| Revision as of 17:29, 15 March 2012 editBorealdreams (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users854 edits →Pages I'm working on to improve & get in agreement← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:05, 16 March 2012 edit undoGuy Macon (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers59,291 edits →March, 2012Next edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| :moving forward, rather than fighting behind....] ] (]) 15:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC) | :moving forward, rather than fighting behind....] ] (]) 15:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::It appears that, after I went and deleted every comment that was critical of you (tell me if I missed any) in an attempt to have a fresh start, you are still linking to my comments in the history with snide comments like "Is this your example of Neutrality?" So which is it? Do you want to start fresh or do you want to keep fighting over past comments? | |||
| ::You are also allowing Hengistmate to continue one of his many fights with other editors (this time he is fighting Andy Dingley) on your talk page. Do you really want to get involved in his battles? If so, be aware that you may end up being his next target. If it were me, I would silently delete his criticisms of Andy Dingley without comment (you are allowed to delete anything that is on your own talk page, including the civility warning above). --] (]) 10:05, 16 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:05, 16 March 2012
Pages I'm working on to improve & get in agreement
- Electric spark
- Electrostatic discharge
- Electric discharge
- Lightning
- Lightning rod
- Lightning storm
- Lightning strike
- Lightning bolt
- Lightning Protection Systems
- Surge protector
- Voltage_spike
Don't let it get you down.
Hengistmate,
I've removed this discussion, points noted, as I'm more interested (see below discussion) in moving forward than engaging in a pissing match that goes no where.
Regards, Borealdreams (talk) 16:03, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Not slinging mud, just acknowledging a reality... The-Undue-Weight-of-Truth-on Borealdreams (talk) 20:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Mr. Messer-Kruse's experience is eerily familiar. wonder if . . . nah, too much of a coincidence. BTW, full marks for attempting to bury the hatchet. I am appalled at the utter gracelessnes of the response. This is what happens. If you would like to study an example of the behaviour that is condoned and does not attract a lecture from someone who has no authority to deliver one, see here. I sometimes despair. Nil carborundum. Hengistmate (talk) 21:24, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Lightning_rod
FYI: Misplaced Pages:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard#Lightning_rod. --Guy Macon (talk) 20:44, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
March, 2012
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Lightning rod. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. --Guy Macon (talk) 07:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
Is this your example of Neutrality?
- moving forward, rather than fighting behind....Guy_Macon#Olive_Branch Borealdreams (talk) 15:57, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
- It appears that, after I went and deleted every comment that was critical of you (tell me if I missed any) in an attempt to have a fresh start, you are still linking to my comments in the history with snide comments like "Is this your example of Neutrality?" So which is it? Do you want to start fresh or do you want to keep fighting over past comments?
- You are also allowing Hengistmate to continue one of his many fights with other editors (this time he is fighting Andy Dingley) on your talk page. Do you really want to get involved in his battles? If so, be aware that you may end up being his next target. If it were me, I would silently delete his criticisms of Andy Dingley without comment (you are allowed to delete anything that is on your own talk page, including the civility warning above). --Guy Macon (talk) 10:05, 16 March 2012 (UTC)