Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 20:51, 2 May 2012

WikiThanks

Thanks for your recent contributions! 66.87.0.137 (talk) 13:56, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

DRN-notice

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Talk:Serbia under German occupation, Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet_investigations/DIREKTOR/Archive#25_March_2012". Thank you. --Peacemaker67 (talk) 12:59, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Invitation

http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Banate_of_Severin Dobitocilor (talk) 08:33, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Bačka Oblast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Darda

Syrmia Oblast (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Irig

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

Re: Revert warring in Serbia under German occupation

I suggest you look into Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution. I haven't had time to devote to this myself, but there should be plenty of other editors :) --Joy (talk) 08:07, 7 April 2012 (UTC)

An award for you

Golden Wiki Award You are among the top 5% of most active Wikipedians this past month! 66.87.2.33 (talk) 23:07, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Template

Ispravio sa u ta tri clanka. Boli je nekih polja viska. -- Bojan  Talk  05:30, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Nisam ja, u stvari jesam. Ulogovao sam bota preko svog naloga, a on je ispravljao na hiljade clanaka, nisam stigao sve da ispregledam. -- Bojan  Talk  05:31, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Radio sam to posto sam primetio da mnogi clanci o Srbiji i Bosni imaju samo da je to mesto u Srbiji ili u Bosni u toj i toj opstini i postojao je dole sablon za koordinate. Takav standradiyovan tekst sam iskoristio da dodam sablon i da on iscrtava mapu gde se to selo nalayi. Negde sam dodavao i cirilicne nazive (ne znam iz kog rayloga nije uspelo u svim mestima), kao i medjuwiki veze (jer ih uopste nisu imali), npr Žunjeviće ili sam iskoristi to sto postoji slika na pocetku clanka, npr Surduk. Jos nisam zavrsio, cekam da AnomeBot doda korrdinate u sve clanke gde fali pa da ponovo krenem. Treba jos da se za sela u Vojvodini doda da izmedju okruga i drzave postoji jos i pokrajina. Sve cu to da uradim, samo malo da se odmorim od toga. -- Bojan  Talk  05:44, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Btw, I wrote article Salaš u Malom Ritu, and discovered that Ja sm rođen tamo na salašu is not folk song. It was written by Miomir Petrović and Dragan Mirković (student and his comrade in the show). Branko Bauer met them in Niš and hired them for the show. -- Bojan  Talk  05:58, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Moguovo za Opstinegradove, ovo za statisticke regione mi nije jasno. Mislim da ti statisticki regioni nisu nista specijalno ida i se pridaje suvisan znacaj. Samo sad imam neke privatne probleme, vikipedija mije na poslednjemmestu. Ako moze ovo da saceka do maja recimo? -- Bojan  Talk  19:47, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

1. ovo sam pokusavao, negde sam uspeo, negde nisam, videcu jos da pokusam ugrabiti
2. ne svidja mi se da mesam administrativne i statisticke regione, izazvace zabunu. Izjednacavaju se Vojvodina kao pokrajina, koja stvarno ima samoupravu i Istocna i juzna Srbija koja postoji samo u statistickom zavodu.
3. isto
4. pokusacu
5. ovo mogu sigurno
6. pokusacu, ovo sve zavisi koliko bude uspesna tacka 4 -- Bojan  Talk  06:45, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Ili i Province Vojvodina i Region Vojvodina? -- Bojan  Talk  06:59, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Mislio sam ovako -- Bojan  Talk  07:37, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Poenta je da statisticki nivoi nisu administrativni. To sto ih nalazis na sajtu statistickog zavoda je logicno, jer oni postoje prvenstveno za potrebe statistickog zavoda. Ja sam i dlje za onako kako sam predlozio, da Vojvodinu pisemo dvaputa, dapored pokrajina stoji i zastava Vojvodine, a pored vojvodine kao statisticke oblasti da ne stoji nikakva zastava, -- Bojan  Talk  11:52, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Sad sam se setio da postoji i region Beograd koji odgovara Beogradskom okrugu. Ako pisem razdvojeno statisticke oblasti od drugih administrativnih regija, Province, Region i District. -- Bojan  Talk  12:09, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Ajde da pitamo za trece misljenje. -- Bojan  Talk  08:20, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Dunno. Folks from Wiki project Serbia or somebody who had showed interested in this before. -- Bojan  Talk  06:33, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Hm, Duja? -- Bojan  Talk  20:06, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Not really, but I will do in in that way nevertheless. Later we can reach compromise for Vojvodina and Belgrade. -- Bojan  Talk  02:29, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. When you recently edited Banat of Temeswar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Principality of Transylvania (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

English

Please use English per WP:SPEAKENGLISH. Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:23, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

where exactly? PANONIAN 18:24, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

On your own Talk page and, for example, here.--Bbb23 (talk) 09:28, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

Well, WP:SPEAKENGLISH says that "it is preferred" that I use English, not that I am obligated to do that. Anyway, I only had private conversation and small disagreement with colleague from sr Misplaced Pages about exact interpretation of Serbian territorial organization law. If you think that this subject is interesting to you, the problem is whether Vojvodina should be presented in two lines or in a single line in infoboxes since it is an autonomous province and also an statistical region. By my opinion, two things are same, i.e. Vojvodina is "an statistical region which have status of autonomous province" and therefore, infobox should have a single line named "Province / Region" for Vojvodina, while User:BokicaK claims that two things are not same and that we should have two separate lines - one for province and another one for statistical region. So, Bbb23, if you think that you can help in this disagreement, you are free to do so. PANONIAN 04:30, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Guidelines are meant to be followed unless there is an overriding reason not to (see WP:PG). I don't see that you have any good reason not to write in English per the guideline.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:15, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Kingdom of Syrmia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Soli and Usora

Banate of Belgrade (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Banate

Banatski Despotovac (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Habsburg Kingdom of Hungary

Bački Jarak (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Habsburg Kingdom of Hungary

Srpski Krstur (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Habsburg Kingdom of Hungary

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:Regions of Azawad

Category:Regions of Azawad, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. --RJFF (talk) 10:49, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Category:History of Albania during Ottoman administration

Category:History of Albania during Ottoman administration, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Pichpich (talk) 12:54, 23 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Temerin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Pest, Tolna and Habsburg Kingdom of Hungary

Nova Pazova (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Palatinate and Habsburg Kingdom of Hungary

Banatska Topola (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Habsburg Kingdom of Hungary

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

April 2012

Your recent editing history at Serbia (Territory of the German Military Commander) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Tiptoety 17:46, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

1RR at Serbia (Territory of the German Military Commander)

Per the discretionary sanctions authorized in the Digwuren case, this article is subject to 1RR. Reverting more than one time in a 24-hour period may result in a block or a ban from this article and its talk page. All reverts should be discussed on the talk page. This is a bright line, not an entitlement, and reverting exactly once per day is considered disruption, and users doing so are subject to being blocked. Please see this notice about recent edit warring. Editors wishing to make controversial edits are strongly advised to discuss them first. Cheers, Tiptoety 01:26, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

under construction template over at Serbia (Territory of the German Military Commander)

G'day again, PANONIAN. Can you give us a clue as to what exactly you are reconstructing or expanding at this article? Thanks. Peacemaker67 (talk) 07:06, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Perhaps you can check history of my edits? I also planned some other expansion. Anyway, I think that these personal tags are stupid idea, so you are free to remove tag that I posted. But, you should also remove the one that you posted - you can expand article without that tag, right? PANONIAN 10:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks! Comparativist1 (talk) 19:36, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Accusation of stalking

I hereby ask you to delete from the discussion of my user page your completely unfounded accusation, which constitutes as far as I am concerned a personal attack. --FocalPoint (talk) 19:06, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

I clearly disagree with your one-sided decision to change all categories of "Ottoman-areas" to "History of areas during Ottoman administration". I have proved that there are several references to "Ottoman-areas" and therefore, I am reverting your edits. This includes Ottoman Hungary as well all your other edits in the Category:History of the Ottoman Empire by country. As far as the Serbia (Territory of the German Military Commander), I have not edited the article at all and I have participated in the discussion, without taking sides. If you believe that accusation of stalking is a tool to stop other editors from participating in editing Misplaced Pages articles, I must inform you that this is not correct, it looks rather an attempt to abuse Misplaced Pages policy. As for the offer not to change non-Central European countries related articles, I am very sorry to hear this and I will not participate in any sort of such "deal". It is only a matter of references, not preferences. I am asking you to discuss the issue in Category talk:History of the Ottoman Empire by country. I am asking you again to remove the accusation of stalking, which I consider to be a personal attack. --FocalPoint (talk) 20:18, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification

{{subst:Contentious topics/alert|topic=b}} -- Director (talk) 20:51, 2 May 2012 (UTC)