| Revision as of 04:49, 4 August 2009 editAgradman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers8,981 edits invitation to WP:Hornbook, a new task force for American law← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:33, 6 September 2009 edit undoAxmann8 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,292 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{unblock |
{{unblock|This unblock is not justified. I feel my block is a result of the opinions of people, not because of policy. Just because I offend someone doesn't mean I can be blocked. Misplaced Pages policy clearly states that this is an abuse of power for every single person supporting, endorsing, or involved in my ban. As I am dissatisfied with ArbCom's decision, I wish to appeal this block directly to Misplaced Pages founder Jimbo Wales. He is an expert on Misplaced Pages policy and is the appropriate person to review the block when every other method was exhausted and disputed. I wouldn't waste Jimbo's time if I didn't think I was being treated unfairly, however, it is clear that liberal bias from administrators is what caused this ban to result. I am extremely disappointed with the blatant racism against white, male Conservatives on Misplaced Pages. I was doomed from the start, just because of the person who I am, which is something I cannot change. I hold that my conduct here is justified, and I believe Jimbo Wales should be called upon to directly review this block. Then, and only then, will I feel that this block truly conforms to Misplaced Pages standards and policy. Even Henrik noted that I was greatly improving. This ban was obviously result of my userbox which did, indeed, conform to Misplaced Pages standards. Had the userbox never been brought up, and had I never been attacked and provoked by Baseball Bugs (who inadvertently called me a "white supremacist" ), I never would have made the inflammatory remarks that ultimately led to an indef block (which is highly inappropriate, since I am not vandalizing in any way. I obviously made an attempt to contribute to the encyclopedia). I was never given a chance by the editors of Misplaced Pages. They automatically shunned me (along with many other conservative users -- these types of blocks have been monitored very closely over the last few months, and I have seen what is going on). They cast me out and did not give me a chance. Now, probably, after all of this effort and explanation, no doubt an admin will come by and deny it without even reviewing it, with some snarky comment. Of course, doing so would only show their insecurity, and would ultimately show that they are scared that I am right.}} | ||
| :Note: As your request has been thoroughly reviewed, further unblock requests, especially repeating the same reasoning, will merely waste admin time. I've protected this talk page from further edits, because three reviews of your request is sufficient. -]<span style="font-size: smaller;"> (] · ])</span> 14:58, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I was entrapped into making the comments I have made. My userbox (which conformed to Misplaced Pages policy) was proposed for deletion, and should not have been. The entire conversation should have never occurred, as Orangemike was the one to suggest that I re-add my userbox to my page. Orangemike is indeed an administrator. If an admin suggests putting something on my page that was against Misplaced Pages policy, then that same administrator should have corrected the mistake. If you look at my edit history, I originally removed the userbox as "polemic", until Orangemike suggested other. I put my trust in a Misplaced Pages administrator, and it gets me indef banned. Interesting. That seems fair. It's complete entrapment. I get attacked mercilessly, and when I try to defend myself from untrue and unwarranted comments (such as those accusing me of white supremacy, which was neither implied or expressed. Please review the ] article and try to tell me that it doesn't state '''numerous''' times that racists are a lot of the time non-racist ones. I never put "I hate blacks" or "I'm a racist skinhead" on my userpage, did I? No, I did not. None other than Orangemike, the one who originally deterred me from removing the userbox (which caused the discussion at ANI), should be the one to review this block and see if it is merited. Henrik should also review this block and tell me if I have done anything "disruptive". <font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">] ]</span></font> 03:30, 27 March 2009 (UTC)|decline=There was pretty much a consensus to block you, indefinitely. Putting that aside, your conduct here has been extremely inappropriate. We're building an encyclopedia, and you were not. You're now blocked indefinitely and I don't see that block being overturned. If you post the same or other frivolous unblock requests again this page will be protected. ] (]) 04:23, 27 March 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I was entrapped into making the comments I have made. My userbox (which conformed to Misplaced Pages policy) was proposed for deletion, and should not have been. The entire conversation should have never occurred, as Orangemike was the one to suggest that I re-add my userbox to my page. Orangemike is indeed an administrator. If an admin suggests putting something on my page that was against Misplaced Pages policy, then that same administrator should have corrected the mistake. If you look at my edit history, I originally removed the userbox as "polemic", until Orangemike suggested other. I put my trust in a Misplaced Pages administrator, and it gets me indef banned. Interesting. That seems fair. It's complete entrapment. I get attacked mercilessly, and when I try to defend myself from untrue and unwarranted comments (such as those accusing me of white supremacy, which was neither implied or expressed. Please review the ] article and try to tell me that it doesn't state '''numerous''' times that racists are a lot of the time non-racist ones. I never put "I hate blacks" or "I'm a racist skinhead" on my userpage, did I? No, I did not. None other than Orangemike, the one who originally deterred me from removing the userbox (which caused the discussion at ANI), should be the one to review this block and see if it is merited. Henrik should also review this block and tell me if I have done anything "disruptive". <font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">] ]</span></font> 03:30, 27 March 2009 (UTC)|decline=In general, making the ''exact same request'' will get you the ''exact same response''... Unless you have something new to tell us, the answer is again, "No." ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 04:09, 27 March 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I was entrapped into making the comments I have made. My userbox (which conformed to Misplaced Pages policy) was proposed for deletion, and should not have been. The entire conversation should have never occurred, as Orangemike was the one to suggest that I re-add my userbox to my page. Orangemike is indeed an administrator. If an admin suggests putting something on my page that was against Misplaced Pages policy, then that same administrator should have corrected the mistake. If you look at my edit history, I originally removed the userbox as "polemic", until Orangemike suggested other. I put my trust in a Misplaced Pages administrator, and it gets me indef banned. Interesting. That seems fair. It's complete entrapment. I get attacked mercilessly, and when I try to defend myself from untrue and unwarranted comments (such as those accusing me of white supremacy, which was neither implied or expressed. Please review the ] article and try to tell me that it doesn't state '''numerous''' times that racists are a lot of the time non-racist ones. I never put "I hate blacks" or "I'm a racist skinhead" on my userpage, did I? No, I did not. None other than Orangemike, the one who originally deterred me from removing the userbox (which caused the discussion at ANI), should be the one to review this block and see if it is merited. Henrik should also review this block and tell me if I have done anything "disruptive". <font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">] ]</span></font> 03:30, 27 March 2009 (UTC)|decline=You seem to have a long history of using Misplaced Pages to push your own personal political point of view. ]. This block is not about a single incident, but a pattern of disruptive behavior. ].].] 04:01, 27 March 2009 (UTC)}} | |||
| :You aren't blocked because of the userbox. ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 03:41, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| I want to repeat that very clearly. You were not blocked because of the userbox, Ax; that would have been an injustice (and a display of appalling ignorance on the part of the blocking admin). You were blocked because you voluntarily agreed to abstain from political edits, and then '''''you broke your word''''', ''more than once'', with a snide citation of ] as your only "excuse" for doing so. That is what got you blocked. Don't pretend otherwise. I have gone to a great deal of effort to be as fair as possible to somebody who clearly is of a different ideology than I am, and who I suspect may be worse than that; but even we Quakers have our limits. This community gave you multiple chances, and you blew them all. Farewell. --] | ] 15:02, 27 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::That's bull, and you know it. You set me up. <font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">] ]</span></font> 01:51, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::Nobody made you say what you said or do what you did. There's nobody to blame for your own words but yourself. ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 03:06, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Actually, on the contrary, I was provoked by Baseball Bugs. I do believe that someone has used "provocation" as an excuse before. Consistency, please. <font face="Old English Text MT" size="3px" bgcolor="black"><span style="background-color: black;">] ]</span></font> 06:58, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :::::"I was provoked" is '''a liberal's excuse'''. It's the "look what you made me do" game. The conservative and/or libertarian position is that you yourself are responsible for your own actions. ] <sup>'']''</sup> ] 07:57, 28 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| {{User:Axmann8/Menu}} | |||
| <font face="Times New Roman"> | |||
| <big><u>The date is</u>: {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{CURRENTDAY}}, {{CURRENTYEAR}}<br><br>Please put your signature on additions to this page.<br></big> | |||
| '''<br><big><big><big><u>Note</u>: If you talk to me in a threatening, biting, crass, sarcastic, violent, angry, or<br><br>negative manner, I will ignore you. Remain ] or your comments here will have<br><br>no meaning whatsoever to me, will be formally stricken from the record, treated<br><br>as a comment that was never made, will be removed, and will and will always be,<br><br>in every application, negated and revoked. Thank you.</big></big></big>''' | |||
| <br> | |||
| _______________________________________________________________________________________________ | |||
| == For your willingness to change. == | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| ]<small> ]</small> has given you a ]! Cookies promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching! <br /> | |||
| Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{tls|Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{tls|munch}}! | |||
| {{clear}} | |||
| </div><!-- Template:Cookie --> | |||
| :Per this comment on ], I thought I would extend a nice message to you. Cheers. --]<small> ]</small> 20:22, 19 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Signpost == | |||
| {{Signpost-subscription|right}} | |||
| This is a good way to keep up with news on Misplaced Pages, such as new featured articles and policy changes.- ]] 21:10, 19 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Good job == | |||
| Hey man, you're really starting to get the hang of this. Good job! <strong>]<small>•]</small></strong> 21:33, 19 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| <div style="border-style:solid; border-color:blue; background-color:AliceBlue; border-width:1px; text-align:left; padding:8px;" class="plainlinks">] | |||
| –<font face="Verdana">] (])</font> has smiled at you! Smiles promote ] and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! <br /> <small>''Smile at others by adding {{tls|Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.''</small> | |||
| </div><!-- Template:smile --> | |||
| == Re:My request for NPW tool == | |||
| <!-- | |||
| // Place a display:None DIV around the talkback template if no parameter was given | |||
| -->{{#if:download|<!--then: (continue) else:<!-- | |||
| -->|<span style="font-size: 120%; font-weight: bold; color: red;">ERROR:</span> <!-- | |||
| -->'''Please enter the ''username'' parameter when using the {{tl|Talkback}} template.'''<!-- | |||
| --><div style="display: none;">}}<!-- | |||
| // Image | |||
| --><div class="usermessage" style="background-color: #BBDDFF; border-color: RoyalBlue;"><!-- | |||
| --> [[Image:Nuvola apps edu languages.svg|left|40px|link=<!-- | |||
| // Prefix the given page with User talk:, if no namespace given | |||
| --> {{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE:download}}|{{ns:0}}|{{ns:3}}:}}<!-- | |||
| --> download<!-- | |||
| // Section link | |||
| --> {{#if:My request for NPW tool|#My request for NPW tool|#toc}}|You have new messages]]<!-- | |||
| // Text | |||
| -->Hello, {{#titleparts:{{PAGENAME}}|1}}. You have new messages at <!-- | |||
| // Prefix the given page with User talk:, if it has no namespace given | |||
| --> [[{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE:download}}|{{ns:0}}|{{ns:3}}:}}<!-- | |||
| // Page link | |||
| --> download<!-- | |||
| // Section link | |||
| --> {{#if:My request for NPW tool|#My request for NPW tool|#toc}}<!-- | |||
| // Link text | |||
| --> |{{#if:<!-- | |||
| // Evaluates to "NOT USERSPACE" if namespace is neither 0 nor 3 | |||
| --> {{#switch:{{NAMESPACE:download}}<!-- | |||
| --> |{{ns:0}}|{{ns:3}}=<!--silent--><!-- | |||
| --> |NOT USERSPACE}}<!-- | |||
| // Evaluates to "IS SUBPAGE" if the page is a subpage | |||
| --> {{#ifeq:{{#titleparts:download|1|2}}|<!-- | |||
| --> <!--empty-->|<!--silent-->|IS SUBPAGE}}<!-- | |||
| // Display full page title if either NOT USERSPACE or IS SUBPAGE is true | |||
| --> |{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE:download}}|{{ns:0}}|{{ns:3}}:}}<!-- | |||
| --> download<!-- | |||
| // Display the PAGENAME of {{{1}}} (i.e. the user name) otherwise | |||
| --> |{{PAGENAME:download}}'s talk page}}]].<br /><!-- | |||
| // Timestamp, notice | |||
| --><span class="plainlinks" style="font-size: 88%; font-weight: normal;">{{#if:|Message added on {{{ts}}}.}} You can at any time by removing the {{tl|Talkback}} or {{tl|Tb}} template.</span><!-- | |||
| --></div><!-- | |||
| // Closing DIV | |||
| -->{{#if:download||</div>}} | |||
| == Ani discussion followup == | |||
| Hi. I wanted to follow-up on your report to ANI. I agree with you that the response from that editor was entirely inappropriate. I believe I have dealt with that, but let's keep an eye on it. However, I'd like to mention something: Your work on ] is very important and much appreciated. However, take a look at ], specifically about where it recommends patrolling from the bottom of the new pages list. I'll be honest, when I was a less experienced editor, I did the same thing and I needed guidance in that area too. Please take it to heart, and keep up the hard work. ] <small>(])</small> 13:32, 22 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Heh, in looking through my archives, it's amazing how similar your episode and mine are. Take a look ]. Unfortunately the other editor had some bigger issues and was eventually indef blocked. ] <small>(])</small> 13:37, 22 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Nice == | |||
| is a lot nicer! It expresses your opinion in quite clear language, without being uncivil to other editors. Even though I disagree with ''what'' is said (hey, reasonable people can occasionally disagree), I can appreciate that it is expressed in a much more civil language. <strong>]<small>•]</small></strong> 16:26, 23 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == About the bar at the top of the page == | |||
| Hi. While I was looking at your user page I noticed a bar at the top with links to your talk page, subpages, useful links etc. I just wanted to know, how do you get that? Could you tell me? If so, that would be great thanks.] (]) 21:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ===Thank you=== | |||
| Thanks, though I've done something to it thats got rid of it? I'm not sure what I've done. Could you send me it again please? ] (]) 21:57, 23 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ===Thank you, again=== | |||
| Thanks once again for helping me. This will come very useful. ] (]) 22:18, 23 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Topic ban == | |||
| You are not entitled to ignore your topic ban a mere week after being unblocked. You agreed to abide by a certain set of rules for 5 months, please don't subvert all the good progress you're making here by being dragged back into political discussions. A simple reference to ] is not an acceptable way to get around a topic ban you freely agreed to - indeed suggested yourself. <strong>]<small>•]</small></strong> 19:49, 25 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Userbox == | |||
| I'm curious if you think ] is appropriate. ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 18:26, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| :Pretty sure you can't compare that to a "This user is a Democrat/Republican" userbox. ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 19:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| ::You are certainly entitled to your opinion, as I am mine, and I've asked the ] of theirs. ''']<sup>]</sup>''' 19:18, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Help == | |||
| Hi. Since you created the bar at the top of your page onto my userpages, I was wandering, do you know how to create a guestbook? If so, can you please tell me? Thank you. ] (]) 18:43, 26 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == About the poems == | |||
| Thank you for commenting on my poems. Please sign my ] sometime. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding ] comment added by ] (] • ]) 19:25, 26 March 2009 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> | |||
| ==Blocked== | |||
| <div class="user-block"> ] You have been '''blocked indefinitely''' from editing in accordance with ] for {{#if:Persistent disruptive editing with racist undertones. This is a collaborative encyclopedia, not a random website for you to parade your issues|'''Persistent disruptive editing with racist undertones. This is a collaborative encyclopedia, not a random website for you to parade your issues'''|repeated ]}}. If you believe this block is unjustified you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|Your reason here}} below. {{#if:<b>]</b> 01:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)|<b>]</b> 01:37, 27 March 2009 (UTC)|}}</div><!-- Template:uw-block3 --> | |||
| :: | |||
| ==] -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum== | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Law/JD curriculum task force/invitation}}] <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 20:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)] <small><sup>]</sup>/<sub>]</sub></small> 04:49, 4 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:33, 6 September 2009
Axmann8 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This unblock is not justified. I feel my block is a result of the opinions of people, not because of policy. Just because I offend someone doesn't mean I can be blocked. Misplaced Pages policy clearly states that this is an abuse of power for every single person supporting, endorsing, or involved in my ban. As I am dissatisfied with ArbCom's decision, I wish to appeal this block directly to Misplaced Pages founder Jimbo Wales. He is an expert on Misplaced Pages policy and is the appropriate person to review the block when every other method was exhausted and disputed. I wouldn't waste Jimbo's time if I didn't think I was being treated unfairly, however, it is clear that liberal bias from administrators is what caused this ban to result. I am extremely disappointed with the blatant racism against white, male Conservatives on Misplaced Pages. I was doomed from the start, just because of the person who I am, which is something I cannot change. I hold that my conduct here is justified, and I believe Jimbo Wales should be called upon to directly review this block. Then, and only then, will I feel that this block truly conforms to Misplaced Pages standards and policy. Even Henrik noted that I was greatly improving. This ban was obviously result of my userbox which did, indeed, conform to Misplaced Pages standards. Had the userbox never been brought up, and had I never been attacked and provoked by Baseball Bugs (who inadvertently called me a "white supremacist" ), I never would have made the inflammatory remarks that ultimately led to an indef block (which is highly inappropriate, since I am not vandalizing in any way. I obviously made an attempt to contribute to the encyclopedia). I was never given a chance by the editors of Misplaced Pages. They automatically shunned me (along with many other conservative users -- these types of blocks have been monitored very closely over the last few months, and I have seen what is going on). They cast me out and did not give me a chance. Now, probably, after all of this effort and explanation, no doubt an admin will come by and deny it without even reviewing it, with some snarky comment. Of course, doing so would only show their insecurity, and would ultimately show that they are scared that I am right.Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=This unblock is not justified. I feel my block is a result of the opinions of people, not because of policy. Just because I offend someone doesn't mean I can be blocked. Misplaced Pages policy clearly states that this is an abuse of power for every single person supporting, endorsing, or involved in my ban. As I am dissatisfied with ArbCom's decision, I wish to appeal this block directly to Misplaced Pages founder Jimbo Wales. He is an expert on Misplaced Pages policy and is the appropriate person to review the block when every other method was exhausted and disputed. I wouldn't waste Jimbo's time if I didn't think I was being treated unfairly, however, it is clear that liberal bias from administrators is what caused this ban to result. I am extremely disappointed with the blatant racism against white, male Conservatives on Misplaced Pages. I was doomed from the start, just because of the person who I am, which is something I cannot change. I hold that my conduct here is justified, and I believe Jimbo Wales should be called upon to directly review this block. Then, and only then, will I feel that this block truly conforms to Misplaced Pages standards and policy. Even Henrik noted that I was greatly improving. This ban was obviously result of my userbox which did, indeed, conform to Misplaced Pages standards. Had the userbox never been brought up, and had I never been attacked and provoked by Baseball Bugs (who inadvertently called me a "white supremacist" ), I never would have made the inflammatory remarks that ultimately led to an indef block (which is highly inappropriate, since I am not vandalizing in any way. I obviously made an attempt to contribute to the encyclopedia). I was never given a chance by the editors of Misplaced Pages. They automatically shunned me (along with many other conservative users -- these types of blocks have been monitored very closely over the last few months, and I have seen what is going on). They cast me out and did not give me a chance. Now, probably, after all of this effort and explanation, no doubt an admin will come by and deny it without even reviewing it, with some snarky comment. Of course, doing so would only show their insecurity, and would ultimately show that they are scared that I am right. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=This unblock is not justified. I feel my block is a result of the opinions of people, not because of policy. Just because I offend someone doesn't mean I can be blocked. Misplaced Pages policy clearly states that this is an abuse of power for every single person supporting, endorsing, or involved in my ban. As I am dissatisfied with ArbCom's decision, I wish to appeal this block directly to Misplaced Pages founder Jimbo Wales. He is an expert on Misplaced Pages policy and is the appropriate person to review the block when every other method was exhausted and disputed. I wouldn't waste Jimbo's time if I didn't think I was being treated unfairly, however, it is clear that liberal bias from administrators is what caused this ban to result. I am extremely disappointed with the blatant racism against white, male Conservatives on Misplaced Pages. I was doomed from the start, just because of the person who I am, which is something I cannot change. I hold that my conduct here is justified, and I believe Jimbo Wales should be called upon to directly review this block. Then, and only then, will I feel that this block truly conforms to Misplaced Pages standards and policy. Even Henrik noted that I was greatly improving. This ban was obviously result of my userbox which did, indeed, conform to Misplaced Pages standards. Had the userbox never been brought up, and had I never been attacked and provoked by Baseball Bugs (who inadvertently called me a "white supremacist" ), I never would have made the inflammatory remarks that ultimately led to an indef block (which is highly inappropriate, since I am not vandalizing in any way. I obviously made an attempt to contribute to the encyclopedia). I was never given a chance by the editors of Misplaced Pages. They automatically shunned me (along with many other conservative users -- these types of blocks have been monitored very closely over the last few months, and I have seen what is going on). They cast me out and did not give me a chance. Now, probably, after all of this effort and explanation, no doubt an admin will come by and deny it without even reviewing it, with some snarky comment. Of course, doing so would only show their insecurity, and would ultimately show that they are scared that I am right. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=This unblock is not justified. I feel my block is a result of the opinions of people, not because of policy. Just because I offend someone doesn't mean I can be blocked. Misplaced Pages policy clearly states that this is an abuse of power for every single person supporting, endorsing, or involved in my ban. As I am dissatisfied with ArbCom's decision, I wish to appeal this block directly to Misplaced Pages founder Jimbo Wales. He is an expert on Misplaced Pages policy and is the appropriate person to review the block when every other method was exhausted and disputed. I wouldn't waste Jimbo's time if I didn't think I was being treated unfairly, however, it is clear that liberal bias from administrators is what caused this ban to result. I am extremely disappointed with the blatant racism against white, male Conservatives on Misplaced Pages. I was doomed from the start, just because of the person who I am, which is something I cannot change. I hold that my conduct here is justified, and I believe Jimbo Wales should be called upon to directly review this block. Then, and only then, will I feel that this block truly conforms to Misplaced Pages standards and policy. Even Henrik noted that I was greatly improving. This ban was obviously result of my userbox which did, indeed, conform to Misplaced Pages standards. Had the userbox never been brought up, and had I never been attacked and provoked by Baseball Bugs (who inadvertently called me a "white supremacist" ), I never would have made the inflammatory remarks that ultimately led to an indef block (which is highly inappropriate, since I am not vandalizing in any way. I obviously made an attempt to contribute to the encyclopedia). I was never given a chance by the editors of Misplaced Pages. They automatically shunned me (along with many other conservative users -- these types of blocks have been monitored very closely over the last few months, and I have seen what is going on). They cast me out and did not give me a chance. Now, probably, after all of this effort and explanation, no doubt an admin will come by and deny it without even reviewing it, with some snarky comment. Of course, doing so would only show their insecurity, and would ultimately show that they are scared that I am right. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}