| Revision as of 18:18, 9 September 2009 editFavonian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators287,936 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Voyage Century Online. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:28, 9 September 2009 edit undoFavonian (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators287,936 edits →Voyage Century Online: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:Voyage Century Online|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 18:18, 9 September 2009 (UTC) | ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''{{#if:Voyage Century Online|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 18:18, 9 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | :''If this is a shared ], and you didn't make the edit, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.'' | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Could you please explain what you are trying to achieve with your edits to this article and others like for instance ]? ] (]) 18:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:28, 9 September 2009
Reverting specific editors
Please don't revert other editors' work purely because you disagree with an earlier edit by the same editor. If you have a problem with a specific, original issue, taking it to that article's talk page is the best way to get the issue looked at by a third party. Thanks. --McGeddon (talk) 09:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Heatseeker (video game). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. --McGeddon (talk) 15:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Gaming articles
Hi, please consider reading WP:VG/GL, in particular the section WP:VGSCOPE. Perhaps then you'll understand why your edits are being reverted. Marasmusine (talk) 13:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
September 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Voyage Century Online. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 18:18, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Voyage Century Online
Could you please explain what you are trying to achieve with your edits to this article and others like for instance The Mummy Returns? Favonian (talk) 18:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)