Revision as of 15:07, 26 March 2021 editNaomiAmethyst (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers, Template editors6,271 edits →Spacing of archive sections: Reply.← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:44, 12 January 2025 edit undoZ. Patterson (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,457 edits Restoring revision 1268878010 by NaomiAmethyst: Removing topic. I think I saw the problem and corrected it. (RW 16.1)Tags: RW Undo | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{skip to TOC}} | {{skip to TOC}} | ||
{{divbox|1=red|2=This user is NOT a human|3=This is the combined talk page for ] and ]. These users are ''']''' and are '''not humans'''. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. '''Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot''' – either a bot operator or another human will answer you.}} | {{divbox|1=red|2=This user is NOT a human|3=This is the combined talk page for ] and ]. These users are ''']''' and are '''not humans'''. Please be aware that bots cannot think like a human and cannot operate outside of their programming. '''Messages you leave on this talk page will not be answered by a bot''' – either a bot operator or another human will answer you.}} | ||
{{divbox|1=red|2=] False positives and false negatives|3=If you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or ]. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.<br />If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that ''is'' vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch ''all'' vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor.}} | {{divbox|1=red|2=] False positives and false negatives|3=If you believe that ClueBot NG has mistakenly identified a good edit as vandalism, please follow the directions in the warning it gave or ]. Please do not report it on this talk page. It takes less time to report the case to the correct location, and we can handle it more effectively there.<br />If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that ''is'' vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch ''all'' vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor.}} | ||
{{divbox|1=blue|2=ClueBot NG Links!|3=]{{•}} ]}} | {{divbox|1=blue|2=ClueBot NG Links!|3=]{{•}} ]}} | ||
{{divbox|1=blue|2=Purpose of this Page|3=This page is for '''comments on''' or '''questions about''' the ClueBots.}} | {{divbox|1=blue|2=Purpose of this Page|3=This page is for '''comments on''' or '''questions about''' the ClueBots.}} | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|} | |} | ||
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | {{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis | ||
|archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/ |
|archiveprefix=User talk:ClueBot Commons/Archives/Facepalms | ||
|format= | |format= | ||
|age=99999 | |age=99999 | ||
Line 33: | Line 33: | ||
|archivebox=yes | |archivebox=yes | ||
|box-advert=yes | |box-advert=yes | ||
|minkeepthreads=2 | |||
|archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{/censor}},{{atop}}</nowiki> | |archivenow=<nowiki>{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow}},{{/censor}},{{atop}}</nowiki> | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 41: | Line 42: | ||
<div style="clear: both;" ></div> | <div style="clear: both;" ></div> | ||
== ClueBot == | == Question regarding ClueBot == | ||
Can I please see the source? (A github url for ClueBot) ? | |||
How long does it take for ClueBot to work? I just set it up.--<span style="background-color:blue; color:white;">JTZegers</span><span style="display:inline-block;margin-bottom:-0.3em;vertical-align:-0.4em;line-height:1.2em;font-size:80%;text-align:left"><sup style="font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit;vertical-align:baseline">]</sup><br /><sub style="font-size:inherit;line-height:inherit;vertical-align:baseline">]</sub></span> 14:49, 16 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
Is it being run on someone's PC or is it being run in the cloud? | |||
:Assuming you're meaning your talk page, you set it to 720 so it's threads that are over 30 days that it'll archive.-- ] (]) 00:10, 21 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
I have more questions than I have answers coming to this page. | |||
Thanks ] (]) 12:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== A cheeseburger for you! == | |||
:@] the bot runs on Wikimedia Toolforge and its source code is . <span style="white-space:nowrap"><span style="font-family:monospace">'''<nowiki>''']<nowiki>]]'''</nowiki>'''</span> (] • ])</span> 13:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
== About ClueBot III JustArchiveThis == | |||
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | You're too quick! ] (]) 17:11, 21 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
{{Ping|Ajshul}} I'm pretty sure ClueBot only eats electricity! ] (]) 11:16, 24 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
== Vandalism after blocks == | |||
Hi! What is CBNG's threshold for reporting to AIV? How old does a warning have to be? Does it take account of previous blocks? It seems to me that the threshold could be lowered a little. For example, it gave a level 1 warning to ], but that IP had a level 4 warning nine days ago and has been blocked twice since then. In cases like this, a re-block is necessary and I would rather have CBNG report straight to AIV, perhaps including a ping to the previous blocking admin. ] | ] 16:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
:{{u|HJ Mitchell}} I'm sure ClueBot NG now reports after 3 warnings and I think it's 48 hours before it considers warnings stale. I'm not sure that it would take into account blocks, it may well not because if it's an IP then it could be re-assigned to another user. I agree with your suggestion though. -- ] (]) 17:29, 24 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
Why the default are set to <code>|format=Y/F</code> when <code>format= %%i</code> is better according to the ]? | |||
== Spacing of archive sections == | |||
Also can I to switch to numbered formats later? Or it's not possible because it will break the bot? - ] (]) 14:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
I wish to report that I use ClueBot III to archive my Talk page, but when I review the source text of the archive, I find that ClueBot is not spacing the sections properly. After a ClueBot III automatic archive, there is no space between the previous section, and the newly archived section. Thus, I am having to manually add a line break between the archived sections. Example of a ClueBot III archive ''before'' I manually add a line break...<br> | |||
{{Tq|<nowiki>== Section heading A ==</nowiki>}}<br><br> | |||
:Because ] to the documentation without updating ]. But I prefer dated archives, myself, because they just make more sense to me, but it's a debated issue. From a technical perspective, it's (slightly) better for the bot and the Misplaced Pages servers to use dated archives since then the bot doesn't have to "find" the right archive by checking the sizes of archives, it just knows based on the date. This isn't a big deal, but when it comes to defaults for a popular bot where most people won't care one way or another, it's better generally that the default be the more efficient option. <span style="color:#dbb5ff;font:bold 125% 'Brush Script MT',cursive;padding-left:.75em;padding-right:.5em">— ] ]</span> 23:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
{{Tq|Text belonging to Section A.}}<br> | |||
{{Tq|<nowiki>== Section heading B ==</nowiki>}} | |||
:What? ] ] ] 00:03, 12 January 2025 (UTC) | |||
After ClueBot III performs an archive, Section B's heading is butted against text belonging to the previous section. Before the archiving, the sections were properly spaced (I have verified this), but after archiving, they're not. They should be separated by a line break that normally follows the text.<br> — ] (]) 11:56, 26 March 2021 (UTC) | |||
:This does not seem to change the rendered page at all for me (I just verified it). It seems to render fine with or without the extra line break in the wikitext. What issue are you seeing? Perhaps a screenshot of ClueBot III's wikitext failing to render? -- ]<sup>(]|]|])</sup> 15:07, 26 March 2021 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:44, 12 January 2025
Skip to table of contents |
If you believe that ClueBot NG has missed an edit that is vandalism, again do not report it here. ClueBot is unable to catch all vandalism. Just revert the edit and warn the editor. ClueBot NG Links!Report False Positives • Frequently Asked Questions Purpose of this PageThis page is for comments on or questions about the ClueBots.
The current status of ClueBot NG is: Running
The current status of ClueBot III is: Running
Praise should go on the praise page. Barnstars and other awards should go on the awards page.
Use the "new section" button at the top of this page to add a new section. Use the link above each section to edit that section.
This page is automatically archived by ClueBot III.
The ClueBots' owner or someone else who knows the answer to your question will reply on this page.
ClueBots | |
---|---|
ClueBot NG/Anti-vandalism · ClueBot II/ClueBot Script | |
ClueBot III/Archive · Talk page for all ClueBots |
Beware! This user's talk page is monitored by talk page watchers. Some of them even talk back. |
Question regarding ClueBot
Can I please see the source? (A github url for ClueBot) ? Is it being run on someone's PC or is it being run in the cloud? I have more questions than I have answers coming to this page.
Thanks Vidyagamerfromaus (talk) 12:20, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
- @Vidyagamerfromaus the bot runs on Wikimedia Toolforge and its source code is here. ''']''' (talk • contribs) 13:47, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
About ClueBot III JustArchiveThis
Why the default are set to |format=Y/F
when format= %%i
is better according to the documentation?
Also can I to switch to numbered formats later? Or it's not possible because it will break the bot? - Ivan530 (Talk) 14:31, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Because someone added that comment to the documentation without updating User:ClueBot III/JustArchiveThis. But I prefer dated archives, myself, because they just make more sense to me, but it's a debated issue. From a technical perspective, it's (slightly) better for the bot and the Misplaced Pages servers to use dated archives since then the bot doesn't have to "find" the right archive by checking the sizes of archives, it just knows based on the date. This isn't a big deal, but when it comes to defaults for a popular bot where most people won't care one way or another, it's better generally that the default be the more efficient option. — Naomi Amethyst 23:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)