Revision as of 23:55, 24 March 2013 editFisherQueen (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users57,545 edits typo.← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:14, 25 March 2013 edit undoStrangesad (talk | contribs)517 edits →WarningNext edit → | ||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:What about not "on its surface"? ] (]) 21:16, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | :What about not "on its surface"? ] (]) 21:16, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
::I can't think of ''any'' time when advising someone else to break the rules that way would be a good idea. If you think that this person has been unfairly treated, the better thing to do would be making a strong case at ] that the topic ban was unreasonable and should be lifted. It's never a good idea to goad someone into actions that would certainly lead to a permanent block for them. Even if your''goal'' is that this person should be permanently blocked, it reflects badly on you to push them into it. A person who is not going to be a beneficial part of Misplaced Pages will eventually make that clear and be indefinitely blocked without any nudging. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 23:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | ::I can't think of ''any'' time when advising someone else to break the rules that way would be a good idea. If you think that this person has been unfairly treated, the better thing to do would be making a strong case at ] that the topic ban was unreasonable and should be lifted. It's never a good idea to goad someone into actions that would certainly lead to a permanent block for them. Even if your''goal'' is that this person should be permanently blocked, it reflects badly on you to push them into it. A person who is not going to be a beneficial part of Misplaced Pages will eventually make that clear and be indefinitely blocked without any nudging. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 23:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::So, you can't think of something that I can think of. We haven't found a common ground. I have no faith in ANI. ] (]) |
Revision as of 04:14, 25 March 2013
Warning
This is shockingly bad advice. I don't know any of the context of this, and just found the page while looking at unblock requests. but advising someone to create sockpuppets to avoid a topic ban seems, on its surface, to be a really, really bad idea. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:06, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- What about not "on its surface"? Strangesad (talk) 21:16, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- I can't think of any time when advising someone else to break the rules that way would be a good idea. If you think that this person has been unfairly treated, the better thing to do would be making a strong case at WP:AN that the topic ban was unreasonable and should be lifted. It's never a good idea to goad someone into actions that would certainly lead to a permanent block for them. Even if yourgoal is that this person should be permanently blocked, it reflects badly on you to push them into it. A person who is not going to be a beneficial part of Misplaced Pages will eventually make that clear and be indefinitely blocked without any nudging. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 23:55, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
- So, you can't think of something that I can think of. We haven't found a common ground. I have no faith in ANI. Strangesad (talk)