Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 00:46, 16 September 2009

Blocked

I thought it is common practice not to punish users who made two reverts in the same article. I saw this numerous times at 3RR. I debated the issues at the article talk page with YMB and Bobbani. I am really surprised how fast you jumped to the gun (in a couple of minutes!) missing a number of previous reports and not allowing me and YMB to tell anything at all at the 3RR. I am sorry for creating problems. I hope this block will still be reviewed by another administrator? Thank you.Biophys (talk) 04:41, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Biophys has been edit warring recently at Russian apartment bombings as well, where he made 3 reverts in 24h on 13 September (and more later): . I was thinking of reporting him, but now he is already blocked for edit warring elsewhere, so I won't. This should be taken into account. Offliner (talk) 04:35, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Offliner, and that is why your just started reverting my recent edits in other articles without even talking: ? Biophys (talk) 04:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

What edit warring? Can sb provide the diffs were Biophys broke 3RR? Thanks. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 17:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

One need not break the 3RR rule in order to be blocked for edit warring. LokiiT (talk) 19:06, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

But one needs to demonstrate edit warring. So far I see no diffs presented here, and I two reverts are not edit warring. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Piotrus, I did not broke the rule and made only two reverts in the article, and I talked a lot with two other users involved. I am afraid that administrator who blocked me was not quite objective. A week ago he did not block PasswordUsername even though he made a clear 3RR violation, but he blocked me in two minutes after receiving the report. However, it is now very fashionable to blame administrators of everything, so I decided to withdraw my request to review the block as to reduce any tensions. My request to review was standing for nine hours without response by any administrator. I can request to review my block again if you recommend.Biophys (talk) 18:12, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

Piotrus, I am not sure if this will make any good, especially in light of EE sanctions.Biophys (talk) 18:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

I didn't see the unblock request, otherwise I'd have unblocked you. As I said above, I see no grounds to support edit warring. I suggest you file the unblock request again. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 22:58, 15 September 2009 (UTC)

You'd better not because you're an involved person in regards to Biophys (not in the edit warring). Favoritism should be avoided.--Caspian blue 00:07, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

• This block is unjustified, I left my comments here. --Martintg (talk) 00:38, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
  • The only reason you think it's unjustified is because in the past I didn't block one of your "enemies" who, in your perception, edit warred just as much. But blocks are handled on a case-by-case basis, so perhaps rather than trying to re-dig-up your bitterness over an old conflict you should get back to improving the encyclopedia. rʨanaɢ /_contribs 00:46, 16 September 2009 (UTC)