| Revision as of 23:58, 16 February 2011 edit99.230.180.208 (talk) →Warning: quoiting the policy for this user← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:58, 17 February 2011 edit undoKurdo777 (talk | contribs)5,050 edits →WarningNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| :::It is not a discussion on another editor (you), only a pointer to the actual discussion. Other editors are affected, and therefore they might choose to comment. It's not you place to try to prevent that from happening. ] (]) 23:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC) | :::It is not a discussion on another editor (you), only a pointer to the actual discussion. Other editors are affected, and therefore they might choose to comment. It's not you place to try to prevent that from happening. ] (]) 23:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :::: No, you can not use an article's talk page in that manner, regardless of why you're doing it, to canvass or attack. I quote you our policy outlined at ], it clearly says: "'''Comment on content, not on the contributor''': Keep the discussions focused upon the topic of the talk page, rather than on the personalities of the editors contributing to the talk page." ] (]) 23:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC) | :::: No, you can not use an article's talk page in that manner, regardless of why you're doing it, to canvass or attack. I quote you our policy outlined at ], it clearly says: "'''Comment on content, not on the contributor''': Keep the discussions focused upon the topic of the talk page, rather than on the personalities of the editors contributing to the talk page." ] (]) 23:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::::: You know what they say, a cover up is always worse than the crime. Your comment on my talk page not only did not excuse your violation of ], it is actually a self-confession to a clear violation of another one of ours policies, named ]. My suggestion to you, familiarize yourself with Misplaced Pages core policies, and do not take issues so personally, do not stalk other editors, do not comment on other editor's perceived backgrounds. If you have a dispute, behave in a civil manner, and only comment on thee content, not the other editor. I neither have anything against you, nor care about you the person. My only concern is content. Otherwise, I could have easily got you blocked for your "hate" comment. But I didn't, I just warned you so that you'd not do it again. But instead of saying you're sorry, and moving on, you made things personal, and now insist on justifying personal attacks with lame excuses. This is not constructive my friend. Please don't insist on attacking on my character or harnessing me, I did let it go this time, but I will not next time. ] (]) 14:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:58, 17 February 2011
Warning
First of all, read WP:NPA, comment on the content , not the contributor. Consider this a friendly warning. Secondly, Iran is not a part of the Arab world, nor did the Iranian protests start this year. Kurdo777 (talk) 14:20, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- You're not allowed to remove warnings from your talk page. You made a personal attack on my talk page , and you were warned as a result. Do not remove the warning. Kurdo777 (talk) 22:08, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- You don't 'own' your talk page, it's a part of Misplaced Pages. And you cannot use an article's talk page to discuss other editors. Please familiarize yourself with Misplaced Pages policies Kurdo777 (talk) 22:32, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- Since you insist on defacing my Talk page, at least get your facts straight. What I posted was not some 'personal attack', but a warning that your Kurdistan-centric views have been interfering with what should be an encyclopedic view of the protests. Unfortunately, you have chosen to continue your downward spiral. Flatterworld (talk) 23:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- What part of an article talk page is not an appropriate venue to discuss another editor, don't you understand? Read our Guidelines on talk pages at WP:Talk, you can not use an article's talk page, to target or even discuss another editor. Kurdo777 (talk) 23:47, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is not a discussion on another editor (you), only a pointer to the actual discussion. Other editors are affected, and therefore they might choose to comment. It's not you place to try to prevent that from happening. Flatterworld (talk) 23:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- No, you can not use an article's talk page in that manner, regardless of why you're doing it, to canvass or attack. I quote you our policy outlined at WP:TALK, it clearly says: "Comment on content, not on the contributor: Keep the discussions focused upon the topic of the talk page, rather than on the personalities of the editors contributing to the talk page." Kurdo777 (talk) 23:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- You know what they say, a cover up is always worse than the crime. Your comment on my talk page not only did not excuse your violation of WP:NPA, it is actually a self-confession to a clear violation of another one of ours policies, named WP:AGF. My suggestion to you, familiarize yourself with Misplaced Pages core policies, and do not take issues so personally, do not stalk other editors, do not comment on other editor's perceived backgrounds. If you have a dispute, behave in a civil manner, and only comment on thee content, not the other editor. I neither have anything against you, nor care about you the person. My only concern is content. Otherwise, I could have easily got you blocked for your "hate" comment. But I didn't, I just warned you so that you'd not do it again. But instead of saying you're sorry, and moving on, you made things personal, and now insist on justifying personal attacks with lame excuses. This is not constructive my friend. Please don't insist on attacking on my character or harnessing me, I did let it go this time, but I will not next time. Kurdo777 (talk) 14:58, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- No, you can not use an article's talk page in that manner, regardless of why you're doing it, to canvass or attack. I quote you our policy outlined at WP:TALK, it clearly says: "Comment on content, not on the contributor: Keep the discussions focused upon the topic of the talk page, rather than on the personalities of the editors contributing to the talk page." Kurdo777 (talk) 23:56, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- It is not a discussion on another editor (you), only a pointer to the actual discussion. Other editors are affected, and therefore they might choose to comment. It's not you place to try to prevent that from happening. Flatterworld (talk) 23:52, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
- You don't 'own' your talk page, it's a part of Misplaced Pages. And you cannot use an article's talk page to discuss other editors. Please familiarize yourself with Misplaced Pages policies Kurdo777 (talk) 22:32, 16 February 2011 (UTC)