Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:12, 7 July 2012

This is Mar4d's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25Auto-archiving period: 28 days

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 Archive 12 Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15 Archive 16 Archive 17 Archive 18 Archive 19 Archive 20 Archive 21 Archive 22 Archive 23 Archive 24 Archive 25

This page has archives. Sections older than 28 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.

India v. South Asia

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Invite to WikiConference India 2011

Hi

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation Hello Mar4d! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you. If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only. If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it. Please click HERE to take part. Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback. You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey

Done

Incase you're not wachlisting

You're Welcome

Talk:Pakistan#Kashmir conflict should be merged

Re: SPA's

Talkback

Aleemiyah Institute of Islamic Studies

June 2012

Welcome to Misplaced Pages. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Tarana-e-Milli. Please comment on the content and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Strike off your lame comment DℬigXray 20:06, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Continuing mediation

Both Darkness Shines and JCAla have indicated that they are willing to cease disputes elsewhere. I trust that you also agree with this. I've asked the following question: "Would participants be willing to agree on specific examples of text within articles that we could take a look at with reference to the identified issues?" Sunray (talk) 22:27, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Warning on SE

Hi there! I saw your warning on SE's tp. Well, please do not template the regulars. I agree that what SE wrote can't be considered proper but your warning also can't be justified. We are here to develope the encyclopedia not to fight. It is better if this is discontinued by both the sides now. I'd like to offer an apology on behalf of him and lets stop this now. Cheers! →TSU  06:54, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict)Just an observation, templating is not supposed to be a provocation. See WP:TTR which presents equal opposite reasons for templating the regulars when it is really needed. Thanks for refactoring the personal comments though. Cheers. --lTopGunl (talk) 12:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

You should have followed the same before preaching me.....about personal attacks. ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle 12:47, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Actually the first person to keep that mind is the one making that edit (the edits you make are your responsibility)... not the one who received it or moved the content. --lTopGunl (talk) 12:50, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

One of the 1300 most active Wikipedians ignores the mistake...forgets to warn the user not to do the mistake again and even displays the same in their user(or) talk page...that's fine..I completely agree with you ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle 12:55, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Do you mean to justify your actions in light of others'? Or to make a right with two wrongs, or tit for tat? The user making that edit is already banned. You're not; so take the responsibility of your own editing and stop making WP:POINTy edits. --lTopGunl (talk) 13:39, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

no...I didn't mean to justify my edit.Maybe my mention of names was wrong...but I found it particularly surprising(and shocking that Mar4d didn't template the user who did the same mistake as done by me.Morever, mentioning DS's name in the star was later removed by TSU...not Mar4d.This probably means only one thing.... one:he ignores it..or two:he agrees to it...lets think option one is correct for now.. ϮheჂtriԞeΣagle 14:00, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you very much for the barnstar, I appreciate it. (Wiki id2(talk) 16:34, 20 June 2012 (UTC))

You're welcome :] Would like to expand that article and bring it to a decent size. Mar4d (talk) 02:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism

Is there a reason you called this vandalism? WP:VANDAL is very specific on what is called vandalism and what isn't. Calling good faith vandalism is itself disruptive. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © 20:43, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

I was on my phone, so I might have utilised the vandalism button while using the revert option. WP:AGF, thank you. Mar4d (talk) 01:38, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you sir

Thank you verry much for the barnstar, this is my first one... really enjoying... It is an honour working here among the good people like you... MehrajMir ' 09:24, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

You're welcome, you deserve one :) Mar4d (talk) 10:34, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Mediation

The 1995 attack on the Pakistani embassy in Kabul‎ dispute is now being continued on the mediation. --lTopGunl (talk) 09:03, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. Mar4d (talk) 13:32, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Samar (Talk . Contributions) 07:13, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Kashmir separatist movement

Template:Kashmir separatist movement has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Lay of the personal attacks please. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:19, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Wow, twice in one day

You break the 1RR Self revert please. Darkness Shines (talk) 17:41, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

• (talk page stalker) Editing own comments is not editwar. Avoid editing each others' comments. --lTopGunl (talk) 17:45, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Samar (Talk . Contributions) 10:04, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring

Why did you remove reliably sourced content when you restored the POV template? Darkness Shines (talk) 15:53, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

That can go in the body, the lead should only preferably mention tribal forces per WP:WEIGHT since they were at the forefront of the conquest. Mar4d (talk) 15:57, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

No they were not, the ywere lead by Pakistani officers. I will rewrite that entire article to reflect historical fact. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

You are incorrect, the armed forces became involved after the incursion of tribal forces. The article should accordingly document it as such. Mar4d (talk) 16:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Kashmir movement template

May I suggest try to take a middle road. Increase the scope of the template to cover Azad Kashmir and related issues also. And don't get personal. Stop slapping and trouting and all. Samar (Talk . Contributions) 20:39, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your advice, will surely take it. Separatist movements which are also active in Azad Kashmir are also included, which I've noted in the footnote in the template. Mar4d (talk) 02:50, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Pakistan Murdabad

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Do you really think it is an attack page? Sources have been clearly given, and they also establishes the notability. Do remember that Misplaced Pages is not censored. Also it would be great if you can tell how did you reached that place. It would be better if you don't follow me and place false tags. I hope this won't be repeated. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ 14:35, 29 June 2012 (UTC) Unconstructive comment partially striked per WP:NPA. Mar4d (talk) 15:21, 29 June 2012 (UTC))

I have nominated it for AfD, you may discuss there. Also, please do not try to give vieled threats. It is none of your business to figure what articles I edit or make observations on my activities. The policy is clear, comment on the content, not the contributor. Stay on topic now and focus on the content dispute. Mar4d (talk) 14:49, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Wait a sec. I don't care if you are editing ANY article of Misplaced Pages, but I care when you are following me and trying to hound me. ♛♚★Vaibhav Jain★♚♛ 15:09, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

What can I say really, more WP:BATTLEGROUND thinking. I believe I have sufficiently raised my concerns on your article, it would be in best interests to let the final decision come about through means of consensus. I am not impressed by your playing of the WP:HOUND card. Even if it is to be loosely applied, it would be tantamount to questioning how you came to this article. I am going to archive this discussion now, make your comments at the AfD. Mar4d (talk) 15:17, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Care to comment?

Do you care to comment at Talk:Gilgit–Baltistan#Neutrality? Barring any new information, I will be reinstating the POV tag as I am completely unconvinced that the article is neutral based on a two sentence message. I may be starting an RfC on the topic to get some opinions by uninvolved editors. Ryan Vesey Review me! 14:55, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

I've replied on the talk page. Mar4d (talk) 15:04, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Thank you, I've started an RfC and will refrain from adding the tag until the issue is discussed and resolved through that method. Ryan Vesey Review me! 15:06, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration clarification. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Amendment request: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/India-Pakistan and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification#Requests for Clarification;
• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide.

Thanks, Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:12, 7 July 2012 (UTC)