves need a couple sections completed before they can be moved to the article namespace and the competition can begin.


_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
We could sure use your help...


Additional details about our research group are .
=== Track down the administrative divisions types for each country ===
The first task is on the "Administrative divisions of" sections.


== Outline collaboration! ==
In each of these sections, there's an initial hierarchical list of the division types in that country, followed by subheadings for each of the types. Unfortunately, the types listed are those from the template I used to create these pages, and they aren't accurate for many countries.


As you know, Penubag is working on a banner to advertise the Outline WikiProject. And he's almost done.
The defaults that I used were:


The banner prominently presents the "Outline of chocolate", which of course will become ''the most widely advertised outline'' as soon as the banner goes live. The first thing many editors will do after seeing the banner is look for that outline.
* ]
** ]
*** ]


The problem is, we don't have one.
For each country, change the links to the names of the administrative divisions for that country, adding more links if there are more than 3 division types. Those that are subdivisions of another type are indented under the parent type. In most cases, you would leave
municipalities in place, because that's a generic name for "city". We'll blue-link those later. (Blue-linking is creating a redirect so that a link turns blue - that way, the link remains standardized on all the pages in the set).


So that's our first outline collaboration!
Also change the subheadings in the same section to match the initial list, including the "main article" links presented just below each subheading.


I started a ''']''' this morning.
To find out what the administrative divisions are for a country so you can add them, try looking on the ] or ] pages for that country, and on the country's main article as well.


It needs to be finished and moved to the article namespace before we can start using Penubag's banner ad!
==== Add the administrative divisions to their respective subsections ====


Come join in on the fun. It's chocolate!
For each country, find the list of administrative division for each type, and add them under that type's subheading.


] 22:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
For example, copy and paste the provinces listed at ] under the "Provinces of Angola" subheading on that country's list page.


== Outline update - Full Steam Ahead! - 06/18/2009 ==
See the countries listed at ] for examples of how this has been done for those. If there's a map showing the administrative divisions, grab it too.


Several members of the WikiProject have been hard at work.
Generally do not add towns and cities to the municipalities section, as there are usually way too many of them (and will unnecessarily bloat the page). Instead, provide links to the various pages (], ], ], etc.


''']''' has been building and refining the outlines on the U.S. States, the states' historical outlines, and the ]. Lately, his edits have dominated the project's watchlist readout. (I think he's overdue for a barnstar or two. hint hint)
=== Complete the "Government of x" section ===


''']''' has been working on medals for all the main branches of the OOK, and has completed the OOK WikiProject's animated advert banner (see below).
This section also has temporary data, and needs to be corrected/completed.


''']''' has been filling in the currencies for each country on their respective outlines.
The name of the position of the head of state and head of government of each country needs to be corrected, and the specific office holders added.


''']''' and ''']''' have been busy with ], posting banners and notices, and helping our sister project, the ], get established. Indexes work hand-in-hand with the outlines and are prominently linked to from the top of most of them. And the outlines, which serve as tables of contents, are only as good as the pages they link to.
The branches of government subheadings need to be corrected/filled in.


Since we started integrating (linking) the OOK and its support pages into the encyclopedia and into the Misplaced Pages community, activity on outlines has been increasing. Though there's still much left to do.
Etc.


But I digress. There are a couple more...
The above tasks are fun, because it's interesting to see how other countries operate. I've completed about 25 of the country pages so far, and I've been intrigued and even amazed at some of the approaches different countries follow. The U.S. is definitely behind in many respects.


=== Welcome our new members! ] and ]===
Please help out as much as you can, and help us get Around the World started!


''']''' is building the ''']'''.
Sincerely,


''']''' has joined our advanced wiki-tools team, and is currently adding links to outlines in the corresponding subject articles' see also sections.
''''']''''' 17:29, 29 July 2008 (UTC)


Be sure to stop by their talk pages and say "hi".
== AWB edit summaries ==


=== WPOOK's advert banner has gone live! ===
Try out <nowiki>Fixing ]</nowiki> instead of <nowiki>Disambig page style repair: (])</nowiki> when making edits like . (BTW, I fixed up ]'s use of Anonymous.) Cheers! -- ] (]) 23:57, 29 July 2008 (UTC)
''']''' has finished this WikiProject's animated advert banner, and it is now being displayed on the ] which in turn is displayed on about 2000 user pages. Each time someone access one of those pages, there is a 1 in 184 chance of them viewing this:


{{Misplaced Pages ads|ad=184}}
== Roman auxiliaries ==


If you'd like to display the banner on your userpage locked-on to the ad as above, use the following code:
Well spotted in ]. The title ''Procurator'' was used both for the governor of a minor or subordinate province (e.g. Judaea, whose procurator was subordinate to the gov. of Syria) and for the treasurer of each province (who reported direct to the emperor, not to the governor). I've changed the link to ]. PS: As you may have noticed on my talk page, I'm trying to rally support for ] from editors that actually know about Roman military history and who unfortunately missed the review because they were busy. The idea is that when the article is renominated for A-class, they can weigh in and comment on substance, not trivia. That way we can avoid the absurd review that has just been held, where a single individual who knows nothing about the subject (and who didn't bother to read beyond the first few paras) effectively hijacked the process. I am still interested in seeing how you can improve the first section. Yours ] (]) 04:42, 31 July 2008 (UTC)


'''<nowiki>{{Misplaced Pages ads|ad=184}}</nowiki>'''
== Article copyedit request ==


(By the way, it's been awhile since we've barnstarred ]).
Hello, I wanted to request a copy-edit from you for an article that we are trying to finish off to be a "Featured Article" nominee. The article is ]. No other copy-editor is working on it and this is the first and only request that I know of to assist us.


=== Watchers needed! ===
Thanks in advance. ] (]) 06:47, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


If you haven't already, please add the entire project's watchlist to your watchlist. Here's how:
== Late Roman army ==


:From the edit window, copy and paste ] into your raw watchlist.
Good corrections to the intro of ]. I'm pleased to see you reverted "defense" to "defence". That's the way I wrote it until one of your fellow-Yanks changed it (although, to be fair, I believe either spelling is correct).


:Or go to ] and click on "Related changes" in the toolbox menu in Misplaced Pages's sidebar on the left hand side of the screen.
One question: why is "comparable in size to" preferable to "of comparable size to"? I'm perfectly happy with your alternative, but that's why I ask the question. To me, both expressions are idiomatically sound, have exactly the same meaning and are as concise (4 words). So neither is objectively preferable to the other. Which goes to the heart of my concerns about the copyediting process: that all too often, it seems an exercise in which the copyeditor is imposing his own personal (i.e. subjective) preferences over those of the original author, without any objective reason why those preferences are superior.


=== Check the watchlist every time you log on! ===
PS: I hope I haven't intimidated you into being over-cautious with your changes. The exercise would not be worthwhile unless you do what you want to do. So, let rip with the first section! The only thing I insist on is that factual detail and accuracy must not be sacrificed to produce more fluent prose. This is, after all, an encyclopedia article, not an airport thriller. Readers (mainly students doing assignments and Roman army enthusiasts) will be primarily interested in ''facts'', not having a "good read". Yours ] (]) 07:13, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


I forgot to mention this step above. :)
:: We use both constructions. But go ahead and edit without worrying about whether it's an Americanism or not. For spelling, however, I think you should stick to Standard English usage, to maintain consistency i.e. "labour" not "labor" etc, "axe" not "ax". PS: In the past, I studied the differences in American and English vocabulary. As you doubtless are aware, there are numerous words that are different, or that you use differently, from us. What struck me is how you guys tend to use words that are archaic in modern English usage e.g. "turnpike" to mean "highway". I laughed on my first visit to the USA, when I saw signs to the New Jersey Turnpike. That's because in England, the term "turnpike" was last used in the 18th century to mean a highway specially constructed for horse-drawn carriages. Same for "furlough" (we say "leave"), "gurney" ("trolley"), "eminent domain" ("compulsory purchase") etc. All these are 17th-18th century terms which were we dropped but you preserved (presumably because you split away in the 18th c.). Also, you guys use terms we use but with a slightly different meaning. For example you use "store" to mean what we call a "shop"; we use "store" to mean the room at the back of the shop which is used as a deposit for goods that are not on the open shelves. You say "fawcett" for a "tap". We also use "fawcett", but to mean a large valve like those on oil pipelines. Still, it's surprising how close American and English are despite 200 years of separate development. Most Americans can communicate easily with most Englishmen. I guess that's due to modern communications. If your split had taken place in the Middle Ages, your speech might be as different from English English as, say, Dutch is today. Anyway, excuse this lengthy digression. Yours ] (]) 19:35, 4 August 2008 (UTC)


=== The OOK is in 5 other Wikipedias? ===
== ] ==
I can't make heads or tails of 'em, but these links were on ]:


* ]
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"
* ]
|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
* ]
|rowspan="2" |
* ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Minor Barnstar'''
* ]
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thank you for the little edit there. ] (]) 13:21, 5 August 2008 (UTC)
|}


=== Resurrected from the grave yard... ===
==Sri Lankan Tamils FA review==
Thanks again, looks like another look at the LEAD may be of some help. :))] (]) 15:47, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


I discovered an AfD discussion on possibly the first article named "Outline of", which was called ''']''', and which was created 4 years ago. Of course they deleted it. But now it has many friends, and so it has risen from the dead. :)
: Thanks indeed for your kind words, support and your hard work making the article into FA candidate quality (and hopefully FA article). ] (]) 17:16, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


See the DRV discussion at ].
::It is great how you can take seemingly dry sentences make them flow so naturally, really. I like the way you have made it flow especially the last para. ] (]) 21:32, 6 August 2008 (UTC)


=== A diamond buried in project space ===
== Lion King ==


* When ] found the page "Learn" tucked away as a subpage of the ], he thought "This deserves to be in the article space", and moved it to the encyclopedia. See ''']'''.
Hi there, looking at your edits you are doing things recommended in my ''']''', can you please <s>strike out</s> things done so it's clear what work is needed or already done in future? Thanks. ] (]) 19:00, 11 August 2008 (UTC)


== Late Roman army == === Recruiting ===


Recruiters needed. Drop me a note if you are interested.
Hi. I notice you haven't made any mored edits to ] recently. Are you still planning to copyedit the 1st sevction? Best wishes ] (]) 17:12, 13 August 2008 (UTC)


=== Advice from the mentors ===
:: Yes, please do continue. I'm assuming you are going to edit the entire Evolution section (which is actually the 2nd, not 1st section). Yours ] (]) 07:28, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
* ''']''', ''']''', and ''']''' - link to the outlines from the corresponding subject articles' see also sections - this is underway by ''']''' (non-country outlines) and ''']''' (counry outlines).
* ''']''' - add a link to the outlines to the disambiguation pages of the corresponding subjects - good idea. Since "Outline" is just the type of page, not the subject, I think these might qualify for inclusion on disambiguation pages. We need someone to look into the relevant guidelines on this.
* ''']''' - provide a badge (userbox) for WPOOK members to add to their user pages - ''']''' will have one for us soon.
* ''']''' - create a ] explaining outlines, and send it to everyone you know, and make it viral (by including a request for the recipients to send the card to everyone ''they'' know) - this task has been split in three:
:# Creation of a "thank you for your interest" card which introduces (explains) outlines, to send to queriers, new participants to discussions, those who seem to be confused about outlines, etc.
:# Creation of a thank you card / invitation to the ], to send to users we see working on outlines, including a request for them to invite others whom they think might be interested
* ''']''' - contact Wikignomes - OK...
::3. Creation of an invitation to Wikignomes, with a brief rundown on the types of tasks there are for them to do on the outlines. The invitation will include a request for them to invite anyone they think would enjoy working on outlines.
* ''']''' - add examples to ] - more examples will be added as suitable outlines are completed
* ''']''' - add a picture to ] (it doesn't have to be relevant), to provide atmosphere and to break it up visually and add a splash of color - will do, and we'll add a caption to make it relevant, with a link to the outline on that subject. Thank you for the idea.
* ''']''' - ask Jimbo Wales to bestow the award(s) for the country outlines contest, once you get it going first - we'll give that a try
* ''']''' - ask everyone in the project to inform their acquaintances around Misplaced Pages about the OOK - will do, as soon as the cards
* ''']''' - collaborate with all the WikiProjects you share scope with - we've placed a banner on their talk pages, and have placed task notices on some. We'll be posting more tasks, and plan to create a section on contents system development and maintenance for each WikiProject page itself.
* ''']''' - if you can't get outlines added to next year's ], then create your own WikiCup-like contest - there's 6 months left to this year to address reservations and work out the details at WikiCup. In the meantime, there's the ], which needs input.


=== More outline tasks ===
: In response to a comment by another editor, I've expanded the Sources section. Please feel free to take another look at it. Yours ] (]) 09:03, 14 August 2008 (UTC)


* ] draft - our current outline collaboration!
I've changed it to "corpus of imperial decrees". I think in order to save time, it's best if you go ahead and make changes as you see fit without consulting me first, and if there is anything I want to discuss, I'll contact you. OK? Yours ] (]) 19:21, 15 August 2008 (UTC)
* ] - someone moved a big chunk of this article to the talk page, leaving a big gap in the outline. Editors are needed to add subheadings and links.
* See also links - add <nowiki>{{main|Outline of x}}</nowiki> (where "x" is the subject) to the see also section of the corresponding subject article of each outline


== Thank you for your help == ==== New outlines in article space ====
* ] - under construction in article space
* ] (converted from "List of Hinduism-related topics")


==== New outline drafts ====
{| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;"

|rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ]
* ]
|rowspan="2" |
* ]
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar'''

|-
=== Main discussion pages ===
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | Thank You, AnnaFrance, this barnstar is for your ongoing work and copy-edit with '']'' article. With your excellent prose, we are getting closer to eventually making it a FA one day. ] (]) 12:16, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

|}
* ]
* ]
* ]

=== Keep up the great work ===

I'm impressed with the level of enthusiasm and work going into the outlines. I'm proud to be working with each of you.

] 23:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

== Outline collaboration #2: ] ==

This outline is approaching completion.

I added a bunch more links, finding them with the following Google site-specific searches of Misplaced Pages:
*

*

*

*

(You can use the wikicode for the links above as the basis for new searches - just replace "Gibraltar" with any other country or region name).

=== Request: please redirect the redlinks! (bluelinking...) ===

The redlinks need to be bluelinked where possible. The most useful way is to create redirects leading to the material (which is usually included in a section of an article - see ]. That way, when the redirect pages are replaced by the actual articles, the links will already point to the right places.

Please take a crack at it, and bluelink a few.

Thank you.

Good luck.

Have fun.

] 01:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

P.S.: on an unrelated matter, where should the ] be placed on the ]? ''-TT''

== ] ==

That was fun. :)

] 00:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

== Outline update - Push push push - 06/25/2009 ==

Work is proceeding apace...

* ''']''' is working on getting a bot account (and he delivered this update as his trial run).
* ''']''' is working on the ''']''' and upcoming contest.
* ''']''' is developing ''']'''.
* ''']''' is writing a proposal to add a link to the ''']''' leading to the ''']'''.
* ''']''' is integrating the OOK into the encyclopedia by ''']''' outlines by placing a {{tl|main}} link in the see also section of the subject articles that have a corresponding outline.
* I've been trying to keep up with them. :)

; New members

* ''']''' - developing ''']''' and is watching the big picture.
* ''']''' - improving ''']'''

; Hatnotes

The current consensus is that we can't place a hatnote leading to an outline at the top of a subject articles unless the outline being presented is of at least the same quality-level as the article.

; What's next...

Improve outline quality by completing them.

Place hatnotes for the outlines of high enough quality.

Guidelines pertaining to outlines need to be updated. Outlines emerged as a class of pages only a few months ago, and most of the relevant guidelines don't cover them specifically. For example, ''']''' is incredibly out of date.

Invite wikignomes, wikielves, and wikifairies (all 2500+ of them) to help on the outlines .

Identify 600 more subjects with coverage extensive enough to justify outlines, create rudimentary drafts for them, and post notices to the corresponding WikiProjects and subject talk pages to help build them.

Convert outlines titled "List of" to outline articles, and add them to the OOK. There are a few hundred of these. Conversion instructions are needed.

Add a description of outlines to ''']''' and ''']''', and add tips about outlines to the ''']''' and ''']'''.

; Keep up the great work!

] 20:27, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

== Request for feedback ==

] has done an incredible amount of work on ] and posted a note to me on my talk page requesting feedback.

I've posted my observations at ].

Please take a look at the outline and let Minnecologies know what you think of it on the outline's talk page.

Thank you.

] 19:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
<small>Delivered by ] (]) at 20:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC).</small>

== Outline Update - Exhausted - 07/10/2009 ==

I'm sorry that I haven't been available to assign tasks lately. For the past 3 days (not including today) I've been almost totally consumed in discussions concerning the location and very existence of outlines. Today I finally broke free and got back to work on outlines. Felt good.

A great deal has been happening with outlines and behind the scenes. I just don't have time to tell you all about it this time around. Here's the best I can do...

; How to watch what's going on with outlines

If you'd like a bird's eye view of ''everything'' that's happening with respect to outlines, see this page:

* ] - watchlist for copying and pasting into your raw watchlist.

Or go to these pages (and click on "Related changes" in the sidebar's toolbox menu):

* ] - a version of the above watchlist for use with "Related changes".
* ] - a list of key pages related to the OOK, along with their shortcuts.
* ] - list of discussions pertaining to outlines.
; Recently converted to outlines

These outline articles, which were named "List of...", have been converted to an OOK format:

* ''']''' (was "List of martial arts-related topics")
* ''']''' - converted by ''']''' (was called "List of wine-related topics")
* ''']''' (was "List of topics in the creation-evolution controversy")
* ''']''' (was "Actuarial topics")
* ''']''' (was "List of topics in industrial organization")
; Recently merged into outlines

There are a lot of "List of" articles that are outlines. Some of them are on the same subjects as the "Outline of" articles. The following one have been recently merged:

* ] into ''']'''

] 01:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

== Outline Update - Basking in the light of knowledge - 07/28/2009 ==

Phase two of outline integration (de-orphanizing outlines by adding links leading to them into article see also sections) is nearly complete. The better that outlines are integrated into the encyclopedia, the more use they will be to readers.

Due to greater exposure through outline integration, and with most of the OOK team on school summer vacation, development activity on outlines has increased a lot...

; New members

: Be sure to welcome our newest members to the team:
:* ]
:* ]

; News<nowiki>:</nowiki> '''''] survives AfD'''''

:The outline was nominated for deletion for being too general in scope. The consensus was overwhelmingly for keeping it.

:The most memorable comment was posted by ]: ''I like the poetic name, anyway. . "Master Plan of Pakistan" and "Rough Sketch of Bangladesh" would be good too.''

:Special thanks to ] for greatly improving the outline, and helping to save it from AfD.

:To keep track of outline AfDs and other outline-related discussions, see ''']'''.

; Who's active '''''on Misplaced Pages''''' this summer?

:Courtesy of ], ].

: It would be nice to get the most prolific Wikipedians involved with ]. If you can, find a good reason to contact one or more of them, and invite them to work on a relevant outline - or all 500!

; Who's been up to what?

:* ''']''', ''']''', and ''']''' have been working on the government sections of the country outlines. Being that there are about 240 of these, with critical information being filled in on each, this is by far the hardest and most important chore of this WikiProject right now.
:* ''']''' is working on a redesign of the top OOK page.
:* ''']''' has done an incredible job developing the ].
:* And kudos also go to ''']''' for his work on ].

Thank you.

Here's what else has been going on...

; New outlines

:Recently created outlines include:

:* ''']''' - '']''
:* ''']''' - '']''
:* ''']''' - ]
:* ''']''' - '']''

; Recently converted to outlines

:These outline articles, which were named "List of...", have been converted to an OOK format and added to the OOK:

:* ''']''' - was "List of Vietnam War-related topics" - '']''
:* ''']''' - was "List of combinatorics topics" - converted by ]
:* ''']''' - was "List of category theory topics" converted by ]
:* ''']''' - was "List of scientific method topics" - '']''
:* ''']''' - was "List of topics related to ancient Rome" - '']''

; Recently merged into outlines

:There are a lot of "List of" articles that are outlines. Some of them are on the same subjects as the "Outline of" articles. The following articles have been recently merged into OOK pages:

:* ] into ''']''' - '']''
:* ] into ''']''' - '']''

; Outlines that have been tagged
:Tags are requests to fix a problem or improve an article in a particular way. Unless we want the tags to sit there for an extended period of time cluttering up the outlines (we don't), it is up to us to fulfill those requests or attend to underlying misassumptions (if any).

:* ''']''' - tagged as Original research
:* ''']''' - tagged as under construction
:* '''] - tagged as in need of attention from an expert
:* ''']''' - tagged as not citing any references or sources.
:* ''']''' - tagged as an orphan
:* ''']''' - tagged as an orphan
:* ''']''' - tagged as in need of attention from an expert on the subject
:* ''']''' - tagged as an orphan
:* ''']''' - tagged as an orphan
:* ''']''' - tagged as an orphan
:* ''']''' - tagged as an orphan
:* ''']''' - tagged as an orphan
:* ''']''' - tagged as an orphan
:* ''']''' - tagged as an orphan
:* ''']''' - tagged as containing original research or unverified claims, and needing references or sources
:* ''']''' - tagged as an orphan

; I can't stress enough the importance of watching

: With so many outlines (now over 500), and a growing number of support pages (guidelines, wikiproject pages, etc.), I can no longer keep up. I need your help watching over it all.

: If you'd like to omnisciently view ''everything'' "from above", see this page:

:* ] - watchlist for copying and pasting into your raw watchlist.

:Or go to these pages (and click on "Related changes" in the sidebar's toolbox menu):

:* ] - a version of the above watchlist for use with "Related changes".
:* ] - a list of key pages related to the OOK, along with their shortcuts.
:* ] - list of discussions pertaining to outlines.

; What's next?

There are a lot of contradictions in guidelines related to outlines. I'll be turning my attention to fixing those.

The number of "Outline of" articles is rapidly catching up to portals, and will probably pass them by the end of the summer!

Keep up the excellent work.

] 01:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

== We're working on something special... ==

...to award ] for all his hard work.

It's at ].

But it's not done yet. Feel free to help improve it.

I'm hoping that everyone involved with the ] will sign it (please sign without a timestamp).

Thank you.

] 23:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

== OOK collaboration: ] (eom) ==
<small>Delivered by –''']'''&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;] at 21:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)</small>

== '']'' GAR ==

As a major contributor to '']'', I thought you'd want to know that that article is currently under going a ] as part of the ]. The article currently fails the ], as detailed at ]. Its reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time for the issues to be addressed. Thanks. -- ]&nbsp;(]&nbsp;'''·''' ]) 03:01, 7 August 2009 (UTC)H


== ] progress == == prose ==


Hi Anna, could you take a look at the prose and MOS of ] in October? It's a very long article and I'm GA reviewing it, so help on these issues would be much appreciated. Thanks. Greetings ] (]) 11:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi. We've made some progress on Toy Story (not a ton, but we're making headway). The article is a mess thanks to my contributions; I tend to take things apart before I put them back together, I guess. When I merge trivia or other items to other sections, I just throw them in the bottom of the section to be integrated as I write the final prose.


==Help==
A couple of sections need to be converted to prose, and I don't know how I can convert the Awards section. The only thing I've done on it so far is copy the whole section to a list and linked to it. Would you please see if you can put it in prose? I don't know how to do that section. Thanks! ] (]) 00:23, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
Hi Anna, deleted (page) Category:Military of the Ming Dynasty and Category:History of the Ming Dynasty.--] (]) 07:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)


== ] ==
== Can I help? ==


Hi,<br>
Is there anything I can do to help with ]? ] (]) 07:20, 19 August 2008 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current ]. The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages ]. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to ] and submit your choices on ]. For the Election committee, ] (]) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
<!-- Message sent by User:Mdann52@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User:Mdann52/list&oldid=692203726 -->

Latest revision as of 10:32, 3 October 2021

AnnaFrance is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages in October if things go well.
Please leave a new message.
Archives
Archive 1

Best wishes

I just saw that you were taking a wikibreak and your comment on the Toy Story page. I hope everything turns out all right, and no need to worry about PLC... it'll always be here. Best wishes, --Jh12 (talk) 16:27, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Last of the Summer Wine

The Reviewers Award The Reviewers Award
Thank you for all your hard work on Last of the Summer Wine. The article would not have made featured status without you! Redfarmer (talk) 01:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)


I saw you're on a WikiBreak and may not see this for a while, but I wanted to express my gratitude for the assistance you provided in copy editing Last of the Summer Wine. The article is now a featured article, in large part due to your assistance. I am thankful for your help! Cheers! Redfarmer (talk) 01:05, 9 September 2008 (UTC)

Hey there

Hi, I just noticed you at WP:PRV and thought your copyediting standards must by high. Anyways, I was wondering if you could please have a go at Sunderland A.F.C.. The prose isn't the best, but I've referenced most of it and I could be getting it in at GAC shortly. Thank you. :) Sunderland06 (talk) 15:46, 21 September 2008 (UTC)

Concerning the Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Lists of basic topics

(the RfDs have already run their course)

RfD nomination of Navy of Sudan

I have nominated Navy of Sudan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

RfD nomination of Navy of Belarus

I have nominated Navy of Belarus (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) for discussion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • 16:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

Navy redirects

We've been "bluelinking" the Navy of x links in the basic topic country lists, by creating redirects for them, even for the countries that have no navy.

There's been a little controversy over the navy redirects for the landlocked countries (many of which have no navy), as you can see above. But it's all been worked out. Each country with no navy gets a redirect to wherever it is reported that it has no navy, or failing that, to its "military of" article.

The country lists are coming along slowing but surely. It shouldn't take too much longer before they will be complete enough to move into article space (!), but I can still use all the help I can get. (hint hint).

The Transhumanist 20:46, 23 September 2008 (UTC)


We could sure use your help in bluelinking the links in these lists (each link appears in one of the various country basic topic lists):

To bluelink them, create a redirect to wherever the information is covered. If there is no entity, redirect to where that is (or should be) covered.

If you have any questions, please contact me. The Transhumanist 20:58, 23 September 2008 (UTC)

The Scott Mills Show Copyedit

Hi.

When you return from your break, could you please take a look at The Scott Mills Show as it needs a copyedit.

Thanks, TwentiethApril1986 (talk) 13:19, 6 October 2008 (UTC)

Sri Lankan Tamil people

Rajaraja Chola Award
Hi Anna. Just to say you've done a wonderful job with your edits to the article over the past few months - it flows much more smoothly now, and is a much better article for the work you've done. Arulmozhivarman smiles in delight.Taprobanus (talk) 02:32, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Copyedit help

Hi there. I'm wondering if you might have time to help copyediting Alien (film). It's currently at FAC and some concerns about prose have been brought up. I've gone over Tony's guides but I feel I am too close to the text (being the primary contributor) to be able to take an objective eye and work out the kinks. Jappalang recommended you as an experienced copyeditor, so I'm hoping you might have time to lend an eye to the article if you're back from your Wikibreak. Thanks very much for your consideration. --IllaZilla (talk) 23:27, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

humble request for copyediting help

Wandalstouring (talk · contribs) sent me to you for advice on copyediting, after I mangled the 'Late Roman Army' page. Would you be so kind as to drop me a line when you return from Wikibreak? Queenmomcat (talk) 13:39, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Help needed: Sitakunda Upazila

I found you at the now defunct League of copyeditors, and I am really hoping that you can help the article. The article failed an FAC mostly because of irregularities in citation format. But, it also needs a brush up on the copy and a proof reading job. Sorry for dropping in uninvited, but would you consider helping it, please? Aditya 00:18, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

Outline of Knowledge / Geography WikiProject Collaboration: Country outlines

As you probably remember, last spring we started work on the "Geography and places" branch of Misplaced Pages's Outline of knowledge. (WikiProject Lists of basic topics has been renamed to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Outline of knowledge). The geography branch is in the form of a set of outline pages including one for every present-day nation or state in the world. That's 247 pages! This has been a huge undertaking, involving dozens of editors using advanced wiki-tools.

These pages have come a long way, and it won't be long before the whole set is complete enough to be moved to article space into the encyclopedia for the benefit of all. But there's still a lot of work left, and we could use all the help we can get!

While some editors prefer to work on one country at a time, most of our team members take on a particular entry and complete it across all the pages. This has come to be our standard type of task. To facilitate this process, we apply tools such as AutoWikiBrowser, Linky, and WikEd, all of which can be used to process a large number of pages in various (direct or indirect) ways.

In case you are interested in what we've been up to, here's a progress report:

Lately, development has been slow but continuous:

On our recruiting initiative, Penubag has done a fantastic job on the images for the awards we'll be using for our project's collaborations and contests. We now have 3 awards: a medal, a trophy, and a race ribbon. They all look tight. The trophy needs a small adjustment, but other than that, all 3 award images are complete and ready to use to create awards with.

Spartaz has warned us of (threatened to take) G4 (speedy delete) action if we run a competition that resembles the previously deleted Awards Center page. So whatever we do, any contests we run must differ substantially from the methods used there.

One type of competition I've been exploring is "edit racing". I'm in the process of working the bugs out of this concept - the first race didn't work as expected - you see, because we only had an award for first place, so the opponent didn't think it worthwhile to continue once it was clear who the winner would be. And since editors are in different time zones and usually need to start the race at different times, we need to base winning on personal start times - he who completes his assigned edits in the least time (rather than first), wins. And last but not least is quality control. What good is racing if the participants' edits are ripe with errors? So I'll be exploring possibilities such as using a referee (assigned to oversee a particular race), having participants watching each other for errors to knock them back, etc. I'm not sure yet.

Rich Farmbrough has been applying his bot expertise to filling in blanks in the country outlines (the population and area entries). I'm amazed at the number of edits he pumps out each day on a myriad of projects - ours makes up but a small time slice of his activity, and yet he has saved us many hours of manual work. Perhaps we should look into how he gets so much done.  :)

Zlerman has chosen to work on specific outlines, and has taken on Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan. He also has been keen on noticing and reporting design issues pertaining to the whole set of country outlines. Keep up the good work!

Highfields is in charge of capitals, adding them to all the outlines. He is also our first race winner. Check out the award on his user pages.

In case you didn't know, this project has expanded to include work on any and all sets of pages represented on the country outlines. Once the set of country outlines go live (in article space), traffic will likely increase for all the links included on them. The quality and usefulness of those pages will reflect heavily on the country outlines. The outlines, which are essentially lists of links, are only as good as the links they present, and therefore we've branched out to solve the biggest problems with those as well. So far, we've taken on:

  • The creation of disambiguation pages for country adjectivals ("German", "French", "Taiwanese", etc.) We're about half done with these.
  • Wikifying the CIA World Factbook statistics on the "demographics of" country pages. We've been renaming those sections to provide a key string that AWB can use for targetting (for skipping and filtering). Once that's done, we'll be able to break the clean-up down into simple AWB search/replace tasks, because we'll be able to target just those pages that include the CIA stuff.
  • We've also been renaming the "Cuisine of" articles to their adjectival forms ("Chinese cuisine", "Italian cuisine", etc.), for consistency and because the adjective-based terms are generally the most commonly-used names for those cuisine types.

Blackadam2 and Thehelpfulone have been helping out with the "demographics of" pages mentioned above.

And we have a couple speed addicts (addicted to wiki-velocity, not drugs)...

Both Robert Skyhawk and Thehelpfulone prefer (and excel at) simple AWB search/replaces. Robert hasn't actually joined our team yet, but he has been helping out quite a bit from the sidelines (via the WP:AWB/Tasks page. Unfortunately, there has recently been a non-AWB chore that has been holding things up on the AWB front - an edit to all the headings which had to be reverted before too many new edits were made, because any new edits would make the reversion more difficult. The headings have been restored, so now the way is clear for AWB operations, and there are many search/replace tasks in the queue. AWB assignments have started again!

There's a similar bottleneck on the "Demographics of" pages (the "keying" mentioned above), but that's almost cleared too.  :)

With my internet access somewhat crippled as of late, I've been finding it difficult to keep up with you guys. However, I expect to be accessing a Linky-capable workstation on a faster server (I'm on it right now, as you can probably tell from my contributions list for the past couple of days), and so I should really pick up speed. Feels goooooood.  :)

Recruiting has been a bit slow (but steady), due in part to my crippled access, and because we've been waiting for the images for the awards to be completed. I expect the team to grow more rapidly as the bottlenecks are removed.

Well that's what's been happenin', and here's what's in the pipeline...

We've got a long list of entries that need to be completed across all the outlines and related page sets. If you would like to dive in with advanced wiki-tools to process this whole set of pages on one or more tasks, drop me a note!

As for me, I'm about to begin work on a set of lists that corresponds to all the standard links on the country outlines, and these will be presented on the Topic outline of countries which will be organized exactly like the country outlines. Aside from being an extremely useful navigation aid, it will allow editors to easily see the state of country coverage on Misplaced Pages - each list will be one link-set, and each list can be used with our wiki-tools to process the pages listed. I'll provide you with a link once I get up to speed on this.

In the meantime, keep in touch!

Cheers,

The Transhumanist 00:54, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Removal from PR Volunteer List

Due to your notice that you are on an extended wikibreak, and lack of activity within the past six months, you have been removed from the list of available editors at Misplaced Pages:Peer review/volunteers. This is done to ensure those seeking volunteers are only directed to active editors who can respond relatively quickly to requests. If you decide to return to editing Misplaced Pages, feel free to readd your name to this list. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:14, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

Do not read this one - The Hunt - Outline of knowledge WikiProject - 04/17/2009

While surveying libraries, their outline-related resources, and our coverage of them, I came across something funny...

What subclass is the Bible in the Library of Congress Classification?

Do you think they'd like this one at WP:DYK?

(Nope. They didn't.)     :)

Libraries

For months, I've been sitting at a terminal in one of the largest libraries in the country, and I haven't even looked around at the available resources.

Until a few days ago.

I'm overwhelmed.

When compared to libraries, Misplaced Pages is small. (See Digest of Education Statistics 2008, Chapter 7:Libraries and Educational Technology Libraries, and turn to page 617).

But is that a fair comparison?

Yes.

Why?

Because we have growth potential.  :)

And we cover everything, including libraries!

Guess what else I found?

Hunting for outlines

I began to study libraries and librarians, since they are experts in organizing knowledge. And of course I turned to Misplaced Pages to see what we had on the things I came across...

And while doing so I kept running into outlines on Misplaced Pages that are not (yet) part of the Outline of knowledge.

When I come across non-OOK outlines, generally I rename them, and reformat them to our standard outline format. But there is the occasional exception.

Here are some outlines I just added:

  1. List of energy topics --> Outline of energy (it converted great)
  2. List of Dewey Decimal classes --> Outline of Dewey Decimal classes (no conversion)
  3. Library of Congress Classification --> ??? (no rename, no conversion)

The last 2 are outlines by their very nature, and so our standard outline subheadings didn't seem to fit. So I left them as is.

I renamed the first 2, but the last one is the name of the outline, that is, the topic itself is an outline, and that outline is presented as the article's content, so I left the name as is. For now. This needs more thought.

Of course, that's not all. Concerning those last 2 outlines above...

Alternate outlines of knowledge

...not only are they outlines, but they are outlines of knowledge! Well, the top few levels, at least.

Uh, so?

What happens if we linkify them?  :)

That is, what happens if we linkify their classifications to Misplaced Pages's outlines?  :)   :)   :)

They become alternate top ends to the OOK

Yep.

What can you find?

I challenge you to find some "hidden" outlines.

I dare you to take a look around Misplaced Pages for hidden outlines (that is, outlines not yet hooked into the OOK), and add your kills to WP:WPOOK#The hunt for hidden outlines.

My trophies are already there.

May the hunt begin!

The Transhumanist 21:04, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Still active?

You are listed on the volunteer list of theOutline of knowledge WikiProject, which I'm updating.

Is this something you are still interested in participating in?

I look forward to your reply on my talk page.

The Transhumanist 20:52, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

A couple questions for you...

What are the benefits of a tree structure?

The article doesn't say.

I'm interested, because I need to explain the benefits in the guideline on outlines I'm writing. (Outlines are a type of tree structure).

I've also asked the question at various reference desks, and these threads may help to jump start your brain on this question.  :)

What are the benefits of outlines, over and above regular articles?

What benefits have you noticed?

How are Misplaced Pages's outlines useful to you?

I look forward to your answers on my talk page.

The Transhumanist 04:49, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

Has the shit hit the fan? - WPOOK update, 05/25/2009

Maybe...

We've started the next phase

I was experiencing mental block on the article draft for "outline" and on the outline guideline draft. And this was holding the whole project back. Without these (which are intended to explain the type of lists known as outlines in detail), the danger is higher that a controversy could go the wrong way.

I requested help on them, but there was none forthcoming.

So I went ahead and started us on the next phase of operations without those 2 pages...

Our AWB'ers and I have placed about 1600 notices all over Misplaced Pages. And the plan is to place several thousand more.

This generated only one complaint, but it was a very vocal one, and attracted a few other detractors who seemed unfamiliar with the concept of hierarchical outlines and their benefits. However, just as many or more editors came to the defense of the OOK, and there was no consensus formed. But, dab is still trying to rally opposition to outlines at the Village Pump. See below...

Administrator noticeboard incident and Village Pump policy discussion

It appears that the banner placed on the talk page of the Outline of Switzerland caught the attention of an editor named Dbachmann who posted a rather forceful message on my talk page, another on WT:WPOOK, another at WP:VPP, and still another at WP:AN!

He went well out of his way to use negative hype to cause a stir.

It appears that Mr. Bachmann doesn't understand the nature of hierarchical outlines and their applications. And though he implied that he has never seen an OOK outline before, he was involved with a discussion on these when they were called "lists of basic topics".

His primary argument is that outlines are content forks of articles, and violate WP:CFORK.

But "topic lists", of which outlines are a type, have been around for almost as long as Misplaced Pages, and fall under the WP:LISTS and WP:STAND guidelines. They aren't intended as forks, as they are lists, bringing the benefits of lists to the corresponding subjects, such as grouping and navigation.

Someone suggested an MfD, but lists are articles, and are within the jurisdiction of AfD. Only the portal page, which merely lists the outline articles, falls within the scope of the MfD department.

The administrator's noticeboard was considered the wrong venue for the discussion, and the discussion was closed.

But Dab's discussion at the Village Pump is still active. Hopefully level heads will prevail there too.

Now what?

Am I disheartened or deterred? Hell no. I say "full steam ahead!"

But we really need to finish the article draft and the guideline. Otherwise there will continue to be confusion.

Over the next week or two, we'll be posting another 1600 or so notices. It's a good thing we didn't send out 10,000 of them all at once.  :)

The Transhumanist 23:50, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

P.S.: Another related thread has popped up at WP:VPR#OoK's expediency. --TT   04:44, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Why do we have outlines in addition to...?

Main page: Misplaced Pages:Why do we have outlines in addition to...?

Misplaced Pages:Outlines was growing so large that I split this section off as a separate page.

I look forward to your feedback and improvements.

The Transhumanist 22:46, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Outline update - Good news and bad news - 06/08/2009

The big push continues.

And it seems to be working!

The good news is that there's growing support for outlines, and there are more editors than ever editing them!

The bad news is that the complainers are disproportionately represented on the project's various talk pages. While many editors work diligently on the front end, a handful of complainers are trying to tear down the project behind the scenes. Fortunately, barely enough supporters have been watching those pages that no consensus for moving or merging the outlines has succeeded. So far...

Big problem: ignorance of what outlines are for and their benefits

Most of the opposition seems to be unaware of the complete range of what outlines are used for. They just don't get it.

This is why it is important to complete the outline article draft. An article with a comprehensive treatment of outlines would be the perfect place to refer anybody unfamiliar with outlines to.

Opposers also don't seem to understand how outlines differ from some other page type that they prefer. Some think articles are good enough as an overview, others think portals are more in-depth, still others think categories or navigation boxes are the most efficient and useful way to organize and present topical information. Some have simply never seen an "Outline of" page before and think they are a new type of page (they've been around under other names since 2001).

If you run across anyone who doesn't understand the role of outlines on Misplaced Pages, Misplaced Pages:Why do we have outlines in addition to...? might help reduce their misconceptions or uncertainties about outlines.

On the bright side, you've got to see this...

To add the outlines and related support pages to your watchlist (takes less than 30 seconds), cut and paste them from Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist into your raw watchlist. For a way to improve the display of your watchlist - by namespace (very useful) - see Watchlist sorter, or use the "super fast upgrade" at WP:OTS.

Or go to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist using Related changes (currently without the talk pages) and click on "Related changes" in the toolbox menu on the sidebar on the left side of your screen.

The big push

The big push started with about a thousand banners and notices being placed on article talk pages all over Misplaced Pages.

But it didn't stop there...

Welcome our new members...

The following Wikipedians have joined the OOK team.

Be sure to stop by their talk pages and introduce yourselves.

Enter the mentors!

I asked a bunch of mentors at WP:ADOPT for advice. Several of them answered on my talk page. Most of those who replied were happy to help, and posted some very good ideas. A couple even joined the project.

Here are their ideas, and what is being done about them. A few of the tasks still need volunteers:

Linking to outlines has begun

To the tops of about 30 subject articles, I placed a test batch of hatnotes leading to the corresponding outlines. The hatnotes look like this:

For a topical guide to this subject, see Outline of X.(Hidden: <!- PLEASE LEAVE THIS LINE IN PLACE because it leads to the page that serves as the table of contents for Misplaced Pages's overall coverage of this subject. Thank you.-->

The rationale for the hatnotes is that each outline is a topical guide for its subject, and since tables of contents go at the front of a book, a link to each outline should be placed at the front of its subject.

Unfortunately, not all editors agree. Some of the hatnotes have already disappeared.  :(

Some past discussions pertaining to the existence or location of outlines

Note that the "Lists of topics" are of two types, including outlines and indexes, so discussions to remove, move, or merge those are usually relevant to the OOK. Also, outlines are a type of list, so discussions that affect lists in general also pertain to outlines. We've got to be on our toes!

I've excluded links to live discussions, out of respect for WP:CANVASS.

Table of contents to OOK-related stuff

Here's a directory of outline support pages:

Keep up the great work!

The Transhumanist 04:31, 8 June 2009 (UTC)

WPOOK advert banner under development, here's the beta...

Thank you to those who suggested WPOOK have an animated advert banner. Penubag got working on it right away. Here's what he's come up with so far:

Penubag needs feedback.

I've posted a few changes for him to make to it.

Please post additional comments and suggestions for him at User talk:Penubag#Chocolate banner.

Thank you.

The Transhumanist 02:45, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Request to participate in University of Washington survey on tool to quickly understand Wikipedians’ reputations

Hello. I'm part of a research group at the University of Washington. In April, we met with some local Wikipedians to learn what they would like to know about other editors’ history and activities (within Misplaced Pages) when interacting with them on talk pages. The goal of those sessions was to gather feedback to help design an embedded application that could quickly communicate useful information about other Wikipedians. We have now created a few images that we feel represent some of what our participants thought was important. We would appreciate it if you took a few minutes of your time to complete an online survey that investigates whether or not these images would be useful to you. Your quick contribution would be very valuable to our research group and ultimately to Misplaced Pages. (When finished, the code for this application will be given over to the Misplaced Pages community to use and/or adjust as they see fit.)

Willing to spend a few minutes taking our survey? Click this link.

Please feel free to share the link with other Wikipedians. The more feedback, the better! The survey is completely anonymous and takes less than 10 minutes to complete. All data is used for university research purposes only.

Thank you for your time! If you have any questions about our research or research group, please visit our user page. Commprac01 (talk) 21:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Additional details about our research group are available here.

Outline collaboration!

As you know, Penubag is working on a banner to advertise the Outline WikiProject. And he's almost done.

The banner prominently presents the "Outline of chocolate", which of course will become the most widely advertised outline as soon as the banner goes live. The first thing many editors will do after seeing the banner is look for that outline.

The problem is, we don't have one.

So that's our first outline collaboration!

I started a draft this morning.

It needs to be finished and moved to the article namespace before we can start using Penubag's banner ad!

Come join in on the fun. It's chocolate!

The Transhumanist 22:05, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

Outline update - Full Steam Ahead! - 06/18/2009

Several members of the WikiProject have been hard at work.

Buaidh has been building and refining the outlines on the U.S. States, the states' historical outlines, and the Historical outline of the United States. Lately, his edits have dominated the project's watchlist readout. (I think he's overdue for a barnstar or two. hint hint)

Penubag has been working on medals for all the main branches of the OOK, and has completed the OOK WikiProject's animated advert banner (see below).

Highfields has been filling in the currencies for each country on their respective outlines.

NuclearWarfare and Thehelpfulone have been busy with WP:AWB, posting banners and notices, and helping our sister project, the Index WikiProject, get established. Indexes work hand-in-hand with the outlines and are prominently linked to from the top of most of them. And the outlines, which serve as tables of contents, are only as good as the pages they link to.

Since we started integrating (linking) the OOK and its support pages into the encyclopedia and into the Misplaced Pages community, activity on outlines has been increasing. Though there's still much left to do.

But I digress. There are a couple more...

Welcome our new members! Stefan and MacMed

Stefan is building the Outline of sharks.

MacMed has joined our advanced wiki-tools team, and is currently adding links to outlines in the corresponding subject articles' see also sections.

Be sure to stop by their talk pages and say "hi".

WPOOK's advert banner has gone live!

Penubag has finished this WikiProject's animated advert banner, and it is now being displayed on the Misplaced Pages ads template which in turn is displayed on about 2000 user pages. Each time someone access one of those pages, there is a 1 in 184 chance of them viewing this:

Misplaced Pages ad for Misplaced Pages:Wikiproject Outlines
Misplaced Pages adsfile info – #184

If you'd like to display the banner on your userpage locked-on to the ad as above, use the following code:

{{Misplaced Pages ads|ad=184}}

(By the way, it's been awhile since we've barnstarred Penubag).

Watchers needed!

If you haven't already, please add the entire project's watchlist to your watchlist. Here's how:

From the edit window, copy and paste Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist into your raw watchlist.
Or go to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Outline of knowledge/Watchlist using Related changes and click on "Related changes" in the toolbox menu in Misplaced Pages's sidebar on the left hand side of the screen.

Check the watchlist every time you log on!

I forgot to mention this step above.  :)

The OOK is in 5 other Wikipedias?

I can't make heads or tails of 'em, but these links were on Portal:Contents/Outline of knowledge:

Resurrected from the grave yard...

I discovered an AfD discussion on possibly the first article named "Outline of", which was called Outline of Islamic and Muslim related topics, and which was created 4 years ago. Of course they deleted it. But now it has many friends, and so it has risen from the dead.  :)

See the DRV discussion at Misplaced Pages:Deletion review/Log/2009 June 7#Outline of Islamic and Muslim related topics.

A diamond buried in project space

Recruiting

Recruiters needed. Drop me a note if you are interested.

Advice from the mentors

  • Astatine-210, Strdst grl, and Willscrlt - link to the outlines from the corresponding subject articles' see also sections - this is underway by MacMed (non-country outlines) and User talk:NuclearWarfare (counry outlines).
  • Astatine-210 - add a link to the outlines to the disambiguation pages of the corresponding subjects - good idea. Since "Outline" is just the type of page, not the subject, I think these might qualify for inclusion on disambiguation pages. We need someone to look into the relevant guidelines on this.
  • SimonTrew - provide a badge (userbox) for WPOOK members to add to their user pages - Penubag will have one for us soon.
  • Zachary crimsonwolf - create a card explaining outlines, and send it to everyone you know, and make it viral (by including a request for the recipients to send the card to everyone they know) - this task has been split in three:
  1. Creation of a "thank you for your interest" card which introduces (explains) outlines, to send to queriers, new participants to discussions, those who seem to be confused about outlines, etc.
  2. Creation of a thank you card / invitation to the WPOOK, to send to users we see working on outlines, including a request for them to invite others whom they think might be interested
3. Creation of an invitation to Wikignomes, with a brief rundown on the types of tasks there are for them to do on the outlines. The invitation will include a request for them to invite anyone they think would enjoy working on outlines.
  • weebiloobil - add examples to Misplaced Pages:Outlines - more examples will be added as suitable outlines are completed
  • weebiloobil - add a picture to Misplaced Pages:Outlines (it doesn't have to be relevant), to provide atmosphere and to break it up visually and add a splash of color - will do, and we'll add a caption to make it relevant, with a link to the outline on that subject. Thank you for the idea.
  • Zachary crimsonwolf - ask Jimbo Wales to bestow the award(s) for the country outlines contest, once you get it going first - we'll give that a try
  • Zachary crimsonwolf - ask everyone in the project to inform their acquaintances around Misplaced Pages about the OOK - will do, as soon as the cards
  • UzEE - collaborate with all the WikiProjects you share scope with - we've placed a banner on their talk pages, and have placed task notices on some. We'll be posting more tasks, and plan to create a section on contents system development and maintenance for each WikiProject page itself.
  • SriMesh - if you can't get outlines added to next year's WikiCup, then create your own WikiCup-like contest - there's 6 months left to this year to address reservations and work out the details at WikiCup. In the meantime, there's the 200-WikiProject contest, which needs input.

More outline tasks

New outlines in article space

New outline drafts

Main discussion pages

Keep up the great work

I'm impressed with the level of enthusiasm and work going into the outlines. I'm proud to be working with each of you.

The Transhumanist 23:26, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Outline collaboration #2: Outline of Gibraltar

This outline is approaching completion.

I added a bunch more links, finding them with the following Google site-specific searches of Misplaced Pages:

(You can use the wikicode for the links above as the basis for new searches - just replace "Gibraltar" with any other country or region name).

Request: please redirect the redlinks! (bluelinking...)

The redlinks need to be bluelinked where possible. The most useful way is to create redirects leading to the material (which is usually included in a section of an article - see Misplaced Pages:Redirect#Redirects to page sections. That way, when the redirect pages are replaced by the actual articles, the links will already point to the right places.

Please take a crack at it, and bluelink a few.

Thank you.

Good luck.

Have fun.

The Transhumanist 01:12, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

P.S.: on an unrelated matter, where should the Outline of chocolate be placed on the OOK? -TT

I finally got to whack somebody with a trout!

That was fun.  :)

The Transhumanist 00:00, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

Outline update - Push push push - 06/25/2009

Work is proceeding apace...

New members
Hatnotes

The current consensus is that we can't place a hatnote leading to an outline at the top of a subject articles unless the outline being presented is of at least the same quality-level as the article.

What's next...

Improve outline quality by completing them.

Place hatnotes for the outlines of high enough quality.

Guidelines pertaining to outlines need to be updated. Outlines emerged as a class of pages only a few months ago, and most of the relevant guidelines don't cover them specifically. For example, Misplaced Pages:Stand-alone lists is incredibly out of date.

Invite wikignomes, wikielves, and wikifairies (all 2500+ of them) to help on the outlines .

Identify 600 more subjects with coverage extensive enough to justify outlines, create rudimentary drafts for them, and post notices to the corresponding WikiProjects and subject talk pages to help build them.

Convert outlines titled "List of" to outline articles, and add them to the OOK. There are a few hundred of these. Conversion instructions are needed.

Add a description of outlines to About Misplaced Pages and Misplaced Pages:Basic navigation, and add tips about outlines to the WP:TOTD and Tips library.

Keep up the great work!

The Transhumanist 20:27, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

Request for feedback

Minnecologies has done an incredible amount of work on Outline of forestry and posted a note to me on my talk page requesting feedback.

I've posted my observations at Talk:Outline of forestry#Finished outline review.

Please take a look at the outline and let Minnecologies know what you think of it on the outline's talk page.

Thank you.

The Transhumanist 19:37, 29 June 2009 (UTC) Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 20:14, 29 June 2009 (UTC).

Outline Update - Exhausted - 07/10/2009

I'm sorry that I haven't been available to assign tasks lately. For the past 3 days (not including today) I've been almost totally consumed in discussions concerning the location and very existence of outlines. Today I finally broke free and got back to work on outlines. Felt good.

A great deal has been happening with outlines and behind the scenes. I just don't have time to tell you all about it this time around. Here's the best I can do...

How to watch what's going on with outlines

If you'd like a bird's eye view of everything that's happening with respect to outlines, see this page:

  • WP:OOKWL - watchlist for copying and pasting into your raw watchlist.

Or go to these pages (and click on "Related changes" in the sidebar's toolbox menu):

  • WP:OOKRC - a version of the above watchlist for use with "Related changes".
  • WP:OOKDIR - a list of key pages related to the OOK, along with their shortcuts.
  • WP:OOKDISC - list of discussions pertaining to outlines.
Recently converted to outlines

These outline articles, which were named "List of...", have been converted to an OOK format:

Recently merged into outlines

There are a lot of "List of" articles that are outlines. Some of them are on the same subjects as the "Outline of" articles. The following one have been recently merged:

The Transhumanist 01:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Outline Update - Basking in the light of knowledge - 07/28/2009

Phase two of outline integration (de-orphanizing outlines by adding links leading to them into article see also sections) is nearly complete. The better that outlines are integrated into the encyclopedia, the more use they will be to readers.

Due to greater exposure through outline integration, and with most of the OOK team on school summer vacation, development activity on outlines has increased a lot...

New members
Be sure to welcome our newest members to the team:
News: Outline of Palestine survives AfD
The outline was nominated for deletion for being too general in scope. The consensus was overwhelmingly for keeping it.
The most memorable comment was posted by Mandsford: I like the poetic name, anyway. . "Master Plan of Pakistan" and "Rough Sketch of Bangladesh" would be good too.
Special thanks to Tiamut for greatly improving the outline, and helping to save it from AfD.
To keep track of outline AfDs and other outline-related discussions, see WP:OOKDISC.
Who's active on Misplaced Pages this summer?
Courtesy of Rich Farmbrough, here's a list of editors by their edit counts over the previous month (8th June to 8th July).
It would be nice to get the most prolific Wikipedians involved with WP:WPOOK. If you can, find a good reason to contact one or more of them, and invite them to work on a relevant outline - or all 500!
Who's been up to what?
  • Buaidh, Highfields, and Gimme danger have been working on the government sections of the country outlines. Being that there are about 240 of these, with critical information being filled in on each, this is by far the hardest and most important chore of this WikiProject right now.
  • Penubag is working on a redesign of the top OOK page.
  • Tiamut has done an incredible job developing the Outline of Palestine.
  • And kudos also go to Eu.stefan for his work on Outline of Buddhism.

Thank you.

Here's what else has been going on...

New outlines
Recently created outlines include:
Recently converted to outlines
These outline articles, which were named "List of...", have been converted to an OOK format and added to the OOK:
Recently merged into outlines
There are a lot of "List of" articles that are outlines. Some of them are on the same subjects as the "Outline of" articles. The following articles have been recently merged into OOK pages:
Outlines that have been tagged
Tags are requests to fix a problem or improve an article in a particular way. Unless we want the tags to sit there for an extended period of time cluttering up the outlines (we don't), it is up to us to fulfill those requests or attend to underlying misassumptions (if any).
I can't stress enough the importance of watching
With so many outlines (now over 500), and a growing number of support pages (guidelines, wikiproject pages, etc.), I can no longer keep up. I need your help watching over it all.
If you'd like to omnisciently view everything "from above", see this page:
  • WP:OOKWL - watchlist for copying and pasting into your raw watchlist.
Or go to these pages (and click on "Related changes" in the sidebar's toolbox menu):
  • WP:OOKRC - a version of the above watchlist for use with "Related changes".
  • WP:OOKDIR - a list of key pages related to the OOK, along with their shortcuts.
  • WP:OOKDISC - list of discussions pertaining to outlines.
What's next?

There are a lot of contradictions in guidelines related to outlines. I'll be turning my attention to fixing those.

The number of "Outline of" articles is rapidly catching up to portals, and will probably pass them by the end of the summer!

Keep up the excellent work.

The Transhumanist 01:29, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

We're working on something special...

...to award Buaidh for all his hard work.

It's at User:Penubag/Sandbox3.

But it's not done yet. Feel free to help improve it.

I'm hoping that everyone involved with the WP:WPOOK will sign it (please sign without a timestamp).

Thank you.

The Transhumanist 23:05, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

OOK collaboration: Outline of knowledge (eom)

Delivered by –Juliancolton |  at 21:39, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

The Lion King GAR

As a major contributor to The Lion King, I thought you'd want to know that that article is currently under going a Good Article Reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps. The article currently fails the good article criteria, as detailed at Talk:The Lion King/GA1. Its reassessment is on hold for seven days to allow time for the issues to be addressed. Thanks. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 03:01, 7 August 2009 (UTC)H

prose

Hi Anna, could you take a look at the prose and MOS of Greco-Persian Wars in October? It's a very long article and I'm GA reviewing it, so help on these issues would be much appreciated. Thanks. Greetings Wandalstouring (talk) 11:39, 8 September 2009 (UTC)

Help

Hi Anna, deleted (page) Category:Military of the Ming Dynasty and Category:History of the Ming Dynasty.--Yongle the Great (talk) 07:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Misplaced Pages arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

User talk:AnnaFrance: Difference between revisions Add topic