| Revision as of 06:03, 24 July 2013 editNeilN (talk | contribs)134,455 edits Notifying about edit warring noticeboard discussion. using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:31, 24 July 2013 edit undoJauerback (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators72,689 edits You have been blocked from editing for violation of the three-revert rule. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
| ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | ==Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion== | ||
| Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] <sup><font face="Calibri">'']''</font></sup> 06:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC) | Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at ] regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on ]. The thread is ]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. ] <sup><font face="Calibri">'']''</font></sup> 06:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC) | ||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''72 hours''' for your ] caused by ] and violation of the ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}} below this notice, but you should read the ] first. <b>]</b><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub> 13:31, 24 July 2013 (UTC)</div>{{z10}}<!-- Template:uw-3block --> | |||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | |||
Revision as of 13:31, 24 July 2013
January 2013
Hello, I'm James086. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Government, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, James086 18:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
February 2013
Hello, I'm Jab843. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Hermaphrodite, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jab843 (talk) 02:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)
March 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Coffeehouse. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Stryn (talk) 22:02, 7 March 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm 4twenty42o. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Bollocks, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, 4twenty42o (talk) 08:26, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
Dianic Wicca
I've removed most of the tags you recently added (per WP:TAGBOMB). Please remember tagging every identifiable issue in an article with so many can be disruptive. That's what {{multiple issues}} is for (which Dianic Wicca is tagged with). Also, you failed to provide reasons for the tags that require it nor say anything on the talk page.
I did retain your {{cn}} in the lead, though. That is a core/defining point and probably should be singled out. —Sowlos 02:05, 21 April 2013 (UTC)
June 2013
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. EzPz (talk) 04:18, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
July 2013
I cannot stress enough that your edits to the Dr. Oz article are inappropriate at best. You may add the information about his views on circumcision (or anything else), assuming you can word it neutrally and not turn the paragraph into an opinionated rant. Which is what we call soapboxing around here. You've already been blocked for that same reason before - don't go for seconds. §FreeRangeFrog 05:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Final warning - if you continue to restore contentious material removed citing BLP concerns to the Mehmet Oz article your account will be blocked for edit warring and BLP violations.--Jezebel'sPonyo 19:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Mehmet Oz shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN 00:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Misplaced Pages's policy on edit warring. The thread is Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:86.19.115.227 reported by User:NeilN (Result: ). Thank you. NeilN 06:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jauerback/dude. 13:31, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.