| Revision as of 22:16, 15 October 2013 editStudent7 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers72,738 edits →Notification of report: ani← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:17, 15 October 2013 edit undoDarkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 editsm Reverted edits by Student7 (talk) to last version by Darkness ShinesNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :::I don't want to mess up the FA page so I'll ask it here. If it already passes the criteria, why wasn't it promoted the last time around? I am definitely puzzled. --] <small>(])</small> 20:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC) | :::I don't want to mess up the FA page so I'll ask it here. If it already passes the criteria, why wasn't it promoted the last time around? I am definitely puzzled. --] <small>(])</small> 20:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Because the usual suspects jumped in and I lost my temper, so other that Hamiltonstone there were no further comments, but given what has now been written it was obviously a waste of time. One reviewer is suggesting Bose as a source, what a joke. This BTW is the "scholar" who has said that the rapes only numbered in the thousands, and in one paper said the Pakistani military had committed no rapes at all. ] (]) 21:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC) | ::::Because the usual suspects jumped in and I lost my temper, so other that Hamiltonstone there were no further comments, but given what has now been written it was obviously a waste of time. One reviewer is suggesting Bose as a source, what a joke. This BTW is the "scholar" who has said that the rapes only numbered in the thousands, and in one paper said the Pakistani military had committed no rapes at all. ] (]) 21:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ==Notification of report== | |||
| ] There is currently a discussion at ] regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. <!--Template:ANI-notice--> Thank you. | |||
Revision as of 22:17, 15 October 2013
DYK for John Rope
 | On 12 October 2013, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article John Rope, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that John Rope was the first Apache scout to receive the medal of honor? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/John Rope. You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
— Crisco 1492 (talk) 17:07, 12 October 2013 (UTC)
Rape during the Bangladesh Liberation War
Hi there. Had you had any thoughts about taking this back to FAC? I thought probably we were over the POV issues raised by one particular editor, but that the appearance on the FAC page of that discussion, together with Dr Blofield's comments, may have discouraged further reviews. I'd be cautiously optimistic about it running again from scratch... hamiltonstone (talk) 12:07, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- The one particular editor will find something else to prevent it going through, but I was thinking of trying it again at any rate. Will probably do it tonight when I get back from the pub. Thanks. Darkness Shines (talk) 12:49, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- On second thoughts I just did it now, I would likly muff it up later
Darkness Shines (talk) 13:47, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- I don't want to mess up the FA page so I'll ask it here. If it already passes the criteria, why wasn't it promoted the last time around? I am definitely puzzled. --regentspark (comment) 20:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- Because the usual suspects jumped in and I lost my temper, so other that Hamiltonstone there were no further comments, but given what has now been written it was obviously a waste of time. One reviewer is suggesting Bose as a source, what a joke. This BTW is the "scholar" who has said that the rapes only numbered in the thousands, and in one paper said the Pakistani military had committed no rapes at all. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:57, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
- I don't want to mess up the FA page so I'll ask it here. If it already passes the criteria, why wasn't it promoted the last time around? I am definitely puzzled. --regentspark (comment) 20:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)