Misplaced Pages

User talk:Director: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:50, 9 July 2012 editMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Robot: Archiving 2 threads (older than 15d) to User talk:DIREKTOR/Archive 10.← Previous edit Revision as of 12:51, 10 July 2012 edit undoWarhammer76 (talk | contribs)3 edits →RE: Kingdom of Italy mapNext edit →
Line 56: Line 56:


{{talkback|Talk:Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946)|Map|ts=23:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)}} {{talkback|Talk:Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946)|Map|ts=23:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC)}}

tražiš li dečka Ivane Rumora: http://www.iskrica.com/profiles.php?nick=IvanRumora znaj da je ovo samo početak. znamo za tebe i znamo da si ovde da radiš protiv Srba i kad tvoju sliku i ime iskoristimo na najprljavije moguće načine neće te oprat ni ono jebeno more iz kojeg si izašao.

Revision as of 12:51, 10 July 2012


This user believes information should be free.
This user is a medical student.
This user is an Atheist.

Sign (~~~~) before you save.

Home   Talk   Contributions   Archives


Make yourself at home....
  • I usually reply to posted messages here, but if the message is important I'll notify you on on your talkpage as well.
  • If I posted a message on your talkpage I will reply there, but feel free to notify me on my talk if you feel it is urgent.
  • I'd prefer it if noone removed content here, but naturally I have no objections if it's just grammar.
  • Please don't revert my edits on this page.
  • Finally: no insults. I can take criticism as much as the next guy, but outright personal attacks will be reverted and reported.



Director is taking a short wikibreak and will be back on Misplaced Pages soon.

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Director! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

RfC started on WikiProject Yugoslavia

Since you have taken part in substantial discussion on this matter, I am informing you that an RfC has been opened on WP Yugoslavia

cetnici

pricas o cetnicima a nigde ne spominjes Pranjane i spasavanje preko 500 americkih pilota. Sve se desava od 1943 pa do 1944. po istoriji cetnici su tada vec presli na stranu nemaca, a eto gle cuda oni spasavaju Amerikance od Nemaca ... http://www.ong.ohio.gov/stories/2009/08_August/story_20090825b.html STRASNO da se to nigde ne spominje. Prvi gradovi oslobodjeni u ex YU su bili oslobodjeni od strane cetnika itd itd Koliko ima logike da Srbi posle 2. sv rata saradjuju sa nemcima... ? Istorija nije sve sto procitas89.172.76.1 (talk) 00:38, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Languages

Hello, DIREKTOR!

Template Lang-sh (Serbo-Croatian) I have replaced with Lang-hr (Croatian) or Lang-sr (Serbian) with right because:

  • As I have written: „Serbo-Croatian language” does not exist. Why? Serbo-Croatian language is an artificially created language, created in 1950s by Yugoslav government, which wanted to create a Yugoslav nation and delete existing nations such as Croats, Serbs etc. They could do that only with deletion of some South Slavic languages (some languages spoken in Yugoslavia: Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin, Serbian) so they wanted to delete that languages. Today that „language” again does not exist (dead language), because after breakup of Yugoslavia, every of this nations wanted its real (old) language (which they spoke before creation of Serbo-Croatian, which actually had never been spoken) and they have done that. So, in Bosnia and Herzegovina are spoken Bosnian, Croatian and Serbian; in Croatia is spoken Croatian; in Montenegro is spoken Montenegrin; in Serbia is spoken Serbian.
  • Bosnian, Croatian, Montenegrin and Serbian are old languages incurred a lot centuries before creation of Serbo-Croatian. Because of this, that languages can not be forms of Serbo-Croatian language which is an artificially created language, created in 20th century, while Croatian incurred in a 10th century. Some people, like David Dalby, Benjamin W. Fortson etc. are probably Yugonostalgics, which do not recognize current countries (Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Montenegro, Serbia), so they write that nonsenses.

--Ivan OS 10:44, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Please read the following very carefully, as I have found that it is repeated far too frequently in discussions of this sort. It has been repeated by people dozens upon dozens of times at Talk:Serbo-Croatian. Users have written special disclaimers on the top of Talk:Croatian language and Talk:Serbo-Croatian so they wouldn't have to repeat it so often. I myself explained it to you twice already, and this is the third time. So again, please read (and accept) the following:
This project is written according to published, scholarly sources. Linguistics is a science. And as far as Misplaced Pages is concerned, languages (believe it or not) cannot be "declared" or "abolished" by governments. The authority here are scholarly sources. It has been established (over and over and over again) that the vast majority of scholarly sources do not consider the Serbo-Croatian language to be artificial, extinct or abolished. In fact: the vast majority of sources consider Croatian, Serbian, and Bosnian to be the three official standards of a single language, most often referred to as "Serbo-Croatian". Based on these sources, there is currently a Misplaced Pages WP:CONSENSUS on this issue at Talk:Serbo-Croatian.
So in short, as this is Misplaced Pages, for this discussion you can completely forget anything the Croatian government proclaims. The authority here are scholarly sources. Scholarly sources. Not governments - scholarly sources. I've repeated this a million times, please do not expect me to do so again. You are welcome to bring your theories (and sources?) on the Croatian language to Talk:Serbo-Croatian or Talk:Croatian language and attempt to affect the current consensus. Though I honestly doubt you will be successful without a large number of scholarly sources that support your claims.
Until then: PLEASE STOP EDIT-WARRING to push your new edits - seek a consensus for them. You are deleting and ignoring sources. I assure you that should you continue to revert-war your behavior will be immediately reported in the appropriate venue. Regards -- Director (talk) 11:50, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

RE: Kingdom of Italy map

Hello, Director. You have new messages at Talk:Kingdom of Italy (1861–1946).
Message added 23:50, 3 July 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

tražiš li dečka Ivane Rumora: http://www.iskrica.com/profiles.php?nick=IvanRumora znaj da je ovo samo početak. znamo za tebe i znamo da si ovde da radiš protiv Srba i kad tvoju sliku i ime iskoristimo na najprljavije moguće načine neće te oprat ni ono jebeno more iz kojeg si izašao.

User talk:Director: Difference between revisions Add topic