Misplaced Pages

User talk:Fabrictramp: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:32, 10 September 2009 editFabrictramp (talk | contribs)Administrators123,692 edits →Trustive Company Description Page: still reads like a press release← Previous edit Revision as of 02:44, 11 September 2009 edit undoBadger Drink (talk | contribs)3,868 edits →What's going on: new sectionNext edit →
Line 87: Line 87:


:Alas, it's still reading a lot like a press release. Phrases that scream "press release" are things like "premium locations", "leading", "Committed to offering a viable alternative", etc. HTH--] | ] 15:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC) :Alas, it's still reading a lot like a press release. Phrases that scream "press release" are things like "premium locations", "leading", "Committed to offering a viable alternative", etc. HTH--] | ] 15:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

== What's going on ==

Hiya FT. I'm adding the categories to reflect (in the case of the Athletics) the moving of the team from Philly to K.C., and again from K.C. to Oakland. Categorizations like this have the support of consensus - see the ] page (particularly the edit summaries) for some details. After that little edit-war, I re-evaluated my stance and found that I was in the wrong, and am now working to maintain consistency with the defunct team categories. If you need to know anything else, please let me know on my Talk page. ] (]) 02:44, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:44, 11 September 2009


This administrator has volunteered for an administrator review. You may comment on her administrative actions at User:Fabrictramp/Review.

Welcome to my talk page. Please adhere to the talk page guidelines and particularly the following:
  • I will generally respond here to comments that are posted here, rather than replying via your Talk page (or the article Talk page, if you are writing to me here about an article), so you may want to watch this page until you are responded to, or specifically let me know where you'd prefer the reply.
⇒ Start a new Talk topic.
Are you here about a deleted article? While I won't undelete ads, attack pages, copyright violations, hoaxes or pages that have no chance of ever being encyclopedic, I'm glad to consider all other reasonable requests. You can also make a request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for undeletion or Misplaced Pages:Deletion review.
Archiving icon
Archives

Index to archived discussions
2006 - Dec 2007
Dec 2007 - June 2008
June 2008 - December 2008
January 2009 - April 2009
April 2009 - present

This page has archives. Sections older than 8 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Can you please review

Hello Fabrictramp,

Can you please take a look at Bern Herbolsheimer page to see if primary sources tag that you added to the article can be removed now, or if I still need to look for more sources? Thank you!

Looks great! Thank you for your help!

Adding random signed comment to get the bot to archive this.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Westlakes Wildcats

Please feel free to delete my userfyied article Westlakes Wildcats, as I have recently found a Managerzone Wiki, where this article will be noteable. Thankyou.

 Done

Adding random signed comment to get the bot to archive this.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Removal of PROD from Crazy Quilt Bouquet

Hello Fabrictramp, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Crazy Quilt Bouquet has been removed. It was removed by 88.104.15.56 with the following edit summary '(Added links to various articles and reviews.)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with 88.104.15.56 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 01:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)

Re: Refs

Look better now? I changed a bunch of them to cite news.

Btw notice refs 25 and 26. Ref 25 points to the place where you can order a back issue. Ref 26 points to a mirror of the article that Dr. Steel put up on his own site. (Obviously he was proud to get published, I know I would be!) This look kosher?

Thanks for your help. --Jonnybgoode44 (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

I would still suggest adding the "work" field to the cites. And combining 25 and 26 would be the way to go if it's really the same article. I'd use the Paranoia Magazine site rather than Doctor Steel's site. HTH --Fabrictramp | talk to me 14:21, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Well, the first link is just where you can order a back issue; they no longer have the original article posted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.148.245.7 (talk) 19:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Then it's best to make them both go to the Doctor Steel site.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:24, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages SignpostMisplaced Pages Signpost: 31 August 2009

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe

Delivered by SoxBot (talk) at 16:36, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Canadian Cat Association

Why was the page for the Canadian Cat Association removed? I am a current judge for and past president of the CCA. My amendments were simply updating breed standards. Although not allowing my edits may be understandable but to remove the entire page of the only Canadian cat registry is not fair considering most US registries still have their pages.

Thanks

Terrygreentiger (talk) 22:18, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

The page was copied from http://www.cca-afc.com/en/about/index.html with no permission on file. In the deletion notice on your talk page, you'll find instructions on how permission for use may be given.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 22:54, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Trustive Company Description Page

Many thanks for your feedback last month. I've been working hard to try and write an article that is more factual . I've taken on board your suggestions and also used other company article pages as a guide. I've jsut uploaded my revisions - I would appreciate it if you could please cast your eye over it and give me your feedback. I'm happy to work with you on any changes that you feel necessary in order to make it acceptable in in line with wikipedia's guidelines. Thanks a lot for your help. Oldfieldev (talk) 08:30, 10 September 2009 (UTC)emma

Alas, it's still reading a lot like a press release. Phrases that scream "press release" are things like "premium locations", "leading", "Committed to offering a viable alternative", etc. HTH--Fabrictramp | talk to me 15:32, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

What's going on

Hiya FT. I'm adding the categories to reflect (in the case of the Athletics) the moving of the team from Philly to K.C., and again from K.C. to Oakland. Categorizations like this have the support of consensus - see the Montreal Expos page (particularly the edit summaries) for some details. After that little edit-war, I re-evaluated my stance and found that I was in the wrong, and am now working to maintain consistency with the defunct team categories. If you need to know anything else, please let me know on my Talk page. Badger Drink (talk) 02:44, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

User talk:Fabrictramp: Difference between revisions Add topic