| Revision as of 10:31, 19 March 2011 view sourceGwen Gale (talk | contribs)47,788 editsm →Hi: dab← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:04, 19 March 2011 view source Mbz1 (talk | contribs)22,338 edits →Hi: enough is enoughNext edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| :It does seem as though you more or less breached 1rr, the least one could say is that you skirted the edge. Either way, you took it too far. I've left a on your talk page. ] (]) 10:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC) | :It does seem as though you more or less breached 1rr, the least one could say is that you skirted the edge. Either way, you took it too far. I've left a on your talk page. ] (]) 10:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::Gwen, May I please ask you to take a look at ]. As you see ] found neither the block nor the agreed bans to be warranted. Yes, I agreed on those myself, and yes, I am still grateful to you that you did not use your power to force me to admit that anything that was done to me that day was fair. It was not! I could have not agreed to say the block had any merits even, if my life depended on it. Now, when I am getting harassed by any troll/sock/hound because of those humiliating bans I see I should have not agreed on them. '''I have done done nothing wrong on any of those boards to deserve those agreed bans'''. A valid AE request, a valid AN/I post (see what ] said about it), no posts at AN, and yes, bad, but a single SPI should not have resulted in anything like this ever! Why did I agree on those bans? Well, I love wikipedia. For three months after you unblocked me I have written at least , I have uploaded at least 5 high resolution images, but enough is enough. From now on I am not going to follow on that agreement. If I feel I need to contribute on any of those boards, I will. Please feel free to re-block me to satisfy the trolls, the hounds and the socks.Regards.--] (]) 13:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 13:04, 19 March 2011
| |
| archives 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 |
If I left a post on your talk page...
Please answer there. I'll see it, no worries.
Are you here because I deleted your article?
Please read through this first to find out why.
The Signpost: 14 March 2011
- News and notes: Foundation reports editor trends, technology plans and communication changes; brief news
- Features and admins: The best of the week
- Arbitration report: New case on AE sanction handling; AUSC candidates; proposed decision in Kehrli 2 and Monty Hall problem
- Technology report: Left-aligned edit links and bugfixes abound; brief news
Hi
I see you unblocked Mbz1 on the condition she stay away from the noticeboards, but I couldn't quite make out the last part of "has agreed to stay away from ANI, AN, SPI, AE for 6 mos, tkng bvir wrs to only 1 editor". Is it she can't take one specific editor to AN or anyone to ANs. I ask because she just took me to AN/EW, although my three edits were consecutive minus some grammar fixing by another editor. Passionless -Talk 08:14, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Mbz1 agreed to stay away from AN, ANI, SPIs and arb enforcement. "Noticeboards" in threads about this has been shorthand for AN and ANI. This said, given the agreement, one might rather she had taken this to an admin or experienced editor, but it seems highly likely she didn't think she was breaking the agreement by making a GF post to WP:AN3 (she didn't break the agreement) and it looks to me as though she was neither careless nor disruptive in making the post, or in following up on the thread there.
- It does seem as though you more or less breached 1rr, the least one could say is that you skirted the edge. Either way, you took it too far. I've left a warning on your talk page. Gwen Gale (talk) 10:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
- Gwen, May I please ask you to take a look at at this. As you see administrator AGK found neither the block nor the agreed bans to be warranted. Yes, I agreed on those myself, and yes, I am still grateful to you that you did not use your power to force me to admit that anything that was done to me that day was fair. It was not! I could have not agreed to say the block had any merits even, if my life depended on it. Now, when I am getting harassed by any troll/sock/hound because of those humiliating bans I see I should have not agreed on them. I have done done nothing wrong on any of those boards to deserve those agreed bans. A valid AE request, a valid AN/I post (see what administrator AGK said about it), no posts at AN, and yes, bad, but a single SPI should not have resulted in anything like this ever! Why did I agree on those bans? Well, I love wikipedia. For three months after you unblocked me I have written at least 16 new articles, I have uploaded at least 5 high resolution images, but enough is enough. From now on I am not going to follow on that agreement. If I feel I need to contribute on any of those boards, I will. Please feel free to re-block me to satisfy the trolls, the hounds and the socks.Regards.--Mbz1 (talk) 13:04, 19 March 2011 (UTC)