Revision as of 14:34, 3 August 2012 editGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers382,723 edits →August 14: support← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:58, 3 August 2012 edit undoRaul654 (talk | contribs)70,896 edits →August 8: Removing - we've had lots of sports articles latelyNext edit → | ||
Line 103: | Line 103: | ||
==Date requests (5 max)== | ==Date requests (5 max)== | ||
===August 8=== | |||
<div style="width:55%; background-color:#f5fffa; border:1px solid #cef2e0;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em; color: black"> | |||
<div style="float:left;margin-right:0.9em"> | |||
] | |||
</div> | |||
<div> | |||
''']''' is a ] in ], ], United States. The stadium was designed for both ] and ]. It serves as the home field for the ] of the ] (NFL) and ] of ] (MLS). Sounders FC have hosted and won two ] championship matches at CenturyLink in ] and ], setting an attendance record for the tournament final each time. The venue also hosts concerts, trade shows, and consumer shows along with sporting events. Located within a mile (1.6 km) of Seattle's central business district, it is accessible by multiple freeways and forms of mass transit. It was built between 2000 and 2002 after voters approved funding for the construction in a statewide election. This vote created the ] to oversee public ownership of the venue. CenturyLink Field is a modern facility with views of the skyline of ] and can seat 67,000 people. (])</div></div> | |||
Four points I think, maybe five. Two points because it's been over two years since the article was promoted. Two points because there are 20 versions of the article in various languages. There's a weak chance it could get one last point for date relevance because I'm nominating it to appear on the same day that one of it's tenants (Sounders FC) competes for a ] in the U.S. Open Cup final (though not at CenturyLink this time). Related U.S. Open Cup records are mentioned in the blurb. I've contacted the main contributor (who now has a retired banner on their user page) to discuss the nomination, but have not received a response. Having worked with him before he retired, I believe he would have approved of this nomination. --]<sup>'']''</sup><sub style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">'']''</sub> 01:59, 20 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
*<s>'''Comment''': Ref #3 is a bare URL; it's the only thing keeping me from supporting the nomination.</s>--] (]) 02:10, 22 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
:*Nice catch. I've fixed the ref. --]<sup>'']''</sup><sub style="margin-left:-1.0ex;">'']''</sub> 21:50, 22 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
::Thanks; '''support''' for a well-structured, well-sourced venue article.--] (]) 00:03, 23 July 2012 (UTC)00:01, 23 July 2012 (UTC) | |||
*'''Support''' - Not a Seahawks nor Sounders fan, but this is quite a detailed and well-sourced page. '''<span style="text-shadow:#808080 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em">]]]</span>''' 15:54, 1 August 2012 (UTC) | |||
===August 11=== | ===August 11=== | ||
<div style="width:55%; background-color:#f5fffa; border:1px solid #cef2e0;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em; color: black"> | <div style="width:55%; background-color:#f5fffa; border:1px solid #cef2e0;padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em; color: black"> |
Revision as of 18:58, 3 August 2012
Here the community can nominate articles to be selected as "Today's featured article" (TFA) on the main page. The TFA section aims to highlight the range of articles that have "featured article" status, from Art and architecture through to Warfare, and wherever possible it tries to avoid similar topics appearing too close together without good reason. Requests are not the only factor in scheduling the TFA (see Choosing Today's Featured Article); the final decision rests with the TFA coordinators: Wehwalt, Dank, Gog the Mild and SchroCat, who also select TFAs for dates where no suggestions are put forward. Please confine requests to this page, and remember that community endorsement on this page does not necessarily mean the article will appear on the requested date.
If you have an exceptional request that deviates from these instructions (for example, an article making a second appearance as TFA, or a "double-header"), please discuss the matter with the TFA coordinators beforehand. It can be helpful to add the article to the pending requests template, if the desired date for the article is beyond the 30-day period. This does not guarantee selection, but does help others see what nominations may be forthcoming. Requesters should still nominate the article here during the 30-day time-frame. |
Shortcuts
Featured article candidates (FAC): Featured article review (FAR): Today's featured article (TFA):
Featured article tools: | ||||||||
How to post a new nomination:
Scheduling: In the absence of exceptional circumstances, TFAs are scheduled in date order, not according to how long nominations have been open or how many supportive comments they have. So, for example, January 31 will not be scheduled until January 30 has been scheduled (by TFAR nomination or otherwise). |
Summary chart
Currently accepting requests from March 1 to March 31.
Shortcuts The TFAR requests page is currently accepting nominations from March 1 to March 31. Articles for dates beyond then can be listed here, but please note that doing so does not count as a nomination and does not guarantee selection. Before listing here, please check for dead links using checklinks or otherwise, and make sure all statements have good references. This is particularly important for older FAs and reruns. | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Date | Article | Reason | Primary author(s) | Added by (if different) | |
2025: | |||||
March 1 | Meurig ab Arthfael | Why | Dudley Miles | Sheila1988 | |
March 18 | Edward the Martyr | Why | Amitchell125 | Sheila1988 | |
April 1 | Bart Simpson (rerun, first TFA was April 19, 2015) | Why | 750h+ | Xeroctic | |
April 12 | Dolly de Leon | Why | Pseud 14 | ||
April 15 | Lady Blue (TV series) | Why | Aoba47 | Harizotoh9 | |
April 18 | Battle of Poison Spring | Why | HF | ||
April 24 | "I'm God" | Why | Skyshifter | ||
April 25 | 1925 FA Cup final | Why | Kosack | Dank | |
May | 21st Waffen Mountain Division of the SS Skanderbeg (re-run, first TFA was May 14, 2015) | Why | Peacemaker67 | ||
May 6 | Kingdom Hearts: Chain of Memories | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
May 10 | Ben&Ben | Why | Pseud 14 | ||
May 11 | Valley Parade | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
May 11 | Mother (Meghan Trainor song) | Why | MaranoFan | ||
May 17 | Bad Blood (Taylor Swift song) | Why | Ippantekina | Jlwoodwa | |
June | The Combat: Woman Pleading for the Vanquished | Why | iridescent | Harizotoh9 | |
June 1 | Namco | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
June 3 | David Evans (RAAF officer) | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
June 5 | Jaws (film) | Why | 750h+ | ||
June 6 | American logistics in the Northern France campaign | Why | Hawkeye7 | Sheila1988 | |
June 8 | Barbara Bush | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
June 20 | Flight Pattern | Why | Z1720 | ||
June 23 | Battle of Groix | Why | Jackyd101 | Jlwoodwa | |
June 26 | Donkey Kong Land | Why | TheJoebro64 | Jlwoodwa | |
July 1 | Maple syrup | Why | Nikkimaria | Dank | |
July 7 | Gustav Mahler | Why | Brianboulton | Dank | |
July 14 | William Hanna | Why | Rlevse | Dank | |
July 26 | Liz Truss | Why | Tim O'Doherty | Tim O'Doherty and Dank | |
July 29 | Tiger | Why | LittleJerry | ||
July 31 | Battle of Warsaw (1705) | Why | Imonoz | Harizotoh9 | |
August 4 | Death of Ms Dhu | Why | Freikorp | AirshipJungleman29 | |
August 23 | Yugoslav torpedo boat T3 | Why | Peacemaker67 | ||
August 25 | Born to Run | Why | Zmbro | Jlwoodwa | |
August 30 | Late Registration | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
September 2 | 1905–06 New Brompton F.C. season | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
September 6 | Hurricane Ophelia (2005) | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
September 20 | Myst V: End of Ages | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
September 30 | Battle of Morlaix | Why | Gog the Mild | ||
September 30 or October 1 | Hoover Dam | Why | NortyNort, Wehwalt | Dank | |
October 1 | Yugoslav torpedo boat T4 | Why | Peacemaker67 | ||
October 3 | Spaghetti House siege | Why | SchroCat | Dank | |
October 10 | Tragic Kingdom | Why | EA Swyer | Harizotoh9 | |
October 16 | Angela Lansbury | Why | Midnightblueowl | MisawaSakura | |
October 18 | Royal Artillery Memorial | Why | HJ Mitchell | Ham II | |
October 27 | How You Get the Girl | Why | Medxvo | ||
October 29 | John Bullock Clark | Why | HF | ||
November 1 | Matanikau Offensive | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
November 19 | Water Under the Bridge | Why | MaranoFan | ||
November 20 | Nuremberg trials | Why | buidhe | harizotoh9 | |
November 21 | Canoe River train crash | Why | Wehwalt | ||
December 25 | Marcus Trescothick | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
December 30 | William Anderson (RAAF officer) | Why | Ian Rose | Jlwoodwa | |
2026: | |||||
January 27 | History of the Jews in Dęblin and Irena during World War II | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
February 27 | Raichu | Why | Kung Fu Man | ||
March 13 | Swift Justice | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
March 22 | Chris Redfield | Why | Boneless Pizza! | ||
May 5 | Me Too (Meghan Trainor song) | Why | MaranoFan | ||
May 30 | Bejeweled (video game) | Why | Lazman321 | ||
June 1 | Rhine campaign of 1796 | Why | harizotoh9 | ||
June 8 | Types Riot | Why | Z1720 | ||
July 1 | Mount Edziza | Why | User:Volcanoguy | Sheila1988 | |
July 23 | Veronica Clare | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
September 6 | Assassination of William McKinley | Why | Wehwalt | czar | |
September 20 | Persona (series) | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
November | The Story of Miss Moppet | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
November 11 | U.S. Route 101 | Why | SounderBruce | ||
October 15 | Easy on Me | Why | MaranoFan | ||
November 20 | Tôn Thất Đính | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
December 21 | Fredonian Rebellion | Why | Harizotoh9 | ||
December 22 | Title (song) | Why | MaranoFan | ||
2027: | |||||
June | 1987 (What the Fuck Is Going On?) | Why | |||
August 25 | Genghis Khan | Why | AirshipJungleman29 | ||
October 15 | The Motherland Calls | Why | Joeyquism |
Date | Article | Points | Notes | Supports | Opposes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nonspecific 1 | Olympic Games | 7 | 2 age, Date 1, 1000 vital 4, widely covered 2, -2? proximity | 8 | 2 |
Nonspecific 2 | |||||
August 8 | CenturyLink Field | 4 | 2 age; 2 widely covered | 3 | 0 |
August 11 | South Side, Chicago | 2 | 2 age | 3 | 0 |
August 14 | DNA nanotechnology | 4 | 1 for first TFA; 1 for underrepresented topic; 2 no similar TFA in six months | 4 | 0 |
August 15 | Manhunter | 2 | 1 for first TFA (primary authorr); 1 for date relevance | 3 | 0 |
August 30 | Simon B. Buckner | 2 | 2 for age; 2 for date relevance; -2 for similar article within 1 month | 2 | 0 |
Tally may not be up to date; please do not use these tallies for removing a nomination according to criteria 1 or 3 above unless you have verified the numbers. The nominator is included in the number of supporters.
Nonspecific date 1
File:2012 Summer Olympics opening ceremony (8).jpg
Strangely, I can't see this has been nominated; apologies if it has. Main games start today. Per Ettrig on the talk page (modified): It was promoted in 2009 (2 for age), 2 for widely covered, Date related (1), A 1000 vital article (4). Minus 2 for proximity (plse check; does baseball count?). So, a total of 7 points. Can we get some decent photos of the stadium on Commons,now that it is finished please! Johnbod (talk) 01:28, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose. I'm sorry, but given the long-term notice about the games in ITN and the continual tide of olympic DYKs spread out over the coming days and weeks, I don't think we need another main page section taken up by the games. Any other time I'd be supportive of this but it's just overkill and needless saturation at this point. GRAPPLE X 01:52, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- Addendum: With the Phelps story in ITN now, there's another piece of Olympics info already on the main page. At what point is it too much? GRAPPLE X 20:56, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Since we can only use this once, I think it should be for an opening ceremony. I personally would prefer to use it for the larger summer olympics. Waiting 4 or at least 2 years beats just cramming on a random Olympic day.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 02:55, 29 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support: We should still be able to hit the final day. --Nouniquenames (talk) 21:28, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Yes, missing the opening ceremony day is a missed opportunity, but the day of the closing ceremony would also make sense. Formerip (talk) 01:43, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Waiting two or four years is a bit harsh, as there's a nontrivial chance that it could be delisted within such a long time frame if standards change or if subsequent edits bring it out of alignment with the criteria. I would prefer the earliest date possible rather than the closing ceremony, because by then the Olympics will be done and it will be out of everyone's mind. Antony–22 (⁄contribs) 01:56, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support, though I'd much prefer to see this hit the main page in coincidence with an opening ceremony. I was going to add a request for it to run on 27 July several weeks ago, but I was quite busy and there were a few things about the request process that I couldn't figure out. Ideally, I think we should run this at the next available opportunity, preferably before the Games conclude. Evanh2008 02:23, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support - Putting this on the Main Page on the day of the closing ceremony makes a lot of sense. ZappaOMati 15:55, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support Waiting years likely won't do the article good - we should allow this to go on the main page before this is over and interest is still very high. It would speak to the relevance of WP, too, I think, to have a featured article ready. Hekerui (talk) 20:31, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support: I'm persuaded by the above arguments.--Chimino (talk) 01:15, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support, per Hekerui, could not say it better, day of the closing ceremony preferred once we missed the opening, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:27, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
- ps: the blurb: "The Games are held biennially, with Summer and Winter Olympic Games alternating, so that each of these is held every four years." - I can't imagine a reader who doesn't know that. Could rather be said (later) that the four-years interval is an ancient tradition? Perhaps add a number of participating nations or athletes? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:32, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
Nonspecific date 2
Date requests (5 max)
August 11
The South Side is a major part of the City of Chicago. Regions of the city, referred to as sides, are divided by the Chicago River and its branches. The South Side of Chicago was originally defined as all of the city south of the main branch of the Chicago River, but it now excludes the Loop. The South Side has a varied ethnic composition, and it has great disparity in income and other demographic measures. The South Side covers 60% of the city's land area, with a higher ratio of single-family homes and larger sections zoned for industry than the rest of the city. Neighborhoods such as Armour Square, Back of the Yards, Bridgeport, and Pullman tend to be composed of more blue collar residents, while Hyde Park, the Jackson Park Highlands District, Kenwood, and Beverly tend to have middle, upper-middle class, and affluent residents. The South Side boasts a broad array of cultural and social offerings, such as professional sports teams, landmark buildings, nationally renowned museums, elite educational institutions, world class medical institutions, and major parts of the city's elaborate parks system. (more…)Two points for age. It was scheduled for May 5 and I requested that Raul654 (talk · contribs) postpone it to August 11 (the date of the Bud Billiken Parade and Picnic). He unscheduled it for that purpose.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 04:08, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support: probably one of the most important urban zones in the United States.--Chimino (talk) 06:23, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support white sox rule. just sayin' Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:17, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
August 14
DNA nanotechnology is the design and manufacture of artificial nucleic acid structures for technological uses. In this field, nucleic acids such as DNA are used as non-biological engineering materials for nanotechnology rather than as the carriers of genetic information in living cells. Researchers in the field have created static structures such as crystal lattices, nanotubes, polyhedra, and arbitrarily-shaped DNA origami; as well as functional structures including molecular machines and DNA computers. The conceptual foundation for DNA nanotechnology was first laid out in the early 1980s, and the field began to attract widespread interest in the mid 2000s. The field is beginning to be used as a tool to solve basic science problems in structural biology and biophysics, such as protein structure determination, and potential real-world applications in nanomedicine and molecular scale electronics are under development. (more…)Four or five points:
- One point for being my first TFA.
- One point as an underrepresented FA category. (This is a non-biological use of DNA for applications in chemistry and materials science, so it is listed as a chemistry article rather than a biology one.)
- Two points because no similar article as been TFA in the last six months. In that time frame there have been no nanotechnology TFAs (and in fact, this is the first nanotechnology FA ever), and no TFAs on biomolecular structure. The only chemistry TFA has been Psilocybin on February 29, which is dissimilar because it is an article about a single organic drug.
- One point (maybe) for a significant date. This may or may not count, but this date is the first day of the DNA Computing conference, which I will be attending, and I've arranged for my faculty advisor to briefly mention the article in his plenary talk.
Antony–22 (⁄contribs) 19:44, 27 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support, though I think at 4 points. You (or someone) needs to complete the line in the summary section above. Johnbod (talk) 15:38, 28 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support - important stuff which should be mainpaged Casliber (talk · contribs) 14:18, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support good science articles mean the world for this project. Hekerui (talk) 20:37, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support for a good science article, a good message, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:34, 3 August 2012 (UTC)
August 15
Manhunter is a 1986 film based on Thomas Harris's novel Red Dragon. Written and directed by Michael Mann, it stars William Petersen as offender profiler Will Graham, Tom Noonan as serial killer Francis Dollarhyde—"The Tooth Fairy"—and features Brian Cox as Hannibal Lecktor. Manhunter focuses on the forensic work carried out by the FBI to track down the killer and shows the long-term effects that cases like this have on Graham, highlighting the similarities between him and his quarry. The film features heavily stylized use of color to convey this sense of duality, and the nature of the characters' similarity has been explored in academic readings of the film. Opening to mixed reviews, Manhunter fared poorly at the box office at the time of its release, making only $8.6 million in the United States. However, it has been reappraised in more recent reviews and now enjoys a more favorable reception, as both the acting and the stylized visuals have been appreciated better in later years. Its resurgent popularity has seen it labelled as a cult film. (more...)
- 1 point for being the first TFA for the primary author (me); 1 for date relevance (release date is August 15, 1986); for a total of 2 points I believe. GRAPPLE X 20:47, 15 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support - would like to see an appropriate picture added though. Maybe this one? --SkotyWAC 03:07, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Or maybe this one (thought I don't remember the painting being a part of this movie's plot, just the remake and the novel)? --SkotyWAC 03:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- The painting doesn't feature in the finished film at all, just as a tattoo seen in a few early promotional images. GRAPPLE X 16:51, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Or maybe this one (thought I don't remember the painting being a part of this movie's plot, just the remake and the novel)? --SkotyWAC 03:10, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support - Well-sourced article. SwisterTwister talk 05:46, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Comment - There is a redundant mention of Tom Noonan in the blurb's second sentence.--SkotyWAC 06:56, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- Good catch, gone now. GRAPPLE X 13:24, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
- Comment shouldn't Hannibal Lecter's appearance be mentioned at least briefly in the summary? Antony–22 (⁄contribs) 01:59, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
- Only appears for two scenes, but I added it in anyway. GRAPPLE X 02:04, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
August 30
Simon B. Buckner (1823 – 1914) was a soldier in the Mexican–American War and a Confederate lieutenant general in the American Civil War. He graduated from West Point and taught there for five years, with an interlude during the Mexican–American War. He left the army in 1855 to manage real estate he inherited in Chicago. In 1857, he returned to his native state (Kentucky) and was appointed adjutant general by Governor Beriah Magoffin. He attempted to enforce Kentucky's neutrality policy during the early days of the Civil War, but enlisted in the Confederate Army in September 1861. He was the first Confederate general to surrender an army, doing so in at the Battle of Fort Donelson] in 1862. He also participated in Braxton Bragg's failed attempt to invade Kentucky. On August 30, 1887, he was inaugurated governor of Kentucky. As governor, he worked to suppress the Hatfield-McCoy feud and the Rowan County War and ordered an audit that prompted the absconsion of state treasurer James W. Tate with $250,000 from the state treasury. He unsuccessfully sought a seat in the U.S. Senate in 1895 and the U.S. Vice-Presidency in 1896. (more...)2 points Promoted in September 2009 (2 points), quinvigintennial date relevance (175-year anniversary of inauguration as governor; 2 points), similar to July 31 TFA Stephen Trigg (-2 points). Acdixon 18:10, 30 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support. Great article with relevance to military and political history both, especially in this 150th anniversary of the U.S. Civil War. --Coemgenus (talk) 09:56, 31 July 2012 (UTC)