Misplaced Pages

User talk:ObscureReality: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:00, 19 July 2010 editVedant (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers2,892 edits General note: Using talk page as forum on Great power. (TW)← Previous edit Revision as of 20:31, 19 July 2010 edit undo88.106.127.218 (talk) July 2010Next edit →
Line 32: Line 32:
== July 2010 == == July 2010 ==
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a ], talk pages such as ] are for discussion related to improving the article, ] about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting ] and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-chat1 --> ] (]) 20:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC) ] Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a ], talk pages such as ] are for discussion related to improving the article, ] about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting ] and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-chat1 --> ] (]) 20:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


==Vedant==
You may be interested to know that ] is an Indian nationalist and anti-British editor. The majority of his edits are either pro-Indian or anti-British. Vedant appears intent on promoting the notion that India is a great power, even a superpower. ] (]) 20:31, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:31, 19 July 2010

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2





Welcome to Recon.Army's Discussion page

Hello and welcome, I am Recon.Army, please take a look at my User page of you have the time. Please note that I do not accept any Vandalism and/or insulting messages and that such messages will be removed. Don't forget to sign your messages with 4 tildes. Recon.Army (talk) 16:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

List of Aircraft in the IAF

Hello again, Just wanted to let you know that another user has modified the numbers for combat aircraft in the IAF. I left a message on his talk page suggesting that he not change too many of the aircraft service numbers so that the majority of the numbers come from the MilAviaPress article and not from an assortment of various sources which would return the article to its previous state. Vedant (talk) 02:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Makes sense, no doubt some of the aircraft have been retired or have been lost in accidents. By the way, if you ever want to source fleet numbers, check out this E-book on AviationWeek. It's pretty helpful. Vedant (talk) 15:24, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
By the way, in case you're free, one article that really needs major rework is the PLAAF. The entire section contains a ton of unsourced information and features inaccurate inventory numbers. Looking at MilAviaPress, Globalsecurity.org and the E-book from AW, none of the numbers match up and it's clear that there is a LOT of work that needs to be done there. I'm currently a little busy in the real world so I don't know whether I can do a complete overhaul of an article, but that's on my To-do list for now. Vedant (talk) 18:17, 21 May 2010 (UTC)
I see you're also having some differences of opinion with User:Bcs09 with regards to the fleet size of the Indian Navy. Technically Bcs09 is right however as three Nilgiri class ships are still in service with the Indian Navy. According to Globalsecurity, they are to be decommissioned in 2009, 2010, and 2011 (one ship per-year). However, this hasn't happened yet. (See ). Thanks, Vedant (talk) 20:47, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Nilgiri class ships

I had opened a to discuss the matter. So if you have sources to provide, lets discuss it and then remove the ships. But until now, there is no information on the ships getting decommissioned. Bcs09 (talk) 02:44, 22 May 2010 (UTC)

Re List of states with nuclear weapons

Hi I reverted your edit because I thought it might be adding too much detail to a basic table outlining states with nuclear weapons and estimated stockpile numbers. However, I am not fundamentally opposed to the new details. I am of course aware of the difference between strategic and non-strategic (tactical) nuclear weapons. We had previously listed operational/total warheads and the other columns in table would provide further clarification. I though would appreciate if you could start a discussion in the talk page and obtain consensus because making a major change to the table that has been there for months. Nirvana888 (talk) 02:29, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Welcome to Misplaced Pages! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Great power are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. Vedant (talk) 20:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)


Vedant

You may be interested to know that user:Vedant is an Indian nationalist and anti-British editor. The majority of his edits are either pro-Indian or anti-British. Vedant appears intent on promoting the notion that India is a great power, even a superpower. 88.106.127.218 (talk) 20:31, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

User talk:ObscureReality: Difference between revisions Add topic