Revision as of 14:13, 22 August 2013 editMsnicki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,358 edits rm closed items← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:19, 26 August 2013 edit undoHgrosser (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,332 edits →Re: Your edits appear to violate our LGBT Guidelines: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
|} | |} | ||
Thank you! ] (]) 22:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | Thank you! ] (]) 22:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
== Re: Your edits appear to violate our LGBT Guidelines == | |||
Wow, we’re being really over-sensitive now, aren’t we? I’m not on any kind of “agenda” to out trans people. In fact, I had completely forgotten about the Douglas→Nicole Hamilton issue under the recent Bradley Manning news reminded me of it. I feel that clarity for the reader should always come before political correctness, a view with which you do not, unfortunately, agree. As a small step toward clarity, I have taken the liberty of copying the cited footnote (cite-note-3) in its entirety from the ] article replacing the reference to it in the ] article. This will not only be easier for readers to see, but will not break if the footnote gets renumbered. I hope you do not consider this a pert of some nefarious “agenda.” | |||
] (]) 13:19, 26 August 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:19, 26 August 2013
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
for being so clear eyed, consistent, and even in tone while working on the whole Deluna page/umpteen socks investigation. Good work!Tao2911 (talk) 21:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC) |
My goodness. Thank you. Msnicki (talk) 21:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Barnstar of Diplomacy | |
For keeping peace and letting everybody use their opportunities. APS (Full Auto) (talk) 22:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC) |
Thank you! Msnicki (talk) 22:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Re: Your edits appear to violate our LGBT Guidelines
Wow, we’re being really over-sensitive now, aren’t we? I’m not on any kind of “agenda” to out trans people. In fact, I had completely forgotten about the Douglas→Nicole Hamilton issue under the recent Bradley Manning news reminded me of it. I feel that clarity for the reader should always come before political correctness, a view with which you do not, unfortunately, agree. As a small step toward clarity, I have taken the liberty of copying the cited footnote (cite-note-3) in its entirety from the Hamilton C Shell article replacing the reference to it in the C Shell article. This will not only be easier for readers to see, but will not break if the footnote gets renumbered. I hope you do not consider this a pert of some nefarious “agenda.” Hgrosser (talk) 13:19, 26 August 2013 (UTC)