Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Dalejenkins: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 05:16, 28 April 2010 editKtr101 (talk | contribs)104,342 edits →Comments by other users: responded← Previous edit Revision as of 05:18, 28 April 2010 edit undoJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,535 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 41: Line 41:
{{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | Endorse }} &nbsp;&nbsp; <small>Requested by –] 17:25, 27 April 2010 (UTC) </small> {{RFCU| E | No2ndletter | Endorse }} &nbsp;&nbsp; <small>Requested by –] 17:25, 27 April 2010 (UTC) </small>
{{Endorse}} rather a long term sleeper it seems, like {{user|Bravedog}}. Endorsed to check the link. If a sleeper check could be run too that would be great. Thanks, ]<sup>]</sup> 17:29, 27 April 2010 (UTC) {{Endorse}} rather a long term sleeper it seems, like {{user|Bravedog}}. Endorsed to check the link. If a sleeper check could be run too that would be great. Thanks, ]<sup>]</sup> 17:29, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
:Gagatelephone and the three Starwars ones are all {{checkuser|Shockmetric}}, whoever that is. The other three are technically {{unrelated}}; they're on the same continent as each other, but that's the closest relationship to be found. --]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 05:18, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

---- ----

Revision as of 05:18, 28 April 2010

Dalejenkins

Dalejenkins (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Dalejenkins/Archive.


Report date April 27 2010, 17:25 (UTC)
Suspected sockpuppets
Evidence submitted by MuZemike

First edit was to nominate Boba Phat for deletion (see Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Boba Phat (2nd nomination)). Fits the class MO of banned user Dalejenkins. –MuZemike 17:25, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Adding Rogueslade (talk · contribs) as that user's only edits were to that abovementioned AFD. –MuZemike 17:34, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Comments by accused parties

See Defending yourself against claims.

  • Feel free to run whatever checks you feel necessary. You'll see, I'm sure, that the other users and I are, in fact, separate people with separate IP addresses and physical addresses. You'll also probably be able to note that I have made several edits prior to this with no account; I'm sure my IP address was recorded. I assumed that, given I chose to vote for the deletion of an article, it would be prudent to create a new account.Rogueslade (talk) 22:18, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
  • CommentI must concur. Having a sockpuppet accusation against me, and then not letting me defend myself in the designated section seems a bit shady. I may be misunderstanding this area of the site, but there is a section labled "Comments by accused parties". However, when I look at the tabs up top, I see nothing that allows me to edit the page to add such comments. Is this normal? Feel free to run CheckUser on my account as well. I know I'm not a sock puppet, and a CheckUser will verify that.Biohazard388 (talk) 00:15, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
  • It seems I've also been added to this accusation. I can say without a doubt that I am not a sock-puppet account. Run a check on my IP as well if necessary. Is it not possible to have the same opinion as those above me without the accusation that I am just a sock-puppet? Mandoman89 (talk) 02:31, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Comments by other users

These three editors appear within hours of each other and immediately only go to the same AFD. Appears to be a duck test for sockpuppets. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:13, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

I added Mandoman89 as they have also edited at the AFD in question. Ktr101 (talk) 20:37, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

I added the rest to see what else might turn up. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 03:26, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )
Current status – Endorsed for Checkuser attention.    Requested by –MuZemike 17:25, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

 Clerk endorsed rather a long term sleeper it seems, like Bravedog (talk · contribs). Endorsed to check the link. If a sleeper check could be run too that would be great. Thanks, Spitfire 17:29, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Gagatelephone and the three Starwars ones are all Shockmetric (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki), whoever that is. The other three are technically Red X Unrelated; they're on the same continent as each other, but that's the closest relationship to be found. --jpgordon 05:18, 28 April 2010 (UTC)
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Dalejenkins: Difference between revisions Add topic