Misplaced Pages

User talk:Arkhandar: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:27, 17 January 2014 editAbryn (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers51,094 edits Nintendo 2DS GA fail: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 07:19, 24 January 2014 edit undo174.17.0.150 (talk)No edit summaryNext edit →
Line 276: Line 276:


I've failed the second nomination of ] due to problems with the reliability of numerous sources used in the article. Please ensure that all sources have their reliability verified and are replaced as needed before renominating the article. - ] <small>]</small> <small>]</small> 14:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC) I've failed the second nomination of ] due to problems with the reliability of numerous sources used in the article. Please ensure that all sources have their reliability verified and are replaced as needed before renominating the article. - ] <small>]</small> <small>]</small> 14:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion==
]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. —] (]) 07:19, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:19, 24 January 2014

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6


Talk Page InfoHello. You're editing the userpage of Arkhandar. Please make your edits friendly, and don't vandalize the user's page. Thank you!
Time Zone InfoIt is currently 5:23 PM where I live. Please take this into consideration when leaving me a message.

Timings / Latency

For the PS4, Wii U and Xbox One, I have not seen anyone (anywhere) actually mention the timings of the RAM. Can you find me specific posts? Because I didn't see anything mentioned about memory timings in the original post on the neogaf thread. -Kai445 (talk) 00:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Oh, I just saw it now in an hardware forum post on TheWiiU.com forums. Everyone was talking about latency being a major player in overhaul performance and whatnot, most of them stated the numbers I inserted in the article and I thought those numbers were already confirmed to be true. I don't really know how they reached those numbers, so that's why I support the exclusion of them in the article for now, just like you. But now I'm kinda interested in uncovering the truth really.. x)--Arkhandar (talk) 01:09, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
If we can get the RAM chip specs we should be able to find out more. But the PS4 and Xbox latencies should be very similar in an absolute sense. The timing argument is mainly put forth by people that don't know a whole lot about memory, but are invested heavily in their preferred team winning. -Kai445 (talk) 01:30, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
There's nothing we can do right now then, right? I see that you have reverted my edit on the eDRAM, but I inserted 34 MB of eDRAM on the article as seen on the GPU die in the Chipworks analysis. Is there a problem to it or is it rally just 32 MB? Thanks :)--Arkhandar (talk) 13:57, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I was looking for where they literally spelled out "34MB" because it is such an oddball number, but I guess you mean the 32MB eDRAM plus the 2MB eDRAM = 34MB? I guess I don't have a problem with that, but maybe seperating them would be better, or putting a little small underneath or next to it to explain "32MB MEM1, 2MB MEM0" ... ″I'm not sure, really, what might be the most elegant way to put it. -Kai445 (talk) 16:02, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
I'm not sure either. Best to keep it this way for now or until someone makes a suggestion.--Arkhandar (talk) 15:35, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Happy Wikibirthday!

Thanks for all your edits over the past two years! DarkToonLink 08:51, 4 August 2013 (UTC)
Thank you! :) --Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 11:26, 9 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Nintendo 3DS colors and styles

Resolved

The article List of Nintendo 3DS colors and styles has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

And this list of colors and styles is notable how exactly?

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:05, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

3DS

Resolved

As my edit was clearly not vandalism, I would appreciate an edit summary as to why you reverted my edit. Hatnotes are for linking to other articles, not for circular redirects. hbdragon88 (talk) 16:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

I highly suggest bringing this up on the talk page if you two do not reach an agreement. This helps keep matters civil, so both of you can reach a consensus and avoid edit warring. Thank you! CaseyPenk (talk) 16:50, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Ok, won't happen again. Thanks--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 22:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for your understanding and reasonableness. CaseyPenk (talk) 22:39, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Always glad to help.--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 22:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages policies

Resolved

"Misplaced Pages policies demand console images to be in .jpg format, therefore the necessity for a white background" Where can I read Misplaced Pages policies (specifically for .jpg) you mentioned earlier? Thank you. Rukario-sama ^ㅈ^ -(...) 00:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Here.--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 01:10, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Internet Browser (Wii U)

Resolved

Hi Arkhandar, as you might have noticed, Internet Browser (Wii U) was redirected as the result of an AfD that determined the browser didn't have independent notability. If you're intending to improve it so it can stand alone, I'd be happy to userfy it for you. If not, it should be redirected again unless it can be proven that the browser is more notable than it was last month. --BDD (talk) 20:38, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Unresolved
Stop icon

Your recent editing history at PlayStation 3 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. GSK 20:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but what's your justification for this? I am using the current consensus to justify my edits, so there is no use for me to head over to the talk page especially since I hadn't exceed the maximum amount of reverts. The conflicting User:Wester is the one that is going against consensus and as such he should be the one to start a discussion in the talk page, not me. I published this notice in his talk page and he stopped. I believe this was just a slip of yours, and if it is we can just forget it and carry on. Thank you.--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 20:24, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Nintendo 3DS may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • 2013-08-23.</ref> In December 2012, Nintendo Chinese distribution partner, ], launched the in three special editions, one featuring a ] decal while the

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Nintendo 3DS circuit board.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nintendo 3DS circuit board.jpg, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:20, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

September 2013

Resolved

Thank you for contributing to Misplaced Pages. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically Nintendo 3DS, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Werieth (talk) 19:23, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Could you please give a specific reason for deleting the images from the article?--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 19:35, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
WP:NFCC#3,WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFCC#10. See also my first removal edit summary. Werieth (talk) 19:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for responding. I don't think that WP:NFCC#10 is a problem here, since everything seems to be in order. If it isn't, could you please help me correct anything that is out of place? Now, I agree to a certain level about the deletion of the logo Nintendo Video, since it has little "weight" in the article, and the Miiverse logo, since it hasn't been released yet and its importance in the 3DS context is at a minimum at the moment. However, I strongly suggest that the Swapnote logo should be reinserted since Nintendo 3DS is its main and most complete article, and has sufficient notability to justify it. What do you think?--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 19:48, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
10c is still an issue, see WP:NFURG Werieth (talk) 00:26, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Thank you for your help, the issue has now been resolved. For future reference, I think it would be much more productive trying to solve rationale problems rather than deleting content from an article.--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 00:35, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Given that a good rationale requires knowledge about the article and subject in question it can take someone not familiar with the topic 30-60 minutes of research per rationale, someone familiar with the topic can do the same thing in less than 5 minutes. It also helps inform users who add non-free media about the requirements of WP:NFC Werieth (talk) 12:55, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Oh sorry, I though you were in the WikiProject: Video games. I take that back, you're totally right. Sorry about that, and thank you for your contributions.--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 14:03, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Wii U

Resolved

The article Wii U you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Wii U for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. --Sp33dyphil ©ontributions 09:38, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

I have read your review and I agree with the problems you've pointed out. Without your help I couldn't have noticed them, since this is my first GA nomination. I will do my best to improve the article. Thank you for your time.--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 14:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
If you have any concerns or questions, ping me. --Sp33dyphil ©ontributions 23:13, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Ok, thank you. :) --Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 19:04, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

List of Nintendo 3DS colors and styles

Resolved

Hey! I assume that this is the first time you nominate a list right? If so, I see that there is a lot you have to learn about lists before your current candidate can pass. So, I'd like to say two things: i) don't be discouraged, remember that users oppose the list and not your work on the list; and ii) if you want advice and guidance with lists, feel free to come at my talk and I will be more than glad to help you all the way to get your list featured in the future. Cheers! — ΛΧΣ 17:00, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Yes, it was the first time I nominated a list to "featured" status, and unfortunately I did so prematurely. I'm trying to learn all Misplaced Pages guidelines to improve the list as much as I can (and other articles of course). And sure, if I need some guidance I'll head over to your talk page. Thanks for your support :) --Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 19:01, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Pit image

Hello there! Your upload of an image of Pit from Super Smash Bros. for Nintendo 3DS and Wii U was good; however, the image used in the article is preferable as it is both an image from a "canon" game and the original image used. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 00:50, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

Since the artwork is from the same director (Masahiro Sakurai) and it displays Pit's flagship weapons unlike with the "older one", I thought it would be a better fit for the article.--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 19:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC)
It's not advised to constantly update with a new image; this causes disruption in the game's article (ever so slightly) by changing images. As both images show pretty much the same thing, ther's no real purpose in replacing it, especially considering that it's not objectively "superior".

Wii U

I think you need to put some more effort into the sections you are working on. They are nearly copyvio of the source pages, with sentences being reordered but otherwise unchanged. They also appear to not meet MOS guidelines, using second person pronouns, as well as promotional language. -- ferret (talk) 21:47, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Confusion between Wii and Wii U?

I really do not see how there are "many readers" who would believe that the Wii U is some sort of peripheral. And even if there were, the about template is generally used when two different things have extremely similar titles and need to be noted that they are not the same (i.e. Tom Wolfe and Thomas Wolfe. I'm sure people recognize that whatever the Wii and the Wii U are, they are not the same thing. TheStickMan 22:21, 19 October 2013 (UTC)

There is a lot of confusion, and Wii and Wii U are "two different things" and "have extremely similar titles". Here are some of the more recent examples of this:
I think this is enough to justify the template's inclusion.--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 22:52, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
A website that gets most of its info from other sources, anonymous tips, and NeoGAF is a questionable source at best. The first two links are also simply retailer errors, not necessarily a sign of confusion among consumers/readers. You would be sort of on to something with this (taken from the third link), but even then, it's just about what retailers are saying, and all the analyst is said to have done is a "secret shopper kind of thing". TheStickMan 00:51, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
All those three occurrences were also reported by Kotaku. Just because it's not a well know news site it doesn't make it any less true. Nevertheless, Wii and Wii U are very similar names and that by itself justifies the template's inclusion.--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 14:23, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
Then please, provide Kotaku sources then. Also, I would say that the Wii and the Wii U are different enough that a majority will be able to tell that they are different things, even if they don't know exactly what they are. But whatever, it's not a big deal. I'll get over it. TheStickMan 15:21, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Swapnote

Please do not remove referenced content again. In Nintendo's official Japanese statements, the phrase "わいせつ画像送受信" (transmission of obscene imagery) is used. "offensive material" is vague, and can refer to insults, racism, and the like, all of which are not as serious. Don't blank content because you might not like it, it's borderline disruptive editing. --benlisquareTCE 15:02, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm not doing disruptive edits, you are. If someone disagrees with something that you are changing, you should take the issue immediately to the article's talk page, not start and edit war. That's disruptive editing as I recall. Besides, there's absolutely no need to source an article from a Japanese publication on the English Misplaced Pages when there are numerous sources about the subject in English already. Additionally, you said that in Nintendo's official Japanese statement, the phrase "transmission of obscene imagery" is used. How about using that, instead of the poorly sourced, speculative, "pornographic imagery".
Further discussion will be made at Talk:Nintendo 3DS--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 15:15, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
What does "obscene" mean? It's obviously a synonym for lewd, lascivious or pornographic. Japanese newspapers use terms such as "わいせつ" (obscene) because the press is forbidden from using terms such as pornography. That does not mean that we cannot take it for face value. You don't need to prove that the sky is blue if it's already obvious as day. How else can anything else, non-pornographic, be "obscene"? --benlisquareTCE 15:19, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
"Besides, there's absolutely no need to source an article from a Japanese publication on the English Misplaced Pages when there are numerous sources about the subject in English already." - I beg to differ. This being the English Misplaced Pages has nothing to do with this, and per WP:NONENG, non-English references are permitted. Given that the Japanese sources are more factual than the English ones available, there is reason for these Japanese newspaper sources to be used. These are reliable sources - Asahi Shimbun and Mainichi Shimbun are major Japanese newspapers, akin to the New York Times; it's not like they're tabloid sources. If the current English sources have factual limitations, there is no reason why the problem cannot be remedied with the use of Japanese ones. --benlisquareTCE 15:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Nintendo Network. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring states:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. You're welcome to the discussion held at WT:VG. ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  19:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC) ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  19:20, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Or at Talk:Nintendo 3DS or Talk:Nintendo Network, whatever; the point is to discuss and stop edit warring. ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  19:22, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
Hmm, in case you didn't notice, we're already trying to reach a consensus at Talk:Nintendo 3DS, and my last revert was only partial and didn't have anything to do with the issue in question. I don't really see a need for this (rather than spamming a user's talk page).--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 20:14, 3 November 2013 (UTC)
This user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.
Arkhandar (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
2620:0:862:1:a6ba:dbff:fe38:fc71 (talk · contribs · (/64) · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Scottsdesk". The reason given for Scottsdesk's block is: " Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Misplaced Pages because it appears to be mainly intended for publicity and/or promotional purposes. If you intend to edit constructively in other topic areas, you may be granted the right to continue under a change of username. Please read the following carefully. Why can't I edit Misplaced Pages? Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, website or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements and using Misplaced Pages for promotion. Misplaced Pages has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but such groups are generally discouraged from using Misplaced Pages to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy. Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username? Probably not, although if you can demonstrate a pattern of future editing in strict accordance with our neutral point of view policy, you may be granted this right. See Misplaced Pages's FAQ for Organizations for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, organization, or clients. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit Misplaced Pages again. What can I do now? If you have no interest in writing about some other topic than your organization, group, company, or product, you may consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead. If you do intend to make useful contributions here about some other topic, you must convince a Misplaced Pages administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following: Add the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} on your user talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must: Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked. Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked. If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. ".


Accept reason: While you were blocked about a year ago for 24 hours, it was for reasons unrelated to the Scottsdesk block and the activity in question seems not to have recurred. So I have cleared the autoblock. — Daniel Case (talk) 19:53, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nintendo 2DS

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Nintendo 2DS you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Samwalton9 -- Samwalton9 (talk) 00:05, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nintendo 2DS

The article Nintendo 2DS you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Nintendo 2DS for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Samwalton9 -- Samwalton9 (talk) 00:25, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Template: Video game requirements

Arkhandar, since you've put a lot of effort into gaming articles, you may be interested in commenting in an ongoing discussion about the video game requirements template. It is being proposed for deletion. --GoneIn60 (talk) 14:19, 11 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!

The Nintendo Barnstar
For all your work refreshing WP:NIN and doing the update work I've been procrastinating about for over a year! ;) ☺ · Salvidrim! ·  16:05, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! I'm glad you liked the redesign. And you're right, that's way too much yellow. The background's back to white again :) --Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 23:26, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Super Mario franchise icon.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Super Mario franchise icon.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:22, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nintendo 2DS

The article Nintendo 2DS you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Nintendo 2DS for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. I don't think it's too much work before a reassessment, but considering they are fairly large changes I thought it best to fail for now. Do list for assessment again when you've addressed the points I raised though! Samwalton9 (talk) 18:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you for your review. I'll start working on the article as soon as possible. Once again, thanks for your help. :) --Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 19:03, 21 November 2013 (UTC)
Just wanted to say that the pre-release section reads really nicely now :) Samwalton9 (talk) 17:17, 24 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks! That section sure needed some work. I might start working on the post-release section soon, if I somehow manage to do my homework in time :) --Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 17:20, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Consensus for whether List of Nintendo 3DS games should be split into 2 pages

Hello, you're invited to vote and express your views about this on the discussion topic. Jotamide Jotamide (talk) 03:50, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll give my input :) --Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 14:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Your article submission Miiverse

Hello Arkhandar. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Miiverse.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Miiverse}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Misplaced Pages, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Nintendo - 1970.png

Thanks for uploading File:Nintendo - 1970.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Misplaced Pages:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Misplaced Pages:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Misplaced Pages's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:21, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

PlayStation 4

Information icon Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in PlayStation 4. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  17:24, 30 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but exactly did I do?--Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 22:32, 1 December 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 4 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Japanese names

In Japan, the Wii and Wii U are not the "ウィー" and "ウィーユー". The names are written within Japanese text as "Wii" and "Wii U". The katakana is entirely superfluous.—Ryulong (琉竜) 04:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Monolith Soft

Hi, I see that you keep adding an rumored "Untitled Nintendo 3DS game" to the article Monolith Soft. I don't know how often I deleted this wrong piece of information, but somehow it always ends up being added. Because of that I'd like to explain. The Kyoto studio of Monolith Soft was founded as an support studio for internal Nintendo development. It is headed by Yasuyuki Honne and only has like 30 employees. As proven by the listed games in the article, the studio supported Nintendo EAD in the graphics department (two of the sources used in the article were written by me, by the way). Of course, there are artworks that Honne released, causing rumors of a new 3DS game – I myself thought for a long time they would be working on Baten Kaitos 3 on 3DS. But the new developments show that this is not the case. Monolith Soft Kyoto is to small to be developing an own game while assisting EAD; the artworks were likely published for recruitement reasons only. Because of that, I will delet this wrong information again. (Please excuse my English, BTW ;)) Greetings Umweltschützen (talk) 16:55, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Nintendo - 1970.png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Nintendo - 1970.png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. NtheP (talk) 22:20, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nintendo 3DS, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Media format (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Nintendo Task Force

Thank you for the note on my talk page about the Nintendo Task Force! I was pleased to be able to help with Intelligent Systems after spending a year, on and off, on the new table for the page. Due to my schedule, I'm something of an infrequent contributor, but I would like to help when and where I can, particularly with article cleanup. Thanks again for the note about the project! All the best, Jack talk 20:15, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

You're more than welcome to the NTF. And you're like me, we excel at cleaning up :) Thank for you contributions and happy editing! --Arkhandar (TalkContribs) 20:56, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Reference Errors on 24 December

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!


DarkToonLink is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

A reference problem

Nintendo DS line: Cite error: The named reference fourth was invoked but never defined. see --Frze 12:05, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Xeno series logo (2013).png

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Xeno series logo (2013).png, has been listed at Misplaced Pages:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 01:10, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Nintendo 2DS GA fail

I've failed the second nomination of Nintendo 2DS due to problems with the reliability of numerous sources used in the article. Please ensure that all sources have their reliability verified and are replaced as needed before renominating the article. - New Age Retro Hippie (talk) (contributions) 14:27, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. Thank you. —174.17.0.150 (talk) 07:19, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

User talk:Arkhandar: Difference between revisions Add topic