Misplaced Pages

Talk:9/11 conspiracy theories/to do: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Talk:9 | 11 conspiracy theories Browse history interactively← Previous editContent deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:47, 25 May 2007 edit85.210.197.99 (talk) twats← Previous edit Latest revision as of 13:49, 14 September 2009 edit undoSławomir Biały (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers12,807 editsm Undid revision 313280945 by 91.143.127.68 (talk) 
(13 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
*Make all references conform to the citation style described in ].
Your 911 page is biased. 911 was an inside job. End of argument.
*Work towards a consensus on shortening the article.

You should be ashamed for allowing yourselves to be corrupted so easily.

You're either dishnoest, fuck-witted, or both.

Latest revision as of 13:49, 14 September 2009

  • Make all references conform to the citation style described in Misplaced Pages:Footnotes.
  • Work towards a consensus on shortening the article.
Talk:9/11 conspiracy theories/to do: Difference between revisions Add topic