Misplaced Pages

User talk:Scania N113: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:55, 21 January 2010 editMaterialscientist (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators1,994,306 edits a note, at the bottom this time← Previous edit Revision as of 13:17, 21 January 2010 edit undoScania N113 (talk | contribs)266 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:
{{Boxboxbottom}} {{Boxboxbottom}}


== Shame on Materialscientist ==
==Airbus 340==

You block me again because you do not like my edits. What a shame! Do you think I am scared or afraid. I think the one should be afraid is you and your fellow comrades because you know that you are wrong for blocking people for personal excuses. You claim that I have not followed the "consensus" rule, but I do not find any reasons to follow it because you will not accept it. You do not know the topic very well, and you insist on giving the wrong or inadequate information. What a shame! Even strong references are turned down by you because of the so called "consensus". I really doubt that you are a fool without brain. Once again, shame on you. You are going to bear the shame because you will be sorry for that when the time comes. In this case, shame on you all who do not accept the truth.

== Airbus 340 ==
Please '''do not''' insert information into that article before reaching consensus at its talk page. Your there was quite offensive and did not contain any factual prove of your point. Please stay ] and provide ] to your claims. Thank you. ] (]) 09:18, 21 January 2010 (UTC) Please '''do not''' insert information into that article before reaching consensus at its talk page. Your there was quite offensive and did not contain any factual prove of your point. Please stay ] and provide ] to your claims. Thank you. ] (]) 09:18, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
:Although it is unconventional, you may set your rules at this page and request leaving the post at the top of the page, but please follow the wikipedia rules at other talk pages, and post your message at the bottom. Your previous message at talk:Airbus340 was not deleted, it just stays at the bottom. ] (]) 09:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC) :Although it is unconventional, you may set your rules at this page and request leaving the post at the top of the page, but please follow the wikipedia rules at other talk pages, and post your message at the bottom. Your previous message at talk:Airbus340 was not deleted, it just stays at the bottom. ] (]) 09:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Line 50: Line 54:
Regards,<br /> Regards,<br />
Scania N113 Scania N113

==Your recent edits==
] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion{{#if:|, such as on ]}}, you should ] by typing four ]s ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> --] (]) 12:40, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

<div class="user-block"> ] {{#if:|You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''time'''|You have been '''temporarily ]''' from editing}} for {{#if:|'''reason'''|]}}. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our ] first. {{#if:|] (]) 12:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC)}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block1 -->

Please examine ] and, if you would like to edit wikipedia, learn how to work with other editors. Pushing your opinion by brute force is not appreciated.
] (]) 12:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:17, 21 January 2010

Please follow the following two rules, or else your messages will be deleted.
1. Please post your messages on top of old ones (below wikipedia policies and guidelines). I will reply it either on your talk page or mine. It depends on the case.
2. Please remember to sign your messages. I do not have time to check the editing history.

Misplaced Pages key policies and guidelines (?)
Content (?)
P
G
Conduct (?)
P
G
Deletion (?)
P
Enforcement (?)
P
Editing (?)
P
G
Style
Classification
Project content (?)
G
WMF (?)
P
Userboxes
This user participates in WikiProject Historical information.

This user is a participant in
WikiProject Maps
Map Workshop (watch)

This user is interested in maps.

This user participates in WikiProject Countries.

This user participates in
WikiProject Cities.

This user participates in WikiProject Aircraft.

This user participates in WikiProject Airports.

This user participates in WikiProject Airlines.

Shame on Materialscientist

You block me again because you do not like my edits. What a shame! Do you think I am scared or afraid. I think the one should be afraid is you and your fellow comrades because you know that you are wrong for blocking people for personal excuses. You claim that I have not followed the "consensus" rule, but I do not find any reasons to follow it because you will not accept it. You do not know the topic very well, and you insist on giving the wrong or inadequate information. What a shame! Even strong references are turned down by you because of the so called "consensus". I really doubt that you are a fool without brain. Once again, shame on you. You are going to bear the shame because you will be sorry for that when the time comes. In this case, shame on you all who do not accept the truth.

Airbus 340

Please do not insert information into that article before reaching consensus at its talk page. Your only edit there was quite offensive and did not contain any factual prove of your point. Please stay civil and provide reliable references to your claims. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:18, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Although it is unconventional, you may set your rules at this page and request leaving the post at the top of the page, but please follow the wikipedia rules at other talk pages, and post your message at the bottom. Your previous message at talk:Airbus340 was not deleted, it just stays at the bottom. Materialscientist (talk) 09:20, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Yet another note: no page wikipedia in any language is a proper reference for information on wikipedia itself. Information should originate from reliable secondary sources. In this case, web site of Airbus is one of such sources. Materialscientist (talk) 09:27, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
We (I at least) value any constructive and neutrally expressed contribution to wikipedia. So far, I haven't seen much reliable and verified information from your edits. Please understand, that even if we wish to believe you know your topic, we may not, that is why we request reliable references. Materialscientist (talk) 09:36, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
This says 360. The link(s) you provided are not from official Airbus site. A personal note, the more your write without factual support, the less it will be heard. Materialscientist (talk) 09:50, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Can't locate the graph you described. Materialscientist (talk) 10:00, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
Ok found it (wrong link), but the text information is much more reliable than the "overlink" over a graph, because those graphs are not meant to be accurate. Anyway, from my side, even if Airbus site is wrong (which happens, not often though), this is a so minor issue that I won't ever fight about it - there is so much to actually write about on wikipedia. Materialscientist (talk) 10:04, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
No, you haven't provided a reliable source yet, as I mentioned, the image overlink is much less reliable than the actual text from the manufacturer. Materialscientist (talk) 12:08, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Testing

This section is created in order to test the existance of the contents box.

About Shaming Pillar

First of all, thank you for changing the file link for me on that page.

Also, thank you for your messages, Dave 1185. Pleae post your message on top next time or else I will delete it. About the page "Shaming Pillar", I think there is still a significance because there are absolutely more shaming pillars in the world. I promise all of you that I will do more research on this topic, and I will add more related information onto the page. If you think that preserving this pessage will bring harm to the community and you want to remove it, I would appreciate that. Yet, if you are intentionally removing every contributions I made, it would be a shame.

I really hope that you are not trying to delete it when I am being blocked. Also, I would like to tell you that I will insist on making the previous changes on the page A340 becuase the changes I made are based on relevant and reliable references. Also, I posted something on the discussion page, but I do not know why you deleted it as well. You guys kept on deleting the truth. Same, if you think that removing it is good for the community, do it. If you are doing this for provoking me, it would be a real shame.

Some Requests

Can someone help me to change the photo link (in gallery) on the page "Shaming Pillar" from the original one to the new one: File:Shaming_Pillar.jpg? Thank you very much.

Scania N113

Dear all,

Welcome to my talk page! I am Scania N113. This is the page where you can talk with me, and I would be very happy to share with you the knowledge I know. Please place new messages on top because it would be easier for all of us to see. However, please be reminded that I preserve the rights of deleting unwanted messages without giving reasons. Thank you for your co-operation.

Regards,
Scania N113

User talk:Scania N113: Difference between revisions Add topic