| Revision as of 17:11, 30 January 2012 view sourceVice regent (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,519 edits →University MedCab Mediation← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:25, 30 January 2012 view source Vanished user 352535 (talk | contribs)6,069 edits →University MedCab Mediation: response to Vice regentNext edit → | ||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
| :I just saw the mediation closed. I also saw that Eraserhead's comment. I am disappointed to say the least. If no one is interested in mediating, how should the dispute resolution process move forward?''']''' <sub>]</sub> 14:56, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | :I just saw the mediation closed. I also saw that Eraserhead's comment. I am disappointed to say the least. If no one is interested in mediating, how should the dispute resolution process move forward?''']''' <sub>]</sub> 14:56, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :<s>I have asked ] to enter into mediation. Will you reopen it, if he agrees?''']''' <sub>]</sub> 15:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)</s> Never mind. He's not interested either. What is the best way for me to resolve the dispute, then?''']''' <sub>]</sub> 17:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | :<s>I have asked ] to enter into mediation. Will you reopen it, if he agrees?''']''' <sub>]</sub> 15:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)</s> Never mind. He's not interested either. What is the best way for me to resolve the dispute, then?''']''' <sub>]</sub> 17:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::Hi Vice regent, I highly recommend that you keep an eye on this dispute and if there is a problem that needs mediating feel free to leave a message here on my talk page. At this time, there are no other dispute resolution options because not all the parties feel that the dispute needs to be resolved anymore. Other than mediation, there's a ] that's already been tried, there's ] that can't work because that's for disputes between two editors, and ] isn't appropriate at this time as that's for severe conduct disputes (i.e. edit warring, constant personal attacks and so on). Remember, if you ever need my help in resolving a dispute through mediation feel free to leave a message. All the best, '''''<span style="color:red">Whenaxis</span>''''' <small>] | ]</small> 17:25, 30 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:25, 30 January 2012
Merging
Hi Whenaxis. I've responded to your request for comments on merging Iran–European_Union_relations with Foreign_relations_of_Iran. Cheers. Kiwi128 (talk) 01:50, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Done Whenaxis about | talk 22:03, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
Declined your Speedy
Hello, I don't see how Jordan batts is an A7, due to the fact that the article claims he is notable because he is competing in a championship race. He probably doesn't meet WP:N, but I think this is more of an AFD case. Don't you? -CrazyHos12 (talk) 00:24, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Already tagged for AfD
Y Whenaxis about | talk 00:25, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
University MedCab Mediation
Just in case you didn't have it watchlisted (translation: since it was just a notice, I wouldn't have watchlisted it, so just in case you share my bad habits), you may have not seen the interesting note here. Thank you for helping with dispute resolution. Best regards, TransporterMan (TALK) (as MedCab coordinator) 17:13, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message. I did have the users' talk pages that I contacted under watchlist—however, I appreciate your note about it. I will go about delisting the case and archiving it because of the user's request. Whenaxis about | talk 21:30, 27 January 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for being lazy in responding. I thought that I didn't have to respond immediately. I actually do care and wish to see a resolution. I only stopped discussing, because the discussion was going in circles and I was waiting for the mediation.VR talk 19:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, Vice regent, I reopened the mediation case here. So, whenever you are available feel free to take a look. Thanks, Whenaxis about | talk 21:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- I have notified another editor who was involved, but not mentioned at the mediation page.VR talk 00:58, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, Vice regent, I reopened the mediation case here. So, whenever you are available feel free to take a look. Thanks, Whenaxis about | talk 21:09, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry for being lazy in responding. I thought that I didn't have to respond immediately. I actually do care and wish to see a resolution. I only stopped discussing, because the discussion was going in circles and I was waiting for the mediation.VR talk 19:10, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
That's perfectly fine with me. Any editor can participate in the mediation if they want to, they can do so by adding themselves to the "Who is involved?" section. Thanks, Whenaxis about | talk 01:03, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
- I just saw the mediation closed. I also saw that Eraserhead's comment. I am disappointed to say the least. If no one is interested in mediating, how should the dispute resolution process move forward?VR talk 14:56, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
I have asked another user to enter into mediation. Will you reopen it, if he agrees?VR talk 15:08, 30 January 2012 (UTC)Never mind. He's not interested either. What is the best way for me to resolve the dispute, then?VR talk 17:11, 30 January 2012 (UTC)- Hi Vice regent, I highly recommend that you keep an eye on this dispute and if there is a problem that needs mediating feel free to leave a message here on my talk page. At this time, there are no other dispute resolution options because not all the parties feel that the dispute needs to be resolved anymore. Other than mediation, there's a dispute resolution noticeboard that's already been tried, there's third opinions that can't work because that's for disputes between two editors, and arbitration isn't appropriate at this time as that's for severe conduct disputes (i.e. edit warring, constant personal attacks and so on). Remember, if you ever need my help in resolving a dispute through mediation feel free to leave a message. All the best, Whenaxis about | talk 17:25, 30 January 2012 (UTC)