Misplaced Pages

Talk:Volunteer Ministers: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:27, 31 May 2010 editAdambro (talk | contribs)19,040 edits rv to revision by Shirik to rmv comments by banned user← Previous edit Revision as of 18:11, 9 February 2013 edit undoCoffeepusher (talk | contribs)7,488 edits Statement regarding incident, reasons I agree with the edit itselfNext edit →
Line 13: Line 13:
*{{cite news | last =Thompson | first =Damian | title =Mumbai cardinal asked to ban Scientologists from scene of terrorist attacks | work =Holy Smoke | publisher =] | date =November 29, 2008 | url =http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/damian_thompson/blog/2008/11/29/mumbai_cardinal_asked_to_ban_scientologists_from_scene_of_terrorist_attacks | accessdate = 2008-12-03 }} *{{cite news | last =Thompson | first =Damian | title =Mumbai cardinal asked to ban Scientologists from scene of terrorist attacks | work =Holy Smoke | publisher =] | date =November 29, 2008 | url =http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/damian_thompson/blog/2008/11/29/mumbai_cardinal_asked_to_ban_scientologists_from_scene_of_terrorist_attacks | accessdate = 2008-12-03 }}
Sources to use in article. ''']''' (]) 04:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC) Sources to use in article. ''']''' (]) 04:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)
==Legal threats by ] against wikipedia==

I have notified ] on about wikipedia's ] policy regarding I am ] in that Drg55 was probably unaware of this policy, so I am not reporting it to the ] unless Drg55 either continues this behavior or makes it known that they do intend legal action against wikipedia.

That being said, I agree with the deletion of the content but for different reasons. The quotes that Drg55 deleted were not from a ] so they shouldn't be used on this page (in my opinion).] (]) 18:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:11, 9 February 2013

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Volunteer Ministers article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Archives: 1
WikiProject iconScientology B‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is supported by WikiProject Scientology, a collaborative effort to help develop and improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of Scientology. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on Scientology-related topics. See WikiProject Scientology and Misplaced Pages:Contributing FAQ.ScientologyWikipedia:WikiProject ScientologyTemplate:WikiProject ScientologyScientology
BThis article has been rated as B-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

FDNY commendation

While the Church points to a commendation by the New York Fire Department for their relief efforts following the September 11, 2001 attacks

At the opening of the New York Ideal Org (2004), a Stephan Hittman awarded Scientology's Volunteer Ministers the "FDNY and 911 Medal of Valor". It turned out that (a) he had no authority to hand out medals, (b) the FDNY Medal of Valor, since 1960, has only been awarded posthumously and exclusively for line of duty death. So I think that it would be prudent see some detailed references for this, including who handed out this commendation. AndroidCat (talk) 21:52, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

Wow. Cirt (talk) 10:51, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Mumbai cardinal asked to ban Scientologists from scene of terrorist attacks

Sources to use in article. Cirt (talk) 04:44, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

Legal threats by Drg55 against wikipedia

I have notified Drg55 on their talk page about wikipedia's no legal threat policy regarding this edit summary. I am assuming good faith in that Drg55 was probably unaware of this policy, so I am not reporting it to the administrators noticeboard unless Drg55 either continues this behavior or makes it known that they do intend legal action against wikipedia.

That being said, I agree with the deletion of the content but for different reasons. The quotes that Drg55 deleted were not from a reliable source so they shouldn't be used on this page (in my opinion).Coffeepusher (talk) 18:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)

Categories:
Talk:Volunteer Ministers: Difference between revisions Add topic