Revision as of 23:01, 3 June 2013 editNeilN (talk | contribs)134,455 edits Notice: Conflict of Interest. using TW← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:05, 3 June 2013 edit undoNeilN (talk | contribs)134,455 edits →Radha Madhav Dham: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
For information on how to contribute to Misplaced Pages when you have a conflict of interest, please see ]. Thank you.<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. -->]<!-- Template:uw-coi --> ] <sup><font face="Calibri">'']''</font></sup> 23:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC) | For information on how to contribute to Misplaced Pages when you have a conflict of interest, please see ]. Thank you.<!-- THE FOLLOWING CATEGORY SHOULD BE REMOVED WHEN THE USER IS BLOCKED, OR IT IS DECIDED THAT THIS USER DOES NOT HAVE A COI, OR THIS TEMPLATE HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR A WHILE WITH NO ACTION. -->]<!-- Template:uw-coi --> ] <sup><font face="Calibri">'']''</font></sup> 23:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC) | ||
== ] == | |||
The ''name'' of the organization has changed, its ''history'' hasn't. You can further state your case at ]. --] <sup><font face="Calibri">'']''</font></sup> 23:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:05, 3 June 2013
June 2013
Your recent editing history at Radha Madhav Dham shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Please stop deleting the sourced paragraphs from the history section NeilN 22:51, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Hello, Dktaylor2013. We welcome your contributions to Misplaced Pages, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Misplaced Pages, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Misplaced Pages article or website of your organization in other articles (see Misplaced Pages:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Misplaced Pages's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Misplaced Pages when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. NeilN 23:01, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Radha Madhav Dham
The name of the organization has changed, its history hasn't. You can further state your case at Talk:Radha Madhav Dham. --NeilN 23:05, 3 June 2013 (UTC)