| Revision as of 00:58, 9 March 2015 editUrbanVillager (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,469 editsm →Last attempt← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:12, 9 March 2015 edit undoPincrete (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers51,361 edits →Last attempt: delete trollNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| :Yes, it has now passed GA review, thanks for helping to get it there. Cheers, ] (]) 16:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC) | :Yes, it has now passed GA review, thanks for helping to get it there. Cheers, ] (]) 16:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| == Last attempt == | |||
| :My comments to you were in regards to content that encompasses all Malagurski-related articles, so I can't copy/paste it to all Malagurski-related articles. Since you first said that you're an Englishman "''with no connection to anybody or anything in former Yugoslavia.''" (), but you comment on sources that are written in Yugoslav languages, please answer me which one of these is correct: | |||
| :# You don't speak any Yugoslav languages and are trolling and damaging articles, pretending you understand what's written in the sources used as references. | |||
| :# You don't speak any Yugoslav languages, but use Google Translate or some other translating tool, for drawing information from sources for a renowned encyclopedia. | |||
| :# You don't speak any Yugoslav languages, but have a friend helping you out with Yugoslav sources, and you were not honest when you said you have no connection to anybody in the former Yugoslavia. | |||
| :# You speak one or more Yugoslav languages, and you were not honest when you said you have no connection to anything in the former Yugoslavia. | |||
| :I think it's crucially important that you answer this question before you continue editing Malagurski-related articles, because if you don't speak the language and are making edits in regards to sources you don't understand, you're seriously damaging Misplaced Pages. And if you do speak the language, why did you present yourself as a neutral Englishman who has nothing to do with Yugoslavia? Honesty is the best policy, not deleting comments. You have a right to delete this, of course, but that's not very ]. If you're damaging Misplaced Pages by editing in regards to sources you can't understand, please stop. If you understand them, please be honest and show some respect for those editing these articles with you. If you don't want to talk here, I can raise this issue somewhere else, but I want to deescalate any issues you and I have had in the past. Again, I'm asking you that we start a new page, with honesty and mutual respect. But please answer me. --] (]) 00:58, 9 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:12, 9 March 2015
His Dark Materials
Hi. Yes this is about the talk page not the article or the task force. Primarily see Talk:His Dark Materials#Editorial (in)activity and Archive 2. Meanwhile, for visibility I outdented both of your "old" contributions dated December 2012, and I inserted the subheading "Soul" (on which I hope to respond specifically and soon) between them.
Now this is about the task force Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Novels/His Dark Materials task force (which I won't be joining myself). I will look to tag it inactive (only 6 members and see its talk page!). If I find how to do so and do it, that may stimulate some response at the task force talk, or some response to you at the trilogy talk.
--P64 (talk) 00:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the thanks!
Nice to be appreciated for doing something useful once in a while! danno_uk 19:50, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Weight of Chains
No worries. I tend to be move from article to article rather than stay in one place too long. I've been here long enough to get used to every type of character, there's little that fazes me. -- Ricky81682 (talk) 02:35, 3 November 2014 (UTC)
Deletions on City of London articles
Hello, I thought you might be interested that somebody has been deleting sections from City of London Corporation and City remembrancer. The anon IP refuses to engage in discussion when I've undone their edits, and has called the deleted parts "conspiracy theory", so I doubt they're acting in good faith. The page may well need balancing, but I don't think theor actions are helpful. Emma May Smith (talk) 13:37, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Teamwork Barnstar |
| Hi Pincrete. Just a note to let you know the Sexuality of Adolf Hitler article has now been nominated for GA. Thanks again for your help in the clean-up. Diannaa (talk) 16:17, 8 February 2015 (UTC) |
- Yes, it has now passed GA review, thanks for helping to get it there. Cheers, Kierzek (talk) 16:03, 9 February 2015 (UTC)