Revision as of 21:02, 17 September 2012 editAnomieBOT (talk | contribs)Bots6,585,800 editsm Dating maintenance tags: {{Mergeto}}← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:36, 19 September 2012 edit undoMysteriousStrangerintheDark (talk | contribs)1,522 edits →Psychoanalytic legacy: entry refers to more authorsNext edit → | ||
(38 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{psychoanalysis}} | |||
{{mergeto|Wilhelm Reich|discuss=Talk:Orgastic_potency#Merge|date=September 2012}} | {{mergeto|Wilhelm Reich|discuss=Talk:Orgastic_potency#Merge|date=September 2012}} | ||
{{Fringe theories|date=September 2012}} | {{Fringe theories|date=September 2012}} | ||
In the work of ], the |
In the work of ], the term '''orgastic potency''' refers to the ability to experience a ] with specific ]] characteristics - requiring the capacity to love.<ref>{{harvnb|Rycroft|1971}}: 33.</ref> In Reichian psychology, impaired ability to do so, termed "orgastic impotence" (not to be confused with inability to reach orgasm, or ]), is regarded as the cause of all ]. Coined in 1924, Reich described the concept in detail in the 1927 book ''Die Funktion des Orgasmus'' (''Genitality in the Theory and Therapy of Neurosis'') which he presented to ] on the latter's 70th birthday.<ref>{{harvnb|Sharaf|1994}}: 91-2, 100, 116.</ref> Though Reich regarded his work as complementing Freud's original theory of anxiety neurosis, Freud was ambivalent in his reception.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 18, 21.</ref> Reich continued to use orgastic potency as an indicator of a person's health in his later therapeutic methods such as ].<ref>{{harvnb|Sharaf|1994}}: 238-41, 243.</ref> The concept was never used outside Reichian circles.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 19-34.</ref> | ||
==Background and theory== | ==Background and theory== | ||
]]] | ]]] | ||
Reich |
Reich developed his orgasm theory between 1921 and 1924 and it formed the basis for all his later contributions, including the theory of ].<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 23.</ref> Reich was strongly influenced by ]'s distinction between psychoneuroses and actual neuroses, the latter being considered of a physiological origin.<ref>{{harvnb|Rycroft|1971}}: 29.</ref> The starting point of Reich's orgasm theory was his clinical observation of genital disturbance in all neurotics,<ref name="Sharaf 1994 86-105">{{harvnb|Sharaf|1994}}: 86-105.</ref> which he presented in November 1923, in the paper "Genitality from the viewpoint of psycho-analytic prognosis and therapy" (published in the ''International Zeitschrift für Psa'', 10, 1924). That presentation was met with a chilling silence, much hostility, and was partially discredited because Reich could not adequately define normal sexual health. In response, and after a further year of research, Reich introduced the concept "orgastic potency" at the 1924 Psycho-analytic Congress, Salzburg in the paper "Die therapeutische Bedeutung des Genitallibidos", (published in English as "Further Remarks on the Therapeutic Significance of Genital Libido" in the 1975 book ''Early Writings, Volume One'').<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 16.</ref> | ||
Reich was strongly influenced by |
Reich was also strongly influenced by Freud's ] as the energy of an unconscious sexual instinct.<ref>{{harvnb|Rycroft|1971}}: 18-22.</ref> Reich emphasised the libido theory exactly when it was being discarded by psychoanalysis.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 19.</ref> Reich retained the idea of a sexual energy and the concept orgastic potency as central elements in ], a general Reichian theory of health dealing with an organism's energy household.<ref>{{harvnb|Raknes|1944}}: "Lead."</ref> Reich progressively called this energy libido, sexual energy, emotional energy, bioelectric energy, biophysical energy and, finally, ] ("life") energy. In terms of this theory, an individual lacking in orgastic potency is unable to fully discharge energy in orgasm, and thus remains in a constant state of tension, both physical rigidity and mental anxiety, which constitutes neurosis.<ref name="Baker 1986">{{harvnb|Baker|1986}}.</ref> Orgastic potency enables the individual to receive satisfaction in the sex act, whereas those lacking in it are forever seeking it, and are therefore likely to be more sexually needy.<ref name="Baker 1986"/> | ||
In an overview of the meaning of the concept orgastic potency, Reich provided the following summary. He considered it to be an outcome of ] because, he argued, full orgastic potency can only come about if a person is psychologically free of neurosis (pleasure ]), physically free from "body armor" (chronic ]), socially free from ] morality and duty (as imposed by ] and mechanistic ways of life), and has the natural ability to love.<ref>{{harvnb|Reich|1999}}: 6-8.</ref> Reich held that the vast majority of people do not meet these criteria and thus lack orgastic potency.<ref>{{harvnb|Konia|1987}}.</ref> | |||
==Definition == | ==Definition == | ||
Reich defined the natural sexual act that orgastic potency enables the adult to fully experience as characterized by love and the ability to express it; full, deep, pleasurable breathing; deep, delicious current-like sensations running up and down the body shortly before orgasm; involuntary muscular movements before climax |
Reich defined the natural sexual act that orgastic potency enables the adult to fully experience as characterized by love and the ability to express it; full, deep, pleasurable breathing; deep, delicious current-like sensations running up and down the body shortly before orgasm; and involuntary muscular movements before climax.<ref name="Daniels 2008 Orgiastic"/> The pleasure of the orgasm depends on the amount of ] concentrated in the genitals and the steepness of the drop of excitation during the orgasm.<ref>{{harvnb|Reich|1999}}: 102.</ref> The description of orgastic potency and orgastic impotence for both men and women as described by Reich can be summarised as follows:<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 17-8.</ref> | ||
For Reich, this would always be penile-vaginal sexual intercourse, which he described in detail in ''The Function of the Orgasm'' (1942)<ref name="Reich 1999 102-07">{{harvnb|Reich|1999}}: 102-07.</ref> In his view, the course of excitation is exactly the same in women as it is in men, and the orgasm for both is more intense when the peaks of genital excitation coincide, which is often the case in love relationships that are undisturbed by internal or external factors. He stated that five to fifteen minutes was the normal duration for sexual intercourse.<ref>{{harvnb|Reich|1983}}: 181.</ref>{{#tag:ref|"he average sex therapist believes that intercourse that lasts 3 to 13 minutes is normative" ({{harvnb|Corty|2008}}).|group=note}} | |||
The contrasting sexual experience of orgastic potency and orgastic impotence as described by Reich can be summarised as follows (Boadella 1985: 17-8): | |||
{| class="wikitable" | {| class="wikitable" | ||
|- | |- | ||
Line 33: | Line 30: | ||
===Changing definitions=== | ===Changing definitions=== | ||
Reich's precise definition for the phrase "orgastic potency" changed over time as he changed his understanding of the phenomenon. He first described it in detail in his 1927 book ''Die Funktion Des Orgasmus.'' In the 1980 English translation of the book, ''Genitality in the Theory and Therapy of Neuroses'', he defined orgastic potency as "the |
Reich's precise definition for the phrase "orgastic potency" changed over time as he changed his understanding of the phenomenon. He first described it in detail in his 1927 book ''Die Funktion Des Orgasmus.'' In the 1980 English translation of the book, ''Genitality in the Theory and Therapy of Neuroses'', he defined orgastic potency as "the ability to achieve full resolution of existing sexual need-tension".<ref>{{harvnb|Reich|1980}}: 18.</ref> | ||
In his 1940 book ''Die Entdeckung des Orgons Erster Teil: Die Function des Orgasmus'', published in English in 1942 as ''The Discovery of the Orgone, Volume 1: The Function of the Orgasm'', he defined it as "the capacity to surrender to the flow of biological energy, free of any inhibitions; the capacity to discharge completely the dammed-up sexual excitation through involuntary, pleasurable convulsions of the body |
In his 1940 book ''Die Entdeckung des Orgons Erster Teil: Die Function des Orgasmus'', published in English in 1942 as ''The Discovery of the Orgone, Volume 1: The Function of the Orgasm'', he defined it as "the capacity to surrender to the flow of biological energy, free of any inhibitions; the capacity to discharge completely the dammed-up sexual excitation through involuntary, pleasurable convulsions of the body."<ref>{{harvnb|Reich|1999}}: 102. Note: the original reads "damned-up" but this is probably a typo.</ref> | ||
His last published definition of orgastic potency (original date unclear, published in 1961) |
His last published definition of orgastic potency (original date unclear, published in 1961) is "the capacity for complete surrender to the involuntary convulsion of the organism and complete discharge of the excitation at the acme of the genital embrace."<ref name="Reich 1961 10"/> | ||
=== Forms of orgastic impotence === | |||
Since Reichian psychology relates orgastic potency to a very specific form of ], sexual behavior that differs from the norm is regarded as ], caused by a lack of orgastic potency. For example, "character armor" and "muscular armor" are said to change the sexual impulse from something gentle and soft to something brutal and harsh. In this view, the inability to express the sexual impulse causes rage, which is also repressed, making sex mechanical and possibly brutal.<ref>{{harvnb|Daniels|2008}}: "Sexuality and Armoring."</ref> | |||
According to Reich, sexual disturbances are more common in women than in men due to a stronger sexual suppression of women in childhood and stricter sexual education. In ''The Sexual Rights of Youth'', Reich provides the following general categories of what he considered disturbances for men and women:<ref name="Reich 1983 179-89">{{harvnb|Reich|1983|}}: 179-89.</ref> | |||
==== In men ==== | |||
;1. Erectile dysfunction | |||
According to Reich, ], i.e., an incomplete or inadequate ], often occurs in otherwise quite healthy men. In some cases it may have a ] cause, but generally it is due to ] towards the ] or to an ] ] of intercourse. This is usually manifested in feelings of sexual inferiority. An ideology of ] is often based on such fear or shyness, believing that intercourse is unwanted for moral reasons. This is commonly solved by making the sufferer aware of his unconscious anxieties. These are commonly caused by erroneous education that causes men to believe intercourse is a difficult task, which only further increases his fears and causes him to attempt to prove himself even when he is not sexually aroused.<ref name="Reich 1983 179-89"/> | |||
;2. Premature ejaculation | |||
According to Reich, ejaculation soon after penetration prevents sufficient concentration of excitation in the penis and therefore renders complete discharge of the excitation impossible. Moreover, it ] to the female. The causes often lie in the creation of sexual anxiety and suppression of the sex life during childhood. Prematire ejaculation is also often caused by a hasty attempt (such as in fear of being discovered), being fully clothed, excessive stimulation beforehand, or simple infrequency of intercourse.<ref name="Reich 1983 179-89"/> | |||
;3. Inability to experience gratification | |||
Also common, according to Reich, is the inability to experience a proper release of tension during the last phase of pleasure. Important factors are the fear of being interrupted, being fully clothed, being in the presence of third parties, being in a miserable social position, or inner emotional problems. These factors, and frequent change of partners, may prevent a proper adjustment and adaptation to the sexual partner.<ref name="Reich 1983 179-89"/> | |||
==== In women ==== | |||
Reich viewed the capacity for ] as an indicator of orgastic potency in women. | |||
;1. Complete lack of sexual feeling | |||
20–30% of women attain coital climax, after varying lengths of time that are usually markedly longer than in men, while 70–80% require manual stimulation of the ].<ref name="Flaherty">"The amount of time of sexual arousal needed to reach orgasm is variable—and usually much longer—in women than in men; thus, only 20–30% of women attain a coital climax. ... Many women (70–80%) require manual clitoral stimulation". {{cite book|authors=Joseph A. Flaherty, John Marcell Davis, Philip G. Janicak|title=Psychiatry: Diagnosis & therapy. A Lange clinical manual|isbn = 0-8385-1267-4, 9780838512678|publisher=Appleton & Lange (Original from Northwestern University)|year=1993, Digitized 29 Oct 2010|pages=544 pages|accessdate=5 January 2012|url=https://www.google.com/search?hl=en&noj=1&biw=1024&bih=629&tbm=bks&q=The+amount+of+time+of+sexual+arousal+needed+to+reach+orgasm+is+variable+%E2%80%94+and+usually+much+longer+%E2%80%94+in+women+than+in+men%3B+thus%2C+only+20-30%25+of+women+attain+a+coital+climax.+b.+Many+women+%2870-80%25%29+require+manual+clitoral+stimulation.&btnG=Search&oq=The+amount+of+time+of+sexual+arousal+needed+to+reach+orgasm+is+variable+%E2%80%94+and+usually+much+longer+%E2%80%94+in+women+than+in+men%3B+thus%2C+only+20-30%25+of+women+attain+a+coital+climax.+b.+Many+women+%2870-80%25%29+require+manual+clitoral+stimulation.&aq=f&aqi=&aql=&gs_sm=s&gs_upl=2326483l2326991l0l2328690l1l1l0l0l0l0l0l0ll0l0}}</ref> | |||
] is often associated with considerable unpleasure or pain for the woman and may include women lacking any ]l sensation despite having an over-sensitive clitoris. Although, according to Reich, outwardly they behave in a very sexual manner, they avoid intercourse and feel sick at the thought of it.{{#tag:ref|Possibly this includes forms of ] (editor).|group=note}} This is associated with a strong unconscious rejection or fear of the male, commonly overlain by ] and ] tendencies. However, in Reich's view it is often a superficial disturbance that disappears if the man is potent and can ] the woman.<ref name="Reich 1983 179-89"/> | |||
;2. Inadequate vaginal sensation | |||
The woman experiences pleasure during intercourse, but experiences no gratification.<ref name="Reich 1983 179-89"/> | |||
;3. Release before climax | |||
This is a special case, according to Reich, in which the woman experiences normal sensations in the beginning of intercourse but these disappear before release and, thus, she never attains a proper release of tension. This is commonly associated with a fear of excitation, a fear that all of a sudden increases before the climax. Often this is manifested as a woman's belief that something terrible might happen to her in the process. Reich warned that these should not be considered as cases of ], in which the disturbance is regarded as a mechanical reflex-like defence against penetration.<ref name="Reich 1983 179-89"/> | |||
;4. Overexcitement without discharge | |||
The woman is overexcited and apparently experiences much sexual satisfaction during intercourse. However, her excitation neither rises to a point of release nor drops with gratification. In Reich's view, such women are often ] and suffer greatly because they experience a constant state of undischarged sexual excitation.<ref name="Reich 1983 179-89"/> | |||
== Orgasm theory == | == Orgasm theory == | ||
Line 87: | Line 48: | ||
=== The energy source of neurosis === | === The energy source of neurosis === | ||
In his 1933 book ''Character Analysis'' (which moved beyond symptom analysis toward what is now called ]),<ref>{{harvnb| |
In his 1933 book ''Character Analysis'' (which moved beyond symptom analysis toward what is now called ]),<ref>Guntrip, Harry (1961) Personality Structure and Human Interaction, London: Hogarth Press, quoted in {{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 54.</ref> Reich related disturbances of orgastic potency to both types of neuroses originally distinguished by Freud: the actual neurosis and the psychoneurosis.<ref name="Raknes 1944"/> Freud observed that one group of patients suffering from neurosis had sexual disturbances—practising ], conflicts related to ] or ]—and were cured when these disturbances were removed. Hence, Freud reasoned that sexual maladaption caused the damming-up of ''actual'' "sexual stuff"<ref name="Raknes 1944"/> and defined "actual neurosis" as ] based on dammed-up ].<ref>{{harvnb|Kovel|1991}}.</ref> In contrast, those with ] had conflicts related to the ]: repressed impulses, desires and memories, and repressed unresolved conflicts and childhood ]s.<ref name="Raknes 1944"/> | ||
Based on this, Reich argued that frigidity and impotence were key to understanding neuroses, that the energy source of neuroses lay in the difference between accumulated and discharged sexual excitation caused by orgastic impotence, and therefore that while making a patient conscious of repressed sexuality alone might cure the neurosis, it would only necessarily do so when it also led to orgastic potency, that is, the ability to discharge the energy source of the neurosis.{{#tag:ref|Before 1920, Freud had maintained that a symptom must necessarily disappear when its unconscious meaning was made conscious to the patient. In 1920, Freud changed his view, saying that it can but does not have to disappear when the unconscious meaning is uncovered ({{harvnb|Reich|1999}}: 49).|group=note}} Thus, Reich concluded that having orgastic potency allows one to discharge the energy source of all forms of neuroses—both actual neurosis and psychoneurosis.<ref>{{harvnb|Reich|1999}}: 111-12.</ref> | |||
Reich argued that the inability of psychoneurotics to wholly discharge sexual energy caused a damming up of energy (or sexual stasis). That is, he argued that neurotics were in a vicious circle: the actual neurosis physiologically provided the energy for the psychoneurosis, while the psychoneurosis provided a psychological mechanism to maintain the actual neurosis.<ref>{{harvnb|Rycroft|1971}}: 29-31.</ref> | |||
This fundamental relation between psychoneurosis and actual neurosis was revealed when they were treated, because ] was always felt when a neurotic symptom was given up. In other words anxiety was always present at the original moment of onset of neurosis, and all neurotic symptoms work to lessen or bind anxiety. (Over the years, Freud also realised that the distinction between actual neurosis and psychoneurosis was not absolute and that a psychoneurosis was hidden behind every actual neurosis and behind every psychoneurosis was a core of actual neurosis.)<ref name="Raknes 1944"/> | |||
==Recurrence in Reich's work== | ==Recurrence in Reich's work== | ||
Line 132: | Line 91: | ||
# How to prevent neurosis through correct upbringing and education. | # How to prevent neurosis through correct upbringing and education. | ||
# How to prevent sex-negative attitudes in society through sexual reform. | # How to prevent sex-negative attitudes in society through sexual reform. | ||
# How to prevent authoritarian repression through general social reform |
# How to prevent authoritarian repression through general social reform.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 62.</ref> | ||
Reich considered orgastic potency to be opposed and undermined by all types of authoritarian or dictatorial regimes, organisations, or institutions that seek to destroy spontaneous decency and natural self-regulation of the vital energies through compulsive morality and compulsive work.<ref>{{harvnb|Reich|1999}}: 11.</ref> In his view, an authoritarian upbringing forms the psychological basis in the ] of people in all nations, as they are taught to be blindly loyal and nationalistic. In his view, authority is easier, the ].<ref>{{harvnb|Reich|1999}}: 7, 8, 11, 15, 18.</ref> | |||
In Reich's view, to move from authoritarian, formal democracy to genuine democracy, social life must be based on self-determination, natural sociality and morality, earthly happiness in love and pleasurable work. This requires being capable of bearing full responsibility for social existence and rationally determining one's own life, and being psychically independent. It is not a static condition of freedom that can be given, granted or guaranteed to a group, but is a dynamic and continual process of dealing with the development of new ideas, new forms of living and new discoveries. The young must always be able to decide what they take over and what they discard, and be prepared to hear the same from their children.<ref>{{harvnb|Reich|1999}}: 12-15.</ref> | |||
This implies replacing sexual chaos, ], ] and ] with natural happiness in love secured by society.<ref>{{harvnb|Reich|1999}}: 12.</ref> Reich cited ]'s study of the culture in the ], such as in his '']'', as evidence that non-authoritarian societies lacking compulsive morality and duty are possible and correlate with natural moral self-regulation.<ref>{{harvnb|Reich|1971}}: 3.</ref> | |||
==== Negative social effects ==== | ==== Negative social effects ==== | ||
Reich coined the term "emotional plague" to |
Reich coined the term "emotional plague" to refer to a special group dynamic when the destructive, pathological impulses of a group of neurotic characters become mutually reinforcing.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 215.</ref> | ||
“Emotional” refers to the element of social irrationalism in people. “Plague” refers to the contagious, infectious nature and the difficulty of resisting it. Thus, whereas the neurotic character struggles with feelings of guilt in order to suppress destructive drives (e.g. a torture fantasy), people with the emotional plague unconsciously provide each other with a social alibi to act out these suppressed drives. That is, they adopt a group ideology that rationalises acting on irrational, secondary drives. An example would be the ] in which dissident Christians were tortured and executed by their own group.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 215.</ref> | |||
“Emotional” refers to the element of social irrationalism in people (Boadella 1985: 215). That is, the reasoning of the emotional plague-afflicted functions only to rationalise an irrational, predetermined conclusion (Reich 1973 : 511-3). “Plague” refers to the contagious, infectious nature and the difficulty of resisting it. Thus, whereas the neurotic character struggles with feelings of guilt in order to suppress destructive drives (e.g. a torture fantasy), people with the emotional plague unconsciously provide each other with a social alibi to act out these suppressed drives. That is, they adopt a group ideology that rationalises acting on irrational, secondary drives. An example would be the ] in which dissident Christians were tortured and executed by their own group (Boadella 1985: 215). | |||
===Bio-electric experiments=== | ===Bio-electric experiments=== | ||
Line 151: | Line 103: | ||
===Orgone energy accumulator=== | ===Orgone energy accumulator=== | ||
A common misconception about Reich's later developed "]" is that it could provide orgastic potency to those sitting inside the device. Reich wrote the opposite: "The orgone accumulator, as has been clearly stated in the relevant publications (''The Cancer Biopathy'', etc.), cannot provide orgastic potency."<ref>Reich, W. (1950, April) ''Orgone Energy Bulletin'' '''2'''(2).</ref> | A common misconception about Reich's later developed "]" is that it could provide orgastic potency to those sitting inside the device. Reich wrote the opposite: "The orgone accumulator, as has been clearly stated in the relevant publications (''The Cancer Biopathy'', etc.), cannot provide orgastic potency."<ref>Reich, W. (1950, April) ''Orgone Energy Bulletin'' '''2'''(2).</ref> | ||
==Reception== | |||
When Reich's first introduced the orgasm theory at the psychoanalytic congress in Salzburg he was congratulated by ] for successfully formulating the economic element of neurosis.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 19.</ref> However, Reich's presentation of the orgasm theory came exactly when psychoanalysis was moving away from the original Freudian instinct theory based on psychic energy. In his 1926 book ''Inhibitions, Symptoms, Anxiety'' Freud completely abandoned his earlier position and wrote: "Anxiety never arises from repressed libido."<ref>{{harvnb|Freud|1948}}: 54, quoted in {{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 20.</ref> Though Freud never formally rejected Reich's orgasm theory, he was ambivalent in his reception. When Reich presented him the manuscript of ''Die Funktion des Orgasmus'' in May 1926, Freud replied "That thick?" Later that year Freud wrote Reich that the book was "valuable, rich in observation and thought,"<ref>{{harvnb|Freud|1942}}, quoted in {{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 21.</ref> but he also referred to the orgasm theory as Reich's 'hobby-horse'.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 21.</ref> | |||
From here on there were three different reactions to Reich's orgasm theory. Firstly, many of the younger analysts recognised it as an important and fundamental innovation. Thus, Prof. ] wrote in his 1927 review of ''Die Funktion des Orgasmus'': "In this extremely valuable and instructive work the author has really succeeded in broadening as well as deepening Freud's theory of sex and of the neuroses. He broadens it by clarifying for the first time the significance of the genital orgasm for the development and the whole structure of the neuroses; he deepens it by giving Freud's theory of the actual neuroses an exact psychological and physiological meaning. I do not hesitate to consider this work of Reich's the most valuable contribution since Freud's '']''."<ref>{{harvnb|Kronfeld|1927}}, quoted in {{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 19.</ref> The most prominent Freudian to make clinical use of the concept orgastic potency was Edward Hitschmann, the Director of the Psychoanalytic Polyclinic.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 21.</ref> | |||
Secondly, a group of analysts strongly opposed Reich's views for theoretical or personal reasons. The two most important being ], Reich's training assistant, and ].<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 21.</ref> | |||
Thirdly, some refutations were put forward, but even the two most serious criticisms misrepresented Reich's concept. ] wrote that he had "seen full orgastic potency comparatively often in severe neurosis," but defined orgastic potency as "able to have a climax," which strongly opposed Reich's definition.<ref>{{harvnb|Schilder|1941}}, quoted in {{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 21-2.</ref> ] commented on a case that the patient showed "no disturbance of orgastic potency or performance, only difficulties in adjusting to females,"<ref>{{harvnb|Kardiner|1955}}: 176, quoted in {{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 22.</ref> which goes against Reich's emphasis on the ability to fully relate to the partner.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 22.</ref> | |||
Opponents to Reich's concept, though referring to it as "Reich's heresy", were at this time in a minority. In one review it was stated: "few, if any, psycho-analysts will completely disagree with these formulations."<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 23.</ref> | |||
== Legacy == | |||
According to the most definitive biography of Reich,<ref>{{harvnb|Roazen|1985}}.</ref> Reich's view that the capacity to unite tender and sensuous feelings is important for a healthy love relationship was not new. Freud had noted this as early as 1912.<ref name="Sharaf 1994 86-105"/> However, the involuntary physical aspects of the full genital discharge in Reich's work were new.<ref name="Sharaf 1994 86-105"/> The biographer called the concept orgastic potency and the manner in which Reich "connected a series of psychological, social, and biological findings with the presence or absence of this function" unique to Reich.<ref>{{harvnb|Sharaf|1994}}: 4.</ref> | |||
===Psychoanalytic legacy=== | |||
Two further reactions to Reich's work in the psychoanalytic movement were either completely ignoring it or using the concept as if it was commonly accepted, but without referring to Reich as the source. As a result, the theme orgastic potency survived but became divorced from the concepts in which Reich embedded it. For example, in ''Clinical Psychology'' Charles Berg uses Reich's sex economic theory of anxiety as his own without attributing it to Reich.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 23-4.</ref> ] was another psychoanalytic writer who partially adopted Reich's concept without acknowledgement. In his bestselling '']'', Erikson wrote: "Genitality, then, consists in the unobsstructed capacity to develop an orgastic potency so free of pregenital interferences that the genital libido . . . is expressed in heterosexual mutuality . . . and with a convulsion-like discharge of tension from the whole body."<ref>Erikson quoted in {{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 25.</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 23-5.</ref> | |||
], in the classic textbook ''The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neuroses'', uses aspects of Reich's orgasm theory but disguised that they were Reich's contribution, and furthemore he hid the conflicts in the psychoanalytic movement that were explicit in Reich's work. A major entry mainly based on Fenichel's work appeared in the 1953, 1970 ''Psychiatric Dictionary'' by L. Hinsie and R. Campbell: "''Impotence'', orgastic: The incapacity for achieving the orgasm or acme of satisfaction in the sexual act. Many neurotics cannot achieve adequate discharge of their sexual energy through the sexual act. . . . According to Fenichel, an important concomitant of orgastic impotence is that these patients are incapable of love."<ref>Hinsie and Campbell quoted in {{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 24-5.</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 24-5.</ref> | |||
===Reichian legacy=== | |||
The two colleagues of Reich who build most on Reich's orgasm theory and orgastic potency are Philipson and Lowen. They emphasised the importance of human relationship in orgastic functions.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 30-1.</ref> | |||
Tage Philipson, in his 1952 book ''Kaerlighedslivet: Natur Eller Unnatur'', studied natural and unnatural love-life. He wrote that "in healthy people sexuality and love will always be associated together. Sex will come from the heart and return to the heart. . . . the fully healthy person must be the person with completely free love feelings. . . . When this is the case other feelings will also be able to stream through the entire organism: hate, sorrow, anxiety, etc., and the orgasm, as the highest point of sexuality, will also be able to affect the entire organism."<ref>{{harvnb|Philipson|1952}}, quoted in {{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 31.</ref><ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 31.</ref> | |||
Theodore Wolfe, an American pioneer in psychosomatic medicine and later colleague of Reich, thought that anxiety was the cause of both neuroses and psychosomatic distortions. When reading Reich's ''Der Funktion des Orgasmus'' he found in it what he called the key to understanding the dynamics of this relationship.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 32.</ref> | |||
In a review of Reich's sexual theories Elsworth Baker, a psychiatrist and colleague of Reich, wrote that in particular Reich's sexual theories were commonly misinterpreted and misunderstood. While Reich was portrayed as advocating "a wild frantic promiscuity" to seek "mystical, ecstatic orgasm" that could cure all neuroses and physical ills, Baker continues, Reich in fact found that the healthy person needs less sexual activity and that the sexuality has a function to maintain health only for the healthy person.<ref name="Baker 1986"/> | |||
==Comparing definitions of orgasm== | |||
The concepts of the sexual acme used in the famous 1948 and 1953 ]s and the 1966 research by ] were different from the one used by Reich. Reich directly related orgastic potency with the total response system, the personality, contact-ability, total psychosomatic health of a person.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 30.</ref> In contrast, Kinsey and Masters and Johnson restricted their conclusions to phenomena that all sexual climaxes had in common.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 28.</ref> For example, Kinsey defined the male orgasm as "all cases of ejaculation"<ref>{{harvnb|Kinsey|1948}}: 59-60, quoted in {{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 26.</ref> and the female orgasm as "the sudden and abrupt release . . . from sexual tension, the satisfaction that may result from sexual experience."<ref>{{harvnb|Kinsey|1953}}:628, quoted in {{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 26-7.</ref> In other words, Kinsey focusses on the physiology, anatomy and technique involved in inducing a discharge of tension. Therefore, Kinsey's usage of the term orgasm covers behaviour that in the Reichian typology ranges from orgastic potency to orgastic impotence.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 26-7.</ref> Examples of distinctions Reich made but which were not pursued by Kinsey and Masters and Johnson include the difference between local and total bodily responses, and between voluntary and involuntary movements.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 28-9.</ref> | |||
;Mature orgasm | |||
{{See also|Orgasm#Clitoral and vaginal variabilities}} | |||
In 1905, Freud developed the psychoanalytic distinction between clitoral and vaginal orgasm, with only the latter being identified with ].<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 27.</ref> This distinction has since been challenged among others on physiological grounds. For example, Masters and Johnson wrote: "Are clitoral and vaginal orgasms truly separate and anatomic entities? From a biological point of view the answer to this question is an unequivocal NO."<ref>{{harvnb|Masters|1963}}, quoted in {{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 28.</ref> However, a clinically grounded qualitative distinction between mature and immature sexuality was only introduced with Reich's concept orgastic potency vs. orgastic impotence (instead of vaginal vs. clitoral).<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 28.</ref> As Masters and Johnson focussed on phenomena shared by all sexual climaxes - ranging from what Reich categorised as orgastic potency to impotence - their finding has no direct relevance to or implications for Reich's distinction.<ref>{{harvnb|Boadella|1985}}: 28.</ref> | |||
== Works == | == Works == | ||
;Reich, Wilhelm | ;Reich, Wilhelm | ||
*1924 (1986): "Further Remarks on the Therapeutic Significance of Genital Libido," German title: "Die Therapeutische Bedeutung des Genitallibidos". Part of ''Early Writings, Volume One''. ] ed.: ISBN 0374513473. | |||
*1922: ] (essay). | |||
*1924 (1986): ''Further Remarks on the Therapeutic Significance of Genital Libido,'' German title: ''Die Therapeutische Bedeutung des Genitallibidos''. Part of ''Early Writings, Volume One''. ] ed.: ISBN 0374513473. | |||
*1927 (1980): ''Genitality in the Theory and Therapy of Neurosis'' German title: ''Die Funktion Des Orgasmus''. ] ed.: ISBN 0374516413. | *1927 (1980): ''Genitality in the Theory and Therapy of Neurosis'' German title: ''Die Funktion Des Orgasmus''. ] ed.: ISBN 0374516413. | ||
*1932 (1951): ''The Invasion of Compulsory Sex-Morality''. German title: ''Der Einbruch der Sexualmoral..''. 1995 ] ed.: ISBN 0374509395. | |||
*1933 (1946): '']''. German title: ''Die Massenpsychologie des Faschismus'' 1980 ] ed.: ISBN 0374508844. | |||
*1930 (1945): '']''. German title: ''Die Sexualität im Kulturkampf..''. 1963 ] ed.: ISBN 0374502684. | |||
*1937 (1982): ''The Bioelectrical Investigation of Sexuality and Anxiety''. German title: ''Experimentelle Ergebniße..''. 1983 ] ed.: ISBN 0374517282 | |||
*1940 (1942): '']'' German title: ''Die Entdeckung des Orgons Erster Teil..''. 1986 ] ed.: ISBN 0374502048. | |||
*1983 (posthumous collection): ''Children of the Future: On the Prevention of Sexual Pathology''. 1984 ] ed.: ISBN 0374518467. | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
Line 201: | Line 181: | ||
| year = 1985 | | year = 1985 | ||
| location = London}}. | | location = London}}. | ||
:{{Citation | |||
| last = Corty | |||
| first = Eric W. | |||
| others = Jenay, M; Guardiani BS | |||
| title = Canadian and American Sex Therapists' Perceptions of Normal and Abnormal Ejaculatory Latencies: How Long Should Intercourse Last? | |||
| year = 2008 | |||
| month = May | |||
| journal = The Journal of Sexual Medicine | |||
| volume = 5 | |||
| issue = 5 | |||
| pages = 1251–1256 | |||
| accessdate = 12 June 2012 | |||
| doi = 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2008.00797.x}}. | |||
:{{Citation | |||
| last = D'Aloia | |||
| first = Alessandro | |||
| title = Marxism and Psychoanalysis - Notes on Wilhelm Reich's Life and Works | |||
| year = 2004 | |||
| date = 15 October 2004 | |||
| publisher = In Defence of Marxism | |||
| url = http://www.marxist.com/marxism-psychoanalysis-wilhelm-reich.htm | |||
| archiveurl = http://www.webcitation.org/68E4DhnZp | |||
| archivedate = 7 June 2012}}. | |||
:{{Citation | :{{Citation | ||
| last = Daniels | | last = Daniels | ||
Line 236: | Line 193: | ||
| archivedate = 6 June 2012}}. | | archivedate = 6 June 2012}}. | ||
:{{Citation | :{{Citation | ||
| last = |
| last = Freud | ||
| first = |
| first = Sigmund | ||
| |
| authorlink = Sigmund Freud | ||
| title = |
| title = Letter to Reich | ||
| year = 1942 | |||
| journal = Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy | |||
| postscript =. quoted in Reich (1942) ''The Function of the Orgasm'', New York}}. | |||
| volume = 29 | |||
:{{Citation | |||
| issue = 3 | |||
| |
| last = Freud | ||
| first = Sigmund | |||
| doi = 10.1023/A:1021973219022 | |||
| authorlink = Sigmund Freud | |||
| quote = was quickly discredited.}} | |||
| title = Inhibitions, Symptoms, Anxiety | |||
| year = 1948 | |||
| publisher = Hogarth Press}}. | |||
:{{Citation | |||
| last = Kardiner | |||
| first = Abram | |||
| authorlink = Abram Kardiner | |||
| title = Sex and Morality | |||
| publisher = Routledge & Kegan Paul | |||
| year = 1955}}. | |||
:{{Citation | :{{Citation | ||
| last = Kinsey | | last = Kinsey | ||
Line 285: | Line 252: | ||
| location = London | | location = London | ||
| isbn = 0140136312}}. | | isbn = 0140136312}}. | ||
:{{Citation | |||
| last = Kronfeld | |||
| first = Arthur | |||
| authorlink = Arthur Kronfeld | |||
| title = Review of ''Die Funktion des Orgasmus'' | |||
| journal = Archiv. fuer Frauenkunde | |||
| volume = 14 | |||
| year = 1927}}. | |||
:{{Citation | :{{Citation | ||
| last = Lowen | | last = Lowen | ||
Line 320: | Line 295: | ||
| year = 1966 | | year = 1966 | ||
| location = Boston, USA}}. | | location = Boston, USA}}. | ||
:{{Citation | |||
| last = Philipson | |||
| first = Tage | |||
| title = Kaerlighedslivet: Natur Eller Unnatur | |||
| year = 1952 | |||
| location = Copenhagen}}. | |||
:{{Citation | :{{Citation | ||
| last = Raknes | | last = Raknes | ||
Line 348: | Line 329: | ||
| first = Wilhelm | | first = Wilhelm | ||
| authorlink = Wilhelm Reich | | authorlink = Wilhelm Reich | ||
| others = Trans. by Philip Schmitz | |||
| title = The Invasion of Compulsory Sex-Morality | |||
| title = Genitality in the Theory and Therapy of Neurosis | |||
| year = 1971 | |||
| origyear = Published in 1927 as ''Die Funktion des Orgasmus: Zur Psychopathologie und zur Soziologie des Geschlechtslebens'' | |||
| year = 1980 | |||
| publisher = ] | | publisher = ] | ||
| location = New York | | location = New York | ||
| postscript =. Note: not to be confused with the 1942 ''The Function of the Orgasm, Volume I of The Discovery of the Orgone''}}. | |||
| isbn = 0374509395 | |||
| postscript =. (Tr. of Der Einbruch der Sexualmoral, 1932)}}. | |||
:{{Citation | |||
| last = Reich | |||
| first = Wilhelm | |||
| others = Tr. Vincent R. Carfagno | |||
| authorlink = Wilhelm Reich | |||
| title = Character Analysis | |||
| year = 1973 | |||
| publisher = Vision Press | |||
| location = London | |||
| isbn = 0374509395 | |||
| postscript =. 3rd enlarged ed. Originally published in 1933}}. | |||
:{{Citation | |||
| last = Reich | |||
| first = Wilhelm | |||
| authorlink = Wilhelm Reich | |||
| editor1-last = Higgins | |||
| editor1-first = Mary | |||
| editor2-last = Raphael | |||
| editor2-first = Chester M. | |||
| others = Trans. by Derek Jordan, Inge Jordan and Beverly Placzek | |||
| title = Children of the Future: On the Prevention of Sexual Pathology | |||
| year = 1983 | |||
| publisher = ] | |||
| location = New York | |||
| isbn = 0-374-51846-7}}. | |||
:{{Citation | :{{Citation | ||
| last = Reich | | last = Reich | ||
Line 392: | Line 349: | ||
| location = London | | location = London | ||
| isbn = 0-285-64970-1}}. | | isbn = 0-285-64970-1}}. | ||
:{{Citation | |||
| last = Reich | |||
| first = Wilhelm | |||
| authorlink = Wilhelm Reich | |||
| others = Trans. by Barbara G. Koopman and Irmgard Bertelsen | |||
| title = Function of the Orgasm (Part II) | |||
| origyear = Published in 1927 as ''Die Funktion des Orgasmus: Zur Psychopathologie und zur Soziologie des Geschlechtslebens'' | |||
| journal = Journal of Orgonomy | |||
| volume = 14 | |||
| issue = 1 | |||
| year = 1980 | |||
| issn = 0022-3298 | |||
| oclc= 1754708 | |||
| url = http://www.orgonomy.org/articles/Reich/Function_of_the_Orgasm_PartII.pdf http://www.psychosomaticmedicine.org/content/16/3/240.abstract | |||
| archiveurl = http://www.webcitation.org/68Cq0YTak | |||
| archivedate = 6 June 2012 | |||
| postscript =. Note: not to be confused with the 1942 ''The Function of the Orgasm, Volume I of The Discovery of the Orgone''}}. | |||
:{{Citation | :{{Citation | ||
| last = Roazen | | last = Roazen | ||
Line 424: | Line 364: | ||
| archivedate = 8 June 2012}}. | | archivedate = 8 June 2012}}. | ||
:{{Citation | :{{Citation | ||
| last = |
| last = Rycroft | ||
| first = |
| first = Charles | ||
| authorlink = Charles Rycroft | |||
| others = Bohnen AM; Groeneveld FP; Dohle GR; Thomas S; Bosch JL | |||
| title = |
| title = Reich | ||
| year = |
| year = 1971 | ||
| |
| publisher = Fontana | ||
| |
| location = London}}. | ||
:{{Citation | |||
| volume = 7 | |||
| |
| last = Schilder | ||
| |
| first = Paul | ||
| authorlink = Paul Ferdinand Schilder | |||
| pmid = 20497307 | |||
| title = Types of anxiety neuroses | |||
| doi=10.1111/j.1743-6109.2010.01849.x}}. | |||
| journal = Int. Journal of Psa | |||
| year = 1941}}. | |||
:{{Citation | :{{Citation | ||
| last = Sharaf | | last = Sharaf | ||
Line 447: | Line 389: | ||
| location = Cambridge, Massachusetts | | location = Cambridge, Massachusetts | ||
| isbn = 0-306-80575-8}}. | | isbn = 0-306-80575-8}}. | ||
:{{Citation | |||
| author = Time Magazine | |||
| magazine = Time Magazine | |||
| title = Obituary notice for Wilhelm Reich | |||
| date = 18 November 1957 | |||
| year = 1957 | |||
| url = http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,868066,00.html | |||
| archiveurl = http://www.webcitation.org/68Gd0Zx8C | |||
| archivedate = 8 June 2012}}. | |||
:{{Citation | |||
| last = Wilcox | |||
| first = Roger M. | |||
| title = Orgastic Potency as the criterion for emotional health | |||
| year = 2001 | |||
| date = 20 March 2001 | |||
| work = A Skeptical Scrutiny of the Works and Theories of Wilhelm Reich | |||
| publisher = Roger M. Wilcox's Home Page | |||
| url = http://www.rogermwilcox.com/Reich/orgastic_potency.html | |||
| archiveurl = http://www.webcitation.org/68CqdNcUg | |||
| archivedate = 6 June 2012}}. | |||
:{{Citation | :{{Citation | ||
| last = Wilhelm Reich Infant Trust | | last = Wilhelm Reich Infant Trust |
Revision as of 23:36, 19 September 2012
Part of a series of articles on |
Psychoanalysis |
---|
Sigmund Freud's couch |
Concepts |
Important figures |
Important works
|
Schools of thought |
Training |
See also |
It has been suggested that this article be merged into Wilhelm Reich. (Discuss) Proposed since September 2012. |
This article may present fringe theories, without giving appropriate weight to the mainstream view and explaining the responses to the fringe theories. Please help improve it or discuss the issue on the talk page. (September 2012) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
In the work of Wilhelm Reich, the term orgastic potency refers to the ability to experience a sexual climax with specific psychosomatic characteristics - requiring the capacity to love. In Reichian psychology, impaired ability to do so, termed "orgastic impotence" (not to be confused with inability to reach orgasm, or anorgasmia), is regarded as the cause of all neuroses. Coined in 1924, Reich described the concept in detail in the 1927 book Die Funktion des Orgasmus (Genitality in the Theory and Therapy of Neurosis) which he presented to Sigmund Freud on the latter's 70th birthday. Though Reich regarded his work as complementing Freud's original theory of anxiety neurosis, Freud was ambivalent in his reception. Reich continued to use orgastic potency as an indicator of a person's health in his later therapeutic methods such as vegetotherapy. The concept was never used outside Reichian circles.
Background and theory
Reich developed his orgasm theory between 1921 and 1924 and it formed the basis for all his later contributions, including the theory of character analysis. Reich was strongly influenced by Sigmund Freud's distinction between psychoneuroses and actual neuroses, the latter being considered of a physiological origin. The starting point of Reich's orgasm theory was his clinical observation of genital disturbance in all neurotics, which he presented in November 1923, in the paper "Genitality from the viewpoint of psycho-analytic prognosis and therapy" (published in the International Zeitschrift für Psa, 10, 1924). That presentation was met with a chilling silence, much hostility, and was partially discredited because Reich could not adequately define normal sexual health. In response, and after a further year of research, Reich introduced the concept "orgastic potency" at the 1924 Psycho-analytic Congress, Salzburg in the paper "Die therapeutische Bedeutung des Genitallibidos", (published in English as "Further Remarks on the Therapeutic Significance of Genital Libido" in the 1975 book Early Writings, Volume One).
Reich was also strongly influenced by Freud's libido as the energy of an unconscious sexual instinct. Reich emphasised the libido theory exactly when it was being discarded by psychoanalysis. Reich retained the idea of a sexual energy and the concept orgastic potency as central elements in sex-economy, a general Reichian theory of health dealing with an organism's energy household. Reich progressively called this energy libido, sexual energy, emotional energy, bioelectric energy, biophysical energy and, finally, orgone ("life") energy. In terms of this theory, an individual lacking in orgastic potency is unable to fully discharge energy in orgasm, and thus remains in a constant state of tension, both physical rigidity and mental anxiety, which constitutes neurosis. Orgastic potency enables the individual to receive satisfaction in the sex act, whereas those lacking in it are forever seeking it, and are therefore likely to be more sexually needy.
In an overview of the meaning of the concept orgastic potency, Reich provided the following summary. He considered it to be an outcome of health because, he argued, full orgastic potency can only come about if a person is psychologically free of neurosis (pleasure anxiety), physically free from "body armor" (chronic muscular contraction), socially free from compulsive morality and duty (as imposed by authoritarian and mechanistic ways of life), and has the natural ability to love. Reich held that the vast majority of people do not meet these criteria and thus lack orgastic potency.
Definition
Reich defined the natural sexual act that orgastic potency enables the adult to fully experience as characterized by love and the ability to express it; full, deep, pleasurable breathing; deep, delicious current-like sensations running up and down the body shortly before orgasm; and involuntary muscular movements before climax. The pleasure of the orgasm depends on the amount of sexual tension concentrated in the genitals and the steepness of the drop of excitation during the orgasm. The description of orgastic potency and orgastic impotence for both men and women as described by Reich can be summarised as follows:
Phases of development of excitation | Orgastic potency | Orgastic impotence |
---|---|---|
1. Foreplay | "Biological readiness. 'Calm excitement.' Mutual pleasurable anticipation." | "Over- or under-excitement. 'Cold' erection. 'Dry' vagina. Foreplay insufficient or over-prolonged." |
2. Penetration | "Preceded by a spontaneous urge to enter, or to be entered by, the partner." | "Either: sadistic piercing by the man and rape fantasy by the woman. Or: fear of penetrating or of being penetrated and decrease of pleasure at penetration." |
3. Voluntary phase of sexual movements | "Movements are voluntary but effortless and rhythmical, unhurried and gentle. Extraneous thoughts are absent; there is absorption in the experience. Pleasurable sensations continue to increase. Periods of rest do not lead to a decrease of pleasure." | "Violent friction, nervous haste. Extraneous thoughts or fantasies are compulsively present. Pre-occupation with sense of duty to one's partner and fear of 'failure' or determination to 'succeed'. Period of rest likely to lead to a sharp drop in excitation." |
4. Involuntary phases of muscle contractions | "Excitation leads to involuntary contractions of the genital musculature (which precede ejaculation in the man and lead to the acme). The total body musculature participates with lively contractions as the excitation flows back from the genital to the body. 'Melting' sensations in the body. Clouding of consciousness at the acme." | "Involuntary movements greatly reduced or in some cases absent altogether. Sensations remain localised in the genital and do not spread to the body as a whole. Involuntary responses may be simulated for the benefit of the partner. Squeezing and pushing, with spastic contraction, to achieve a climax. Head remains in control and the clouding of consciousness is absent." |
5. Phase of relaxation | "Pleasant bodily and mental relaxation. Feeling of harmony with partner. Strong desire for rest or sleep. 'After-glow'." | "Feelings of leaden exhaustion, disgust, repulsion, indifference or hatred towards partner. Excitation not fully discharged, sometimes leading to insomnia. Omne animal post coitum triste est." |
Changing definitions
Reich's precise definition for the phrase "orgastic potency" changed over time as he changed his understanding of the phenomenon. He first described it in detail in his 1927 book Die Funktion Des Orgasmus. In the 1980 English translation of the book, Genitality in the Theory and Therapy of Neuroses, he defined orgastic potency as "the ability to achieve full resolution of existing sexual need-tension".
In his 1940 book Die Entdeckung des Orgons Erster Teil: Die Function des Orgasmus, published in English in 1942 as The Discovery of the Orgone, Volume 1: The Function of the Orgasm, he defined it as "the capacity to surrender to the flow of biological energy, free of any inhibitions; the capacity to discharge completely the dammed-up sexual excitation through involuntary, pleasurable convulsions of the body."
His last published definition of orgastic potency (original date unclear, published in 1961) is "the capacity for complete surrender to the involuntary convulsion of the organism and complete discharge of the excitation at the acme of the genital embrace."
Orgasm theory
Orgastic potency is one central concept of a broader Reichian theory of the relation between neurosis and the function of the orgasm.
Correlation of neurosis and genital disturbance
Reich examined unsuccessful clinical cases, dividing them into two groups: those where therapy did not bring results, and those in which the patients, after apparent improvement, relapsed into their neuroses or developed new neuroses. In addition to his own patients' love lives, he examined through interviews and case records those of 200 patients seen at the Vienna Psychoanalytic Polyclinic. Reich was impressed by the depth and frequency of genital disturbances he observed. One example was a patient who had reported having a normal sex life, but on closer interviewing by Reich revealed not experiencing orgasm during intercourse and having thoughts of murdering her partner following the act. Such observations made Reich very suspicious of superficial reports about sexual experience. His analysis of these cases led Reich to conclude that genital disturbance was present in all neuroses and correlated in severity to the severity of the neurosis, and that all patients who improved in therapy and remained symptom-free achieved a gratifying genital sex life. This led Reich to establish criteria for satisfactory sexual intercourse. Based on interviews with people who appeared to have satisfactory sex lives, he described the sex act as being optimally satisfactory only if it follows a specific pattern. Orgastic potency is Reich's term for the ability to have this maximally fulfilling type of sexual experience, which in the Reichian view is limited to those who are free from neuroses and appears to be shared by all people free of neuroses.
Sexual stasis
Reich distinguished between complete release of accumulated sexual tensions in orgasm, resulting in the restoration of energy equilibrium, and orgastic impotence, in which the release of energy is incomplete, resulting in a damming-up of energy or stasis. This dammed-up sexual energy results in a vicious circle by feeding the inhibition that prevents sexual release and pleasure, which in turn increases sexual stasis, in a manner analogous to a pressure cooker. This outer rigidity and inner anxiety is the neurosis, which fuels harshness, brutality, sexual sadism, restriction, mechanisation, confinement to routines and becoming filled with compulsions or phobias as well as loneliness, helplessness, craving for authority, fear of responsibility and mystical longing.
Hence, stasis was the energy source of neurosis, and neurosis was the sum total of all chronic and automatic inhibitions of natural sexual excitations. Reich defined "stasis anxiety" as "he anxiety caused by the stasis of sexual energy in the center of the organism when its peripheral orgastic discharge is inhibited." and the related "stasis neurosis" as "ll somatic disturbances which are the immediate result of the stasis of sexual energy, with stasis anxiety at its core."
The energy source of neurosis
In his 1933 book Character Analysis (which moved beyond symptom analysis toward what is now called ego psychology), Reich related disturbances of orgastic potency to both types of neuroses originally distinguished by Freud: the actual neurosis and the psychoneurosis. Freud observed that one group of patients suffering from neurosis had sexual disturbances—practising coitus interruptus, conflicts related to masturbation or sexual abstinence—and were cured when these disturbances were removed. Hence, Freud reasoned that sexual maladaption caused the damming-up of actual "sexual stuff" and defined "actual neurosis" as anxiety based on dammed-up libido. In contrast, those with psychoneuroses had conflicts related to the unconscious: repressed impulses, desires and memories, and repressed unresolved conflicts and childhood traumas.
Reich argued that the inability of psychoneurotics to wholly discharge sexual energy caused a damming up of energy (or sexual stasis). That is, he argued that neurotics were in a vicious circle: the actual neurosis physiologically provided the energy for the psychoneurosis, while the psychoneurosis provided a psychological mechanism to maintain the actual neurosis.
Recurrence in Reich's work
Relationship of orgastic potency to body and mind
In Reichian psychology, the individual lacking orgastic potency is seen to have developed a neurotic psychosomatic "armor" that blocks the experience of pleasure. This is differentiated between the functionally identical "character armor" and "muscular armor."
Character armor
Central to Reichian character analysis is the concept of "character resistance" or "character defence", by which a person's character—what the patient did rather than what he or she said—was seen as his or her primary defence mechanism. Character attributes include posture, expression, and way of speaking. Reich defined character armor as "he sum total of typical character attitudes which an individual develops as a blocking against his emotional excitations, resulting in rigidity of the body, lack of emotional contact, and 'deadness'."
Reich used the terms "genital character" and "neurotic character" to respectively distinguish between characters with and without orgastic potency. Real characters of actual people are considered to be somewhere on a continuum between the two.
- Genital character
The genital character is the non-neurotic character structure, which is free from armor and, therefore, has the capacity of natural-self regulation on the basis of orgastic potency. The genital character is able to fully focus on a task or object, has a natural yearning for continued human contact that finds expression in work and social life, feels a healthy sympathy for fellow human beings in sorrow and happiness, and experiences life as a fulfilment and unfolding of his or her natural tendencies and struggle to achieve objectives. His or her sex life attains full bloom in a context of heterosexual intercourse with full surrender, without identifying the partner either consciously or unconsciously with a parent, without wishing to torment or to be tormented, without accepting celibacy except for strongly convincing reasons, and without looking for another partner so long as his or her affection for the partner is reciprocated.
- Neurotic characters
The neurotic character operates under a principle of compulsive moral regulation due to chronic energy stasis.
The neurotic character's work and life is permeated by struggle to suppress original and even more basic urges or tendencies. The various forms of neurotic character correspond to the equally many ways of suppressing such urges or tendencies that the human being in question considers to be dangerous or is ashamed of. A feeling of inferiority may sometimes lead to a striving for power and honor; work is directed by such desires or by duty, rather than by a striving for joy and happiness.
His or her sex life is disturbed by impulses derived from pregenital wishes, so strong that they prevent the experience of full release during orgasm, or else genital wishes are so suppressed by prohibitions and a guilty conscience that they either inhibit a full release during orgasm or prevent the establishment of an adult sex life. Sexual discharge will leave him or her empty, unsatisfied, and not fully at peace, resulting in sensations of emptiness and a feeling of inferiority, a widespread phenomenon termed post-coital tristesse.
Muscular armor
Reich argued that if repression occurred, this energy, in the form of stored emotions or affects, was held back by muscular contraction or armor, which restricts and immobilizes the body and becomes the somatic core of neuroses, making full orgastic discharge impossible.
Reich defined muscular armor as: "The sum total of the muscular attitudes (chronic muscular spasms) which an individual develops as a block against the breakthrough of emotions and organ sensations, in particular anxiety, rage, and sexual excitation."
Muscular armor prevents the sexual climax from being experienced throughout the body. For example, forms of armoring are pulling back the pelvis or tightening the thigh and buttock muscles.
Moreover, Reich regarded the ego as playing an active part in the act of perception, since whereas some people perceive the gentle stroking of an erogenous zone as pleasurable, for others it is merely a tactile sensation.
Resolving armor
Main article: Vegetotherapy Further information: Body psychotherapy, Neo-Reichian massage, Bioenergetic analysis, Gestalt therapy, and Primal therapyDissolving character and muscular rigidifications or armorings is the basic principle of Reichian vegetotherapy. This dissolution softens movement, eases breathing, and can also bring back the repressed memory of the childhood situation that caused the repression, Reich wrote.
The two goals of vegetotherapy are the attainment of orgastic potency during sexual intercourse and of the "orgasm reflex" during therapy. The orgasm reflex may be observed as waves of pleasure moving through the body, a series of spontaneous, involuntary movements, and signifies that the person is free of body armoring, entailing the ability to give and receive love in all its forms.
Implications for society
Prevention through social reform
The Invasion of Compulsory Sex-Morality, written in 1931, was Reich's first step in approaching the answer to the problem of mass neuroses in society, followed by The Mass Psychology of Fascism and The Sexual Revolution. The primary sociological issues with which Reich dealt included in particular the following three:
- How to prevent neurosis through correct upbringing and education.
- How to prevent sex-negative attitudes in society through sexual reform.
- How to prevent authoritarian repression through general social reform.
Negative social effects
Reich coined the term "emotional plague" to refer to a special group dynamic when the destructive, pathological impulses of a group of neurotic characters become mutually reinforcing. “Emotional” refers to the element of social irrationalism in people. “Plague” refers to the contagious, infectious nature and the difficulty of resisting it. Thus, whereas the neurotic character struggles with feelings of guilt in order to suppress destructive drives (e.g. a torture fantasy), people with the emotional plague unconsciously provide each other with a social alibi to act out these suppressed drives. That is, they adopt a group ideology that rationalises acting on irrational, secondary drives. An example would be the Salem witch trials in which dissident Christians were tortured and executed by their own group.
Bio-electric experiments
In a series of experiments, Reich found that the orgasm had characteristics of a bioelectrical phenomenon and drew the conclusion that the genitals in coitus constitute an electrolytic system: "The male and female circulations and the mutually stimulating plasmatic excitations in the autonomic nervous systems represent the inherent sources of electrical charge on the organs of sexual contact. The equalization of the potential gradient occurs between the two surface potentials—penile epidermis and vaginal mucosa." In a further experiment, Reich found that the same bioelectric energy displayed an antithetic function: if it flows outward to the skin surface, causing a build-up of charge at the skin, it is experienced as pleasure; in contrast, if it flows inward, away from the skin surface, resulting in a lowering of charge at the skin, then it is experienced as an increase in central tension or anxiety. To experience a pleasurable and full orgastic discharge of excitation, the energy needs to reach the skin, specifically the vulva. A clitoral climax could only provide a local response.
Orgone energy accumulator
A common misconception about Reich's later developed "orgone energy accumulator" is that it could provide orgastic potency to those sitting inside the device. Reich wrote the opposite: "The orgone accumulator, as has been clearly stated in the relevant publications (The Cancer Biopathy, etc.), cannot provide orgastic potency."
Reception
When Reich's first introduced the orgasm theory at the psychoanalytic congress in Salzburg he was congratulated by Karl Abraham for successfully formulating the economic element of neurosis. However, Reich's presentation of the orgasm theory came exactly when psychoanalysis was moving away from the original Freudian instinct theory based on psychic energy. In his 1926 book Inhibitions, Symptoms, Anxiety Freud completely abandoned his earlier position and wrote: "Anxiety never arises from repressed libido." Though Freud never formally rejected Reich's orgasm theory, he was ambivalent in his reception. When Reich presented him the manuscript of Die Funktion des Orgasmus in May 1926, Freud replied "That thick?" Later that year Freud wrote Reich that the book was "valuable, rich in observation and thought," but he also referred to the orgasm theory as Reich's 'hobby-horse'.
From here on there were three different reactions to Reich's orgasm theory. Firstly, many of the younger analysts recognised it as an important and fundamental innovation. Thus, Prof. Arthur Kronfeld wrote in his 1927 review of Die Funktion des Orgasmus: "In this extremely valuable and instructive work the author has really succeeded in broadening as well as deepening Freud's theory of sex and of the neuroses. He broadens it by clarifying for the first time the significance of the genital orgasm for the development and the whole structure of the neuroses; he deepens it by giving Freud's theory of the actual neuroses an exact psychological and physiological meaning. I do not hesitate to consider this work of Reich's the most valuable contribution since Freud's The Ego and the Id." The most prominent Freudian to make clinical use of the concept orgastic potency was Edward Hitschmann, the Director of the Psychoanalytic Polyclinic.
Secondly, a group of analysts strongly opposed Reich's views for theoretical or personal reasons. The two most important being Paul Federn, Reich's training assistant, and Hermann Nunberg.
Thirdly, some refutations were put forward, but even the two most serious criticisms misrepresented Reich's concept. Paul Schilder wrote that he had "seen full orgastic potency comparatively often in severe neurosis," but defined orgastic potency as "able to have a climax," which strongly opposed Reich's definition. Abram Kardiner commented on a case that the patient showed "no disturbance of orgastic potency or performance, only difficulties in adjusting to females," which goes against Reich's emphasis on the ability to fully relate to the partner.
Opponents to Reich's concept, though referring to it as "Reich's heresy", were at this time in a minority. In one review it was stated: "few, if any, psycho-analysts will completely disagree with these formulations."
Legacy
According to the most definitive biography of Reich, Reich's view that the capacity to unite tender and sensuous feelings is important for a healthy love relationship was not new. Freud had noted this as early as 1912. However, the involuntary physical aspects of the full genital discharge in Reich's work were new. The biographer called the concept orgastic potency and the manner in which Reich "connected a series of psychological, social, and biological findings with the presence or absence of this function" unique to Reich.
Psychoanalytic legacy
Two further reactions to Reich's work in the psychoanalytic movement were either completely ignoring it or using the concept as if it was commonly accepted, but without referring to Reich as the source. As a result, the theme orgastic potency survived but became divorced from the concepts in which Reich embedded it. For example, in Clinical Psychology Charles Berg uses Reich's sex economic theory of anxiety as his own without attributing it to Reich. Erik Erikson was another psychoanalytic writer who partially adopted Reich's concept without acknowledgement. In his bestselling Childhood and Society, Erikson wrote: "Genitality, then, consists in the unobsstructed capacity to develop an orgastic potency so free of pregenital interferences that the genital libido . . . is expressed in heterosexual mutuality . . . and with a convulsion-like discharge of tension from the whole body."
Otto Fenichel, in the classic textbook The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neuroses, uses aspects of Reich's orgasm theory but disguised that they were Reich's contribution, and furthemore he hid the conflicts in the psychoanalytic movement that were explicit in Reich's work. A major entry mainly based on Fenichel's work appeared in the 1953, 1970 Psychiatric Dictionary by L. Hinsie and R. Campbell: "Impotence, orgastic: The incapacity for achieving the orgasm or acme of satisfaction in the sexual act. Many neurotics cannot achieve adequate discharge of their sexual energy through the sexual act. . . . According to Fenichel, an important concomitant of orgastic impotence is that these patients are incapable of love."
Reichian legacy
The two colleagues of Reich who build most on Reich's orgasm theory and orgastic potency are Philipson and Lowen. They emphasised the importance of human relationship in orgastic functions.
Tage Philipson, in his 1952 book Kaerlighedslivet: Natur Eller Unnatur, studied natural and unnatural love-life. He wrote that "in healthy people sexuality and love will always be associated together. Sex will come from the heart and return to the heart. . . . the fully healthy person must be the person with completely free love feelings. . . . When this is the case other feelings will also be able to stream through the entire organism: hate, sorrow, anxiety, etc., and the orgasm, as the highest point of sexuality, will also be able to affect the entire organism."
Theodore Wolfe, an American pioneer in psychosomatic medicine and later colleague of Reich, thought that anxiety was the cause of both neuroses and psychosomatic distortions. When reading Reich's Der Funktion des Orgasmus he found in it what he called the key to understanding the dynamics of this relationship.
In a review of Reich's sexual theories Elsworth Baker, a psychiatrist and colleague of Reich, wrote that in particular Reich's sexual theories were commonly misinterpreted and misunderstood. While Reich was portrayed as advocating "a wild frantic promiscuity" to seek "mystical, ecstatic orgasm" that could cure all neuroses and physical ills, Baker continues, Reich in fact found that the healthy person needs less sexual activity and that the sexuality has a function to maintain health only for the healthy person.
Comparing definitions of orgasm
The concepts of the sexual acme used in the famous 1948 and 1953 Kinsey reports and the 1966 research by Masters and Johnson were different from the one used by Reich. Reich directly related orgastic potency with the total response system, the personality, contact-ability, total psychosomatic health of a person. In contrast, Kinsey and Masters and Johnson restricted their conclusions to phenomena that all sexual climaxes had in common. For example, Kinsey defined the male orgasm as "all cases of ejaculation" and the female orgasm as "the sudden and abrupt release . . . from sexual tension, the satisfaction that may result from sexual experience." In other words, Kinsey focusses on the physiology, anatomy and technique involved in inducing a discharge of tension. Therefore, Kinsey's usage of the term orgasm covers behaviour that in the Reichian typology ranges from orgastic potency to orgastic impotence. Examples of distinctions Reich made but which were not pursued by Kinsey and Masters and Johnson include the difference between local and total bodily responses, and between voluntary and involuntary movements.
- Mature orgasm
In 1905, Freud developed the psychoanalytic distinction between clitoral and vaginal orgasm, with only the latter being identified with psychosexual maturity. This distinction has since been challenged among others on physiological grounds. For example, Masters and Johnson wrote: "Are clitoral and vaginal orgasms truly separate and anatomic entities? From a biological point of view the answer to this question is an unequivocal NO." However, a clinically grounded qualitative distinction between mature and immature sexuality was only introduced with Reich's concept orgastic potency vs. orgastic impotence (instead of vaginal vs. clitoral). As Masters and Johnson focussed on phenomena shared by all sexual climaxes - ranging from what Reich categorised as orgastic potency to impotence - their finding has no direct relevance to or implications for Reich's distinction.
Works
- Reich, Wilhelm
- 1924 (1986): "Further Remarks on the Therapeutic Significance of Genital Libido," German title: "Die Therapeutische Bedeutung des Genitallibidos". Part of Early Writings, Volume One. FSG ed.: ISBN 0374513473.
- 1927 (1980): Genitality in the Theory and Therapy of Neurosis German title: Die Funktion Des Orgasmus. FSG ed.: ISBN 0374516413.
See also
Notes
- Footnotes
- Citations
- Rycroft 1971: 33.
- Sharaf 1994: 91-2, 100, 116.
- Boadella 1985: 18, 21.
- Sharaf 1994: 238-41, 243.
- Boadella 1985: 19-34.
- Boadella 1985: 23.
- Rycroft 1971: 29.
- ^ Sharaf 1994: 86-105.
- Boadella 1985: 16.
- Rycroft 1971: 18-22.
- Boadella 1985: 19.
- Raknes 1944 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFRaknes1944 (help): "Lead."
- ^ Baker 1986 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFBaker1986 (help).
- Reich 1999: 6-8.
- Konia 1987.
- ^ Daniels 2008: "Orgiastic Potency" .
- Reich 1999: 102.
- Boadella 1985: 17-8.
- Reich 1980: 18.
- Reich 1999: 102. Note: the original reads "damned-up" but this is probably a typo.
- ^ Reich 1961: 10.
- ^ Raknes 1944 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFRaknes1944 (help).
- ^ Daniels 2008: "Neurotic Sexuality."
- Reich 1961.
- Guntrip, Harry (1961) Personality Structure and Human Interaction, London: Hogarth Press, quoted in Boadella 1985: 54.
- Kovel 1991.
- Rycroft 1971: 29-31.
- Daniels 2008.
- ^ Reich 1961: 9-12.
- Baker 1986 harvnb error: multiple targets (2×): CITEREFBaker1986 (help): para. 4.
- Daniels 2008: "Sexuality and Armoring."
- Reich 1999: 52.
- Reich 1999: 8.
- ^ Sharaf 1994: 238-41, 243.
- Wilhelm Reich Infant Trust 2011.
- Boadella 1985: 62.
- Boadella 1985: 215.
- Boadella 1985: 215.
- Reich, W. (1950, April) Orgone Energy Bulletin 2(2).
- Boadella 1985: 19.
- Freud 1948: 54, quoted in Boadella 1985: 20.
- Freud 1942, quoted in Boadella 1985: 21.
- Boadella 1985: 21.
- Kronfeld 1927, quoted in Boadella 1985: 19.
- Boadella 1985: 21.
- Boadella 1985: 21.
- Schilder 1941, quoted in Boadella 1985: 21-2.
- Kardiner 1955: 176, quoted in Boadella 1985: 22.
- Boadella 1985: 22.
- Boadella 1985: 23.
- Roazen 1985.
- Sharaf 1994: 4.
- Boadella 1985: 23-4.
- Erikson quoted in Boadella 1985: 25.
- Boadella 1985: 23-5.
- Hinsie and Campbell quoted in Boadella 1985: 24-5.
- Boadella 1985: 24-5.
- Boadella 1985: 30-1.
- Philipson 1952, quoted in Boadella 1985: 31.
- Boadella 1985: 31.
- Boadella 1985: 32.
- Boadella 1985: 30.
- Boadella 1985: 28.
- Kinsey 1948: 59-60, quoted in Boadella 1985: 26.
- Kinsey 1953:628, quoted in Boadella 1985: 26-7.
- Boadella 1985: 26-7.
- Boadella 1985: 28-9.
- Boadella 1985: 27.
- Masters 1963, quoted in Boadella 1985: 28.
- Boadella 1985: 28.
- Boadella 1985: 28.
References
- Baker, Elsworth (1986), "Sexual Theories of Wilhelm Reich", Journal of Orgonomy, 20 (2): 175–194, ISSN 0022-3298, OCLC 1754708, archived from the original (PDF) on 6 June 2012.
- Boadella, David (1985), Wilhelm Reich: The Evolution of His Work, London
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link). - Daniels, Victor (10 May 2008), "Lecture notes on Wilhelm Reich and His Influence", Victor Daniels' Website in The Psychology Department, Sonoma State University, archived from the original on 6 June 2012
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link). - Freud, Sigmund (1942), Letter to Reich. quoted in Reich (1942) The Function of the Orgasm, New York
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: postscript (link). - Freud, Sigmund (1948), Inhibitions, Symptoms, Anxiety, Hogarth Press.
- Kardiner, Abram (1955), Sex and Morality, Routledge & Kegan Paul.
- Kinsey, Alfred (1948), Sexual Behaviour in the Human Male, & Others, New York
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link). - Kinsey, Alfred (1953), Sexual Behaviour in the Human Female, & Others, New York
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link). - Konia, Charles (1987), "A Patient Brought to Genitality", Journal of Orgonomy, 21 (2): 172–184, ISSN 0022-3298, OCLC 1754708, archived from the original (PDF) on 6 June 2012.
- Kovel, Joel (1991), A Complete Guide to Therapy: From Psychoanalysis to Behaviour Modification, London: Penguin Books, ISBN 0140136312.
- Kronfeld, Arthur (1927), "Review of Die Funktion des Orgasmus", Archiv. fuer Frauenkunde, 14.
- Lowen, Alexander (1966), Love and Orgasm, New York & London
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link). - Marmor, Judd (1954), "Some Considerations Concerning Orgasm in the Female", Psychosomatic medicine, 16 (3): 240–245, archived from the original (PDF) on 16 September 2012.
- Masters, W.H. (1963), "The sexual response cycle of the human female III. The Clitoris: anatomic and clinical considerations", West. Jo. Surg. Obst. & Gynec., Johnson, V. E..
- Masters, W.H. (1966), Human Sexual Response, Johnson, V. E., Boston, USA
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link). - Philipson, Tage (1952), Kaerlighedslivet: Natur Eller Unnatur, Copenhagen
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link). - Raknes, Ola (1944), "Sex-economy: A theory of living functioning", International Journal of Sex-Economy and Orgone-Research, 3 (1), (under pseudonym Carl Arnold): 17–37, OCLC 5917664. See here for a summary on Xiandos.info, archived from the original on 9 June 2012.
{{citation}}
: External link in
(help); Unknown parameter|postscript=
|month=
ignored (help)CS1 maint: postscript (link) - Reich, Wilhelm (1961), Selected Writings: An Introduction to Orgonomy, Foreword by Mary Boyd Higgins, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, ISBN 0374501971.
- Reich, Wilhelm (1980) , Genitality in the Theory and Therapy of Neurosis, Trans. by Philip Schmitz, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux. Note: not to be confused with the 1942 The Function of the Orgasm, Volume I of The Discovery of the Orgone
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: postscript (link). - Reich, Wilhelm (1999) , The Function of the Orgasm: Sex-Economic Problems of Biological Energy, The Discovery of the Orgone, vol. Volume I, Trans. Vincent R. Carfagno, London: Souvenir Press, ISBN 0-285-64970-1
{{citation}}
:|volume=
has extra text (help). - Roazen, Paul (1985), "Fury on Earth: A Biography of Wilhelm Reich. Myron Sharaf. New York: St Martin's Press/Marek, 1983, xiii + 550 pp.", Psychoanalytic Review, 72, National Psychological Association for Psychoanalysis: 668–671, ISSN 0033-2836, archived from the original on 8 June 2012.
- Rycroft, Charles (1971), Reich, London: Fontana.
- Schilder, Paul (1941), "Types of anxiety neuroses", Int. Journal of Psa.
- Sharaf, Myron (1994) , Fury on Earth: A Biography of Wilhelm Reich (1st Da Capo Press ed.), Cambridge, Massachusetts: Da Capo Press, ISBN 0-306-80575-8.
- Wilhelm Reich Infant Trust (4 January 2011), The Invasion of Compulsory Sex-Morality, archived from the original on 6 June 2012
{{citation}}
: CS1 maint: date and year (link).
Further reading
- Baker, Elsworth (1986), Sexual Theories of Wilhelm Reich, archived from the original (PDF) on 6 June 2012.
- Raknes, Ola (1944), Sex-economy: A Theory of Living Functioning. For a summary see here on Xiandos.info, archived from the original on 9 June 2012
{{citation}}
: External link in
(help)CS1 maint: postscript (link).|postscript=
- Reich, Wilhelm (1963), Selected Writings: An Introduction to Orgonomy, New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, ISBN 0374501963.
External links
- Documentary "Man's Right to Know" (28 min) Wilhelm Reich Infant Trust. An introduction to the life and work of Wilhelm Reich.
- Documentary Who is Afraid of Wilhelm Reich ("Wer Hat Angst vor Wilhelm Reich") (1:34 hr), Antonin Svoboda in coproduction with Austrian TV.
Wilhelm Reich | |
---|---|
Ideas | |
Works |
|
Other |
|