Revision as of 23:11, 12 January 2013 view sourceApteva (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,591 edits →Requests for arbitration← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:30, 13 January 2013 view source Apteva (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users12,591 edits →CASENAMENext edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Header<noinclude>|width=53%</noinclude>}} | ||
== |
== Repeal of hyphen ban == | ||
'''Initiated by ''' ] (]) '''at''' 23:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC) | '''Initiated by ''' ] (]) '''at''' 23:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
<!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> | <!-- use {{admin|username}} if the party is an administrator --> | ||
*{{userlinks|Apteva}}, ''filing party'' | *{{userlinks|Apteva}}, ''filing party'' | ||
*{{ |
*{{admin|Seraphimblade}} | ||
*{{userlinks|username3}} | |||
*{{userlinks|username4}} | |||
<!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> | <!-- The editor filing the case should be included as a party for purposes of notifications. --> | ||
Line 21: | Line 19: | ||
;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | ;Confirmation that other steps in ] have been tried | ||
<!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> | <!-- Identify prior attempts at dispute resolution here, with links/diffs to the page where the resolution took place. If prior dispute resolution has not been attempted, the reasons for this should be explained in the request for arbitration --> | ||
*{{diff|User_talk:Seraphimblade|531605507|531599836}} | |||
*Link 1 | |||
*Link 2 | |||
=== Statement by {Party 1} === | |||
=== Statement by |
=== Statement by Apteva === | ||
This is very simple. In one of the more bizarre community actions, I am topic banned from making uncontroverial corrections involving horizontal lines such as hyphens, used for well everywhere and endashes used not so much. I brought up the proper use of hyphens, as to me the MOS was being misapplied and had errors, ].{{diff|Misplaced Pages talk:Manual of Style|514439391|514355457}} So I brought it up again. And again. The MOS regulars had decided in July 2011 to handle things in a particular way, and created, what I referred to as the great endash debacle of 2011, moving up to hundreds of articles to odd names because of this choice. As these moves got noticed, some editors asked to move them back, ]. An RFC/U was opened to ask me to stop discussing hyphens and endashes, which is reasonable, although that assumes that the topic does not require discussion. A subsequent AN discussion lead to a topic ban{{diff|Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard|531604470|531603903}} even though I had already agreed to not discuss hyphens, and was not supported as many of those voting were involved, and there was strong opposition to a topic ban. However, since then discussion has, as predicted, continued on hyphens and endashes, and expanded as well, which I commented on, and was in my opinion, improperly warned for violating the topic ban (if it is a topic ban on eggs and someone brings up dairy, is that a violation if I discuss only the other aspects of dairy?) As discussion on hyphens and endashes is continuing and I am fully prepared to limit my discussion appropriately, I ask that the topic ban be vacated (because it was inappropriate). There are now two requests at AN that the topic be brought to Arbcom, perhaps through a negotiated discussion such as that of Palestine. | |||
=== Statement by |
=== Statement by Seraphimblade === | ||
=== Clerk notes === | === Clerk notes === |
Revision as of 00:30, 13 January 2013
Requests for arbitration
Arbitration Committee proceedings- recent changes
- purge this page
- view or discuss this template
Request name | Motions | Initiated | Votes |
---|---|---|---|
Repeal of hyphen ban | 12 January 2013 | {{{votes}}} |
Case name | Links | Evidence due | Prop. Dec. due |
---|---|---|---|
Palestine-Israel articles 5 | (t) (ev / t) (ws / t) (pd / t) | 21 Dec 2024 | 11 Jan 2025 |
No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).
Clarification and Amendment requestsRequest name | Motions | Case | Posted |
---|---|---|---|
Amendment request: American politics 2 | none | (orig. case) | 15 January 2025 |
No arbitrator motions are currently open.
Shortcuts
About this page Use this page to request the committee open an arbitration case. To be accepted, an arbitration request needs 4 net votes to "accept" (or a majority). Arbitration is a last resort. WP:DR lists the other, escalating processes that should be used before arbitration. The committee will decline premature requests. Requests may be referred to as "case requests" or "RFARs"; once opened, they become "cases". Before requesting arbitration, read the arbitration guide to case requests. Then click the button below. Complete the instructions quickly; requests incomplete for over an hour may be removed. Consider preparing the request in your userspace. To request enforcement of an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement. To clarify or change an existing arbitration ruling, see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification and Amendment.
Guidance on participation and word limits Unlike many venues on Misplaced Pages, ArbCom imposes word limits. Please observe the below notes on complying with word limits.
General guidance
|
Repeal of hyphen ban
Initiated by Apteva (talk) at 23:11, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Involved parties
- Apteva (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), filing party
- Seraphimblade (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)
- Confirmation that all parties are aware of the request
- Diff. 1
- Diff. 2
- Confirmation that other steps in dispute resolution have been tried
Statement by Apteva
This is very simple. In one of the more bizarre community actions, I am topic banned from making uncontroverial corrections involving horizontal lines such as hyphens, used for well everywhere and endashes used not so much. I brought up the proper use of hyphens, as to me the MOS was being misapplied and had errors, and got no where. So I brought it up again. And again. The MOS regulars had decided in July 2011 to handle things in a particular way, and created, what I referred to as the great endash debacle of 2011, moving up to hundreds of articles to odd names because of this choice. As these moves got noticed, some editors asked to move them back, notably here. An RFC/U was opened to ask me to stop discussing hyphens and endashes, which is reasonable, although that assumes that the topic does not require discussion. A subsequent AN discussion lead to a topic ban even though I had already agreed to not discuss hyphens, and was not supported as many of those voting were involved, and there was strong opposition to a topic ban. However, since then discussion has, as predicted, continued on hyphens and endashes, and expanded as well, which I commented on, and was in my opinion, improperly warned for violating the topic ban (if it is a topic ban on eggs and someone brings up dairy, is that a violation if I discuss only the other aspects of dairy?) As discussion on hyphens and endashes is continuing and I am fully prepared to limit my discussion appropriately, I ask that the topic ban be vacated (because it was inappropriate). There are now two requests at AN that the topic be brought to Arbcom, perhaps through a negotiated discussion such as that of Palestine.
Statement by Seraphimblade
Clerk notes
- This area is used for notes by the clerks (including clerk recusals).
CASENAME: Arbitrators' opinion on hearing this matter <0/0/0/0>-Repeal_of_hyphen_ban">
Vote key: (Accept/decline/recuse/other)