| Revision as of 06:05, 28 April 2014 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,585,729 editsm Substing templates: {{uw-3rr}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:55, 28 April 2014 edit undoFredtham59 (talk | contribs)299 edits →warningNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> | ||
| ] (]) 05:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC) | ] (]) 05:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC) | ||
| I kindly inform you that your last edit ] is a serious breach of ] . Despite 2 warning you keep going on. Soon or later you will have to assume the consequence... Also what is the point to open a discussion on the article talk page ] and 2 hours later go ahead with your controversial edit. ''']''' ''']''' '''<sup>]</sup>''' 14:55, 28 April 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:55, 28 April 2014
Please comment on Talk:2013–14 Thai political crisis
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:2013–14 Thai political crisis. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Gun politics in the United States
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment at Gun politics in the United States. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. This message is pursuant to the directions for publicizing an RFC. Thank you.Anythingyouwant (talk) 05:04, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Politics
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Politics. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Misplaced Pages:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
warning
It is your second warning, an edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2013%E2%80%9314_Thai_political_crisis&diff=606040937&oldid=606040479
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2013%E2%80%9314_Thai_political_crisis&diff=606053294&oldid=606048200
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2013%E2%80%9314_Thai_political_crisis&diff=606060969&oldid=606059077
- http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=2013%E2%80%9314_Thai_political_crisis&diff=606134876&oldid=606130124
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. 202.176.80.160 (talk) 05:49, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
I kindly inform you that your last edit ] is a serious breach of WP:NOT3RR . Despite 2 warning you keep going on. Soon or later you will have to assume the consequence... Also what is the point to open a discussion on the article talk page ] and 2 hours later go ahead with your controversial edit. Fred Tham 14:55, 28 April 2014 (UTC)