| Revision as of 14:52, 14 July 2012 editOne Night In Hackney (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,879 edits →Banned editor: r← Previous edit |
Revision as of 15:48, 19 July 2012 edit undoOne Night In Hackney (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,879 edits -Next edit → |
| Line 9: |
Line 9: |
|
</center> |
|
</center> |
|
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
|
{{bots|deny=DPL bot}} |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
== Did you see this one? == |
|
|
|
|
|
Misfortune upon misfortune. ] (]) 09:35, 1 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:Hardly surprising. Since nominators are on public record, some BNP members/supporters have an aversion to letting "concerned citizens" know who they are and where they live, that's assuming they can muster the required number to begin with. So this thing does tend to happen a lot.... <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 10:20, 1 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Your Iris Robinson joke fell flat it seems. == |
|
|
|
|
|
I think you caused some offence. Giggle. <small>(wait, that was no joke)</Small> --] (]) 12:00, 10 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:At least I've achieved something then. What have they ever done? Cried and stamped their feet on an article's talk page because it's the "wrong" page title? I'll take my contributions over theirs, and so would pretty much everyone else I know... <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 17:07, 10 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::Just as depressing as the folks who claimed it was "wrong" to describe C.S Lewis as Irish. I don't understand these people at all; they give no real rational half the time. I want to scream at them. --] (]) 23:48, 13 May 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== ] Part 2 == |
|
|
|
|
|
Wow, already removed, at least could not find it anywhere, have to post a new one. |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, i agree with you 200%, thus both sets of refs (retirement followed by recovery) must be kept. Regards - --] (]) 20:49, 5 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Well we covered the main points at ] so I thought it simpler to keep the discussion there where others can see it easier. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 20:51, 5 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
*My bad mate, well played :) --] (]) 21:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Of Darleks and other things == |
|
|
|
|
|
I was getting fond of being known for Dr Who :-) ----] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 16:25, 25 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:I wasn't sure if you'd noticed or not, so thought I'd deal with the troll anyway.... <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 16:35, 25 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::Noticed but I try and avoid editing anything about my real person if I can avoid it, so appreciate other editors picking them up! ----] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 16:41, 25 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::I decided ] was a good idea, after the recent problems I had of a similar nature on another article. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 16:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::Good call ----] <small><sup>]</sup></small> 17:05, 25 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Clarificationgiven, again == |
|
|
|
|
|
He or she is at it again, I am not sure how to proceed here. I know you have brought this person to ANI before. I am at a bit of a loss here. Sorry for the intrusion. ] (]) 21:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:I'm sure someone will block him if he carries on much longer, I'll keep an eye on things. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 17:29, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
::Thanks, I appreciate it. I am trying my best.... ] (]) 18:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
:::And i will try my best in never getting banned, and following the rules.] (]) 07:46, 27 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Varlaam == |
|
|
|
|
|
I weighed in on the ANI on Varlaam, but so far, silence from the admin. set. Hopefully it will help, eventually, because he needs to be jettisoned from here once and for all. --] (]) 18:01, 27 June 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
Should I bring exchange with Varlaam to ANI? The discussion you began is stale now, and no action has been taken, though it has not yet been closed. The matter is being discussed and . ---<font face="Georgia">''']'''<sub>'']''</sub></font> 17:42, 6 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:Well he does seem to have stopped (for now) since the message on his talk page, so you probably wouldn't get any reply now except a block being punitive at this point. RFC on this editor might be a next logical step, but since his disputes tend to involve a single editor on one article (multiplied by many editors and articles obviously) it might be difficult to even get one certified, given the narrow scope that RFC is supposed to encompass. I'm not really sure of the right venue to deal with problems of this nature. <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 17:54, 6 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
::Yes, he's stopped for now. But, as we both know, he'll be back. Assuming good faith is out at this point --- this behavior has gone for a long time, as we both know. But, neither ANI nor AIV have worked, and you do not think RFC will work either. So, what now? ---<font face="Georgia">''']'''<sub>'']''</sub></font> 20:09, 6 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
== Hi == |
|
|
|
|
|
I was under the probably mistake impression that two socks or the sock and the master need to be spotted in order for an SPI to be run, I don't know anything about launching SPI's so I thought I would ask you as you seem to know. I can instantly spot socks, and I figure handing over the most outrageous ones would be easy enough, but I was always under the impression I'd have to go and crossmatch and find the tail end of the quacking duck, basically find it's owner ? not true then ? <span style="text-shadow:#c5C3e3 0.2em 0.2em 0.2em;">]</span>] 12:28, 12 Jul 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==Assange== |
|
|
So, not being a registered editor I have no idea what happens next. I assume that the debate is over (Gregcaletta not having responded) - unless one/both of you haven't replied because you're in Washington DC for some event or other that I hear may be happening. Being unregistered (but geeky), I don't want to make the edit and get into a revert war, but the article here: |
|
|
|
|
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/Assange_v_Swedish_Prosecution_Authority |
|
|
|
|
|
uses "conditional bail", which I think is what has been shown on Talk:assange. I'll check back in a while and see what's up, but I am hoping that I can leave it in your hands for now? <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (]) 18:39, 12 July 2012 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|
|
|
|
|
== Banned editor == |
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry. I didn't know ] was banned. It looked like a legit edit and your initial reversion didn't have an edit summary to explain. Thanks for checking it.—] 13:35, 13 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
:No problem. As you can see by ] he's quite prolific, hopefully he'll take the hint and stop some time soon..... <font face="Celtic">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 14:52, 14 July 2012 (UTC) |
|
