| Revision as of 21:24, 26 December 2014 editDaveApter (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,808 edits →Please cut it out: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:35, 26 December 2014 edit undoJohn Carter (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users176,670 edits →Please cut it out: responseNext edit → | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
| John, please stop the continual harassment and personal attacks directed at me. You have not provided and evidence to support the accusations you make against me. You also state incorrectly that my remarks about Astynax are unsupported by evidence; there has been an abundance of information provided by myself and others on the evidence and workshop pages of the arbitration case. As regards your opinion that I have a COI in relation to Landmark, the fact that the Arbitrators have not made such a finding should be the end of the matter. I have made my position absolutely clear, and I don't know why you imagine I am under any obligation to respond further to an endless series of impertinent questions from yourself and Lithistman. ] (]) 21:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | John, please stop the continual harassment and personal attacks directed at me. You have not provided and evidence to support the accusations you make against me. You also state incorrectly that my remarks about Astynax are unsupported by evidence; there has been an abundance of information provided by myself and others on the evidence and workshop pages of the arbitration case. As regards your opinion that I have a COI in relation to Landmark, the fact that the Arbitrators have not made such a finding should be the end of the matter. I have made my position absolutely clear, and I don't know why you imagine I am under any obligation to respond further to an endless series of impertinent questions from yourself and Lithistman. ] (]) 21:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :{{pinglDaveApter}} No, you have not. Your obvious ''refusal'' to answer a directly relevant question as to how you accessed material which is not available to the public raises serious questions regarding your basic honesty. Also, I find it nothing short of ridiculous that you do not seem able to recognize that there are few other editors involved in this topic that the "single-purpose accounts" principle would reasonably be seen as applying to. And, frankly, your rather obnoxious, and frankly stupid, trolling on this matter on the Historicity of Jesus talk page demonstrates I think rather clearly to anyone that your own conduct is open to question. I find it impossible to believe any person with a clear grasp of policies and guidelines could come to the conclusions you have, and, honestly, I cannot see that such reflects well on you. And please refrain from using my talk page in this fashion again. ] (]) 21:35, 26 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:35, 26 December 2014
SEMI-RETIRED This user is no longer very active on Misplaced Pages.
This week's article for improvement (week 52, 2014)
 An aurora is a natural phenomenon.
Hello, John Carter.
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Spaghetti • Game design Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:08, 22 December 2014 (UTC) • Opt-out instructions |
|---|
Murder of Kylie Maybury
Can you do me a favour and give Murder of Kylie Maybury a once-over and clean-up? Paul Austin (talk) 01:14, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
User:Pass a Method and User:Stephen G. Brown
What do you make of this? And how can the matter be over if Pass a Method now has the Zigguzoo account? If Pass a Method is emailing Stephen G. Brown and telling him about a new account he is editing under, how is it at all okay for Stephen G. Brown to still not move the name back to where it belongs? Flyer22 (talk) 08:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
Happy Holidays
|
Happy Holiday Cheer | |
| Season's Greetings! This message celebrates the holiday season, promotes WikiLove, and hopefully makes your day a little better. Spread the seasonal good cheer by wishing another user an Awesome Holiday and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone with whom you had disagreements in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Share the good feelings! Joys! Onel5969 (talk) 03:35, 23 December 2014 (UTC)|} Historicity of Jesus arbitration case - proposed decision postedThis is a courtesy message to inform you that the proposed decision has been posted for the Historicity of Jesus arbitration case. Constructive, relevant comments are welcome on the proposed decision talk page. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 03:41, 25 December 2014 (UTC) Message delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk). Please cut it outJohn, please stop the continual harassment and personal attacks directed at me. You have not provided and evidence to support the accusations you make against me. You also state incorrectly that my remarks about Astynax are unsupported by evidence; there has been an abundance of information provided by myself and others on the evidence and workshop pages of the arbitration case. As regards your opinion that I have a COI in relation to Landmark, the fact that the Arbitrators have not made such a finding should be the end of the matter. I have made my position absolutely clear, and I don't know why you imagine I am under any obligation to respond further to an endless series of impertinent questions from yourself and Lithistman. DaveApter (talk) 21:24, 26 December 2014 (UTC)
|