| Revision as of 20:35, 4 October 2013 editKonveyor Belt (talk | contribs)Rollbackers4,216 edits fix← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:44, 4 October 2013 edit undoChrisGualtieri (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers457,369 edits →Proposed merge with Bleach (manga): reNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| This article appears not to need two standalone articles when the purpose could easily be served with one. ''']''' <small>''] ]</small>'' 20:32, 4 October 2013 (UTC) | This article appears not to need two standalone articles when the purpose could easily be served with one. ''']''' <small>''] ]</small>'' 20:32, 4 October 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == I can't work now == | |||
| Ryulong, you have locked me out of editing for 24 hours with your edit warring. Now you'll just revert it out of existance when I got my back turned. I can't even improve the article because of this, lest I break 3RR. I didn't realize you are so desperate to prevent coverage of anime and manga topics that you would do this again. ] (]) 20:44, 4 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:44, 4 October 2013
Proposed merge with Bleach (manga)
This split was contentious when discussed at WT:Manual of Style/Anime- and manga-related articles#Nonsense instructions and ChrisGualtieri went ahead with it anyway. He is part of a minority of editors who believe that manga and anime adaptations deserve separate articles due to the glut of sources that discuss their reception and release separately, when the majority of the members of WP:ANIME believe that articles are best kept as about both forms of media and information regarding the separate media are relegated to list articles. —Ryulong (琉竜) 20:13, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- You cannot preclude creation of an article, you ignored the inuse and you brought it to 3RR with your tagging so I can't edit it or improve it. You are actively engaged in preventing improvement because you disagree that we need a page on the anime, even when hundreds of sources exist and there is a vast different in content. The LOCALCONSENSUS was rejected at the RFC, MOSAM has no authority and cannot prevent article creation or limiting of notable content that deserves a page. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:27, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- How was tagging it and fixing your mistakes bringing it to 3RR? And I am not the only one who disagrees "that we need a page on the anime". This is a plot summary (identical to that for the manga except for stuff like the Bount arc), a cast list (no other anime article features a cast list other than ones that you've done this same treatment to; that information is usually left to the character list pages), and you've just turned Bleach (manga)#Anime into a "release" section and copied over the two paragraphs on the reception of the anime. The amount of padding you've put into this to make it appear as a suitable standalone article is ridiculous. And I will not repeat what Konveyor Belt has said, but I will point out a line you seem to be ignoring on WP:N: "This is not a guarantee that a topic will necessarily be handled as a separate, stand-alone page. Editors may use their discretion to merge or group two or more related topics into a single article." That is what WP:ANIME did for these pages so you need to stop complaining about "LOCALCONSENSUS".—Ryulong (琉竜) 20:33, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
- Support per nom. We don't need extra articles clogging the wiki. As I said in the MOSAM discussion:
but although I do believe that these articles should be expanded, there is a fine line. GNG says that such articles can be created, but it doesn't justify their creation. Any decisions about merging or not merging will need to be done based on the individual needs of each article.
— Konveyor Belt, WT:MOS-AM
This article appears not to need two standalone articles when the purpose could easily be served with one. Konveyor Belt express your horror at my edits 20:32, 4 October 2013 (UTC)
I can't work now
Ryulong, you have locked me out of editing for 24 hours with your edit warring. Now you'll just revert it out of existance when I got my back turned. I can't even improve the article because of this, lest I break 3RR. I didn't realize you are so desperate to prevent coverage of anime and manga topics that you would do this again. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 20:44, 4 October 2013 (UTC)