| Revision as of 12:40, 22 February 2013 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 48h) to User talk:Apteva/Archive 6.← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:34, 28 February 2013 edit undoBeeblebrox (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators114,068 edits →Re: your email to me: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| :I took out the link in the section heading and added a timestamp. That should fix it. ] (]) 04:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | :I took out the link in the section heading and added a timestamp. That should fix it. ] (]) 04:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :*Thanks for your trouble. ] (]) 04:42, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | :*Thanks for your trouble. ] (]) 04:42, 22 February 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Re: your email to me == | |||
| You'll have to forgive me for not respecting your request to only reply by email, I can't say I see any point to it. The reason is that the so-called explanation you gave makes no more sense than the (essentially the same) explanation you gave on-wiki. That you cannot seem to see that is frankly sad and alarming, but also irrelevant. You were limited to one account because you didn't seem to understand how to properly use an alternate account. The bizarre idea that what was actually meant was ''only one at a time'' only strengthens this perception. I won't bother arguing it with you further though because it is abundantly clear that you are completely unwilling to listen and have convinced yourself that you understand the policy and everyone else does not. This attitude seems to be the source of the many problems you have had here, you might want to think about putting your ego in check once in a while. Good luck with all that. ] (]) 00:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:34, 28 February 2013
 Archives | ||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 3 sections are present. |
Welcome!
Hello, Apteva, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Darwinek (talk) 08:22, 3 June 2008 (UTC)
MOS and TITLE again?
Your recent remarks about MOS at and seem to signal a return to battle over WP:MOS and WP:TITLE after your recent block. Some of your latest edits do give the appearance of trying to test your topic ban. You have been given some good advice to engage in a different field of activity; I hope you take it. —Neotarf (talk) 07:27, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
Photovoltaic power station
Thanks for your comment. I have responded thereunder. Grateful for your views on proposed changes to the List of photovoltaic power stations.
Belated thanks, also, for the GA nomination. Following you suggestion, a large number of references have been added, but it was still rejected. It seems to be down to the subjective view of a random reviewer. Anyway I think the article reads pretty well, and it's got lots of good data.--MrRenewables (talk) 12:14, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
RfC formatting
Hi Apteva,
If you have the time, I'd appreciate advice or help on the Talk:Microsoft Windows/Multilingual support RfC. Somebody else posted this talk page discussion as an RfC, but—when I refactored it—it seems to have confused the RfC bot's indenting algorithm (the RfCs after this one are all indented). Not a great problem, but if you have time... LittleBen (talk) 04:22, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- I took out the link in the section heading and added a timestamp. That should fix it. Apteva (talk) 04:33, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for your trouble. LittleBen (talk) 04:42, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Re: your email to me
You'll have to forgive me for not respecting your request to only reply by email, I can't say I see any point to it. The reason is that the so-called explanation you gave makes no more sense than the (essentially the same) explanation you gave on-wiki. That you cannot seem to see that is frankly sad and alarming, but also irrelevant. You were limited to one account because you didn't seem to understand how to properly use an alternate account. The bizarre idea that what was actually meant was only one at a time only strengthens this perception. I won't bother arguing it with you further though because it is abundantly clear that you are completely unwilling to listen and have convinced yourself that you understand the policy and everyone else does not. This attitude seems to be the source of the many problems you have had here, you might want to think about putting your ego in check once in a while. Good luck with all that. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:34, 28 February 2013 (UTC)