Misplaced Pages

1946 Polish people's referendum: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:07, 22 November 2007 edit201.1.172.47 (talk) Added info with references from TIME Magazine from 1946← Previous edit Latest revision as of 21:08, 28 December 2024 edit undoNumber 57 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators293,596 edits Combine results tables, as is frequently done for multi-question referendums, fix reference 
(84 intermediate revisions by 58 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Politics of Poland}} {{Politics of Poland}}
The '''People's Referendum''' (Polish: ''referendum ludowe'') of ], also known as the "Three Times Yes" (Polish: ''Trzy razy tak'', often abbreviated as 3xTAK) referendum, was a ] held in ] on ] ] on the authority of the ] (order of ] 1946). The referendum presented an opportunity for the forces vying for political control of Poland following the ] to test their popularity among the general population. In a sign of things to come, the results, which showed a lack of support for the ] government, were rigged to show that communist policies had overwhelming support{{Fact|date=May 2007}}.


A three-question referendum was held in ] on 30 June 1946. Known as the people's referendum ({{langx|pl|referendum ludowe}}) or three times yes referendum (''Trzy razy tak'', often abbreviated as ''3×TAK'') it was held as a result of a ] order of 27 April 1946. The referendum presented an opportunity for the forces vying for political control of Poland following ] to test their popularity among the general population. However, the results were forged and the referendum failed to meet democratic standards.<ref name="NS">{{cite book |editor1-last=Nohlen |editor1-first=Dieter |editor2-last=Stöver |editor2-first=Philip |editor1-link=Dieter Nohlen |title=Elections in Europe: A Data Handbook |date=2010 |publisher=Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft |isbn=978-3832956097 |page=1475}}</ref><ref name="Williamson"/><ref name=":0">{{Cite journal |last=Staar |first=Richard F. |date=1958 |title=Elections in Communist Poland |url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/2108857 |journal=Midwest Journal of Political Science |volume=2 |issue=2 |pages=200–218 |doi=10.2307/2108857 |issn=0026-3397}}</ref>

During the referendum campaign, the communists repressed the opposition led by ].<ref name=":0" /> Communists censored ] (PSL) communications, disrupted PSL meetings, and mass arrested PSL members.<ref name=":0" />

== Questions ==
The referendum comprised three questions: The referendum comprised three questions:

<blockquote style="background: #efefef; border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em;"> <blockquote style="background: #efefef; border: 1px solid black; padding: 1em;">
# ''Are you in favour of abolishing the ]?'' # Are you in favour of abolishing the ]?
# ''Are you in favour of adopting an ] founded on ] and the ] of basic national industries, including the preservation of the statutory rights of private enterprise?'' # Do you want consolidation, in the future constitution of the ] founded on ] and the ] of basic national industries, including the preservation of the statutory rights of private enterprise?
# Do you want consolidation of the western border of the Polish State on the ]?<ref name="wiem">{{cite web |title=Referendum ludowe |url=http://portalwiedzy.onet.pl/15919,,,,referendum_ludowe,haslo.html |website=]|access-date=4 December 2009 |language=pl |archive-date=5 October 2012 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20121005152316/http://portalwiedzy.onet.pl/15919,,,,referendum_ludowe,haslo.html |url-status=dead }}</ref>
# ''Do you want to adopt the ] (comprising the ] and the ]) as the western border of Poland?''
</blockquote> </blockquote>


== Campaign ==
Parties of the pro-communist Democratic Bloc (], ], ], ]) campaigned heavily in favor of "Three Times Yes". ], which realised what was really at stake in the vote, namely Polish independence and future of the country, advocated voting "no" on the first question, despite the fact that it had been opposed to the Senate's existence since before the war. The majority of PSL political support was in rural areas, among people who supported agricultural reform{{Fact|date=May 2007}}, so the party found it impossible to advocate voting "no" on the second question. Nonetheless, the party's opposition to the first question was used by the communists to declare the more liberal PSL activists "traitors". The ] party argued against the first two questions only, while ] advocated a "no" for all three questions, as a sign of protest against the annexation of the eastern territories of Poland (known as the ]) by the ].
]
Parties of the pro-communist Democratic Bloc, (the ] (PPR), ], ], and ]) campaigned heavily in favor of "Three Times Yes", while non-communist parties advocated various other combinations; hence the referendum was seen as unofficially deciding whether the Polish citizenry supported or opposed communism.<ref name=wiem /><ref name="mk">{{cite journal |last1=Korkuć |first1=Maciej |title=Wybory 1947 – mit założycielski komunizmu |journal=] |url=http://www.polska1918-89.pl/pdf/wybory-1947-%E2%80%93-mit-zalozycielski-komunizmu,5603.pdf |date=2007 |issue=1–2 |language=pl|pages=111–113}}</ref> The ] (PSL) and ] advocated voting "no" on the first question<ref name=wiem /> despite the fact that it had been opposed to the Senate's existence since before the war. The majority of PSL political support was in rural areas, among people who supported agricultural reform{{Citation needed|date=May 2007}}, so the party found it impossible to advocate voting "no" on the second question. Nonetheless, the party's opposition to the first question was used by the communists to declare the more liberal PSL activists "traitors". Catholic groups supported "no" on the first question, "yes" on the third, and left the second to voters individual preferences.<ref name=wiem /> The ] party argued against the first two questions only, while the ] advocated a "no" for all three questions, as a sign of protest against the annexation of the eastern territories of Poland (known as the ]) by the ].<ref name=wiem />


== Results ==
The official results, published on ] ], showed that from a population of 13,160,451 eligible voters, 90.1% or 11,857,986 had taken part in the referendum. Of these, 11,530,551 or 97.2% were counted as valid. On the first question, 68% voters chose "yes". On the second question, 77.2% voted "yes". On the third question, 91.4% voted "yes"{{Fact|date=May 2007}}. The official results, published on 12 July 1946, showed that from a population of 13,160,451 eligible voters, 90.1% or 11,857,986 had taken part in the referendum. Of these, 11,530,551 or 97.2% were counted as valid. On the first question, 68% of voters chose "yes". On the second question, 77.2% voted "yes". On the third question, 91.4% voted "yes".<ref name=wiem/>


However, the official results were far removed from the actual results since the vote had been seriously compromised by the communists and their supporters. The communists, who already ''de facto'' controlled much of the government and had the backing of the military (both the Polish ] and Soviet ]), used the police (]) and the secret services (]) to switch real ballots for false ones, stuff ballot boxes with false votes, destroy votes not in favour of all or any of the three questions or simply falsify votes. Voting in the army was done on command and without secrecy.<ref>, '']'', June 17, 1946</ref><ref>, '']'', July 08, 1946</ref> However, the official results were far removed from the actual results since the vote had been seriously compromised by the communists and their supporters. The communists, who already ''de facto'' controlled much of the government and had the backing of the military (both the Polish ] and Soviet ]), used the police (]) and the secret services (]) to threaten, assault and even murder opposition activists, switch real ballots for false ones, stuff ballot boxes with false votes, consider blank ballots as "yes" votes, destroy votes not in favour of all or any of the three questions or simply falsify votes.<ref name=wiem /><ref name=mk/> Voting in the army was done on command and without secrecy.<ref>{{cite magazine |date= 17 June 1946 |title= You Cannot Shoot Us All|url= http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,793059,00.html|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20110219195337/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,793059,00.html|url-status= dead|archive-date= February 19, 2011|magazine= ]}}</ref><ref>{{cite magazine |date= 8 July 1946 |title= It is Forbidden|url= http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,778716,00.html|archive-url= https://web.archive.org/web/20080501181143/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,778716,00.html|url-status= dead|archive-date= May 1, 2008|magazine= ]}}</ref> The falsification was overseen, just like the later ], by Soviet experts like ] and ], both high-ranking officers from the Soviet ].<ref name=mk/>


In ], where the opposition managed to ensure a fair vote, the "no" results were: 84%, 59% and 30% for all three questions{{Fact|date=May 2007}}. Despite the protests of the opposition, led by ], and representatives of the ] and ], the results were declared free and fair by the government. In ], where the opposition managed to ensure a fair vote, the "no" results were: 84%, 59% and 30% for all three questions.<ref name=wiem/> PSL, which was able to obtain real records for approximately 48% of the voting districts, estimated that a "yes" for all three questions was chosen by 16.7% of respondents.<ref name=wiem/> Despite the protests of the opposition, led by ], and representatives of the ] and ], the results were declared free and fair by the government.


{| class=wikitable style=text-align:right
Materials published after the communists lost power in Poland in ] show that the nationwide results were the following: for the first question, "yes" was chosen by 26.9% voters. For the second question, 42% chose "yes". For the third question, 66.9% chose "yes"{{Fact|date=May 2007}}..
!rowspan=2|Question
!colspan=2|For
!colspan=2|Against
!rowspan=2|Invalid/<br>blank
!rowspan=2|Total<br>votes
!rowspan=2|Registered<br>voters
!rowspan=2|Turnout
!rowspan=2|Outcome
|-
!Votes
!%
!Votes
!%
|-
|align=left|Abolition of the Senate||7,844,522||68.03||3,686,029||31.97||327,435||11,857,986||rowspan=3|13,160,451||90.10||{{yes2|Approved}}
|-
|align=left|Economic system||8,896,105||77.15||2,634,446||22.85||327,435||11,857,986||90.10||{{yes2|Approved}}
|-
|align=left|Western border||10,534,697||91.36||995,854||8.64||327,435||11,857,986||90.10||{{yes2|Approved}}
|-
|colspan=14 align=left|Source: Nohlen & Stöver
|}


== Aftermath ==
PSL estimated that a "yes" for all three questions was chosen by 15% of respondents{{Fact|date=May 2007}}. Secret documents from the PPR show that they believed 27% of respondents had voted yes for all three questions. The official results indicated this figure was 68%{{Fact|date=May 2007}}.
Following the referendum, the ] called for democratic elections. However, the ] were "completely manipulated".<ref name=NS />


According to documents released forty-three years later, 29% of respondents had voted yes for all three questions. The official results indicated this figure was 68%.<ref name="Williamson">{{cite book|last1=Williamson |first1=David G. |author1-link=David G. Williamson |title=The Polish Underground 1939-1947|date=2012|publisher=Pen and Sword|isbn=978-1-84884-281-6|page=203}}</ref> Materials published after the communists lost power in Poland in 1989 showed that only the third question received a majority of votes in favor. For the first question, "yes" was chosen by 26.9% voters. For the second question, 42% chose "yes". For the third question, 66.9% chose "yes".<ref>{{cite book |last1=Osękowski |first1=Czesław |title=Referendum 30 czerwca 1946 roku w Polsce |date=2000 |publisher=Wydawnictwo Sejmowe |isbn=83-7059-459-X |language=pl}}</ref>{{page needed|date=May 2019}}<ref>{{cite journal |last1=Stawicki |first1=Robert |title=Zarys instytucji referendum jako formy demokracji bezpośredniej : referendum ogólnokrajowe w Polsce |date=2013 |issue=620 |page=8 |url=https://www.senat.gov.pl/gfx/senat/pl/senatopracowania/50/plik/ot-620_internet.pdf |journal=Opracowania Tematyczne |publisher=Kancelaria Senatu |language=pl}}</ref>
The referendum demonstrated the weakness of the communists and encouraged them to increase their persecution of the opposition and general repression{{Fact|date=May 2007}}. It also discouraged them from holding any further referendums. However, it should be noted that communists did have a significant base of support, as at least 27% of voters voted for their policies without any duress.

]

<br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br><br>


==References== ==References==
{{reflist}}
<references/>
* ], 1982 and several reprints. ''God's Playground''. 2 vols. New York: Columbia Univ. Press. ISBN 0-231-05353-3 and ISBN 0-231-05351-7
* M.Turlejska, ''Zapis pierwszej dekady, 1945-1954''
* Article in Polish PWN Encyclopedia, online version. Accessed on 11 July 2005. Polish language.


== Further reading ==
*{{cite book |last1=Davies |first1=Norman |author-link1=Norman Davies |title=], Vol. 2}}
*{{cite book |last1=Turlejska |first1=Maria |title=Zapis pierwszej dekady 1945–1954 |date=1972 |publisher=Książka i Wiedza |language=pl}}
*{{cite web |title=Polska Historia |url=http://encyklopedia.pwn.pl/58502_1.html |website=Encyclopedia PWN |publisher=] |access-date=11 July 2005 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20050405222603/http://encyklopedia.pwn.pl/58502_1.html |archive-date=5 April 2005 |language=pl}}
*{{cite web |last1=Petrov |first1=Nikita |author-link1=Nikita Petrov |title=The Role of the MGB of USSR in the Sovietization of Poland: the Referendum and Sejm Elections in 1946–1947 |url=http://bbb.livejournal.com/1269125.html |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110723032842/http://bbb.livejournal.com/1269125.html |archive-date=23 July 2011 |language=ru}}


{{Polish Elections}} {{Polish elections}}
{{History of the People's Republic of Poland}}


] ]
] ]
] ]
] ]
]

]

Latest revision as of 21:08, 28 December 2024

Politics of Poland
Government
Legislature



Executive


Judiciary
Elections
Political parties
Administrative divisions
Foreign relations

Related topics

A three-question referendum was held in Poland on 30 June 1946. Known as the people's referendum (Polish: referendum ludowe) or three times yes referendum (Trzy razy tak, often abbreviated as 3×TAK) it was held as a result of a State National Council order of 27 April 1946. The referendum presented an opportunity for the forces vying for political control of Poland following World War II to test their popularity among the general population. However, the results were forged and the referendum failed to meet democratic standards.

During the referendum campaign, the communists repressed the opposition led by Stanisław Mikołajczyk. Communists censored Polish People's Party (PSL) communications, disrupted PSL meetings, and mass arrested PSL members.

Questions

The referendum comprised three questions:

  1. Are you in favour of abolishing the Senate?
  2. Do you want consolidation, in the future constitution of the economic system founded on agricultural reform and the nationalisation of basic national industries, including the preservation of the statutory rights of private enterprise?
  3. Do you want consolidation of the western border of the Polish State on the Baltic, Oder river and Lusatian Neisse?

Campaign

Agitation poster in Warsaw

Parties of the pro-communist Democratic Bloc, (the Polish Workers' Party (PPR), Socialist Party, Democratic Party, and People's Party) campaigned heavily in favor of "Three Times Yes", while non-communist parties advocated various other combinations; hence the referendum was seen as unofficially deciding whether the Polish citizenry supported or opposed communism. The Polish People's Party (PSL) and Labor Party advocated voting "no" on the first question despite the fact that it had been opposed to the Senate's existence since before the war. The majority of PSL political support was in rural areas, among people who supported agricultural reform, so the party found it impossible to advocate voting "no" on the second question. Nonetheless, the party's opposition to the first question was used by the communists to declare the more liberal PSL activists "traitors". Catholic groups supported "no" on the first question, "yes" on the third, and left the second to voters individual preferences. The Wolność i Niezawisłość party argued against the first two questions only, while the National Armed Forces advocated a "no" for all three questions, as a sign of protest against the annexation of the eastern territories of Poland (known as the Kresy) by the Soviet Union.

Results

The official results, published on 12 July 1946, showed that from a population of 13,160,451 eligible voters, 90.1% or 11,857,986 had taken part in the referendum. Of these, 11,530,551 or 97.2% were counted as valid. On the first question, 68% of voters chose "yes". On the second question, 77.2% voted "yes". On the third question, 91.4% voted "yes".

However, the official results were far removed from the actual results since the vote had been seriously compromised by the communists and their supporters. The communists, who already de facto controlled much of the government and had the backing of the military (both the Polish Wojsko Ludowe and Soviet Red Army), used the police (Milicja Obywatelska) and the secret services (Urząd Bezpieczeństwa) to threaten, assault and even murder opposition activists, switch real ballots for false ones, stuff ballot boxes with false votes, consider blank ballots as "yes" votes, destroy votes not in favour of all or any of the three questions or simply falsify votes. Voting in the army was done on command and without secrecy. The falsification was overseen, just like the later 1947 Polish legislative election, by Soviet experts like Aron Palkin and Semyon Davydov, both high-ranking officers from the Soviet Ministry for State Security.

In Kraków, where the opposition managed to ensure a fair vote, the "no" results were: 84%, 59% and 30% for all three questions. PSL, which was able to obtain real records for approximately 48% of the voting districts, estimated that a "yes" for all three questions was chosen by 16.7% of respondents. Despite the protests of the opposition, led by Stanisław Mikołajczyk, and representatives of the United Kingdom and United States, the results were declared free and fair by the government.

Question For Against Invalid/
blank
Total
votes
Registered
voters
Turnout Outcome
Votes % Votes %
Abolition of the Senate 7,844,522 68.03 3,686,029 31.97 327,435 11,857,986 13,160,451 90.10 Approved
Economic system 8,896,105 77.15 2,634,446 22.85 327,435 11,857,986 90.10 Approved
Western border 10,534,697 91.36 995,854 8.64 327,435 11,857,986 90.10 Approved
Source: Nohlen & Stöver

Aftermath

Following the referendum, the Allies called for democratic elections. However, the 1947 elections were "completely manipulated".

According to documents released forty-three years later, 29% of respondents had voted yes for all three questions. The official results indicated this figure was 68%. Materials published after the communists lost power in Poland in 1989 showed that only the third question received a majority of votes in favor. For the first question, "yes" was chosen by 26.9% voters. For the second question, 42% chose "yes". For the third question, 66.9% chose "yes".

References

  1. ^ Nohlen, Dieter; Stöver, Philip, eds. (2010). Elections in Europe: A Data Handbook. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft. p. 1475. ISBN 978-3832956097.
  2. ^ Williamson, David G. (2012). The Polish Underground 1939-1947. Pen and Sword. p. 203. ISBN 978-1-84884-281-6.
  3. ^ Staar, Richard F. (1958). "Elections in Communist Poland". Midwest Journal of Political Science. 2 (2): 200–218. doi:10.2307/2108857. ISSN 0026-3397.
  4. ^ "Referendum ludowe". WIEM Encyklopedia (in Polish). Archived from the original on 5 October 2012. Retrieved 4 December 2009.
  5. ^ Korkuć, Maciej (2007). "Wybory 1947 – mit założycielski komunizmu" (PDF). Biuletyn IPN (in Polish) (1–2): 111–113.
  6. "You Cannot Shoot Us All". Time. 17 June 1946. Archived from the original on February 19, 2011.
  7. "It is Forbidden". Time. 8 July 1946. Archived from the original on May 1, 2008.
  8. Osękowski, Czesław (2000). Referendum 30 czerwca 1946 roku w Polsce (in Polish). Wydawnictwo Sejmowe. ISBN 83-7059-459-X.
  9. Stawicki, Robert (2013). "Zarys instytucji referendum jako formy demokracji bezpośredniej : referendum ogólnokrajowe w Polsce" (PDF). Opracowania Tematyczne (in Polish) (620). Kancelaria Senatu: 8.

Further reading

Poland Elections and referendums in Poland
Presidential elections
Parliamentary elections
Local elections
European elections
Referendums
Silesian Sejm elections
History of the Polish People's Republic
1945–48 Early post-war
1948–56 Sovietization
under Bierut's rule
1956–70 Gomułka's
autarchic communism
1970–81 Gierek's
international opening
1981–89 Jaruzelski's
autocratic rule and demise
Categories:
1946 Polish people's referendum: Difference between revisions Add topic