Revision as of 03:00, 12 December 2014 editStalwart111 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers16,939 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:02, 12 December 2014 edit undoTechnical 13 (talk | contribs)37,142 edits Removing the personal attack, let's focus on the article instead.Next edit → | ||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
::*Well, not really, there are about 10 entries in the list above but the article has 139 references. So even if those were removed as being copies of this article rather than references, we'd still be left with about 129 secondary sources. ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 03:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC) | ::*Well, not really, there are about 10 entries in the list above but the article has 139 references. So even if those were removed as being copies of this article rather than references, we'd still be left with about 129 secondary sources. ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 03:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
*'''Speedy keep''' for what is a confused attempt at ], trolling, or just an honest misunderstanding of how all of this works. ] (]) 02:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC) | *'''Speedy keep''' for what is {{RPA|a confused attempt at ], trolling, or just}} an honest misunderstanding of how all of this works. ] (]) 02:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
*'''Comment''' - yeah, quite a few of those look like Misplaced Pages mirrors with content copied from our article rather than the other way around. Any suggestion that any of those were published before ours? ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 02:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' - yeah, quite a few of those look like Misplaced Pages mirrors with content copied from our article rather than the other way around. Any suggestion that any of those were published before ours? ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 02:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:02, 12 December 2014
Cocaine
- Cocaine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Severe copyright violation. Copyvios report returns:
Copyvios results show at least a 99.5% copyright violation | ||
---|---|---|
Site | Percent violation | direct compare link |
http://www.lycaeum.org/Cocaine | 99.5% | Compare |
http://www.wewantsexualfreedom.com/?p=40139 | 99.4% | Compare |
http://www.uatests.com/drug-information/cocaine.php | 99.2% | Compare |
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1gIpkLzT2yg | 72.9% | Compare |
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/drug-that-spans-the-ages-the-history-of-cocaine-468286.html | 60.7% | Compare |
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2086.html | 46.5% | Compare |
http://www.havocscope.com/tag/cocaine/ | 45.9% | Compare |
http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A10832384 | 45.4% | Compare |
http://steinhardt.nyu.edu/appsych/chibps/cocaine | 44.1% | Compare |
http://www.justice.gov/oig/special/9712/appb.htm | 43.5% | Compare |
71 URLs with lower confidence hidden. | Show them. |
— {{U|Technical 13}} 02:10, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Question: Aren't those websites using text from Misplaced Pages, not the other way around? Gnome de plume (talk) 02:16, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- I highly doubt that https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2086.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A10832384 or http://www.justice.gov/oig/special/9712/appb.htm are is quoting Misplaced Pages. If all of the sources were quoting Misplaced Pages (they're not, we're quoting them), then we'd have an unsourced article which implies a lack of notability and as such is eligible for deletion. — {{U|Technical 13}} 02:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Well, not really, there are about 10 entries in the list above but the article has 139 references. So even if those were removed as being copies of this article rather than references, we'd still be left with about 129 secondary sources. St★lwart 03:00, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy keep for what is (Personal attack removed) an honest misunderstanding of how all of this works. GraniteSand (talk) 02:18, 12 December 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - yeah, quite a few of those look like Misplaced Pages mirrors with content copied from our article rather than the other way around. Any suggestion that any of those were published before ours? St★lwart 02:57, 12 December 2014 (UTC)