| Revision as of 17:50, 29 November 2014 editTgeorgescu (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users55,184 edits reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:52, 29 November 2014 edit undoTgeorgescu (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users55,184 edits →November 2014: warningNext edit → | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
| ::Canaanites in Egypt is a red herring. Hyksos, too. That's not what the Exodus story is about. Please do not change what the sources say. ] (]) 17:50, 29 November 2014 (UTC) | ::Canaanites in Egypt is a red herring. Hyksos, too. That's not what the Exodus story is about. Please do not change what the sources say. ] (]) 17:50, 29 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == November 2014 == | |||
| ] Your recent editing history at ] shows that you are currently engaged in an ]. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See ] for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. | |||
| '''Being involved in an edit war can result in your being ]'''—especially if you violate the ], which states that an editor must not perform more than three ] on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—'''even if you don't violate the three-revert rule'''—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 17:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:52, 29 November 2014
The Exodus
Please read (short, illuminating reading, written by an evangelical historian). Tgeorgescu (talk) 17:39, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
That is a perspective of some author on a website, but his knowledge is severely lacking. Increasing finds in recent years has provided evidence for periods of Israel's history once doubted. The Merneptah Stele is still evidence from a non-Israeli, non-Biblical source for the existence of Israel east of Egypt circa 1200 BC.
- Furthermore, the existence of Canaanites (including proto-Israelites) in Egypt between 1700 - 1300 BC is known, due to evidence of the Semitic Canaanite Hyksos period. Most scholars acknowledge now that a Canaanite population, or populations, exited the region following the re-establishment of native Egyptian rule. There are known massive natural disasters to have occurred in the same time frame, including the eruption of Thera which ended the Minoan civilization. 173.238.79.44 (talk) 17:49, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
- Canaanites in Egypt is a red herring. Hyksos, too. That's not what the Exodus story is about. Please do not change what the sources say. Tgeorgescu (talk) 17:50, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
Your recent editing history at The Exodus shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Tgeorgescu (talk) 17:52, 29 November 2014 (UTC)