Revision as of 18:50, 12 November 2007 editGoRight (talk | contribs)6,435 edits →wp:3rr again← Previous edit | Latest revision as of 04:20, 10 August 2014 edit undoGoRight (talk | contribs)6,435 edits May I use my talk page to discuss matters related to my ban? | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
__NOINDEX__ | |||
==]== | |||
<div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
Save these for future reference: | |||
{{{1|]}}} has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! {{{2|}}} <br /> Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. | |||
* , | |||
</div><!-- Template:smile --> | |||
* | |||
Wow, that talk page is a warzone :-P ] 23:38, 26 October 2007 (UTC) | |||
I have a couple of questions for anyone who might notice them: | |||
# Am I allowed to use my talk page to discuss matters related to my ban, civilly of course, or will that be used as justification to turn off my talk page privileges? | |||
# May I request that all of the pages under my user space be deleted, except for my talk page which cannot be according to policy? | |||
--] (]) 04:18, 10 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
== ] == | |||
Hi GoRight! As far as I can tell, you have either already violated Misplaced Pages's ], or are very close to a violation on ]. The rule is intended to limit unproductive reversions by restricting editors to no more than 3 reverts per article per 24 hours, where a "revert" is defined broadly as any edit that at least partially undoes another editors work. In particular, a revert for this rule does not have to restore an older version, and reverts that undo different edits still count towards the limit. If you did not already do so, please read this rule and abide by it - preferably in letter and in spirit. Thanks! --] 21:19, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Blocked == | |||
<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for {{{{{subst|}}}#if:12 hours|a period of '''12 hours'''|a short time}} in accordance with ] for violating the ] {{{{{subst|}}}#if:An Inconvenient Truth|at ]}}. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek ] rather than engaging in an ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{sig|}}}|''']''' <sup>]</sup> 22:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-3block --> | |||
You've made at least 4 reverts in the past few hours (, , , , and a partial revert which undid part of the prior edit). You express familiarity with ] . It should be clear that there is no consensus supporting your proposed changes; please discuss them on the talk page after the block expires rather than continuing to reinsert them. ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 22:48, 6 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
{{unblock reviewed|1=I do not believe that my edits constitute reverts in the sense intended by WP:3RR. In each case I actively provided commentary in the discussion page concerning my rational for the changes thus demonstrating my willingness to cooperate with the community. Also, a close inspection of my edits will reveal that I was, in fact, making alternate wordings in an attempt to accommodate the views of others while still presenting the material I feel was relevant to the article. In addition, all of my material was clearly sourced and as such should be allowed in the article. | |||
If my interpretation above is incorrect, please clarify what actually constitutes a revert under WP:3R. Does changing the wording to accommodate the views of other editors also constitute a reversion? Is merely touching a given section of text considered a revert? For example, the item you list as a partial revert is did not restore any of the original content at all but was merely a new edit.|decline=The idea behind 3RR is to prevent people from repeated edits that make the same point or convey the same information. I have reviewed your edits and you repeatedly inserted references to anthropogenic leanings. Please be more careful and if you find yourself inserting or deleting similar language repeatedly, go to the talk page and discuss it there first.}} --'''<span style="background:Black;color:White"> ]|]|] </span>''' 05:32, 7 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
==The Zen Garden Award== | |||
{| style="border: 1px solid {{{border|gray}}}; background-color: {{{color|#fdffe7}}};" | |||
|rowspan="2" valign="top" | ] | |||
|rowspan="2" | | |||
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: bottom; height: 1.1em;" | '''Zen Garden Award for Infinite Patience''' | |||
|- | |||
|style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award this to ] for the infinite patience he has shown while attempting to improve the ] article and also for having to deal with the above ban because of his efforts. ] 23:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
|} | |||
You can move this award to your main user page or wherever else you like :-) ] 23:39, 8 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
: Thanks, I appreciate it. I haven't given up on the AIT page but have been focusing on other topics for a while. --] 01:49, 10 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
== Smoke and some sort of fire == | |||
There are traces of Singer's fire which others aren't willing to examine. I'm not in a hurry so it will take several days for the address of the info to reach me, then I'll probably have the search space reduced by 98%. (] 03:24, 10 November 2007 (UTC)) | |||
=wp:3rr again= | |||
looks like you close to breaking the rule again if you not done so already so watch it on the article An Inconvenient Truth] 18:41, 12 November 2007 (UTC) | |||
: Thanks for the heads up. I have been careful about which sections I am touching. I am done for now anyway. --] 18:50, 12 November 2007 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 04:20, 10 August 2014
Save these for future reference:
I have a couple of questions for anyone who might notice them:
- Am I allowed to use my talk page to discuss matters related to my ban, civilly of course, or will that be used as justification to turn off my talk page privileges?
- May I request that all of the pages under my user space be deleted, except for my talk page which cannot be according to policy?