Misplaced Pages

User talk:Tewfik/Archive 5: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Tewfik Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:45, 11 September 2006 editDianelos (talk | contribs)412 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 20:58, 11 September 2006 edit undoAmoruso (talk | contribs)13,357 edits →check out the Lehi pageNext edit →
Line 11: Line 11:
:to make it NPOV one needs to delete the whole line about terrorism not based on facts except for the british angle. Notice also the ] and irrelevance in the end. ] 07:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC) :to make it NPOV one needs to delete the whole line about terrorism not based on facts except for the british angle. Notice also the ] and irrelevance in the end. ] 07:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
::Hi. The version with the unbased claims based on that editorial alone is being reverted, also other corrections of libel material are being reverted without any explanations using pop-ups by ]'s close friend on these matters, ] (and also seems a user named Derex). I explained all the changes very much in detail in the discussion there. thanks. ] 20:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC) ::Hi. The version with the unbased claims based on that editorial alone is being reverted, also other corrections of libel material are being reverted without any explanations using pop-ups by ]'s close friend on these matters, ] (and also seems a user named Derex). I explained all the changes very much in detail in the discussion there. thanks. ] 20:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

::: what ] is simply ridicilous. Why is he allowed to do that sort of things on introductions of pages, it's unthinkable. ] 20:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)


== Short article == == Short article ==

Revision as of 20:58, 11 September 2006

Welcome to Tewfik's Talk page. Feel free to leave comments and criticism at the bottom of the page:

check out the Lehi page

User:Zero0000 is trying to push his WP:POV and WP:OR to slur the group in a non wikipedian fashion. Amoruso 05:18, 5 September 2006 (UTC)

to make it NPOV one needs to delete the whole line about terrorism not based on facts except for the british angle. Notice also the WP:OR and irrelevance in the end. Amoruso 07:37, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi. The version with the unbased claims based on that editorial alone is being reverted, also other corrections of libel material are being reverted without any explanations using pop-ups by User:Zero0000's close friend on these matters, Ian_Pitchford (and also seems a user named Derex). I explained all the changes very much in detail in the discussion there. thanks. Amoruso 20:21, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
what Ian_Pitchford is simply ridicilous. Why is he allowed to do that sort of things on introductions of pages, it's unthinkable. Amoruso 20:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Short article

The recently created article Eric Szulczewski doesn't seem to have enough information to be useful to the Misplaced Pages community, and it seems that such a person doesn't exist. I'm not sure what to do about this, as I know it's not vandalism, but it's not helpful either. Do you think you could deal with this? (by the way, the reason I'm asking you is because I believe you are a sysop) Thanks, Ruff

Talk

Thank you for the help. I'm not quite sure what you mean by saying I should stop clearing my talk page. If you really want to, you can look at my archive, but I sure wouldn't if I were you . Ruff 22:12, 7 September 2006 (UTC)

HEEELLP!

Do you have any idea of how I can clear my browser cache? I keep trying to sign stuff and it ends up with my IP on it instead. AAARRRGGG! Ruff

Ctrl-F5 Iorek85 04:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Ambulances

Sorry! I didn't see your comment (the guy below you posted at a similar time, so when I woke up, I say his comment instead of checking the diff. I wasn't ignoring you, I swear! Yes, downers comments make it somewhat notable, but he only got his info from the zombietime (and yeah, it scares the shit out of me that the foreign minister of my country gets his information from a conspiracy blog). The problem is, if we add it, then we add the refutation as well, and we end up with "a blog claimed the ambualnce attacks were hoaxed, but the red cross and the media involved refuted this." which doesn't say, anything at all, really. Not to mention that zombietime, I don't think, can be considered a reliable source. Again, sorry for taking so long to reply. Iorek85 04:55, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Pie chart

Hi, can you please help changing/removing the pie chart from http://en.wikipedia.org/Casualties_of_the_2006_Israel-Lebanon_conflict (if it will be returned after my edit) Also check out the discussion there. 83.130.97.111 17:10, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

Israel's bombing of civilian cars

Deleting well-referenced and relevant information does not make an article "more neutral". In the diff I quoted in the 2006 Israel Lebanon war talk page you deleted the info that Israel attacked civilian cars fleeing the south. This is a well known fact (see here). It's also highly relevant addition to the Target in civilian areas section in the paragraph that speaks about Israel's leaflets warning the civilian population to flee the area. Finally the wording I use is taken from a letter sent by a well-respected Israeli organization, the Association for Civil Rights in Israel, to the PM of Israel so one can't allege that it displays an anti-Israeli bias, as sometimes happens when an editor contributes info that is critical of Israel government action.

As for having my email address in plaintext in my userpage I don't care - it's already in the open; but thanks for the warning anyway. Dianelos 08:45, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

User talk:Tewfik/Archive 5: Difference between revisions Add topic