| Revision as of 04:06, 29 September 2011 edit293.xx.xxx.xx (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,033 edits →Copyright violation in article← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:13, 30 September 2011 edit undoRoguegeek (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,689 editsm reverting that mumbo jumboNext edit → | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
| Thanks <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | Thanks <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 07:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | ||
| == Copyright violation in article == | |||
| ] Your addition to ] has been removed, as it appears to have added ] material to Misplaced Pages without ] from the copyright holder. For ], we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of ''information'', but not as a source of ''article content'' such as sentences or images. Misplaced Pages takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators '''will be ]'''. <!-- Template:uw-copyright -->--] (]) 04:06, 29 September 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:13, 30 September 2011
 Archives |
RE: Honda S2000 (super late reply)
Hi, I deleted it because in my opinion the cars on Misplaced Pages pages should be stock. And if you really have to include a modified version of the car, please pick something that isn't an eyesore. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baconskate (talk • contribs) 04:01, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- That makes complete sense if it was just some picture of a modified vehicle, but it isn't. It's a picture of the subject of the article used prominently in a major motion picture. This brings notability to the article. Notability is a major factor here on Misplaced Pages that determines whether an article should exist or not. In my opinion, it is that reason alone which is good enough to make sure the images is kept on the article. It has, in fact, been there for years with no editors contesting it for that very same reason. I hope this clears us why the image exists in the article, but please let me know if you have any questions. Also, if you would like to continue to contest the image, I would suggest you start a discussion on the S2000 talk page so that we can see what other editors opinions are and build a consensus on what to do about the issue. roguegeek (talk·cont) 01:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
RE: Honda S2000
Ok I get that, but shouldn't it be notable because its a great RWD sports car, not because it was in some movie? And why the pink one instead of this one: http://imcdb.org/i008539.jpg ?
Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baconskate (talk • contribs) 07:33, 17 September 2011 (UTC)