Misplaced Pages

User talk:MervinVillarreal: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:24, 4 January 2013 editMervinVillarreal (talk | contribs)600 editsm Blocked← Previous edit Revision as of 19:27, 4 January 2013 edit undoMervinVillarreal (talk | contribs)600 edits January 2013Next edit →
Line 138: Line 138:


Mervin, I then strongly suggest that you take the time to read ]. Then such misunderstandings can be prevented in future. <span style="border:2px solid black;margin-top:2px;bottom:2px;font- verdana;background:#FF8000" > ] ]</span> 19:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC) Mervin, I then strongly suggest that you take the time to read ]. Then such misunderstandings can be prevented in future. <span style="border:2px solid black;margin-top:2px;bottom:2px;font- verdana;background:#FF8000" > ] ]</span> 19:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

mervin1234 my xbox live account. no problem, these days I'll be locked, I'll be playing xbox xd, besides, I have read the privacy policies, greetings.

Revision as of 19:27, 4 January 2013

MervinVillarreal Talk Page
Home Talk Contributions

This is MervinVillarreal's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
User talk
  • If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
  • If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist.
  • Please click here to leave me a new message.
Archiving icon
Archives
Archive 1

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!
Welcome to Misplaced Pages, MervinVillarreal! Thank you for your contributions. I am MisterShiney and I have been editing Misplaced Pages for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Misplaced Pages:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! MisterShiney 18:22, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

thanks! MervinVillarreal (talk) 18:31, 26 December 2012 (UTC)

MervinVillarreal, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi MervinVillarreal! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Ummm

Random question, why have you set out your talk page exactly like mine? Right down to the colours in the title part? MisterShiney 21:45, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


dont is the same MervinVillarreal (talk) 22:19, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

If you insist on editing English Misplaced Pages then I must insist that your use of the written English Language improves! It is the same. Right down to the shade of Orange surrounding your username at the top. MisterShiney 22:21, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


I am waiting for your reply in World War Z. MervinVillarreal (talk) 22:23, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

That's nice. I am refusing to respond because I refuse to go around in circles like a child. MisterShiney 22:24, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

then, nationality can change?MervinVillarreal (talk) 22:25, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

No. It is being left open to other editors to contribute. MisterShiney 22:30, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

so what is a consensus? do not British production in the movie, then this cant to have a "UK" in the section of countryMervinVillarreal (talk) 22:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

A consensus has not been reached. Mainly because one of the editors cant even write in English properly to be able to, in my personal opinion, not only put across his argument but to make suitable edits. MisterShiney 22:38, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

My English is not perfect, but I try to improve, and I do not want that Misplaced Pages articles are false. "World war Z Film" for example. MervinVillarreal (talk) 22:44, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Then I respectfully suggest that you leave it for English speaking Wikipedians or those Wikipedians with a firm enough grasp of the English Language. Perhaps you would be better suited to Spanish Misplaced Pages. The article is not false as it currently stands. MisterShiney 22:57, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

clear that it is false, the movie has no British producer, and leads to "UK" in the section of country. you can explain me it?MervinVillarreal (talk) 23:03, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

As has already been explained to you....GK is in fact a British Producer. You can cite as many sources as you want saying it's offices are in California, but don't forget, that it is common practice for film production companies to have offices in Los Angeles...you know...where Hollywood is? MisterShiney 23:33, 28 December 2012 (UTC)


Look, if you find any source that says that GK Films is based in UK, or even having offices in UK, I forget all about World War Z, but if not, I will proceed to change the nationality of the film, since I have the evidence to prove that world war z film is American, and no have British producer company to determining nationality "except the director, this has no bearing on nationality", in wikipedia, we determine the nationality of the movie, for that; who company produces the movie and who distributed, you know, you need find any source that says that GK Films has offices in London even, or else I will go to change the nationality, I have my reliable sources.

and I know you understand that.

here are my sources

MervinVillarreal (talk) 17:13, 30 December 2012 (UTC)

Help

Hello sir, I am the user from India. Most of the users are vandalizing the wiki article.I dnt know how to avoid their disruptive editing.I need ur help lot to overcome this sir..I am auto confirmed user nw and wat else shud I do to warn them?? Please help meBenjaminvetri (talk) 08:24, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

you need talk with a Administrator.MervinVillarreal (talk) 17:52, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Your behaviour

There is a discussion about your behaviour at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Disruptive_jingoistic_behaviour_by_User:MervinVillarreal. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 18:30, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Blocked

Hi. I've blocked you for one week, due to much the same behavior that got you blocked the last time. You apparently show no interest in discussing with other editors, but instead go around reverting on multiple articles again and again. Also, replies like this doesn't really help your situation. I've set the block for one week for now, use that time to cool down and read up on policy. Bjelleklang - talk 18:40, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MervinVillarreal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

First, when I returned to do vandalism? I not revert an article 3 times in less than 24 hours to be considered vandalism? Or am I wrong?

second, he insult me, please read;

"I Would Have just templated your ass"


Where is my vandalism? Tests will I show? please

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=First, when I returned to do vandalism? I not revert an article 3 times in less than 24 hours to be considered vandalism? Or am I wrong? second, he insult me, please read; "I Would Have just templated your ass" Where is my vandalism? Tests will I show? please |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=First, when I returned to do vandalism? I not revert an article 3 times in less than 24 hours to be considered vandalism? Or am I wrong? second, he insult me, please read; "I Would Have just templated your ass" Where is my vandalism? Tests will I show? please |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=First, when I returned to do vandalism? I not revert an article 3 times in less than 24 hours to be considered vandalism? Or am I wrong? second, he insult me, please read; "I Would Have just templated your ass" Where is my vandalism? Tests will I show? please |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Just a small comment; you don't have to violate 3RR to have an edit war. You've had around 20 edits for the past few days where you either add "american" or remove other nationalities, or revert other users opposing you. 3RR is just one part of the policy on edit warring, and what you did was disruptive. In addition, you've been uncivil with edits such as this and the link in my blocknotice, you've added or removed WikiProject templates (, ) without being part of the WikiProjects and you've removed discussions such as here. I won't respond to any appeals, but will leave it up for other admins to decide. Bjelleklang - talk 18:50, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MervinVillarreal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The last time I was blocked, blocked me because I reversed an article three times in less than 24 hours, I have the evidence, so then why I was blocked? .... Also, add a national "American" than once every 24 hours is vandalism?

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=The last time I was blocked, blocked me because I reversed an article three times in less than 24 hours, I have the evidence, so then why I was blocked? .... Also, add a national "American" than once every 24 hours is vandalism? |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=The last time I was blocked, blocked me because I reversed an article three times in less than 24 hours, I have the evidence, so then why I was blocked? .... Also, add a national "American" than once every 24 hours is vandalism? |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=The last time I was blocked, blocked me because I reversed an article three times in less than 24 hours, I have the evidence, so then why I was blocked? .... Also, add a national "American" than once every 24 hours is vandalism? |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Please see my note above. Read WP:EW, and pay special attention to the lead: An edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions, rather than trying to resolve the disagreement by discussion. Edit warring is unconstructive and creates animosity between editors, making it harder to reach a consensus. Users who engage in edit wars risk being blocked or even banned. Note that an editor who repeatedly restores his or her preferred version is edit warring, whether or not his or her edits were justifiable: it is no defence to say "but my edits were right, so it wasn't edit warring". Bjelleklang - talk 19:09, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

MervinVillarreal (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

exactly! the last time that I was blocked was for edit warring, and I accept it, I did ,but since that i was unblocked, I not do more a edit warring, so I say

What are my edit wars that I did today? 04/01/2013?

Thank u

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=exactly! the last time that I was blocked was for edit warring, and I accept it, I did ,but since that i was unblocked, I not do more a edit warring, so I say What are my edit wars that I did today? 04/01/2013? Thank u |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=exactly! the last time that I was blocked was for edit warring, and I accept it, I did ,but since that i was unblocked, I not do more a edit warring, so I say What are my edit wars that I did today? 04/01/2013? Thank u |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=exactly! the last time that I was blocked was for edit warring, and I accept it, I did ,but since that i was unblocked, I not do more a edit warring, so I say What are my edit wars that I did today? 04/01/2013? Thank u |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
MervinVillarreal (talk) 19:13, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013

Do not use multiple IP addresses to disruptively edit or Make a point on wikipedia, like you did at World War Z (film) and on the Rockstar Games talk page. Such attempts to avoid detection, or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Misplaced Pages but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to do so you may be blocked permanently from editing without further notice. MisterShiney 19:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)


the administrator talk me about it, thanks, did not know.MervinVillarreal (talk) 19:22, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Mervin, I then strongly suggest that you take the time to read Policies and guidelines. Then such misunderstandings can be prevented in future. MisterShiney 19:23, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

mervin1234 my xbox live account. no problem, these days I'll be locked, I'll be playing xbox xd, besides, I have read the privacy policies, greetings.

Category:
User talk:MervinVillarreal: Difference between revisions Add topic