Misplaced Pages

How to Review Articles

Step-by-step "how-to" for reviewing multiple edits

Go to Articles with edits awaiting review page and start reviewing but keep in mind the following:

Note: When reviewing multiple edits, bear in mind there may have been a good edit that has been removed by subsequent vandalism. Do not rely solely on what you see in the "pending review" page.

1. Check the page history regardless of whether the version you see contains vandalism.
2. If all the edits were made by one editor, and the most recent edit is vandalism, it is reasonable to assume they are all vandalism. Return to the review page, undo the series, and you are finished with your review. Go to 7.
3. If the most recent version is good, you can review the previous edit in the series from the page history, and accept all edits that way.
4. If the pending edits were made by multiple editors, review each edit individually from the page history. Undo any edit that is vandalism, a BLP violation, or clearly unacceptable according to review criteria. Each undo will create a new edit under your username, but will not be automatically accepted. Leave good edits in place, unreviewed.
5. Once you are satisfied that all inappropriate edits have been undone, you will be left with good edits. Check the most recent pending edit to be certain you've removed all vandalism. Review that edit.
6. This will clear the backlog of pending changes.
7. Don't forget to breathe!

Burhan Ahmed | Penny for your thoughts? 10:00, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Rollback

Hello, per your request, I've granted you Rollback rights! Just remember:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Misplaced Pages:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Misplaced Pages:New admin school/Rollback
• You may wish to display the {{User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox and/or the {{Rollback}} top icon on your user page

If you have any questions, please do let me know.

HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:13, 13 January 2011 (UTC)

Don't care with iaasi

Don't care with user "iaaasi". He is famous for his primitive type of chauvinist edits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.2.98.93 (talk) 19:41, 22 January 2011 (UTC) - Note: The IP 84.2.98.93 is under sockpuppetry investigation(Iaaasi (talk) 12:23, 23 January 2011 (UTC))(

March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive a week away

WikiProject Good Articles will be running a GAN backlog elimination drive for the entire month of March. The goal of this drive is to bring the number of outstanding Good Article nominations down to below 50. This will help editors in restoring confidence to the GAN process as well as actively improving, polishing, and rewarding good content. If you are interested in participating in the drive, please place your name here. Awards will be given out to those who review certain numbers of GANs as well as to those who review the most. On behalf of my co-coordinator Wizardman, we hope we can see you in March. MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 00:16, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your participation in the March 2011 GAN backlog elimination drive

On behalf of User:Wizardman and myself, we would like to take the time and thank you for your contributions made as part of the March 2011 Good articles backlog elimination drive. Awards and barnstars will go out shortly for those who have reviewed a certain number of articles.

During the backlog drive, in the month of March 2011,

• 522 GA nominations were undertaken.
• 423 GA nominations passed.
• 72 GA nominations failed.
• 27 GA nominations were on hold.

We started the GA backlog elimination drive with 378 GA nominations remaining, with 291 that were not reviewed at all. By 2:00, April 1, 2011, the backlog was at 171 GA nominations, with 100 that were left unreviewed.

At the start of the drive, the oldest unreviewed GA nomination was 101 days (Andrei Kirilenko (politician), at 20 November 2010, reviewed and passed 1 March 2011); at the end of the drive the oldest unreviewed GA nomination was 39 days (Gery Chico, at 24 February 2011, still yet to be reviewed as of this posting).

While we did not achieve the objective of getting the backlog of outstanding GA nominations down to below 50, we reduced the GA backlog by over half. The GA reviews also seemed to be of a higher quality and have consistently led, to say the least, to marginal improvements to those articles (although there were significant improvements to many, even on the some of the nominations that were failed).

If you would like to comment on the drive itself and maybe even make suggestions on how to improve the next one, please make a comment at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Good articles/GAN backlog elimination drives/March 2011#Feedback. Another GA backlog elimination drive is being planned for later this year, tentatively for September or October 2011. Also, if you have any comments or remarks on how to improve the Good article process in general, Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Good articles can always use some feedback at Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Good articles.

Again, on behalf of User:Wizardman and myself, thank you for making the March 2011 GA backlog elimination drive a success.

MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 21:48, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Your contributed article, Formanites

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, Formanites. First, thank you for your contribution; Misplaced Pages relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - Forman Christian College. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Misplaced Pages. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Forman Christian College - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Misplaced Pages looks forward to your future contributions. Quiggers1P (talk) 14:31, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

The information on the page was already included in the main article of the school. If you want to add alumni or any other information, you should add them to the article of the school. Quiggers1P (talk) 14:46, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

The Ravians article should not be on Misplaced Pages and I will get that merged into the main school. I understand your concern but there is no point in having two near-identical lists, you can mention the nickname on the school's article without any issues. Quiggers1P (talk) 14:56, 9 July 2011 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Rejathsopanam

Hello Assassin's Creed. I am just letting you know that I deleted Rejathsopanam, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. Salvio 15:21, 10 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2011

Welcome to Misplaced Pages and thank you for your contributions. However, I noticed that your username (Assassin's Creed) may not meet Misplaced Pages's username policy because it sounds like a reference to the video game, Assassin's Creed. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account and use that for editing. Thank you. Marcus Qwertyus 01:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

AfD

At this moment, could you please stop nominating article for deletion. Instead, familiarize yourself with articles already nominated. See why and how the process is conducted. Please read Misplaced Pages deletion policy and Misplaced Pages:Guide to deletion before nominating deletions. You must give a reason why the article should be deleted. Also, remember to Misplaced Pages:Please do not bite the newcomers... putting up and AfD 10 minutes after the article is created for having no references is not good. Bgwhite (talk) 04:46, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

You obviously don't agree with this by removing it from your talk page.

Please see WP:BEFORE on what to do before doing an AfD. Especially note where it states, "If the article was recently created, please consider that many good articles started their Wikilife in pretty bad shape. Unless it is obviously a hopeless case, consider sharing your reservations with the article creator, an associated WikiProject, or on the article's talk page, and/or adding a cleanup tag, instead of bringing the article to AfD. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a good candidate for AfD.".

Also states: "Before nominating due to sourcing or notability concerns, make a good-faith attempt to confirm that such sources don't exist." Bgwhite (talk) 05:09, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I am sorry, I have read that and I'll never again do this mistake, mistake happen by me, I am agree for this. Thankyou for advice and helping me.--—AssassiN's Creed 05:13, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

You are new to AfD. Things like this will happen and we all make mistakes. You have made some good nominations for speedy deletion. I've also noticed you put the autobiography tag on some articles incorrectly. Teemu Metso's article stands out. The creator of the article is a seasoned editor who creates alot of Ice Hockey articles. Just slow down and learn first and you will be fine. You may be interested in joining Misplaced Pages:New pages patrol. They have tools to help out looking at new pages. Also, Special:NewPages is a great place to start looking at all the new pages created. Please, if you have questions on anything, don't hesitate to contact me. Bgwhite (talk) 05:30, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

• Bgwhite offered good advice above. I've just been looking at another article that you took to AfD today: Koron (music). You opened the AfD discussion 7 minutes after the article was created. As was noted yesterday on another AfD, it is debatable whether it is good practice to take an article to AfD minutes after its creation. In this case, I also note that during that 7 minutes you had edited 2 other articles. That is insufficient time to have read, digested and followed WP:BEFORE. AllyD (talk) 21:14, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Naujawan Bharat Sabha

I have edited the page. Kindly remove the speedy deletion tag. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajayuv (talk • contribs) 06:49, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I have edited the page and rewritten it in my own words please remove the tag. ! Rajayuv (talk) 06:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Kamal Atatürk

Sorry, you can't A7 a school. There are some quite arbitrary rules on speedying, and that's one - it actually says it on the pink box (near the top). You can use PROD or Afd on school articles. Peridon (talk) 10:41, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

VideoZer

Hardly spam... Have another look and another try. Peridon (talk) 11:56, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I think this is an advertising article.--—AssassiN's Creed 11:59, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Have you actually read it? It's borderline on attack! Peridon (talk) 15:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

But I think this is like a video streaming website, and this is an advertise.--—AssassiN's Creed 15:49, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Not everything about websites is advertising. Yes, this is a streaming video site. But they're not being very polite about it... Peridon (talk) 18:41, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Autobiography tagging

Hello, I noticed you placed a tag on an article about someone who died in 1948. That tag called the article an autobiography and indicated that there were biography of a living person concerns. Please do not use this tag on articles about people who have died. Please be careful to use tags only when appropriate to the specific case. I removed the tag. On another matter, I see that another editor has expressed concern that your user name is the name of a video game. My concern is that new editors may be intimidated by your name when you are trying to delete their articles. I suggest you consider a username change. Just my thought. Cullen328 (talk) 14:05, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Robert Padulo

I declined your speedy deletion request. Notability is claimed as the founder of that company. However, it is highly questionable. I encourage you to list it at AfD. LadyofShalott 15:19, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

But Sir, this article has invalid reference, check it and tell that He is it or another man, I reference site name of person is "LOUIS PADULO". Thanks for guide.--—AssassiN's Creed 15:23, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

First, I'm not a sir (look at my username :) ). Second, the source you found is just for another person. It has no bearing on the subject of this article. question is for the father of the article subject. Third, the speedy deletion tag you used is specifically for there being no claim of notability, which this article does have. LadyofShalott 15:28, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok sorry Mam, but this biography article of a living person should be deleted for giving no references or giving improper references, thanks.--—AssassiN's Creed 15:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

As I said initially, I encourage you to take it to WP:AfD. LadyofShalott 15:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for encouraging...--—AssassiN's Creed 15:54, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I started Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Robert Padulo. LadyofShalott 17:45, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Inappropriate tags on article Norman Criddle

This is the second time in 48 hours you have placed inappropriate tags on an article I started. The article Norman Criddle clearly does not violate NPOV policy, and it has 5 references in 6 inline citations for 6 sentences so it clearly doesn't need additional references. Over the weekend you put 5 inappropriate tags on my article Carpenter's Chameleon. They were removed and evidence of my query to your talk page has been removed too. It's looking like you are the one who is violating NPOV policy and you are targeting my articles in a deliberate fashion. I would welcome your justification for your actions. Cohee (talk) 17:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

autobiography tagging

Please stop from using the autobiography tag. Roos Vermeij, Nastja Kolar, Juha-Pekka Pietila, Lee Yong-Soo (footballer), Hamdi Abu Golayyel and Norman Criddle were tagged by you today and not one should have been tagged. All were done by experienced editors that have no connection with the subject of the article. Also many were tagged with refimproveBLP. For example, Nastja Kolar is a tennis player. Two references were given to Tennis organization that prove she is a player and notable. Nothing about the article suggests the articles was edited "by the subject or an institution related to the subject"... thus it doesn't warrant autobiography tag. The two refs given prove everything in the article, thus refimproveBLP tag isn't needed.

Also you did another AfD that relies on not references given. As I said yesterday, doing an AfD solely on the article not having references is not a reason for an AfD. There has to be a reason why the subject of the article is not notable. There are plenty of references out there on the web about Chamberlain. The question is does he meet notability guidelines for golf? In Chamberlain's case, no. He has not been on the European tour for atleast a year and has not won a tournament... This is the reason to bring to AfD and not that references are not given. Please, please be more careful. Bgwhite (talk) 17:58, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

• And another: Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Edgar C. Otálvora. Please, please read, digest and follow WP:BEFORE. AllyD (talk) 22:33, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

I did not find any references on this article of a biography so I put tag of nominating.--—AssassiN's Creed 22:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Assassin, this is the third time I've written about this. DO NOT put an article up for AfD just because it is missing references. There other avenues you should do first. Otalvora's article was created less than 30 minutes before you did an AfD. Again, please read WP:BEFORE especially where it says, "Before nominating due to sourcing or notability concerns, make a good-faith attempt to confirm that such sources don't exist."

If you want to nominate another article for AfD, please contact me first. Leave your rational for wanting to delete it. Then we can discusses if/why off the case. Bgwhite (talk) 23:03, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok next time I'll discuss.--—AssassiN's Creed 05:40, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

• Despite the above discussion and Bgwhite's offer to you, there is now another AfD based on "Unreferenced autobiography": Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Pradeep Baliyan. AllyD (talk) 21:52, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Bibek Bhandari

Hello Assassin's Creed. I am just letting you know that I deleted Bibek Bhandari, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 22:36, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Thanks buddy.--—AssassiN's Creed 22:38, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Awan folk Dances

Hello Assassin's Creed. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Awan folk Dances, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not blatantly vandalism or a hoax. Thank you. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 22:39, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Altered speedy deletion rationale: Edwin M. Epstein

Hello Assassin's Creed. I am just letting you know that I deleted Edwin M. Epstein, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. —GFOLEY FOUR!— 22:41, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Faisal Movers

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Faisal Movers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 07:46, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Smart Mark Radio

Thanks for doing the CSD on Smart Mark Radio. I was debating whether to do it myself, as the content looked copy-pasted, but alas the whole article is a promotion. BigDwiki (talk) 07:58, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Word to the wise (I hope...)

I've just declined another of your speedies - you can't nominate a recording under A7. Please do take some time out from patrolling to read the CSD criteria thoroughly. If you don't, I fear you might find yourself with an enforced time-out. A7 is for people, groups of people, companies and clubs - note they all are made up of people. The only exception is websites and such (which don't contain people, of course). Products, buildings, rocks, recipes, philosophical ideas, records - none of these are to be speedied under A7. Peridon (talk) 11:17, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

The series of comments on your talk page is very telling. I have to agree with Peridon. Stop listing things for deletion at all for a while. Carefully read the speedy deletion criteria, and study how other people tag things for deletion. Also, go participate in AfD for a while. If you do these things, you'll get a better idea of how deletion nominations really work around here. LadyofShalott 12:13, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Please Fix your User Page! :)

Hi... I recieved a couple of messages on my talk page today and couldn't figure out why. They seem to be directed to you for edits/comments that you have made on articles. I've discovered that the link on your user page (If you have any question please ask it on my talk page) leads to MY talk page for some reason. Can you please change that? And you might want to take a look at the messages at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks!  :) Wikipelli 12:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Mohammed dolphin

Hello Assassin's Creed, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Mohammed dolphin, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: asserts notability "he is rated as one of the top ten music producers in the Middle-East." converting to BLPPROD. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. SmartSE (talk) 13:48, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined

Hi again, AC. I have just declined your speedy deletion request for Robert Kerr (Musician and Composer). You tagged that with A7, but there is plenty claim of notability in that article to make A7 not at all appropriate. Please stop tagging things for speedy deletion at this point. LadyofShalott 14:07, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

But its references don't give the proper information. --—AssassiN's Creed 14:09, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

That's a different problem. It is not what A7 is for. It is not a speedy deletion issue at all. LadyofShalott 14:39, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Ok tell which tag should be put on these articles. Shinya Deguchi and Group Discussion. tell me please.--—AssassiN's Creed 14:41, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Replied to this cmt. at my talk page. LadyofShalott 15:20, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Deletions

There are three main ways of getting things deleted. There is Speedy Deletion, which has numbered and labelled categories. These are very limited in nature, and don't allow for much discretion. As I explained above, you can A7 speedy things with people in (like a company), but not the things the company makes. The db-reason one is to be avoided until you are an expert. All these are described on Misplaced Pages:Criteria for speedy deletion. I used to keep a copy of this open when I started patrolling - and still refer to it as an admin. Speedy is a shortcut to tell the admins that there seems to be a certain problem that is very obvious, and the admin then makes a decision as to what to do. For things like notability and references, or not so obvious hoaxes, or anything else not in speedy's area, Proposed Deletion is the thing to use. This gives time for the author to fix the problem. If nothing has been done in a week (or 10 days for BLP), the article is liable to be deleted. If the PROD tag is removed without the problem going too, Articles for Deletion is the thing. Please take note of what we are telling you - we are not trying to drive you away. We are trying to help you to get it right more of the time. You do get it right quite often, but the ones you get wrong are ones you shouldn't be getting wrong. Follow some editors like User:Shirt58 or User:Reaper Eternal to name but two of the regular patrollers. See what they tag and work out why they've done it. If the article disappears from their contribs list, it's been deleted. If it doesn't, see why in the history. Ask questions. Most admins are willing to help, and so are many of the patrollers. Go into Articles for deletion and read the discussions. But do have a break from tagging while you do this. You are young and enthusiastic - so is a young doctor straight out of medical school. Is he allowed to do heart transplants right away? No. He has to watch for some time, and then he may be allowed to stitch one chest up. Watch what we do. Look at the articles listed at Category:Candidates for speedy deletion. (That didn't want to display.) See what they are tagged. See what the result is. Do this for about a week - and ask if you're not sure why an admin made her/his decision. We would much rather you were a nuisance in that way than by flinging tags around like bread to ducks. Peridon (talk) 16:44, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

I understand, now I have to break tagging for some days, ok. Thanks for guiding me.--—AssassiN's Creed 16:50, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Please do stop nominating things for deletion for a little while. Participate in some AfDs. Ask questions - of me, Peridon, and other editors. Follow the other advice of Peridon above. You are enthusiastic, which is good, but you need to slow down a bit. Being unreferenced is not enough of a reason, in and of itself, for something to be deleted. WP:BEFORE is important to read and follow. If a biography of a living person does not have references, consider using the tag {{subst:prodblp}} rather than either a speedy deletion tag or going to AfD - this gives other editors ten days to find and add references for the article. Also, I wonder if you are aware of the difference between general biography and autobiography - at least one of your AfD listings (for Pradeep Baliyan) called the article an autobiography when there is no evidence that is the case. LadyofShalott 22:59, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Help

Hi... I took the liberty of changing the link on your userpage which incorrectly lead users to MY talk page instead of yours. Judging by the design and color on your page, I assume that you might have copy/pasted some code from mine. I hope you don't mind.

On the subject of your message on my talk page (User_talk:Wikipelli#Help), I believe that the administrators and other editors have made attempts to help you. I haven't checked your edits, but I have seen that they have provided you with links to articles in Misplaced Pages that will help you understand the process of editing, reviewing, and tagging articles for deletion. One editor even offered to help you if you put your concerns on their page first and they would discuss it with you.

Unfortunately, it is NOT an exact science! :) There are nuances that you need to become familiar with when marking articles for deletion. References are critical in Misplaced Pages, but there are times when an editor is creating an article and they haven't had the opportunity to include them. What I do is initially check a new article for notability more than for references. You should give an author time to add references to articles before tagging for deletion.

Please go slow. :) Look at how other editors do it... ask questions... seek advice... Above all else, take advantage of the links that others have included above. Please leave a message on my talk page anytime if you have questions. I don't know everything, but I might be able to help! Cheers! Wikipelli 16:57, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Đặng Thị Huệ

Hi again AC. I declined your speedy deletion request for this article on the basis that being the wife of a county's ruler is enough of a claim of notability that the A7 criterion does not apply. I did add the {{unreferenced}} tag because of the lack of references. Note that no references is not sufficient grounds for an article to be speedily deleted. LadyofShalott 17:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: ab.cd

Re your message: I don't see any warnings about copyright issues for the article. There is enough context to identify the subject, but the notability is not clearly established so I have changed the CSD tagging to {{db-web}}. Let's give the editor a moment to see if they contest the deletion and try to fix the article. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 05:21, 13 July 2011 (UTC)