Misplaced Pages

Talk:Rejection of evolution by religious groups/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:Rejection of evolution by religious groups Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:59, 29 July 2007 editHrafn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users40,179 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:11, 2 May 2020 edit undoVsmith (talk | contribs)Administrators273,185 editsm Vsmith moved page Talk:Creation–evolution controversy/to do to Talk:Rejection of evolution by religious groups/to do: There is no controversy 
(10 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{tasks
*<s>'''Clean-up formatting so the article has a logical flow.'''</s> (done)
|requests=
**Clean up of 'Arguments relating to the definition, limits and philosophy of science' section, which is currently a grab-bag of older subsections 'dumped' there in the last general clean-up, into a coherent section with a logical flow.
|copyedit=
***In particular, its introductory paragraph needs to provide an overview and give structure to its sub-sections.
|wikify=

|merge=
* <s>'''Create a section explaining the continuum of beliefs and'''</s> dispel misconceptions about creationism "''vs''" evolution.(partially done - what "misconceptions" are there?)
|cleanup=
**<s>'''Include concise summaries of ], ], ], ], ]...'''</s>(done)
*Arguments relating to the definition, limits and philosophy of science' section.
**<s>'''Explain what the leverage is for all beliefs (], ]...).'''</s>(done)
<nowiki></nowiki>

|expand=
* <s>'''Add evidences against evolution (or allow for adding evidences against evolution)'''</s> This is not an article about the evidence but the controversy.
⚫ *'Forums for the controversy' section should go beyond debates, and eventually add an introductory sentence.

⚫ *'Public policy issues' & 'Issues relating to religion' sections require introductory paragraphs to provide an overview and give structure to their sub-sections.
* <s>'''Add evidences for evolution'''</s> See main: ]
}}

⚫ *<s>'''Integrate 'Debates' section better into article flow. It's currently a complete orphan.'''</s> Expand 'Forums for the controversy' section beyond debates, and eventually add an introductory sentence.

⚫ *'Issues relating to religion and public policy' section requires an introductory paragraph to provide an overview and give structure to its sub-sections.

Latest revision as of 13:11, 2 May 2020


 Here are some tasks awaiting attention:
  • Cleanup : *Arguments relating to the definition, limits and philosophy of science' section.
  • Expand : *'Forums for the controversy' section should go beyond debates, and eventually add an introductory sentence.
    • 'Public policy issues' & 'Issues relating to religion' sections require introductory paragraphs to provide an overview and give structure to their sub-sections.
Talk:Rejection of evolution by religious groups/to do: Difference between revisions Add topic