Misplaced Pages

User talk:Ryulong: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:21, 19 March 2010 view sourceXeno (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Bureaucrats, Administrators103,386 edits →FYI: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 21:21, 19 March 2010 view source Heavydata (talk | contribs)619 edits →The ColonsNext edit →
Line 73: Line 73:
I thought you were done talking to me about this matter. I guess if you do it while logged out it doesn't count huh? ] (]) 12:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC) I thought you were done talking to me about this matter. I guess if you do it while logged out it doesn't count huh? ] (]) 12:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
:That was not me and suggesting it was is an assumption of bad faith. That IP geolocates to Oklahoma. I'm in New York and a checkuser will prove that.—<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font> (<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>) 13:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC) :That was not me and suggesting it was is an assumption of bad faith. That IP geolocates to Oklahoma. I'm in New York and a checkuser will prove that.—<font color="blue">Ryūlóng</font> (<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>) 13:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
::Then why would an IP out of nowhere who made no edits except one in October suddenly oppose me? If not a sock puppet, it must be a meat puppet instead. ] (]) 21:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)


== FYI == == FYI ==

Revision as of 21:21, 19 March 2010


Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page by using either the "new section" tab or this link.
Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). If you do not sign your comments, I may remove them entirely.
Please keep your comments short and to the point. I do not want to read essays on this page.
I will revert and ignore any basic template messages used on my talk page. If you want to talk to me, use your own words.
I prefer to keep conversations on one page. If I left a message for you on your user talk page, I prefer to respond to you there.
My local time: January 2025 19 Sunday 6:17 pm EST
Archives
  1. 2—6/06
  2. 7/06
  3. 8/06
  4. 9/06
  5. 10/06
  6. 11/06
  7. 12/06
  8. 1/07
  9. 2/07
  10. 3/07
  11. 4/07
  12. 5/07
  13. 6/07
  14. 7/07
  15. 8/07
  16. 9/07
  17. 10/07
  18. 11/07
  19. 12/07
  20. 1/08
  21. 2/08
  22. 3/08
  23. 4/08
  24. 5/08
  25. 6/08
  26. 7/08
  27. 8/08
  28. 9/08
  29. 10/08
  30. 11/08
  31. 12/08
  32. 1/09
  33. 2/09
  34. 3/09
  35. 4/09
  36. 5/09
  37. 6/09
  38. 7/09
  39. 8/09
  40. 9/09
  41. 10/09
  42. 11/09
  43. 12/09
  44. 1/10
  45. 2/10
  46. 3/10
  47. 4/10
  48. 5/10
  49. 6/10
  50. 7/10
  51. 8/10
  52. 9/10
  53. 10/10
  54. 11/10
  55. 12/10
  56. 1/11
  57. 2/11
  58. 3/11
  59. 4/11
  60. 5/11
  61. 6/11
  62. 7/11
  63. 8/11
  64. 9/11
  65. 10/11
  66. 11/11
  67. 12/11
  68. 1/12
  69. 2/12
  70. 3/12
  71. 4/12
  72. 5/12
  73. 6/12
  74. 7/12
  75. 8/12
  76. 9/12
  77. 10/12
  78. 11/12
  79. 12/12
  80. 1/13
  81. 2/13
  82. 3/13
  83. 4/13
  84. 5/13
  85. 6/13
  86. 7/13
  87. 8/13
  88. 9/13
  89. 10/13
  90. 11/13
  91. 12/13
  92. 1/14
  93. 2/14
  94. 3/14
  95. 4/14
  96. 5/14
  97. 6/14
  98. 7/14
  99. 8/14
  100. 9/14
  101. 10/14
  102. 11/14
  103. 12/14
  104. 1/15

When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng

Ultraman Zero 2010

There will be a new ultra series for Ultraman Zero and there will be an dark version of him self called, Techtor Gear Black (テクターギアブラック, Tecutā Gia Burakku). Ultraman Zero vs. Techtor Gear Black. AlienX2009 (talk) 18:16, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Doesn't mean anything yet.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:58, 27 February 2010 (UTC)
Yes it does. Zero will have a series during summer according to the scans. AlienX2010 (talk) 19:54, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
No they do not say that.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 23:52, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
According to TV-Magazine, Zero will have a series. AlienX2010 (talk) 01:01, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
When more information comes out we'll do something about it.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:02, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
Sure. AlienX2010 (talk) 01:03, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

User:btphelps

Hi. Do you know about this? I have been working with this editor (btphelps (talk · contribs)) for the last couple of weeks on the Holt Manufacturing Company and related articles, and find it very surprising that he should be blocked. -- EdJogg (talk) 20:56, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

I don't know what IP it is. I don't remember when the block occurred, and I certainly can't do any unblocking can I?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:33, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
It's OK. I was taking the notice at face value, and it mentioned your user name. Someone else has unblocked him, so all's well now. Sorry for bothering you! -- EdJogg (talk) 00:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Talk page

If I add information to a talk page, will it be reviewed for possible additions/changes to the main page? 76.22.36.95 (talk) 18:44, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

It will be discussed and determined whether or not other editors think it is a good idea.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed new Power Rangers character infobox

I noticed that you have removed Tommy's image from the WP:TOKU talk page, however, I would like your opinion on my proposed new Power Rangers character infobox. I have removed the colored title bar, replacing it with a color section where we use {{color box}}es to list all colors, that way we can represent all of a Ranger's colors equally. After all, there have been many edit wars on what color should be used to represent a particular Ranger, particularly Tommy Oliver, Adam Park, and T.J. Johnson. Do you support my idea? ANDROS 02:55, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Just do it and fix it across the articles.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 03:01, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

wqa

The off wiki accusation is irrelevant -- however, accusing another editor of stalking on-wiki is not. Suggest you strike the comment and forget about the WQA. Gerardw (talk) 02:34, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

You're right about it not being stalking. He just happens to have an account on both sites and is using it to his advantage.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 02:35, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

Threat left on your page

It's being dealt with here . Ridernyc (talk) 00:11, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

My talk page

My talk page is apparently protected, and "can be edited or moved only by administrators." As I've since been unblocked, is it possible to unprotect this page and perhaps archive the vandalism mayhem or something similar? Thanks. --S-man (talk) 01:32, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I cannot perform any such unprotections anymore. Please go to WP:RFPP. Also, are you telling me you've been unblocked for two years but you have not bothered to request for your talk page to be unprotected until right now?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:33, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, I will take it there. I have been unblocked for two years, but only recently returned to Misplaced Pages, and have really have not paid much attention to my talk page. --S-man (talk) 01:46, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Exotick

where is your sourece? AlienX2010 (talk) 23:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Terebikun, April 2010, Page 31.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 00:15, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Telephone

Sorry i dont know how long you been on wikipedia but simply reverting edits when a discussion is open is not an acceptable form of editing. You can see from my edit and from the talk page that the issue is being discussed. Therefore editing the page in the way which you did is likely to inflame the situation. In future please engage in the discussion and wait until resolved before implementing change. I suggest you add your opinion to the page/responses. Lil-unique1 (talk) 01:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Four years. And read WP:BRD.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 01:07, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

The Colons

I am not discussing this with you anymore Heavydata. Consensus will determine it otherwise.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 12:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

They're without colons on the official sites, so they should also be without colons on Misplaced Pages. I'm thinking of making a move request for Star Wars now too, thanks. I only got 53 out of the 54 articles sadly. Heavydata (talk) 10:41, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Both are extremely useless, extremely unfeasible, and asinine. There are probably hundreds of Star Wars pages. RangerBoard isn't right about everything.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
I don't understand why you're so worried. If the move is approved you won't have to do any of the work, someone else will. Also, I just found this , so I won't bother asking for a move because it seems they are all have a clear consensus. Heavydata (talk) 10:51, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
So because there is no manual of style that dictates this for Power Rangers articles, you're still going to disrupt Misplaced Pages to appease the RangerBoard masses?—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 10:53, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
No, I'm requesting a move to the CORRECT titles. It has nothing to do with what Rangerboard believes. It's what provided on the official sites, and that alone. If the official sites had colons and Rangerboard said there were no colons? Guess what I'd do, nothing because then the colons would be the correct titles! Do you have AIM or MSN or something so we can discuss this further? Heavydata (talk) 10:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
And how would you have found out about this issue? Rangerboard. They are the only place that actually rages that Misplaced Pages uses colons because it's grammatically correct and not just because of the laziness of the Bandai and Disney webmasters.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 11:00, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
It seems like you're the one raging here because there's the possibility that the colons will go away. Yeah I found out from Rangerboard, so what? I thought the pages would be better off without colons because they are the OFFICIAL NAMES of the show. Lets see your proof that the names have colons in them. Heavydata (talk) 11:03, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Stating that a punctuation mark makes what Misplaced Pages has not the official title of a television show is ridiculous. It's standard English grammar and the film industry's normal practice that the title and subtitle are separated by a colon and "Zeo", "Turbo", "Mystic Force", and "RPM" are all subtitles to "Power Rangers".—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 11:12, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
So? It's still Power Rangers RPM, not Power Rangers: RPM according to Bandai's site. And what proof do you have that Bandai was lazy to not put the colon in? I guess we should move MMPR to Mighty Morphin: Power Rangers according to your logic. Heavydata (talk) 11:16, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Power Rangers is not the subtitle to Mighty Morphin. "Mighty Morphin Power Rangers" is the proper grammar. "Power Rangers RPM" is not. I've made my statement at the talk page. I find the move disruptive and pointless just because every subtitle for TV and film is treated the way Misplaced Pages has the pages already. Bandai and Disney's websites omitting them is an error on their part and frankly, it's just two dots.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 11:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
And what examples of other films/tv shows with subtitles with a colon do you have? What proof do you have that it was an error on Disney and Bandai's part? I think they would know the names of their own shows! If it's just two dots, then why are you so defensive? Seriously You came to the talk page in less than three minutes and have been arguing with me non stop over colons. If it's not a big deal like you claim, then just let it go and move on with your life. Heavydata (talk) 11:24, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Star Wars, Star Trek, Pokémon (anime), etc. It's how things are done.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 11:27, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
I'm not seeing any colon on the Pokemon Page, I googled "Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope", and it equally came out with as many "Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope" as it did "Star Wars: Episode IV A New Hope", and they reached a consensus between the two. Power Rangers has not. Also, look here http://www.startrek.com/startrek/view/series/TNG/]. Colon on the official Star Trek site, so it makes sense that the wikipedia article has a colon before "The Next Generation". The move request can help us get a clean consensus between the two anyway. Heavydata (talk) 11:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
The various anime seasons are designated with subtitles. You just didn't look hard enough. And Google does not acknowledge punctuation marks. You'll get identical results for "Power Rangers RPM" as you would "Power Rangers: RPM" or even "Power Rangers. RPM". The colon is just a general practice and that's what Misplaced Pages is doing. Stop complaining that Misplaced Pages uses a colon for the Power Rangers articles when the Bandai and Disney pages don't because it does not matter.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 11:38, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
I see the anime seasons now, but would you look at this? . The official Pokemon site uses colons for the seasons as well! It makes sense that the page would be called Pokemon: Galactic Battles! If it doesn't matter, then let it go. Heavydata (talk) 11:44, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
It's how cinema works. I'm done arguing with you. The colon should be there but Bandai and Disney have omitted it for whatever reason, just like how the Star Wars movies have different placements.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 11:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
You've given me no proof that that's how it's done with Cinema. Pokemon, Star Wars, and Star Trek all make sense with Colons, Power Rangers does NOT. You have 100% no proof that they omitted it. I have no idea why you could be so picky about colons. If you can come up with a single rational example stating that the colons belong, then I might consider changing my mind. So far, you've given me nothing but crap, and for what reason? For two little dots? Just give me a good example of why you're right and I'm wrong... Heavydata (talk) 11:52, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
I am done discussing this with you. The community will decide whether or not your argument or mine is what is best for the encyclopedia and not what is best for the hivemind fandumb.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 11:54, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

I thought you were done talking to me about this matter. I guess if you do it while logged out it doesn't count huh? Heavydata (talk) 12:57, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

That was not me and suggesting it was is an assumption of bad faith. That IP geolocates to Oklahoma. I'm in New York and a checkuser will prove that.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 13:11, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Then why would an IP out of nowhere who made no edits except one in October suddenly oppose me? If not a sock puppet, it must be a meat puppet instead. Heavydata (talk) 21:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

FYI

Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard#Review of indefinite rangeblocks. –xeno 17:21, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Ryulong: Difference between revisions Add topic