Misplaced Pages

User talk:Roguegeek: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 07:54, 30 September 2011 edit293.xx.xxx.xx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,033 edits Top Gear: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 02:29, 4 October 2011 edit undo293.xx.xxx.xx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,033 edits Top GearNext edit →
Line 26: Line 26:


I am a bit perplexed at how you berate me for acting in bad faith and then pull a stunt like this.--] (]) 07:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC) I am a bit perplexed at how you berate me for acting in bad faith and then pull a stunt like this.--] (]) 07:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Still waiting for that apology....--] (]) 02:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:29, 4 October 2011

Archiving icon
Archives

RE: Honda S2000 (super late reply)

Hi, I deleted it because in my opinion the cars on Misplaced Pages pages should be stock. And if you really have to include a modified version of the car, please pick something that isn't an eyesore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baconskate (talkcontribs) 04:01, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

That makes complete sense if it was just some picture of a modified vehicle, but it isn't. It's a picture of the subject of the article used prominently in a major motion picture. This brings notability to the article. Notability is a major factor here on Misplaced Pages that determines whether an article should exist or not. In my opinion, it is that reason alone which is good enough to make sure the images is kept on the article. It has, in fact, been there for years with no editors contesting it for that very same reason. I hope this clears us why the image exists in the article, but please let me know if you have any questions. Also, if you would like to continue to contest the image, I would suggest you start a discussion on the S2000 talk page so that we can see what other editors opinions are and build a consensus on what to do about the issue. roguegeek (talk·cont) 01:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

RE: Honda S2000

Ok I get that, but shouldn't it be notable because its a great RWD sports car, not because it was in some movie? And why the pink one instead of this one: http://imcdb.org/i008539.jpg ?

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baconskate (talkcontribs) 07:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Top Gear

I will be glad to discuss things with you, but I request a formal apology for this line first:

Firstly, you aren't going to be banning or blocking anyone, so don't threaten with that. You aren't an admin and there isn't a single admin that would ban for what's happening here.

I am a bit perplexed at how you berate me for acting in bad faith and then pull a stunt like this.--293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 07:54, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Still waiting for that apology....--293.xx.xxx.xx (talk) 02:29, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Roguegeek: Difference between revisions Add topic