Revision as of 22:36, 5 August 2015 editPrestonmag (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,996 edits Notifying author of deletion nomination for Seyed Farshad Dereke← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:34, 9 August 2015 edit undoParamandyr (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers50,228 edits →Edit warring: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Thanks, ] (]) 22:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC) | Thanks, ] (]) 22:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Edit warring == | |||
{{3rr}} --] (]) 00:34, 9 August 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:34, 9 August 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Persepolis. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. -PotatoNinja 12:03, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
Reference errors on 4 June
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Iran page, your edit caused an unsupported parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
Sunset Photos
I know you speak English or you wouldn't be able to edit in those photos in the Sunset article. So let me tell you for the 5th time: Do Not place a photo in the Sunset article. The article is Maxed now with photos. There won't be anymore placed there. If you think one of your photos is "better" than those in the article, you can go to the talk page and submit a photo for consensus approval. You have been reverted by several editors for breaking this rule and depositing photos. You are acting like a child. Is that how you want to be regarded here? As a Child? Perhaps you are a child, and I need to get an admin to ban you. LAST WARNING!
Proposed deletion of Seyed Farshad Dereke
Hello, Ali mjr. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Seyed Farshad Dereke, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Seyed Farshad Dereke to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.
If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.
Thanks, Prestonmag (talk) 22:36, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
Edit warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. --Kansas Bear (talk) 00:34, 9 August 2015 (UTC)