| Revision as of 14:17, 13 October 2007 editHrafn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,179 edits Update & remove long-since-completed tasks← Previous edit |
Latest revision as of 13:11, 2 May 2020 edit undoVsmith (talk | contribs)Administrators273,205 editsm Vsmith moved page Talk:Creation–evolution controversy/to do to Talk:Rejection of evolution by religious groups/to do: There is no controversy |
| (8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
|
{{tasks |
| ⚫ |
*Clean up of 'Arguments relating to the definition, limits and philosophy of science' section. |
|
|
|
|requests= |
|
**<s>In particular, its introductory paragraph needs to provide an overview and give structure to its sub-sections.</s>(done) |
|
|
|
|copyedit= |
|
**<s>'False dichotomy' section requires attention & integration into the parent section.</s>(removed) |
|
|
|
|wikify= |
|
* <s>'''Create a section explaining the continuum of beliefs and'''</s> dispel misconceptions about creationism "''vs''" evolution.(partially done - what "misconceptions" are there?) |
|
|
|
|merge= |
|
|
|cleanup= |
|
⚫ |
*Arguments relating to the definition, limits and philosophy of science' section. |
|
|
<nowiki></nowiki> |
|
|
|expand= |
|
|
*'Forums for the controversy' section should go beyond debates, and eventually add an introductory sentence. |
|
*'Public policy issues' & 'Issues relating to religion' sections require introductory paragraphs to provide an overview and give structure to their sub-sections. |
|
*'Public policy issues' & 'Issues relating to religion' sections require introductory paragraphs to provide an overview and give structure to their sub-sections. |
|
|
}} |
