Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:03, 20 December 2014

This my Talk Page. Leave a message and I will get back to you. If I left a message on your talk page , please respond to me there as I will be looking there for the answer. AlbinoFerret 13:06, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Day of Ashura

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Day of Ashura. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 18 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Atlantis

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Atlantis. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

= What I'm looking for in the Farsalinos/PBusardo video

Hi there, I was looking at a couple of things.

• Use it to source the claim that says that wicking materials and airflow greatly affects the quality of the vape, add that certain wicking setups add to the quality as well.
• Introducing high powered specialized mods. Subsequently talking about what kind of atomizer may or may not be used with them.
• Talking about different materials like pyrex and stainless steel that are better than materials previously used.
• Source a claim that talks about puff counter and puff duration on certain mod (I don't remember if the claim is still there, if not I would add it.)

I would of also liked to add in another section the divide that exists between the e-cigs industry, the cigalikes vs the refillables industries (as Farsalinos calls them) as well as the fragmentation of the refillable industry.

Those are some examples of what I would of like to see. It is really a shame that we cannot use it, which is, between you and me, absolutely ridiculous. The guy is a well known specialist, talking about a subject that is directly within is field of expertise and we can't use it because of the format in which the information is being given. I profoundly despise the form-over-content rules that we need to abide by when common sense would dictate otherwise. Don't get me wrong... I get that we cannot use blogs or vlogs etc etc when the claims are made by the blogger or vlogger, but if a blogger interviews a specialist and that the information provided is without the shadow of a doubt being reported accurately (i.e. hearing it from the horses mouth like in this case) common! Anyways.... I know I can't change that. Rant over. TheNorlo (talk) 00:06, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks but the link you've sent me speaks exclusively of crappy big tobacco cig-a-likes and says nothing about the stuff that actually works i.e. refillable ecig gear. Finding info on these is still very hard to come by.TheNorlo (talk) 20:55, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

Please comment on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Education

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Education. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:10, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

December 2014

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
So that there is no confusion when we go to 3RR Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 20:03, 20 December 2014 (UTC)