Revision as of 00:20, 28 April 2010 editTzu Zha Men (talk | contribs)464 edits not convinced by this. One could equally argue it is currently under Israeli rule of law, so IL shoudl come first.← Previous edit |
Revision as of 00:34, 28 April 2010 edit undoSupreme Deliciousness (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,598 edits Undid revision 358754787 by Tzu Zha Men (talk)Next edit → |
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
|
⚫ |
{{WP Syria|class=Start|importance=Mid|auto=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Israel|class=Stub|importance=|auto=yes}} |
|
{{WikiProject Israel|class=Stub|importance=|auto=yes}} |
⚫ |
{{WP Syria|class=Stub|importance=Mid|auto=yes}} |
|
|
{{Lake project|class=stub}} |
|
{{Lake project|class=stub}} |
|
{{Volcano|class=stub}} |
|
{{Volcano|class=stub}} |
Line 7: |
Line 7: |
|
:I have also removed Israeli and Syrian parent categories to avoid creating edit wars. Anyhow, the Israeli occupied territories category supercedes inclusion in parent categories. --] ] 22:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
:I have also removed Israeli and Syrian parent categories to avoid creating edit wars. Anyhow, the Israeli occupied territories category supercedes inclusion in parent categories. --] ] 22:18, 7 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
:: The lake is ''de jure'' part of Syria but ''de facto'' part of Israel. I side with nsaum75, to avoid edit war over this nonsense. --] ] 18:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
:: The lake is ''de jure'' part of Syria but ''de facto'' part of Israel. I side with nsaum75, to avoid edit war over this nonsense. --] ] 18:49, 30 November 2009 (UTC) |
|
|
|
|
|
==WP== |
|
|
Its internationally recognized as a Syrian lake, so that should come first. --] (]) 00:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC) |